Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:42:38.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metabolic and reproductive characteristics of replacement beef heifers subjected to an early-weaning regimen involving high-concentrate feeding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2016

A. L. Zezeski
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
V. L. McCracken
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
R. K. Poole
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
A. Al Naib
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
J. K. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
M. A. McCann
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
M. L. Rhoads*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
*
Get access

Abstract

In an effort to better understand the consequences of early weaning (EW) for replacement beef heifers, a two-phase experiment was conducted investigating the impact on metabolic function and documenting reproductive characteristics. In phase 1, Angus×Simmental heifers (n=35) were stratified by BW and sire, and randomly assigned to either a normal weaning (NW, n=18) or EW (n=17) treatment. EW heifers were weaned at 107±3 days of age and provided access to a concentrate-based ration ad libitum with limit-fed mixed grass hay. NW heifers remained with their dams until 232±3 days of age, at which point heifers from both treatments were comingled and grazed on mixed summer pasture. Following NW, weekly blood samples were collected from all heifers for progesterone analyses used to determine the onset of puberty. Pelvic and ovarian size was measured before breeding. All heifers were subjected to an estrous synchronization protocol with timed artificial insemination (AI) at 437±4 days of age. During phase 2 of the experiment, a subset of pregnant heifers (n=16) were divided into two replicates and subjected to a glucose tolerance test, epinephrine challenge and progesterone clearance analysis. Neither age nor BW at puberty differed between EW and NW heifers. Likewise, no differences in pelvic area or ovarian size were observed. Thus, it appears that the reproductive maturity of EW and NW heifers was similar. Heifers studied during phase 2 of the experiment were restricted to those that had become pregnant to their first AI. Within this cohort, EW heifers tended to have lower overall circulating progesterone concentrations than those that were NW (P=0.14). Aspects of glucose and insulin dynamics were also altered, as EW heifers tended to have lower baseline glucose concentrations (P=0.10) despite similar baseline insulin concentrations. Compared with NW heifers, EW heifers had lower insulin area under the curve (P<0.05), which was partly the result of a tendency for lower peak insulin concentrations (P=0.11). Results of the glucose tolerance test indicate that a lesser insulin response was necessary to properly clear the glucose in the EW heifers, suggesting enhanced insulin sensitivity. Collectively, these results indicate that EW is not detrimental for the growth or reproductive development of replacement beef heifers, although some differences in glucose and insulin dynamics persist into adulthood.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

a

Present address: Department of Animal Science, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.

b

Present address: Assistant Dean for Extension, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.

References

Byerley, DJ, Staigmiller, RB, Berardinelli, JG and Short, RE 1987. Pregnancy rates of beef heifers bred either on puberal or third estrus. Journal of Animal Science 65, 645650.Google Scholar
Cardoso, RC, Alves, BR, Prezotto, LD, Thorson, JF, Tedeschi, LO, Keisler, DH, Amstalden, M and Williams, GL 2014a. Reciprocal changes in leptin and NPY during nutritional acceleration of puberty in heifers. Journal of Endocrinology 223, 289298.Google Scholar
Cardoso, RC, Alves, BR, Prezotto, LD, Thorson, JF, Tedeschi, LO, Keisler, DH, Park, CS, Amstalden, M and Williams, GL 2014b. Use of a stair-step compensatory gain nutritional regimen to program the onset of puberty in beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 92, 29422949.Google Scholar
Ferraretto, LF, Gencoglu, H, Hackbart, KS, Nascimento, AB, Dalla Costa, F, Bender, RW, Guenther, JN, Shaver, RD and Wiltbank, MC 2014. Effect of feed restriction on reproductive and metabolic hormones in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 754763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gasser, CL, Behlke, EJ, Grum, DE and Day, ML 2006a. Effect of timing of feeding a high-concentrate diet on growth and attainment of puberty in early-weaned heifers. Journal of Animal Science 84, 31183122.Google Scholar
Gasser, CL, Burke, CR, Mussard, ML, Behlke, EJ, Grum, DE, Kinder, JE and Day, ML 2006b. Induction of precocious puberty in heifers II: advanced ovarian follicular development. Journal of Animal Science 84, 20422049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gasser, CL, Burke, CR, Mussard, ML, Behlke, EJ, Grum, DE, Kinder, JE and Day, ML 2006c. Induction of precocious puberty in heifers II: advanced ovarian follicular development. Journal of Animal Science 84, 20422049.Google Scholar
Gasser, CL, Grum, DE, Mussard, ML, Fluharty, FL, Kinder, JE and Day, ML 2006d. Induction of precocious puberty in heifers I: enhanced secretion of luteinizing hormone. Journal of Animal Science 84, 20352041.Google Scholar
Grings, EE, Geary, TW, Short, RE and MacNeil, MD 2007. Beef heifer development within three calving systems. Journal of Animal Science 85, 20482058.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutierrez, K, Kasimanickam, R, Tibary, A, Gay, JM, Kastelic, JP, Hall, JB and Whittier, WD 2014. Effect of reproductive tract scoring on reproductive efficiency in beef heifers bred by timed insemination and natural service versus only natural service. Theriogenology 81, 918924.Google Scholar
Hall, JB 2005. Reproductive evaluation of heifers. Proceedings of Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle, 1–2 November 2005, Lexington, KY, USA, pp. 279–283.Google Scholar
Holm, DE, Nielen, M, Jorritsma, R, Irons, PC and Thompson, PN 2015. Evaluation of pre-breeding reproductive tract scoring as a predictor of long term reproductive performance in beef heifers. Preventative Veterinary Medicine 118, 5663.Google Scholar
Holt, LC, Whittier, WD, Gwazdauskas, FC and Vinson, WE 1989. Early postpartum reproductive profiles in Holstein cows with retained placenta and uterine discharges. Journal of Dairy Science 72, 533539.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, IA, Dewhurst, RJ, Evans, AC, Lonergan, P and Butler, ST 2012. Effect of grass dry matter intake and fat supplementation on progesterone metabolism in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 78, 878886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jordaens, L, Arias-Alvarez, M, Pintelon, I, Thys, S, Valckx, S, Dezhkam, Y, Bols, PE and Leroy, JL 2015. Elevated non-esterified fatty acid concentrations hamper bovine oviductal epithelial cell physiology in three different in vitro culture systems. Theriogenology 84, 899910.Google Scholar
McCracken, VL, Xie, G, Deaver, SE, Baumgard, LH, Rhoads, RP and Rhoads, ML 2015. Short communication: hepatic progesterone-metabolizing enzymes cytochrome P450 2C and 3A in lactating cows during thermoneutral and heat stress conditions. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 31523157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, DL, Kerley, MS, Walker, EL, Keisler, DH, Pierce, VL, Schmidt, TB, Stahl, CA, Linville, ML and Berg, EP 2005. Growth rate, body composition, and meat tenderness in early vs. traditionally weaned beef calves. Journal of Animal Science 83, 27522761.Google Scholar
Moisá, SJ, Shike, DW, Shoup, L, Rodriguez-Zas, SL and Loor, JJ 2015. Maternal plane of nutrition during late gestation and weaning age alter Angus×Simmental offspring longissimus muscle transcriptome and intramuscular fat. PLoS One 10, e0131478.Google Scholar
Moriel, P, Johnson, SE, Vendramini, JM, Mercadante, VR, Hersom, MJ and Arthington, JD 2014. Effects of calf weaning age and subsequent management system on growth and reproductive performance of beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 92, 30963107.Google Scholar
Myers, SE, Faulkner, DB, Ireland, FA, Berger, LL and Parrett, DF 1999. Production systems comparing early weaning to normal weaning with or without creep feeding for beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 77, 300310.Google Scholar
Perry, GA, Smith, MF, Roberts, AJ, MacNeil, MD and Geary, TW 2007. Relationship between size of the ovulatory follicle and pregnancy success in beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 85, 684689.Google Scholar
Rasby, R 2007. Early weaning beef calves. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 23, 2940.Google Scholar
Rhoads, ML, Rhoads, RP, VanBaale, MJ, Collier, RJ, Sanders, SR, Weber, WJ, Crooker, BA and Baumgard, LH 2009. Effects of heat stress and plane of nutrition on lactating Holstein cows: I. Production, metabolism, and aspects of circulating somatotropin. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 19861997.Google Scholar
Roberts, AJ, Geary, TW, Grings, EE, Waterman, RC and MacNeil, MD 2009. Reproductive performance of heifers offered ad libitum or restricted access to feed for a one hundred forty-day period after weaning. Journal of Animal Science 87, 30433052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sangsritavong, S, Combs, DK, Sartori, R, Armentano, LE and Wiltbank, MC 2002. High feed intake increases liver blood flow and metabolism of progesterone and estradiol-17beta in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 28312842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheffler, JM, McCann, MA, Greiner, SP, Jiang, H, Hanigan, MD, Bridges, GA, Lake, SL and Gerrard, DE 2014. Early metabolic imprinting events increase marbling scores in fed cattle. Journal of Animal Science 92, 320324.Google Scholar
Schoonmaker, JP, Fluharty, FL, Loerch, SC, Turner, TB, Moeller, SJ and Wulf, DM 2001. Effect of weaning status and implant regimen on growth, performance, and carcass characteristics of steers. Journal of Animal Science 79, 10741084.Google Scholar
Van Donkersgoed, J, Ribble, CS, Townsend, HG and Janzen, ED 1990. The usefulness of pelvic area measurements as an on-farm test for predicting calving difficulty in beef heifers. Canadian Veterinary Journal 31, 190193.Google Scholar
Van Hoeck, V, Leroy, JL, Arias Alvarez, M, Rizos, D, Gutierrez-Adan, A, Schnorbusch, K, Bols, PE, Leese, HJ and Sturmey, RG 2013. Oocyte developmental failure in response to elevated nonesterified fatty acid concentrations: mechanistic insights. Reproduction 145, 3344.Google Scholar
Waterman, RC, Geary, TW, Paterson, JA and Lipsey, RJ 2012. Early weaning in northern great plains beef cattle production systems: II. Development of replacement heifers weaned at 80 or 215 d of age. Livestock Science 148, 3645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheelock, JB, Rhoads, RP, VanBaale, MJ, Sanders, SR and Baumgard, LH 2010. Effects of heat stress on energetic metabolism in lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 644655.Google Scholar