Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:37:09.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The learning ability and memory retention of broiler breeders: 2 transgenerational effects of reduced balanced protein diet on reward-based learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2018

C. Li ,
S. Schallier ,
J. Lesuisse ,
C. Lamberigts ,
B. Driessen ,
N. Everaert  and
J. Buyse
C. Li
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Livestock Physiology, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, KasteelparkArenberg 30, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
S. Schallier
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Livestock Physiology, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, KasteelparkArenberg 30, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
J. Lesuisse
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Livestock Physiology, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, KasteelparkArenberg 30, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
C. Lamberigts
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Livestock Physiology, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, KasteelparkArenberg 30, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
B. Driessen
Affiliation:
Research Group Animal Welfare, Wilbroek 25, 3583 Paal, Belgium
N. Everaert
Affiliation:
Precision Livestock and Nutrition Unit, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, Passage des Déportés2, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
J. Buyse*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Livestock Physiology, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, KasteelparkArenberg 30, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The effect of reduced balanced protein (RP) diet in the F0 and F1 generation of broiler breeders on the learning ability and memory retention of the F2 generation was investigated by means of a reward v. no reward discrimination T-maze test. There were two treatments for the F0 generation: control (C) group, reared on standard commercial diets, and reduced balanced protein (RP) group, fed with RP diets (25% reduction in CP and amino acids). The female F0-progeny of each treatment was again separated into the two dietary treatments, resulting in four treatments for the F1 generation: C/C, C/RP, RP/C and RP/RP (breeder feed in F0/F1 generation). The RP diets fed breeders received on average 10% more feed than C diets fed breeders to achieve a similar target BW. The F2 generation was composed of four treatments coming from the female F1-progeny of the four treatments and were all fed with C diet (namely C/C/C, C/RP/C, RP/C/C and RP/RP/C). All four F2 generation groups were able to complete the T-maze learning test with a slight difference in success rate but a significant difference within groups was observed regarding the time needed to complete the test. In general, the RP/RP/C group needed more time for completing the test compared with the other three groups and the shortest time was recorded for the RP/C/C group. At similar ages, breeders with early learning experience spent significantly less time in completing the test compared with unexperienced breeders. Long-term memory retention was observed in all four groups whereas the learning ability in solving the test decreased with age. It took longer for the breeders to complete the test at older ages. In conclusion, under our experimental conditions, the RP dietary treatment in previous generations had no influence on the T-maze learning ability and memory retention of broiler breeders of the third generation, although it might have effects on the working performance in the T-maze learning test of F2 generation breeders.

Keywords

controlled feedingdiet protein levelgenerationcognitionT-maze
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 13 , Issue 6 , June 2019 , pp. 1260 - 1268
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appleby, MC, Duncan, IJH and McRae, HE 1988. Perching and floor laying by domestic hens: experimental results and their commercial application. British Poultry Science 29, 351–357.Google Scholar
Aviagen 2013. ROSS 308 parent stock management guide. Aviagen Incorporated, Huntsville, AL, USA.Google Scholar
Babb, SJ and Crystal, JD 2005. Discrimination of what, when, and where: implications for episodic-like memory in rats. Learning and Motivation 36, 177–189.Google Scholar
Bokkers, EAM, Koene, P, Rodenburg, TB, Zimmerman, PH and Spruijt, BM 2004. Working for food under conditions of varying motivation in broilers. Animal Behaviour 68, 105–113.Google Scholar
Bokkers, EA and Koene, P 2003. Behaviour of fast-and slow growing broilers to 12 weeks of age and the physical consequences. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81, 59–72.Google Scholar
Bokkers, EA and Koene, P 2004. Motivation and ability to walk for a food reward in fast-and slow-growing broilers to 12 weeks of age. Behavioural Processes 67, 121–130.Google Scholar
Buckley, LA, Sandilands, V, Tolkamp, BJ and D’Eath, RB 2011. Quantifying hungry broiler breeder dietary preferences using a closed economy T-maze task. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 133, 216–227.Google Scholar
Clayton, NS, Yu, KS and Dickinson, A 2001. Scrub jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens) form integrated memories of the multiple features of caching episodes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 27, 17.Google Scholar
De Jong, IC and Guémené, D 2011. Major welfare issues in broiler breeders. World’s Poultry Science Journal 67, 73–82.Google Scholar
Decuypere, E, Bruggeman, V, Everaert, N, Li, Y, Boonen, R, De Tavernier, J, Janssens, S and Buys, N 2010. The Broiler Breeder Paradox: ethical, genetic and physiological perspectives, and suggestions for solutions. British Poultry Science 51, 569–579.Google Scholar
Dixon, LM, Sparks, NHC and Rutherford, KMD 2016. Early experiences matter: a review of the effects of prenatal environment on offspring characteristics in poultry. Poultry Science 95, 489–499.Google Scholar
Elias, PK and Elia, MF 1976. Effects of age on learning ability: contributions from the animal literature. Experimental Aging Research 2, 165–186.Google Scholar
Gallagher, M, Burwell, R and Burchinal, MR 1993. Severity of spatial learning impairment in aging: development of a learning index for performance in the Morris water maze. Behavioral Neuroscience 107, 618.Google Scholar
Germine, LT, Duchaine, B and Nakayama, K 2011. Where cognitive development and aging meet: face learning ability peaks after age 30. Cognition 118, 201–210.Google Scholar
Hocking, PM 1993. Welfare of broiler breeder and layer females subjected to food and water control during rearing: quantifying the degree of restriction. British Poultry Science 34, 53–64.Google Scholar
Jakubczak, LF 1973. Age and animal behavior. In The psychology of adult development and aging (ed. CE Eisdorfer and MP Lawton), pp. 98–111. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Lesuisse, J, Li, C, Schallier, S, Leblois, J, Everaert, N and Buyse, J 2017. Feeding broiler breeders a reduced balanced protein diet during the rearing and laying period impairs reproductive performance but enhances broiler offspring performance. Poultry Science 96, 3949–3959.Google Scholar
Li, C, Lesuisse, J, Schallier, S, Clímaco, W, Wang, Y, Bautil, A, Everaert, N and Buyse, J 2017. The effects of a reduced balanced protein diet on litter moisture, pododermatitis and feather condition of female broiler breeders over three generations. Animal 12, 1493–1500.Google Scholar
Li, C, Lesuisse, J, Schallier, S, Wang, Y, Driessen, B, Everaert, N and Buyse, J 2018. The learning ability and memory retention of broiler breeders: 1 the effects of reduced balanced protein diet on reward based learning. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Lindqvist, C and Jensen, P 2009. Domestication and stress effects on contrafreeloading and spatial learning performance in red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) and White Leghorn layers. Behavioural Processes 81, 80–84.Google Scholar
Lindqvist, C, Janczak, AM, Nätt, D, Baranowska, I, Lindqvist, N, Wichman, A, Lundeberg, J, Lindberg, J, Torjesen, PA and Jensen, P 2007. Transmission of stress-induced learning impairment and associated brain gene expression from parents to offspring in chickens. PLoS One 2, e364.Google Scholar
Nätt, D, Lindqvist, N, Stranneheim, H, Lundeberg, J, Torjesen, PA and Jensen, P 2009. Inheritance of acquired behaviour adaptations and brain gene expression in chickens. PLoS One 4, e6405.Google Scholar
Nicol, CJ 2015. The behavioural biology of chickens. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Nomura, Y and Okuma, Y 1999. Age-related defects in lifespan and learning ability in SAMP8 mice. Neurobiology of Aging 20, 111–115.Google Scholar
Price, EO 1999. Behavioral development in animals undergoing domestication. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65, 245–271.Google Scholar
Rao, K, Xie, J, Yang, X, Chen, L, Grossmann, R and Zhao, R 2009. Maternal low-protein diet programmes offspring growth in association with alterations in yolk leptin deposition and gene expression in yolk-sac membrane, hypothalamus and muscle of developing Langshan chicken embryos. British Journal of Nutrition 102, 848–857.Google Scholar
Reyes-Castro, LA, Rodriguez, JS, Rodriguez-Gonzalez, GL, Wimmer, RD, McDonald, TJ, Larrea, F, Nathanielsz, PW and Zambrano, E 2011. Pre-and/or postnatal protein restriction in rats impairs learning and motivation in male offspring. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience 29, 177–182.Google Scholar
Savory, CJ and Lariviere, JM 2000. Effects of qualitative and quantitative food restriction treatments on feeding motivational state and general activity level of growing broiler breeders. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 69, 135–147.Google Scholar
Ueda, H, Suehiro, K, Kainou, S and Bungo, T 2005. Feeder color and feeder position act as a cue to discriminate between two diets in choice feeding of chicks. The Journal of Poultry Science 42, 321–328.Google Scholar
Vallortigara, G and Zanforlin, M 1989. Place and object learning in chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). Journal of Comparative Psychology 103, 201.Google Scholar
Zheng, W, Sales, GT, Green, AR and Gates, RS 2012. Task-based learning and memory in laying hens. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 29 07 2012, Dallas, Texas, US, 1pp.Google Scholar