Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T01:58:51.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mob size of single-bearing or twin-bearing Merino ewes at lambing may not influence lamb survival when feed-on-offer is high

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2018

A. Lockwood Open the ORCID record for A. Lockwood [Opens in a new window] ,
S. Hancock ,
B. Paganoni ,
C. Macleay ,
G. Kearney ,
R. Sohi  and
A. Thompson
A. Lockwood*
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
S. Hancock
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
B. Paganoni
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, South Perth, WA 6151, Australia
C. Macleay
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, South Perth, WA 6151, Australia
G. Kearney
Affiliation:
36 Paynes Road, Hamilton, VIC 3300, Australia
R. Sohi
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia
A. Thompson
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Limited research has suggested that higher lambing densities increase interference from foreign ewes at lambing which disrupts the ewe-lamb bond and compromises lamb survival. This may be particularly evident in mobs of twin-bearing ewes compared to single-bearing ewes because a greater number of lambs are born per day. Therefore, we hypothesised that; (i) decreasing the mob size of ewes at lambing has a greater impact on the survival of twin-born lambs than single-born lambs; (ii) the relationship between mob size and lamb survival can be explained by differences in the rate of interaction with foreign ewes and lambs at lambing; and (iii) ewes will utilise a limited area of the paddock at lambing and thus lambing density will be defined by the distribution of ewes in the paddock rather than the paddock area. Merino ewes were allocated into a 2×2 factorial combination of ewe pregnancy status (single- or twin-bearing) and mob size (high (n=130 ewes) or low (n=50 ewes)) on day 140 from the start of joining. Each treatment had two replicates excepting the low mob size for twins which had a third replicate. Ewes lambed at a stocking rate of 11 ewes/ha. Feed-on-offer during lambing exceeded 2400 kg dry matter (DM)/ha. Ewe-lamb behaviour was observed and dead lambs were autopsied over 11 days during the peak of lambing. The distribution of ewes in each paddock was recorded every 2 h during daylight hours by counting the number of ewes occupying 2500 m2 grids. The proportion of ewes and their newborn progeny which interacted with foreign ewes at lambing did not differ between the high and low mob sizes for single- (24.9% v. 20.8%) or twin-bearing ewes (14.3% v. 19.6%; P=0.74). Similarly, interaction with foreign lambs did not differ between the high and low mob sizes for single- (14.5% v. 25.2%) and twin-bearing ewes (34.5% v. 26.4%; P=0.44). The distribution of ewes within the paddock did not differ between treatments (P=0.95). On average, single-bearing ewes which lambed at the high and low mob sizes occupied 34% and 36% of the paddock during daylight hours, and the corresponding values for twin-bearing ewes were 40% and 43%. Survival of twin-born lambs was lower than single-born lambs (75.3% v. 87.9%; P<0.01), however, lamb survival was not influenced by mob size regardless of birth type. These results suggest that higher mob sizes may not compromise lamb survival when feed-on-offer during lambing exceeds 2400 kg DM/ha.

Keywords

densitypasturebehaviourinteractionsensors
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 13 , Issue 6 , June 2019 , pp. 1311 - 1318
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, G, Stevens, D, Bradley, L and Barwick, S 1990. Maternal behaviour in Border Leicester, Glen Vale (Border Leicester derived) and Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 30, 27–38.Google Scholar
Alexander, G, Stevens, D, Kilgour, R, de Langen, H, Mottershead, BE and Lynch, JJ 1983b. Separation of ewes from twin lambs: incidence in several sheep breeds. Applied Animal Ethology 10, 301–317.Google Scholar
Alexander, G, Stevens, D and Mottershead, B 1983a. Problems in the accurate recording of lambing data. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 23, 361–368.Google Scholar
Allworth, MB, Wrigley, HA and Cowling, A 2017. Fetal and lamb losses from pregnancy scanning to lamb marking in commercial sheep flocks in southern New South Wales. Animal Production Science 57, 2060–2065.Google Scholar
Arnold, GW and Maller, RA 1985. An analysis of factors influencing spatial distribution in flocks of grazing sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 14, 173–189.Google Scholar
Arnold, GW and Morgan, PD 1975. Behaviour of the ewe and lamb at lambing and its relationship to lamb mortality. Applied Animal Ethology 2, 25–46.Google Scholar
Cloete, SWP 1992. Observations on litter size, parturition and maternal-behaviour in relation to lamb mortality in fecund Dormer and South-African Mutton Merino ewes. South African Journal of Animal Science 22, 214–221.Google Scholar
Cloete, SWP, Scholtz, AJ and Ten Hoope, JM 1998. A note on separation from one or more lamb(s) in Merino lines divergently selected for ewe multiple rearing ability. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 58, 189–195.Google Scholar
Dobos, RC, Dickson, S, Bailey, DW and Trotter, MG 2014. The use of GNSS technology to identify lambing behaviour in pregnant grazing Merino ewes. Animal Production Science 54, 1722–1727.Google Scholar
Dobos, RC, Taylor, DB, Trotter, MG, McCorkell, BE, Schneider, DA and Hinch, GN 2015. Characterising activities of free-ranging Merino ewes before, during and after lambing from GNSS data. Small Ruminant Research 131, 12–16.Google Scholar
Donnelly, J 1984. The productivity of breeding ewes grazing on lucerne or grass and clover pastures on the tablelands of Southern Australia. III. Lamb mortality and weaning percentage. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35, 709–721.Google Scholar
Dwyer, CM and Lawrence, AB 1999. Does the behaviour of the neonate influence the expression of maternal behaviour in sheep? Behaviour 136, 367–389.Google Scholar
Haughey, KG 1973. Vascular abnormalities in the central nervous system associated with perinatal lamb mortality 2. Association of the abnormalities with recognised lesions. Australian Veterinary Journal 49, 9–15.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J 1990. Sward conditions, herbage intake and animal performance. In Grazing management: science into practice (ed. C Whittemore and K Simpson), pp. 82–87. Longman Group UK Limited, UK.Google Scholar
Holst, PJ 2004. Lamb autopsy: notes on a procedure for determining cause of death. NSW Agriculture. Retrieved on 19 October 2018 from https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/_data/assets/pdf_file/0006/177783/lamb-autopsy.pdf.Google Scholar
Holst, PJ, Fogarty, NM and Stanley, DF 2002. Birth weights, meningeal lesions, and survival of diverse genotypes of lambs from Merino and crossbred ewes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 175–181.Google Scholar
Keverne, EB, Lévy, F, Guevara-Guzman, R and Kendrick, KM 1993. Influence of birth and maternal experience on olfactory bulb neurotransmitter release. Neuroscience 56, 557–565.Google Scholar
Lynch, JJ, Hinch, GN and Adams, DB 1992. Social Behaviour and Organisation. In The behaviour of sheep: biological principles and implications for production, pp. 70–77. CSIRO Publications, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.Google Scholar
Morris, ST, McCutcheon, SN, Parker, WJ and Blair, HT 1994. Effect of sward surface height on herbage intake and performance of lactating ewes lambed in winter and continuously stocked on pasture. The Journal of Agricultural Science 122, 471–482.Google Scholar
Nowak, R 1996. Neonatal survival: contributions from behavioural studies in sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49, 61–72.Google Scholar
Nowak, R, Poindron, P and Putu, IG 1989. Development of mother discrimination by single and multiple newborn lambs. Developmental Psychobiology 22, 833–845.Google Scholar
O’Connor, CE, Lawrence, AB and Wood-Gush, DGM 1992. Influence of litter size and parity on maternal behaviour at parturition in Scottish Blackface sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 33, 345–355.Google Scholar
Oldham, CM, Thompson, AN, Ferguson, MB, Gordon, DJ, Kearney, GA and Paganoni, BL 2011. The birthweight and survival of Merino lambs can be predicted from the profile of liveweight change of their mothers during pregnancy. Animal Production Science 51, 776–783.Google Scholar
Refshauge, G, Brien, FD, Hinch, GN and van de Ven, R 2016. Neonatal lamb mortality: factors associated with the death of Australian lambs. Animal Production Science 56, 726–735.Google Scholar
Robertson, SM, King, BJ, Broster, JC and Friend, MA 2012. The survival of lambs in shelter declines at high stocking intensities. Animal Production Science 52, 497–501.Google Scholar
Russel, A 1984. Body condition scoring of sheep. In Practice 6, 91–93.Google Scholar
Sibbald, AM and Hooper, RJ 2004. Sociability and the willingness of individual sheep to move away from their companions in order to graze. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 86, 51–62.Google Scholar
Sohi, R, Trompf, J, Marriott, H, Bervan, A, Godoy, BI, Weerasinghe, M, Desai, A and Jois, M 2017. Determination of maternal pedigree and ewe–lamb spatial relationships by application of Bluetooth technology in extensive farming systems. Journal of Animal Science 95, 5145–5150.Google Scholar
Stevens, D, Alexander, G and Lynch, JJ 1981. Do Merino ewes seek isolation or shelter at lambing? Applied Animal Ethology 7, 149–155.Google Scholar
Val-Laillet, D, Simon, M and Nowak, R 2004. A full belly and colostrum: two major determinants of filial love. Developmental Psychobiology 45, 163–173.Google Scholar
Verbyla, AP, Cullis, BR, Kenward, MG and Welham, SJ 1999. The analysis of designed experiments and longitudinal data by using smoothing splines. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) 48, 269–311.Google Scholar
VSN International 2017. Genstat for Windows, 19th Edition. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK.Google Scholar
Winfield, CG 1970. The effect of stocking intensity at lambing on lamb survival and ewe and lamb behaviour. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 8, 291–296.Google Scholar