Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:53:30.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Meta-analysis of the amino acid digestibility of oilseed meal in growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2016

F. Messad ,
M. P. Létourneau-Montminy ,
E. Charbonneau ,
D. Sauvant  and
F. Guay
F. Messad
Affiliation:
Département des sciences animales, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, G1V 0A6, Canada
M. P. Létourneau-Montminy
Affiliation:
Département des sciences animales, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, G1V 0A6, Canada
E. Charbonneau
Affiliation:
Département des sciences animales, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, G1V 0A6, Canada
D. Sauvant
Affiliation:
INRA, AgroParisTech, UMR791 Physiologie de la Nutrition et alimentation, F–75231 Paris, France
F. Guay*
Affiliation:
Département des sciences animales, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, G1V 0A6, Canada
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Oilseed meal is an important source of essential amino acids (EAA) for livestock production. It is the second most important ingredient in pig feed after grains. Optimal use of these ingredients requires precise knowledge of amino acid standardized ileal digestibility (SID), which may vary depending on several factors including botanical variety or processing treatments. A meta-analysis was performed in order to derive models for predicting the SID of soybean, cotton and rapeseed meal EAA, based on chemical composition data such as CP, total concentration of each EAA and fibre (crude fibre, ADF and NDF) content. A database of 47 references (224 experimental treatments) was built. A model incorporating processing method of the meals (e.g. cold pressed, expeller pressed, solvent extracted), experimental surgical procedure (T-cannula, re-entrant cannula, post valve T-cannula and ileo-rectal anastomosis) and pig growth stage (BW⩽ or ⩾25 kg) was tested. Results indicated that neither processing nor BW affected EAA SID. NDF was the best predictor of SID (R2=0.944, 0.836, 0.779, 0.899 and 0.814, respectively, for Lys, Met, Thr, Trp and Val). The total EAA content was the best predictor of digestible content (g/kg diet) for each EAA (R2=0.990, 0.985, 0.977, 0.985 and 0.978, respectively, for Lys, Met, Thr, Trp and Val). This study shows that routine chemical analyses may be used to predict EAA digestibility with satisfactory accuracy.

Keywords

meta-analysisamino acidsstandardized ileal digestibilityoilseed mealspigs
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 10 , Issue 10 , October 2016 , pp. 1635 - 1644
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeida, FN, Htoo, JK, Thomson, J and Stein, HH 2014. Digestibility by growing pigs of amino acids in heat-damaged sunflower meal and cottonseed meal. Journal of Animal Science 92, 585–593.Google Scholar
Bruce, KJ, Karr-Lilienthal, LK, Zinn, KE, Pope, LL, Mahan, DC, Fastinger, ND, Watts, M, Utterback, PL, Parsons, CM, Castaneda, EO, Ellis, M and Fahey, JGC 2006. Evaluation of the inclusion of soybean oil and soybean processing by-products to soybean meal on nutrient composition and digestibility in swine and poultry. Journal of Animal Science 84, 1403–1414.Google Scholar
Buraczewska, L, Święch, E, Tuśnio, A, Taciak, M, Ceregrzyn, M and Korczyński, W 2007. The effect of pectin on amino acid digestibility and digesta viscosity, motility and morphology of the small intestine, and on N-balance and performance of young pigs. Livestock Science 109, 53–56.Google Scholar
Causeur, D, Daumas, G, Dhorne, T, Engel, B, Fonti furnols, M and Højsgaard, S (ed.) 2003. Statistical handbook for assessing pig classification methods: recommendations from the ‘EUPIGCLASS’ project group. EC project G6RD-CT-1999-00127.Google Scholar
Cromwell, GL, Cline, TR, Crenshaw, JD, Crenshaw, TD, Easter, RA, Ewan, RC, Hamilton, CR, Hill, GM, Lewis, AJ, Mahan, DC, Nelssen, JL, Pettigrew, JE, Veum, TL and Yen, JT 2000. Variability among sources and laboratories in analyses of wheat middlings. NCR-42 committee on swine nutrition. Journal of Animal Science 78, 2652–2658.Google Scholar
Cullison, A and Lowrey, RS 1987. Feeds and feeding, 4th edition. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
De Lange, CFM, Soufffant, WB and Sauer, WC 1990. Real ileal protein and amino acid digestibilities in feedstuffs for growing pigs as determined with the 15N-isotope dilution technique. Journal of Animal Science 68, 409–418.Google Scholar
Dilger, RN, Sands, JS, Ragland, D and Adeola, O 2004. Digestibility of nitrogen and amino acids in soybean meal with added soyhulls. Journal of Animal Science 82, 715–724.Google Scholar
Eklund, M, Caine, WR, Sauer, WC, Huang, GS, Diebold, G, Schollenberger, M and Mosenthin, R 2012. True and standardized ileal digestibilities and specific ileal endogenous recoveries of crude protein and amino acid in soybean meal, rapeseed meal and peas fed to growing pigs. Livestock Science 145, 174–182.Google Scholar
Favero, A, Ragland, D, Vieira, SL, Owusu-Asiedu, A and Adeola, O 2014. Digestibility marker and ileal amino acid digestibility in phytase-supplemented soybean or canola meals for growing pig. Journal of Animal Science 92, 5583–5592.Google Scholar
Frikha, M, Serrano, MP, Valencia, DG, Rebollar, PG, Fickler, J and Mateos, GG 2012. Correlation between ileal digestibility of amino acids and chemical composition of soybean meals in broilers at 21 days of age. Animal Feed Science and Technology 178, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goerke, M, Eklund, M, Sauer, N, Rademacher, M, Piepho, HP and Mosenthin, R 2012. Standardized ileal digestibilities of crude protein and amino acids and contents of anti-nutritional factors, mycotoxins and isoflavones of European soybean meal imports fed to piglets. Journal of Animal Science 90, 4883–4895.Google Scholar
Huang, SX, Sauer, WC, Marty, BJ and Hardin, RT 1999. Amino acid digestibilities in different samples of wheat shorts for growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 77, 2469–2477.Google Scholar
Ikegami, S, Tsuchihashi, F, Harada, H, Tsuchihashi, N, Nishide, E and Innami, S 1990. Effect of viscous indigestible polysaccharide on pancreatic-biliary secretion in the pig. Journal of Nutrition 27, 353–360.Google Scholar
Karr-Lilienthal, LK, Merchen, NR, Grieshop, CM, Flahaven, MA, Mahan, DC, Fastinger, ND, Watts, M and Fahey, JGC 2004. Ileal amino acid digestibilities by pigs fed soybean meals from five major soybean-producing countries. Journal of Animal Science 82, 3198–3209.Google Scholar
Kovalenko, IV, Rippke, GR and Hurburgh, CR Jr 2006. Determination of amino acid composition of soybeans (Glycine max) by near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 54, 3485–3491.Google Scholar
Lenis, NP, Bikker, P, van der Meulen, J, van Diepen, JT, Bakker, JG and Jongbloed, AW 1996. Effect of dietary neutral detergent fiber on ileal digestibility and portal flux of nitrogen and amino acids and on nitrogen utilization in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2687–2699.Google Scholar
Li, D, Xu, XX, Qiao, SY, Zheng, CT, Chen, Y, Piao, XS, Han, IK and Thacker, P 2000. Growth performance of growing-finishing pigs fed diets supplemented with Chinese cottonseed meal based on amino acid digestibilities. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 13, 521–527.Google Scholar
Loncke, C, Ortigues-Marty, I, Vernet, J, Lapierre, H, Sauvant, D and Noziere, P 2009. Empirical prediction of net portal appearance of volatile fatty acids, glucose, and their secondary metabolites (beta-hydroxybutyrate, lactate) from dietary characteristics in ruminants: a meta-analysis approach. Journal of Animal Sciences 87, 253–268.Google Scholar
Maison, T and Stein, HH 2014. Digestibility by growing pigs of amino acids in canola meal from North America and 00-rapeseed meal and 00-rapeseed expellers from Europe. Journal of Animal Science 92, 3502–3514.Google Scholar
Marichal-landin, G, Sève, B, Colléaux, Y and Lebreton, Y 1995. Endogenous amino nitrogen collected from pigs with end-to-end ileorectal anastomosis is affected by the method of estimation and altered by dietary fiber. Journal of Nutrition 125, 136–146.Google Scholar
Mertens, DR 2003. Challenges in measuring insoluble dietary fiber. Journal of Animal Science 81, 3233–3249.Google Scholar
Messad, F, Létourneau-Montminy, MP, Charbonneau, E, Sauvant, D and Guay, F 2015. Prediction of standardized ileal digestibility and essential amino acid content of ingredients in swine: a meta-analysis. Animal Feed Science and Technology 207, 204–221.Google Scholar
Messerschmidt, U, Eklund, M, Sauer, N, Rist, VTS, Rosenfelder, P, Spindler, HK, Htoo, JK, Schöne, F and Mosenthin, R 2014. Chemical composition and standardized ileal amino acid digestibility in rapeseed meals sourced from German oil mills for growing pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 187, 68–76.Google Scholar
National Resarch Council (NRC) 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine 10th edition, tenth revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 2012. Nutrient requirements of swine, 11th revised edition. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Neutra, MR and Forstner, FJ 1987. Gastrointestinal mucus synthesis, secretion and function. In Physiology of the gastrointestinal tract (ed. LR Johnson), pp. 575–1009. Raven Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Olukosi, OA, Bolarinwa, OA, Cowieson, AJ and Adeola, O 2012. Marker type but not concentration influenced apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in phytase-supplemented diets for broiler chickens and pigs. Journal of Animal Science 90, 4414–4420.Google Scholar
Prawirodigdo, S, Gannon, NJ, van Barneveld, RJ, Kerton, DJ, Leury, BJ and Dunshea, FR 1998. Assessment of apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids and nitrogen in cottonseed and soyabean meals fed to pigs determined using ileal dissection under halothane anaesthesia or following carbon dioxide-stunning. British Journal of Nutrition 80, 183–191.Google Scholar
Renard, CMGC, Crepeau, MJ and Thibault, JF 1994. Influence of ionic strength, pH and dielectric constant on hydration properties of native and modified fibre from sugar-beet and wheat bran. Industrial Crops and Products 3, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rérat, A, Régine, C, Vaissade, P and Finot, PA 2002. Nutritional and metabolic consequences of the early Maillard reaction of heat treated milk in the pig. European Journal of Nutrition 41, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth-Maier, DA, Bohmer, BM and Roth, FX 2004. Effect of feed canola meal and sweet lupin (L. luteus, L. angustifolus) in amino acid balanced diets on growth performance and carcass characteristics of growing-finishing pigs. Animal Research 53, 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauvant, D, Perez, JM and Tran, G 2004. Tables de composition et de valeur nutritive des matières premières destinées aux animaux d’élevage : porcs, volailles, bovins, ovins, lapins, chevaux, poisson. INRA Éditions, Versailles, France.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D, Schmidely, P and Daudin, JJ 2005. Les méta-analyses des données expérimentales: applications en nutrition animale. INRA Productions Animales 18, 63–73.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D, Schmidely, P, Daudin, JJ and Saint-Pierre, NR 2008. Meta-analyses of experimental data in animal nutrition. Animal 2, 1203–1214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulze, H, van Leeuwen, P, Verstegen, MWA, Huisman, J, Souffrant, WB and Ahrens, F 1994. Effect of level of dietary neutral detergent fiber on ileal apparent digestibility and ileal nitrogen losses in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 72, 2362–2368.Google Scholar
Shah, N, Atallah, MT, Mahoney, RR and Pellett, PL 1982. Effect of dietary fiber components on fecal nitrogen excretion and protein utilization in growing rats. Journal of Nutrition 112, 658–663.Google Scholar
Urbaityte, R, Mosenthin, R and Eklund, M 2009. The concept of standardized ileal amino acid digestibilities: principles and application in feed ingredients for piglets. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 22, 1209–1223.Google Scholar
Van Barneveld, RJ, Batterham, ES and Norton, BW 1994. The effect of heat on amino acids for growing pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 72, 221–241.Google Scholar
Van Kempen, GJM, Kim, IB, Jansman, AJM, Verstegen, MWA, Hancock, JD, Lee, DJ, Gabert, VM, Albin, DM, Fahey, GC, Grieshop, CM and Mahan, D 2002. Regional and processor variation in the ileal digestible amino acid content of soybean meals measured in growing swine. Journal of Animal Science 80, 429–439.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Messad supplementary material

Messad supplementary material 1

Download Messad supplementary material(File)
File 68.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Messad supplementary material

Messad supplementary material 2

Download Messad supplementary material(File)
File 44.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Messad supplementary material

Messad supplementary material 3

Download Messad supplementary material(File)
File 46.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Messad supplementary material

Messad supplementary material 4

Download Messad supplementary material(File)
File 72.7 KB