Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:28:03.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Manure management for greenhouse gas mitigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2013

S. O. Petersen ,
M. Blanchard ,
D. Chadwick ,
A. Del Prado ,
N. Edouard ,
J. Mosquera  and
S. G. Sommer
S. O. Petersen*
Affiliation:
Department Agroecology, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
M. Blanchard
Affiliation:
Cirad, UMR Selmet, Montpellier, F-34398, France; Cirad, UMR Selmet, RSA, Antsirabe, Madagascar
D. Chadwick
Affiliation:
School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University, Deiniol Road, Bangor LL57 2UW, Wales
A. Del Prado
Affiliation:
Basque Centre for Climate Change, Alameda Urquijo 4, 48008 Bilbao, Spain
N. Edouard
Affiliation:
INRA Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1348 PEGASE, F-35590 Saint Gilles, France
J. Mosquera
Affiliation:
Wageningen UR Livestock Research, PO Box 135, 6700 AC Wageningen, The Netherlands
S. G. Sommer
Affiliation:
Institute of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology and Environmental Technology, University Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Ongoing intensification and specialisation of livestock production lead to increasing volumes of manure to be managed, which are a source of the greenhouse gases (GHGs) methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). Net emissions of CH4 and N2O result from a multitude of microbial activities in the manure environment. Their relative importance depends not only on manure composition and local management practices with respect to treatment, storage and field application, but also on ambient climatic conditions. The diversity of livestock production systems, and their associated manure management, is discussed on the basis of four regional cases (Sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia, China and Europe) with increasing levels of intensification and priorities with respect to nutrient management and environmental regulation. GHG mitigation options for production systems based on solid and liquid manure management are then presented, and potentials for positive and negative interactions between pollutants, and between management practices, are discussed. The diversity of manure properties and environmental conditions necessitate a modelling approach for improving estimates of GHG emissions, and for predicting effects of management changes for GHG mitigation, and requirements for such a model are discussed. Finally, we briefly discuss drivers for, and barriers against, introduction of GHG mitigation measures for livestock production. There is no conflict between efforts to improve food and feed production, and efforts to reduce GHG emissions from manure management. Growth in livestock populations are projected to occur mainly in intensive production systems where, for this and other reasons, the largest potentials for GHG mitigation may be found.

Keywords

methanenitrous oxidestoragetreatmentfarm model
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue s2: Greenhouse Gases & Animal Agriculture Conference (GGAA 2013), 23rd ‐ 26th June 2013, Dublin, Ireland , June 2013 , pp. 266 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akiyama, H, Yan, X, Yagi, K 2010. Evaluation of effectiveness of enhanced-efficiency fertilizers as mitigation options for N2O and NO emissions from agricultural soils: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology 16, 1837–1846.Google Scholar
Ambus, P, Petersen, SO 2005. Oxidation of 13C-labeled methane in surface crusts of pig- and cattle slurry. Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies 41, 125–133.Google Scholar
Amon, B, Amon, T, Boxberger, J, Alt, C 2001. Emissions of NH3, N2O and CH4 from dairy cows housed in a farmyard manure tying stall (housing, manure storage, manure spreading). Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 60, 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amon, B, Kryvoruchko, V, Amon, T, Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S 2006. Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 112, 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amon, B, Kryvoruchko, V, Fröhlich, M, Amon, T, Pöllinger, A, Mösenbacher, I, Hausleitner, A 2007. Ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from a straw flow system for fattening pigs: housing and manure storage. Livestock Science 112, 199–207.Google Scholar
Anon. 2007. Valoriser les savoirs locaux sur l'intégration agriculture élevage pour une gestion durable des écosystèmes des savanes subhumides de l'Afrique. Projet Agriculture-élevage de Duras (DCG 2-50). Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso), CIRDES. Rapport Final: 99.Google Scholar
Anon. 2010. Biogas barometer – November 2010. Le journal des énergies renouvelables No. 200, pp. 104–119. Retrieved from http://www.eurobserv-er.org/downloads.aspGoogle Scholar
Anon. 2012. Fertiliser manual (RB209), 8th edition. TSO, Norwich. 252pp. Retrieved from http://www.defra.gov.uk/publications/2011/03/25/fertiliser-manual-rb209/Google Scholar
Baggs, EM, Smales, CL, Bateman, EJ 2010. Changing pH shifts the microbial source as well as the magnitude of N2O emission from soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 46, 793–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, W, Brunsch, R, Pazsiczki, I 2006. Greenhouse gas emissions from covered slurry compared with uncovered during storage. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 112, 129–134.Google Scholar
Blanchard, M 2010. Gestion de la fertilité des sols et rôle du troupeau dans les systèmes coton-céréales-élevage au Mali-Sud, savoirs techniques locaux et pratiques d'intégration agriculture élevage (Soil fertility management and herd role in the cotton-cereals-livestock systems in south Mali, technical local knowledge and crop-livestock farming practices). Thèses, UPEC.Google Scholar
Blanchard, M, Vall, E 2010. Production et utilisation de la fumure organique au Mali-Sud: savoirs des paysans face aux savoirs des agronomes, quels enseignements pour le développement? FA Thibaud Bénédicte. Paris, Karthala, pp. 59–76.Google Scholar
Bouwman, L, Goldewijk, KK, Van Der Hoek, KW, Beusen, AHW, Van Vuuren, DP, Willems, J, Rufino, MC, Stehfest, E 2012. Exploring global changes in nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in agriculture induced by livestock production over the 1900–2050 period. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1012878108.Google Scholar
Brask, M, Lund, P, Hellwing, ALF, Poulsen, M, Weisbjerg, MR. Enteric methane production, digestibility and rumen fermentation in dairy cows fed different forages with and without rapeseed fat supplementation. Submitted.Google Scholar
Bruun, S, Jensen, LS, Vu Thi Khanh Van, , Sommer, SG 2013. Small-scale household biogas digesters: an option for global warming mitigation or a potential climate bomb? Policy Analysis, submitted.Google Scholar
Burton, C 2007. The potential contribution of separation technologies to the management of livestock manure. Livestock Science 112, 208–216.Google Scholar
Burton, CH, Turner, C 2003. Manure management. Treatment strategies for sustainable agriculture, 2nd edition. Silsoe Research Institute, Bedford, UK.Google Scholar
Cabaraux, JF, Philippe, FX, Laitat, M, Canart, B, Van den Heede, M, Nicks, B 2009. Gaseous emissions from weaned pigs raised on different floor systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 130, 86–92.Google Scholar
Cardenas, LM, Thorman, R, Ashlee, N, Butler, M, Chadwick, DR, Chambers, B, Cuttle, S, Donovan, N, Kingston, H, Lane, S, Scholefield, D 2010. Quantifying annual N2O emission fluxes from grazed grassland under a range of inorganic fertiliser nitrogen inputs. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 136, 218–226.Google Scholar
Chadwick, DR 2005. Emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane from cattle manure heaps: effect of compaction and covering. Atmospheric Environment 39, 787–799.Google Scholar
Chadwick, D, Qing, C, Yan'an, T, Guanghui, Y, Qirong, S 2012. Improving manure nutrient management towards sustainable intensification in China. A Policy Brief No. 6, UK-China Sustainable Agriculture Innovations Network (SAIN), 6pp.Google Scholar
Chadwick, D, Sommer, SG, Thorman, R, Fangueiro, D, Cardenas, L, Amon, B, Misselbrook, T 2011. Manure management: implications for greenhouse gas emissions. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 514–531.Google Scholar
Chambers, BJ, Smith, KS, Pain, BF 2000. Strategies to encourage better use of nitrogen in animal manures. Soil Use and Management 16, 157–161.Google Scholar
Chardon, X, Rigolot, C, Baratte, C, Espagnol, S, Raison, C, Martin-Clouaire, R, Rellier, J-P, Le Gall, A, Dourmad, JY, Piquemal, B, Leterme, P, Paillat, JM, Delaby, L, Garcia, F, Peyraud, JL, Poupa, JC, Morvan, T, Faverdin, P 2012. MELODIE: a whole-farm model to study the dynamics of nutrients in dairy and pig farms with crops. Animal 6, 1711–1721.Google Scholar
Chen, Y, Cheng, JJ, Creamer, KS 2008. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresource Technology 99, 4044–4064.Google Scholar
Clemens, J, Trimborn, M, Weiland, P, Amon, B 2006. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by anaerobic digestion of cattle slurry. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 112, 171–177.Google Scholar
Collins, HP, Alva, AK, Streubel, JD, Fransen, SF, Frear, C, Chen, S, Kruger, C, Granatstein, D 2011. Greenhouse gas emissions from an irrigated silt loam soil amended with anaerobically digested dairy manure. Soil Science Society of America Journal 75, 2206–2216.Google Scholar
Cu, TTT, Pham, HC, Le, TH, Nguyen, VC, Le, XA, Nguyen, XT, Sommer, SG 2012. Manure management practices on biogas and non-biogas pig farms in developing countries e using livestock farms in Vietnam as an example. Journal of Cleaner Production 27, 64–71.Google Scholar
Cuhel, J, Simek, M, Laughlin, RJ, Bru, D, Chèneby, D, Watson, CJ, Philippot, L 2010. Insights into the effect of soil pH on N2O and N2 emissions and denitrifier community size and activity. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76, 1870–1878.Google Scholar
Cytryn, E, Levkovitch, I, Negreanu, Y, Dowd, S, Frenk, S, Silber, A 2012. Impact of short-term acidification on nitrification and nitrifying bacterial community dynamics in soilless cultivation media. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78, 6576–6582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Boer, W, Kowalchuk, GA 2001. Nitrification in acid soil: microorganisms and mechanisms. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 33, 853–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vrieze, J, Hennebel, T, Boon, N, Verstraete, W 2012. Methanosarcina: the rediscovered methanogen for heavy duty biomethanation. Bioresource Technology 112, 1–9.Google Scholar
Del Prado, A, Crosson, P, Olesen, JE, Rotz, A 2013. Whole-farm models to quantify GHG emissions and their potential use for linking climate change mitigation and adaptation in ruminant systems. Animal (suppl. s2), 373–385.Google Scholar
Del Prado, A, Chadwick, D, Cardenas, L, Misselbrook, T, Scholefield, D, Merino, P 2010. Exploring systems responses to mitigation of GHG in UK dairy farms. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 136, 318–332.Google Scholar
Del Prado, A, Misselbrook, T, Chadwick, D, Hopkins, A, Dewhurst, RJ, Davison, P, Butler, A, Schröder, J, Scholefield, D 2011. SIMSDAIRY: a modelling framework to identify sustainable dairy farms in the UK. Framework description and test for organic systems and N fertiliser optimisation. Science of The Total Environment 409, 3993–4009.Google Scholar
Di, HJ, Cameron, KC 2012. How does the application of different nitrification inhibitors affect nitrous oxide emissions and nitrate leaching from cow urine in grazed pastures? Soil Use and Management 28, 54–61.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, J, Oenema, O, Bannink, A 2011. Dietary strategies to reducing N excretion from cattle: implications for methane emissions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 3, 414–422.Google Scholar
Ding, WX, Yu, HY, Cai, ZC 2011. Impact of urease and nitrification inhibitors on nitrous oxide emissions from fluvo-aquic soil in the North China Plain. Biology and Fertility of Soils 47, 91–99.Google Scholar
Dinuccio, E, Berg, W, Balsari, P 2008. Gaseous emissions from the storage of untreated slurries and the fractions obtained alter mechanical separation. Atmospheric Environment 42, 2448–2459.Google Scholar
Dittert, K, Bol, R, King, R, Chadwick, D, Hatch, D 2001. Use of a novel nitrification inhibitor to reduce nitrous oxide emissions from 15N-labelled slurry injected into soil. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 15, 1291–1296.Google Scholar
Duan, YF, Elsgaard, L, Petersen, SO 2013. Inhibition of methane oxidation in slurry surface crust by inorganic nitrogen: an incubation study. Journal of Environmental Quality 42, 507–515.Google Scholar
European Commission (EC) 1991. Council Directive of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources. Directive 91/676/EEC, Brussels.Google Scholar
Edouard, N, Charpiot, A, Hassouna, M, Faverdin, P, Robin, P, Dollé, JB 2012. Ammonia and greenhouse gases emissions from dairy cattle buildings: slurry vs. farm yard manure management systems. International Symposium on Emission of Gas and Dust from Livestock. INRA, Saint-Malo, France, p. 31.Google Scholar
Fangueiro, D, Coutinho, J, Chadwick, D, Moreira, N, Trindade, H 2008. Cattle slurry treatment by screw-press separation and chemically enhanced settling: effect on greenhouse gases and ammonia emissions during storage. Journal of Environmental Quality 37, 2322–2331.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) 2010. Greenhouse gas emissions from the dairy sector. A life cycle assessment. Rome, Italy, 94pp. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/k7930e/k7930e00.pdf.Google Scholar
Forster, P, Ramaswamy, V, Artaxo, P, Berntsen, T, Betts, R, Fahey, DW, Haywood, J, Lean, J, Lowe, DC, Myhre, G, Nganga, J, Prinn, R, Raga, G, Schulz, M, Van Dorland, R 2007. Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed. S Solomon, D Qin, M Manning, Z Chen, M Marquis, KB Averyt, M Tignor and HL Miller), pp. 129–234. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Fukumoto, Y 2006. Reduction of nitrous oxide emission from pig manure composting by addition of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. Environmental Science and Technology 40, 6787–6791.Google Scholar
Gac, A, Béline, F, Bioteau, T, Maguet, K 2007. A French inventory of gaseous emissions (CH4, N2O, NH3) from livestock manure management using a mass-flow approach. Livestock Science 112, 252–260.Google Scholar
Ganry, F, Feller, C, Harmand, J-M, Guilbert, H 2001. Management of soil organic matter in semiarid Africa for annual cropping systems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 61, 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, JJ, Bai, XL, Zhuo, B, Zhou, JB, Chen, ZJ 2012. Soil nutrient content and nutrient balances in newly-built solar greenhouses in northern China. Nutrient Cycling and Agroecosystems 94, 63–72.Google Scholar
Gerber, P, Chilonda, P, Franceschini, G, Menzi, H 2005. Geographical determinants and environmental implications of livestock production intensification in Asia. Bioresource Technology 96, 263–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goreau, TJ, Kaplan, WA, Wofsky, SC, McElroy, MB, Valois, FW, Watson, SW 1980. Production of NO2− and N2O by nitrifying bacteria at reduced concentrations of oxygen. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 40, 526–532.Google Scholar
Groenestein, CM, Smits, MCJ, Huijsmans, JFM, Oenema, O 2011. Measures to reduce ammonia emissions from livestock manures; now, soon and later. Wageningen UR Livestock Research Report 488. Wageningen, 53 pp.Google Scholar
Groenestein, K, Mosquera, J, Van der Sluis, S 2012. Emission factors for methane and nitrous oxide from manure management and mitigation options. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 9 (suppl. 1), 139–146.Google Scholar
Guarino, M, Fabbri, C, Brambilla, M, Valli, L, Navarotto, P 2006. Evaluation of simplified covering systems to reduce gaseous emissions from livestock manure storage. Transactions of the ASABE 49, 737–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeussermann, A, Hartung, E, Gallmann, E, Jungbluth, T 2006. Influence of season, ventilation strategy, and slurry removal on methane emissions from pig houses. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 112, 115–121.Google Scholar
Halet, D, Boon, N, Verstraete, W 2006. Community dynamics of methanotrophic bacteria during composting of organic matter. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 101, 297–302.Google Scholar
Hansen, MN, Henriksen, K, Sommer, SG 2006. Observations of production and emission of greenhouse gases and ammonia during storage of solids separated from pig slurry: effects of covering. Atmospheric Environment 40, 4172–4181.Google Scholar
Hansen, RR, Nielsen, DA, Schramm, A, Nielsen, LP, Revsbech, NP, Hansen, MN 2009. Greenhouse gas microbiology in wet and dry straw crust covering pig slurry. Journal of Environmental Quality 38, 1311–1319.Google Scholar
Hanson, RS, Hanson, TE 1996. Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiology Reviews 60, 439–471.Google Scholar
Hao, X, Chang, C, Larney, FJ, Travis, GR 2001. Greenhouse gas emissions during cattle feedlot manure composting. Journal of Environmental Quality 30, 376–386.Google Scholar
Hatch, D, Trinidade, H, Cardenas, L, Carneiro, J, Hawkins, J, Scholefield, D, Chadwick, D 2005. Laboratory study of the effects of two nitrification inhibitors on greenhouse gas emissions from a slurry-treated arable soil: impact of diurnal temperature cycle. Biology and Fertility of Soils 41, 225–232.Google Scholar
Hindrichsen, IK, Wettstein, H-R, Machmüller, A, Jörg, B, Kreuzer, M 2005. Effect of the carbohydrate composition of feed concentrates on methane emissions from dairy cows and their slurry. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 107, 329–350.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, I, Gerling, D, Kyiogwom, UB, Mané-Bielfeldt, A 2001. Farmers’ management strategies to maintain soil fertility in a remote area in northwest Nigeria. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 86, 263–275.Google Scholar
Hoogwijk, M, Faaij, A, Eickhout, B, de Vries, B, Turkenburg, W 2005. Potential of biomass energy out to 2100, for four IPCC SRES land-use scenarios. Biomass and Bioenergy 29, 225–257.Google Scholar
Husted, S 1994. Seasonal variation in methane emission from stored slurry and solid manures. Journal of Environmental Quality 23, 585–592.Google Scholar
Husted, S, Jensen, LS, Jørgensen, SS 1991. Reducing ammonia loss from cattle slurry by the use of acidifying additives: the role of the buffer system. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 57, 335–349.Google Scholar
IAASTD 2009. Agriculture at a crossroads. Global report. In International assessment of agricultural knowledge, science and technology for development (ed. BD McIntyre, HR Herren, J Wakhungu and RT Watson), 590pp. IAASTD, Washington DC. Retrieved from http://www.unep.org/dewa/Assessments/Ecosystems/IAASTD/tabid/105853/Default.aspx/.Google Scholar
IPCC 2006. Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Agriculture, forestry and other land use, vol. 4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IGES, Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan.Google Scholar
Jia, Z, Conrad, R 2009. Bacteria rather than archaea dominate microbial ammonia oxidation in an agricultural soil. Environmental Microbiology 11, 1658–1671.Google Scholar
Jiang, X, Sommer, SG, Christensen, KV 2011. A review of the biogas industry in China. Energy Policy 39, 6073–6081.Google Scholar
Kaiser, S 1999. Analyse und bewertung eines zweiraumkompoststalls für matschweine unter besonderer berücksichtigung der gasförmigen stoffströme. PhD Thesis, VDI-MEG Schrift 334, University of Göttingen, Germany.Google Scholar
Kool, DM, Dolfing, J, Wrage, N, Van Groenigen, JW 2011. Nitrifier denitrification as a distinct and significant source of nitrous oxide from soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 43, 174–178.Google Scholar
Kruska, RL, Reid, RS, Thornton, PK, Henninger, N, Kristjanson, PM 2003. Mapping livestock-oriented agricultural production systems for the developing world. Agricultural Systems 77, 39–63.Google Scholar
Kyllingsbæk, A, Hansen, JF 2007. Development in nutrient balances in Danish agriculture 1980–2004. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 79, 267–280.Google Scholar
Laanbroek, HJ, Gerards, S 1991. Effects of organic manure on nitrification in arable soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils 12, 147–153.Google Scholar
Landais, E, Guérin, H 1992. Systèmes d’élevage et transferts de fertilité dans la zone des savanes africaines. I. La production des matières fertilisantes. Cahiers Agriculture 1, 225–238.Google Scholar
Landais, E, Lhoste, P 1993. Systèmes d’élevage et transferts de fertilité dans la zone des savanes africaines. II. Les systèmes de gestion de la fumure animale et leur insertion dans les relations entre l’élevage et l'agriculture. Cahiers Agriculture 2, 9–25.Google Scholar
Lantinga, EA, Keuning, JA, Groenwold, J, Deenan, PJAG 1987. Distribution of excreted nitrogen by grazing cattle and its effects on sward quality, herbage production and utilization. In Animal manure on grassland and fodder crops. Fertilizer or waste? (ed. HG van der Meer, RJ Unwin, TA van Dijk and GC Ennik), pp. 103–107. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Leip, A, Weiss, F, Wassenaar, T, Perez, I, Fellmann, T, Loudjani, P, Tubiello, F, Grandgirard, D, Monni, S, Biala, K 2011. Evaluation of the Livestock Sector's Contribution to the EU Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GGELS). European Commission Joint Research Centre. Web. 5 May 2011. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/livestock-gas/full_text_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Li, C, Frolking, S, Frolking, TA 1992. A model of nitrous oxide evolution from soil driven by rainfall events: 1. Model structure and sensitivity. Journal of Geophysical Research 97, 9759–9776.Google Scholar
Li, C, Salas, W, Zhang, R, Krauter, C, Rotz, A, Mitloehner, F 2012. Manure-DNDC: a biogeochemical process model for quantifying greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from livestock manure systems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 93, 163–200.Google Scholar
Manlay, RJ, Chotte, J-L, Masse, D, Laurent, J-Y, Feller, C 2002. Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus allocation in agro-ecosystems of a West African savanna: III. Plant and soil components under continuous cultivation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 88, 249–269.Google Scholar
Martinez, J, Guiziou, F, Peu, P, Gueutier, V 2003. Influence of treatment techniques for pig slurry on methane emissions during subsequent storage. Biosystems Engineering 85, 347–354.Google Scholar
Mennicken, L 1998. Biobett für Legehennen – ein Beitrag zum Umweltschutz? [Biobeds for laying hens – a contribution to environmental protection?] DGS 13, 12–20.Google Scholar
Menzi, H, Oenema, O, Burton, C, Shipin, O, Gerber, P, Robinson, T, Franceschini, G 2010. Impacts of intensive livestock production and manure management on the environment. In Livestock in a changing lanscape, vol. 1: drivers, consequences, and responses (ed. H Steinfeld, HA Mooney, F Schneider and LE Neville), pp. 139–163. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
MEP 2010. Ministry of Environmental Protection, Bulletin of National Environmental Statistics 2009 MEP, Beijing (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Minamikawa, K, Sakai, N 2006. The practical use of water management based on soil redox potential for decreasing methane emission from a paddy field in Japan. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 116, 181–188.Google Scholar
Misselbrook, TH, Chadwick, DR, Pain, BF, Headon, DM 1998. Dietary manipulation as a means of decreasing N losses and methane emissions and improving herbage N uptake following application of pig slurry to grassland. The Journal of Agricultural Science 130, 183–191.Google Scholar
Misselbrook, TH, Powell, JM, Broderick, GA, Grabber, JH 2005. Dietary manipulation in dairy cattle: laboratory experiments to assess the influence on ammonia emissions. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 1765–1777.Google Scholar
MOA 2010. The Chinese agricultural statistical data in 2009. China Agricultural Publishing House, Beijing.Google Scholar
Monteny, GJ, Bannink, A, Chadwick, D 2006. Greenhouse gas abatement strategies for animal husbandry. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 112, 163–170.Google Scholar
Mosquera, J, Hol, JMG, Rappoldt, C, Dolfing, J 2007. Precise soil management as a tool to reduce CH4 and N2O emissions from agricultural soils. Animal Sciences Group Report 28, 42 pp.Google Scholar
Mosquera, J, Schils, R, Groenestein, CM, Hoeksma, P, Velthof, G, Hummelink, E 2011. Emissies van lachgas, methaan en ammoniak uit mest na scheiding. Wageningen UR Livestock Research Report 427.Google Scholar
Møller, HB, Sarker, S, Hellwin, ALF, Weisbjerg, MR 2012. Quantification of methane production and emission from anaerobic digestion of cattle manure derived from different feeding. Paper presented at 3rd Int. Conf. CIGR, July 8–12 in Valencia, Spain. Retrieved from http://cigr.ageng2012.org/images/fotosg/tabla_137_C0327.pdfGoogle Scholar
Nelson, DW, Huber, D 1992. Nitrification inhibitors for corn production. National Corn Handbook, NHC-55.Google Scholar
Nicks, B, Laitat, M, Van den Heede, M, Désiron, A, Verhaeghe, C, Canart, B 2003. Emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide, methane, carbon dioxide and water vapor in the raising of weaned pigs on straw-based and sawdust-based deep litters. Animal Research 52, 299–308.Google Scholar
Nicks, B, Laitat, M, Farnir, F, Van den Heede, M, Désiron, A, Verhaeghe, C, Canart, B 2004. Gaseous emissions from deep-litter pens with straw or sawdust for fattening pigs. Animal Science 78, 99–107.Google Scholar
Nielsen, DA, Schramm, A, Nielsen, LP, Revsbech, NP 2013. Seasonal methane oxidation potential in manure crusts. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 79, 407–410.Google Scholar
Nielsen, O-K, Lyck, E, Mikkelsen, MH, Hoffmann, L, Gyldenkærne, S, Winther, M, Nielsen, M, Fauser, P, Thomsen, M, Plejdrup, MS, Albrektsen, R, Hjelgaard, K, Johannsen, VK, Vesterdal, L, Rasmussen, E, Arfaoui, K, Baunbæk, L 2010. Denmark's National Inventory Report 2010. Emission Inventories 1990–2008 – Submitted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol. National Environmental Research Institute, Aarhus University, Denmark. 1178pp. – NERI Technical Report No 784. Retrieved from http://www.dmu.dk/Pub/FR784.pdf.Google Scholar
Oenema, O, Kros, H, de Vries, W 2003. Approaches and uncertainties in nutrient budgets: implications for nutrient management and environmental policies. European Journal of Agronomy 20, 3–16.Google Scholar
Oenema, O, Oudendag, D, Velthof, GL 2007. Nutrient losses from manure management in the European Union. Livestock Science 112, 261–272.Google Scholar
Ogburn, DM, White, I 2011. Integrating livestock production with crops and saline fish ponds to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Integrative Environmental Analyses 8, 39–52.Google Scholar
Olesen, JE, Schelde, K, Weiske, A, Weisbjerg, MR, Asman, WAH, Djurhuus, J 2006. Modelling greenhouse gas emissions from European conventional and organic dairy farms. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 112, 207–220.Google Scholar
Osada, T, Kuroda, K, Yonaga, M 2000. Determination of nitrous oxide, methane, and ammonia emissions from a swine waste composting process. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 2, 51–56.Google Scholar
Panetta, DM, Powers, WJ, Xin, H, Kerr, BJ, Stalder, KJ 2006. Nitrogen excretion and ammonia emissions from pig fed modified diets. Journal of Environmental Quality 35, 1297–1308.Google Scholar
Pattey, E, Trzcinski, MK, Desjardins, RL 2005. Quantifying the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions as a result of composting dairy and beef cattle manure. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 72, 173–187.Google Scholar
Petersen, SO, Ambus, P 2006. Methane oxidation in pig and cattle slurry storages, and effects of surface crust moisture and methane availability. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 74, 1–11.Google Scholar
Petersen, SO, Amon, B, Gattinger, A 2005. Methane oxidation in slurry storage surface crusts. Journal of Environmental Quality 34, 455–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, SO, Andersen, AJ, Eriksen, J 2012. Effects of slurry acidification on ammonia and methane emission during storage. Journal of Environmental Quality 41, 88–94.Google Scholar
Petersen, SO, Nielsen, AL, Haarder, K, Henriksen, K 1992. Factors con-trolling nitrification and denitrification: a laboratory study with gel-stabilized liquid cattle manure. Microbial Ecology 23, 239–255.Google Scholar
Petersen, SO, Nielsen, TH, Frostegård, Å, Olesen, T 1996. O2 uptake, C metabolism and denitrification associated with manure hot-spots. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 28, 341–349.Google Scholar
Petersen, SO, Dorno, N, Lindholst, S, Feilberg, A, Eriksen, J 2013. Emissions of CH4, N2O, NH3 and odorants from pig slurry during winter and summer storage. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 95, 103–113.Google Scholar
Petersen, SO, Højberg, O, Poulsen, M, Schwab, C, Eriksen, J. Methane mitigation and methanogen community changes with acidification of pig slurry. Submitted.Google Scholar
Peyraud, JL, Cellier, P, Donnars, C, Réchauchère, O 2012. Les flux d'azote liés aux élevages, réduire les pertes, rétablir les équilibres. Expertise scientifique collective, synthèse du rapport. INRA (France), pp. 1–68.Google Scholar
Philippe, FX, Laitat, M, Canart, B, Van den Heede, M, Nicks, B 2007. Gaseous emissions during the fattening of pigs kept either on fully slatted floors or on straw flow. Animal 1, 1515–1523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philippe, FX, Laitat, M, Wavreille, J, Bartiaux-Thill, N, Nicks, BCabaraux, JF 2011. Ammonia and greenhouse gas emission from group-housed gestating sows depends on floor type. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 140, 498–505.Google Scholar
Prapaspongsa, T 2010. Sustainable piggery waste management: A study based on examples and cases from Denmark and Thailand. PhD thesis, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark, ISBN 978-87-90033-67-5.Google Scholar
Rastogi, G, Ranade, DR, Yeole, TY, Gupta, AK, Patole, MS, Shouche, YS 2008. Molecular analyses of methanogen diversity associated with cattle dung. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 24, 2973–2979.Google Scholar
Rigolot, C, Espagnol, S, Pomar, C, Dourmad, J-Y 2010a. Modelling of manure production by pigs and NH3, N2O and CH4 emissions. Part I: animal excretion and enteric CH4, effect of feeding and performance. Animal 4, 1401–1412.Google Scholar
Rigolot, C, Espagnol, S, Robin, P, Hassouna, M, Béline, F, Paillat, JM, Dourmad, J-Y 2010b. Modelling of manure production by pigs and NH3, N2O and CH4 emissions. Part II: effect of animal housing, manure storage and treatment practices. Animal 4, 1413–1424.Google Scholar
Rotz, CA 2004. Management to reduce nitrogen losses in animal production. Journal of Animal Science 82, E119–E137.Google Scholar
Rotz, CA, Montes, F, Chianese, DS 2010. The carbon footprint of dairy production systems through partial life cycle assessment. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 1266–1282.Google Scholar
Rufino, MC, Rowe, EC 2006. Nitrogen cycling efficiencies through resource-poor African crop-livestock systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 112, 261–282.Google Scholar
Rufino, MC, Tittonell, P, van Wijk, MT, Castellanos-Navarrete, A, Delve, RJ, de Ridder, N, Giller, KE 2007. Manure as a key resource within smallholder farming systems: analysing farm-scale nutrient cycling efficiencies with the NUANCES framework. Livestock Science 112, 273–287.Google Scholar
Russelle, MP, Entz, MH, Franzluebbers, AJ 2007. Reconsidering integrated crop-livestock systems in North America. Agronomy Journal 99, 325–334.Google Scholar
Ryschawy, J, Choisis, N, Choisis, JP, Joannon, A, Gibon, A 2012. Mixed crop-livestock systems: an economic and environmental-friendly way of farming? Animal 6, 1722–1730.Google Scholar
Schils, RLM, Olesen, JE, del Prado, A, Soussana, JF 2007. A review of farm level modelling approaches for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from ruminant livestock systems. Livestock Science 112, 240–251.Google Scholar
Schils, RLM, Verhagen, A, Aarts, HFM, Kuikman, PJ, Šebek, LBJ 2006. Effect of improved nitrogen management on greenhouse gas emissions from intensive dairy systems in the Netherlands. Global Change Biology 12, 382–391.Google Scholar
Schröder, J 2005. Revisiting the agronomic benefits of manure: a correct assessment and exploitation of its fertilizer value spares the environment. Bioresource Technology 96, 253–261.Google Scholar
Sharma, R, Ryan, K, Hao, X, Larney, FJ, McAllister, TA, Topp, E 2011. Real-time quantification of mcrA, pmoA for methanogen, methanotroph estimations during composting. Journal of Environmental Quality 40, 199–205.Google Scholar
Sommer, SG, Petersen, SO, Søegaard, HT 2000. Greenhouse gas emission from stored livestock slurry. Journal of Environmental Quality 29, 744–750.Google Scholar
Sommer, SG, Petersen, SO, Møller, HB 2004. Algorithms for calculating methane and nitrous oxide emissions from manure management. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 69, 143–154.Google Scholar
Sommer, SG, Olesen, JE, Petersen, SO, Weisbjerg, MR, Valli, L, Rohde, L, Béline, F 2009. Region-specific assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation with different manure management strategies in four agroecological zones. Global Change Biology 15, 2825–2837.Google Scholar
Steinfeld, H, Gerber, P, Wassenaar, T, Castel, V, Rosales, M, de Haan, C 2006. Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Subbarao, GV, Ito, O, Sahrawat, KL, Berry, WL, Nakahara, K, Ishikawa, T, Watanabe, T, Suenaga, K, Rondon, M, Rao, IM 2006. Scope and strategies for regulation of nitrification in agricultural systems – challenges and opportunities. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 25, 303–335.Google Scholar
Sutaryo, S, Ward, A, Møller, HB 2012. Thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of separated solids from acidified dairy cow manure. Bioresource Technology 114, 195–200.Google Scholar
Sutton, MA, Oenema, O, Erisman, JW, Leip, A, van Grinsven, H, Winiwarter, W 2011. Too much of a good thing. Nature 472, 159–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szanto, GL, Hamelers, HVM, Rulkens, WH, Veeken, AHM 2007. NH3, N2O and CH4 emissions during passively aerated composting of straw-rich pig manure. Bioresource Technology 98, 2659–2670.Google Scholar
Thomsen, IK, Pedersen, AR, Nyord, T, Petersen, SO 2010. Effects of slurry pre-treatment and application technique on short-term N2O emissions as determined by a new non-linear approach. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 136, 227–235.Google Scholar
Thomsen, IK, Olesen, JE, Møller, HB, Sørensen, P, Christensen, BT 2012. Carbon dynamics and retention in soil after anaerobic digestion of dairy cattle feed and faeces. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 58, 82–87.Google Scholar
Thomson, AJ, Giannopoulos, G, Pretty, J, Baggs, EM, Richardson, DJ 2012. Biological sources and sinks of nitrous oxide and strategies to mitigate emissions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 367, 1157–1168.Google Scholar
Thorman, RE, Chadwick, DR, Harrison, R, Boyles, LO, Matthews, R 2007. The effect on N2O emissions of storage conditions and rapid incorporation of pig and cattle farmyard manure into tillage land. Biosystems Engineering 97, 501–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorman, RE, Chadwick, D, Boyles, LO, Matthews, R, Sagoo, E, Harrison, R 2006. Nitrous oxide emissions during storage of solid manure and following application to arable land. In Proceedings of the 12th RAMIRAN Conference, Aarhus, Denmark, 11–13 September (ed. SO Petersen). Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Tjele, Denmark.Google Scholar
Tittonell, P, Rufino, MC, Janssen, BH, Giller, KE 2010. Carbon and nutrient losses during manure storage under traditional and improved practices in smallholder crop-livestock systems-evidence from Kenya. Plant and Soil 328, 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umetsu, K, Kimura, Y, Takahashi, J, Kishimoto, T, Kojima, T, Young, B 2005. Methane emission from stored dairy manure slurry and slurry after digestion by methane digester. Animal Science Journal 76, 73–79.Google Scholar
Valentine, DL 2007. Adaptations to energy stress dictate the ecology of the archaea. Nature Reviews – Microbiology 5, 316–323.Google Scholar
Vall, E, Dugué, P, Blanchard, M 2006. Le tissage des relations agriculture-élevage au fil du coton. Cahiers Agricultures 15, 72–79.Google Scholar
Vallejo, A, García-Torres, L, Díez, JA, Arce, A, López-Fernández, S. Comparison of N losses (NO3-, N2O, NO) from surface applied, injected or amended (DCD) pig slurry of an irrigated soil in a Mediterranean climate. Plant and Soil 272, 313–325.Google Scholar
Vallejo, A, Skiba, UM, García-Torres, L, Arce, A, López-Fernández, , Sánchez-Martín, L 2006. Nitrogen oxides emission from soils bearing a potato crop as influenced by fertilization with treated pig slurries and composts. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38, 2782–2793.Google Scholar
Van Groenigen, JW, Kasper, GJ, Velthof, GL, van den Pol-van Dasselaar, A, Kuikman, PJ 2004. Nitrous oxide emissions from silage maize fields under different mineral nitrogen fertilizer and manure applications. Plant and Soil 263, 101–111.Google Scholar
VanderZaag, AC, Gordon, RJ, Jamieson, RC, Burton, DL, Stratton, GW 2009. Gas emissions from straw covered liquid dairy manure during summer storage and autumn agitation. Transactions of the ASABE 52, 599–608.Google Scholar
Vellinga, TV, Hoving, IE 2011. Maize silage for dairy cows: mitigation of methane emissions can be offset by land use change. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 89, 413–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velthof, GJ, Mosquera, J, Huis in't Veld, JWH, Hummelink, E 2010. Effect of manure application technique on nitrous oxide emission from agricultural soils. Alterra report 1992, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Vu, QD, Tran, TM, Nguyen, PD, Vu, CC, Vu, VTK, Jensen, LS 2012. Effect of biogas technology on nutrient flows for small- and medium-scale pig farms in Vietnam. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 94, 1–13.Google Scholar
Vu, TKV, Tran, MT, Dang, TTS 2007. A survey of manure management on pig farms in Northern Vietnam. Livestock Science 112, 288–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallenstein, MD, Myrold, DD, Firestone, M, Voytek, M 2006. Environ-mental controls of denitrifying communities and denitrification rates: insights from molecular methods. Ecological Applications 16, 2143–2152.Google Scholar
Wang, CB, Zhang, LX 2012. Life cycle assessment of carbon emission from a household biogas digester: implications for policy. Proceedings in Environmental Science 13, 778–789.Google Scholar
Webb, J, Sommer, SG, Kupper, T, Groenestein, K, Hutchings, NJ, Eurich-Menden, B, Rodhe, L, Misselbrook, TH, Amon, B 2012. Emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane during the management of solid manures. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 8, 67–107.Google Scholar
Weslien, P, Klemedtsson, L, Svensson, L, Galle, B, Kasimir-Klemedtsson, A, Gustafsson, A 1998. Nitrogen losses following application of pig slurry to arable land. Soil Use and Management 14, 200–208.Google Scholar
Wilshusen, JH, Hettiaratchi, JPA, De Visscher, A, Saint-Fort, R 2004. Methane oxidation and formation of EPS in compost: effect of oxygen concentration. Environmental Pollution 129, 305–314.Google Scholar
Wood, JD, Gordon, RJ, Wagner-Riddle, C, Dunfield, KE, Madani, A 2012. Relationships between dairy slurry total solids, gas emissions, and surface crusts. Journal of Environmental Quality 41, 694–704.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, N, Otawa, K, Nakai, Y 2010. Diversity and abundance of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and ammonia-oxidizing archaea during cattle manure composting. Microbial Ecology 60, 807–815.Google Scholar
Yamulki, S 2006. Effect of straw addition on nitrous oxide and methane emissions from stored farmyard manures. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 112, 140–145.Google Scholar
Zaman, M, Nguyen, ML 2012. How application timings of urease and nitrification inhibitors affect N losses from urine patches in pastoral system. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 156, 37–48.Google Scholar
Zhang, W-F, Dou, Z, He, P, Ju, X-T, Powlson, D, Chadwick, D, Norse, D, Lu, Y-L, Zhang, Y, Wu, L, Chen, X-P, Cassman, KG, Zhang, F-S 2013. New technologies reduce greenhouse gas emissions from nitrogenous fertilizer in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (in press).Google Scholar