Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T10:43:43.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jennet milk production during the lactation in a Sicilian farming system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

C. Giosuè ,
M. Alabiso ,
G. Russo ,
M. L. Alicata  and
C. Torrisi
C. Giosuè
Affiliation:
Animal Production Section, S.En.Fi.Mi.Zo Department, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Palermo 90128, Italy
M. Alabiso*
Affiliation:
Animal Production Section, S.En.Fi.Mi.Zo Department, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Palermo 90128, Italy
G. Russo
Affiliation:
Animal Production Section, S.En.Fi.Mi.Zo Department, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Palermo 90128, Italy
M. L. Alicata
Affiliation:
Animal Production Section, S.En.Fi.Mi.Zo Department, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Palermo 90128, Italy
C. Torrisi
Affiliation:
Asilat farm, Miscarello-Aranci region, Milo 95010 (Giarre-CT), Italy
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In Italy, the interest for jennet milk production has recently developed. An 18-month-long experiment was carried out on a jennet farm near Milo (CT), where 24 jennets, which derived from the Ragusana breed, were tested for milk yield and composition over an entire lactation period. The jennets were fed with hay and concentrate in a large paddock. From the 28th post-foaling day to the end of the lactation, the jennets were machine-milked twice a day with an in-between milking interval of 5 h. The milk amount from each jennet was recorded every 3 weeks and individual samples were collected and analyzed for fat, protein, casein, non-proteic nitrogen, lactose and somatic cell count. This study showed that jennets at Sicilian latitudes are not seasonal polyestrous. The daily milk yield, the length of lactation and the milk characteristics varied depending on the foaling season. The total average milk production was 490 ± 36 kg in 295 ± 12 post-foaling days, considering two milking records per day. During the lactation, milk yield decreased constantly from 1.98 to 1.28 kg/jennet per day. When looking at the jennet milk quality during lactation, the percentage of fat and protein decreased, while the lactose percentage increased, according to a tendency apparently unique for equines when compared to the ruminants. When looking at the productive season, spring generally gave the best qualitative and quantitative results. Based on these results, jennet milk yield and quality could be improved; furthermore, jennet milk production may turn out to be a profitable business.

Keywords

jennetlactationmilk yieldmilk composition
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 2 , Issue 10 , October 2008 , pp. 1491 - 1495
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguggini, G, Beghelli, V, Giulio, LF 1998. Fisiologia degli animali domestici con elementi di etologia, pp. 800–802. Utet, Torino, Italy.Google Scholar
Alabiso M, Di Grigoli A, Bonanno A, Alicata ML and Bongarrà M 2000. Effetto del diverso comportamento al rilascio del latte sulla produzione quanti-qualitativa in bovine Modicane. Proceedings of the 54th Società Italiana delle Scienze veterinarie congress, Riva del Garda, Italy, pp. 457–458.Google Scholar
ASPA 1995. Commissione metodologie di valutazione della produzione quanti-qualitativa del latte. Metodi di analisi del latte delle principali specie di interesse zootecnico. Centro stampa Universita` di Perugia, Italy.Google Scholar
Chiofalo B, Azzara V, Lotta L and Chiofalo L 2004. I parametri chimico fisici del latte di asina Ragusana nel corso della lattazione. Proceedings of the 6th Nuove acquisizioni in materia di Ippologia congress, Campobasso, Italy, pp. 77–84.Google Scholar
Dell’Orto, V, Salimei, E, Bontempo, V, Fantuz, F, Toppino, PM, Contarini, G, Locci, F 1994. Dairy mares’ milk: I. Yield and composition of milk and relation with some plasma metabolites. Journal of Dairy Science 77 (suppl. 1), 347.Google Scholar
Doreau, M 1991. Le lait de jument. Productions Animales 4, 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doreau, M, Boulot, S, Jeunet, R, Trin, JM 1985. Comparaison de différentes méthodes de dosage des matières azotés du lait de jument. Le lait 65, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamberini G 2005. “Cavalgiocare”: un’asino per maestro. Proceedings of the 1st Convegno Nazionale sull’asino congress, Grosseto, Italy, pp. 117–119.Google Scholar
Guo, HY, Pang, K, Zhang, XY, Zhao, L, Chen, SW, Dong, ML, Ren, FZ 2007. Composition, physiochemical properties, nitrogen fraction distribution, and amino acid profile of donkey milk. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 1635–1643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iacono, G, Carroccio, A, Cavataio, F, Montalto, G, Soresi, M, Balsamo, V 1992. Use of ass’milk in multiple food allergy. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 14, 177–181.Google ScholarPubMed
ICAR 2003. International Committee for Animal Recording. International regulations for milk recording in sheep. Institut de l’élevage, Department Génétique et Controle des Performances, Paris.Google Scholar
Intrieri F and Minieri L 1969. Sulla composizione chimica del latte di cavalla: indagini su soggetti di razza Avelignese. Proceedings of the 23th Società Italiana delle Scienze veterinarie congress, Saint Vincent, Italy, pp. 558–561.Google Scholar
Malacarne, M, Martuzzi, F, Summer, A, Mariani, P 2002. Protein and fat composition of mare’s milk some nutritional remarks with reference to human and cows milk: a review. International Dairy Journal 12, 869–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto F, Lestinghi A, Caputi Jambrenghi A, Marsico G and Vonghia G 1998. Conservazione e valorizzazione dell’asino di Martina Franca: influenza dell’integrazione alimentare su alcuni aspetti quanti-qualitativi del latte. 1. Indagine preliminare. Proceedings of the 4th Convegno Nazionale della Biodiversità congress, Alghero, Italy, pp. 1173–1176.Google Scholar
Polidori F 1994. Il latte dietetico. Proceedings of Aspetti dietetici nella produzione del latte, un alimento antico proiettato verso il futuro symposium, Torino, Italy, pp. 47–58.Google Scholar
Salimei, E, Fantuz, F, Coppola, R, Chiofalo, B, Polidori, P, Varisco, G 2004. Composition and characteristics of ass’s milk. Animal Research 53, 67–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullrey, DE, Struthers, RD, Hendricks, DG, Brent, BE 1966. Composition of mare’s milk. Journal of Animal Science 25, 217–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfsont, C 2002. Increasing behavioral skills and level of understanding in adults: a brief method integrating Dennison’s Brain Gym® Balance with Piaget’s Reflective Processes. Journal of Adult Development 9, 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar