Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:14:15.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of dietary fibre level and pelleting on the digestibility of energy and nutrients in growing pigs and adult sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

M. Le Gall ,
M. Warpechowski ,
Y. Jaguelin-Peyraud  and
J. Noblet
M. Le Gall*
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR 1079 Systèmes d’Elevage Nutrition Animale et Humaine, Domaine de la Prise, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
M. Warpechowski
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Parana, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
Y. Jaguelin-Peyraud
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR 1079 Systèmes d’Elevage Nutrition Animale et Humaine, Domaine de la Prise, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
J. Noblet
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR 1079 Systèmes d’Elevage Nutrition Animale et Humaine, Domaine de la Prise, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments were carried out to investigate the effect of pelleting on the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of energy and nutrients according to the dietary fibre (DF) level in growing pigs (experiment 1) and in adult sows (experiment 2). Four diets based on wheat, barley, maize and soybean meal and supplemented with increased contents of a mixture of wheat bran, maize bran, soybean hulls and sugar beet pulp (116, 192, 268 and 344 g NDF/kg dry matter (DM) in diets 1 to 4) were tested. In experiment 1, 32 growing pigs (62 kg average BW), in two replicates and according to a factorial design, were fed one of the four diets, either as mash or as pellets. The digestibility of energy, organic matter (OM) and all nutrients decreased with DF increasing for both feed forms; the reduction was about 1% for each 1% NDF increase in the diet (P < 0.001). Pelleting improved moderately the digestibility of energy and OM (+1.5% and +1.0%, respectively; P < 0.05) in connection with greater DF (+5%; P < 0.05) and fat digestibility (+25%). Thus, pelleting improved the digestible energy content of diets on average by 0.3 MJ/kg of feed DM (P < 0.01). In experiment 2, four adult dry sows (235 kg average BW) were used in a 4 × 4 Latin square design and fed the four diets used in experiment 1 as pellets. The digestibility of energy, OM and macronutrients also decreased with DF increase (P < 0.001; −0.4% per 1% increase of dietary NDF for energy) while the digestibility of DF (i.e. crude fibre (CF) or ADF) increased (P < 0.001) or remained at a high level. In conclusion, increasing DF in diets decreases the digestibility of nutrients and energy in pigs and in sows. Although positive, the pelleting impact is minor on the energy and nutrients digestibility of fibre-rich diets in growing pigs, even in high-DF diets.

Keywords

dietary fibredigestibilitygrowing pigpelletsow
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , March 2009 , pp. 352 - 359
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th edition, p. 777. AOAC, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bach Knudsen, KE 2001. The nutritional significance of “dietary fibre” analysis. Animal Feed Science and Technology 90, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach Knudsen, KE, Hansen, JA 1991. Gastrointestinal implications in pigs of wheat and oat fractions I. Digestibility and bulking properties of polysaccharides and other major constituents. The British Journal of Nutrition 65, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bach Knudsen, KE, Jensen, BB, Hansen, I 1993. Digestion of polysaccharides and other major components in the small and large intestine of pigs fed on diets consisting of oat fractions rich in beta-d-glucan. The British Journal of Nutrition 70, 537–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengala-Freire, J, Aumaitre, A, Peiniau, J 1991. Effects of feeding raw and extruded peas on ileal digestibility, pancreatic enzymes and plasma glucose and insulin in early weaned pigs. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 65, 154–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhke, KC 1996. Feed manufacturing technology: current issues and challenges. Animal Feed Science and Technology 62, 49–57.Google Scholar
Björck, I, Nyman, M, Asp, NG 1984. Extrusion cooking and dietary fibre: effects on dietary fibre content and on degradation in the rat intestinal tract. Cereal Chemistry 61, 174–179.Google Scholar
Canibe, N 1997. Apparent digestibility of non-starch polysaccharides and short chain fatty acid production in the large intestine of pigs fed dried or toasted peas. Acta Agricultura Scandinavica, Section A-Animal Science 47, 106–116.Google Scholar
Chabeauti, E, Noblet, J, Carré, B 1991. Digestion of plant cell walls from four different sources in growing pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 32, 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, JH, Englyst, HN 1995. Gastrointestinal effects of food carbohydrate. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 61, 938S–945S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, PR, Roberts, FG, Low, AG, Morgan, LM 1995. The effect of high-molecular-weight guar gum on net apparent glucose absorption and net apparent insulin and gastric inhibitory polypeptide production in the growing pig: relationship to rheological changes in jejunal digesta. The British Journal of Nutrition 74, 539–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Economic Community 1972. Analytical determination of starch. Official Journal of European Communities L123/7 (EEC, Brussels).Google Scholar
Glitsø, LV, Brunsgaard, G, Højsgaard, S, Sandström, B, Bach Knudsen, KE 1998. Intestinal degradation in pigs of rye dietary fibre with different structural characteristics. The British Journal of Nutrition 80, 457–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, H, Hesselman, K, Aman, P 1986. The influence of wheat bran and sugar-beet pulp on the digestibility of dietary components in a cereal-based pig diet. The Journal of Nutrition 116, 242–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keogh, MK, O’Kennedy, BT 1999. Milk fat microencapsulation using whey proteins. International Dairy Journal 9, 657–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahaye, L, Ganier, P, Thibault, JN, Sève, B 2004. Technological processes of feed manufacturing affect protein endogenous losses and amino acid availability for body protein deposition in pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 113, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, FM, Moughan, PJ, Wilson, MN 1993. Dietary fibre viscosity and endogenous protein excretion at the terminal ileum of growing rats. The Journal of Nutrition 123, 1898–1904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Goff, G, Noblet, J 2001. Comparative total tract digestibility of dietary energy and nutrients in growing pigs and adult sows. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2418–2427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Goff, G, Le Groumellec, L, van Milgen, J, Dubois, S, Noblet, J 2002a. Digestibility and metabolic utilisation of dietary energy in adult sows: influence of addition and origin of dietary fibre. The British Journal of Nutrition 87, 325–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Goff, G, van Milgen, J, Noblet, J 2002b. Influence of dietary fibre on digestive utilization and rate of passage in growing pigs, finishing pigs and adult sows. Animal Science 74, 503–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Len, NT, Lindberg, JE, Ogle, B 2007. Digestibility and nitrogen retention of diets containing different levels of fibre in local (Mong Cai), F1 (Mong Cai × Yorkshire) and exotic (Landrace × Yorkshire) growing pigs in Vietnam. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 91, 297–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leterme, P, van Leeuwen, P, Thewis, A, Huisman, J 1996. Chemical composition of pea inner fibre isolates and their effect on the endogenous digestive secretions in pigs. Journal of Science and Food Agricultural 72, 127–134.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montagne, L, Pluske, JR, Hampson, DJ 2003. A review of interactions between dietary fibre and the intestinal mucosa, and their consequences on digestive health in young non-ruminant animals. Animal Feed Science and Technology 108, 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales, J, Perez, JF, Martin-Orue, SM, Fondevila, M, Gasa, J 2002. Large bowel fermentation of maize or sorghum-acorn diets fed as a different source of carbohydrates to Landrace and Iberian pigs. The British Journal of Nutrition 88, 489–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noblet, J 2005. Recent advances in energy evaluation of feeds for pigs. In Recent advances in animal nutrition 2005 (ed. PC Garnsworthy and J Wiseman), pp. 1–26. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham.Google Scholar
Noblet, J, Bach Knudsen, KE 1997. Comparative digestibility of wheat, maize and sugar beet pulp non-starch polysaccharides in adult sows and growing pigs. In Digestive physiology in pigs (ed. JP Laplace, C Fevrier and A Barbeau), pp. 571–574. European Association for Animal Production, Saint-Malo, France.Google Scholar
Noblet, J, Champion, M 2003. Effect of pelleting and body weight on digestibility of energy and fat of two corns in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 81, 140.Google Scholar
Noblet, J, Le Goff, G 2001. Effect of dietary fibre on the energy value of feeds for pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 90, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noblet, J, Perez, JM 1993. Prediction of digestibility of nutrients and energy values of pig diets from chemical analysis. Journal of Animal Science 71, 3389–3398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noblet, J, Shi, XS 1993. Comparative digestibility of energy and nutrients in growing pigs fed ad libitum and adult sows fed at maintenance. Livestock Production Science 34, 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noblet, J, Shi, XS 1994. Effect of body weight on digestive utilization of energy and nutrients of ingredients and diets in pigs. Livestock Production Science 37, 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noblet, J, Fortune, H, Dubois, Sand Henry, Y 1989. Nouvelles bases d’estimation des teneurs en énergie digestible, métabolisable et nette des aliments pour le porc (New approaches for estimation digestible, metabolisable and net energy values in pig feeds), 106pp. INRA, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Noblet, J, Jaguelin-Peyraud, Y, Quemeneur, BChesneau, G 2008. Valeur énergétique de la graine de lin chez le porc: impact de la technologie de cuisson-extrusion. Journées de la Recherche porcine 40, 203–208.Google Scholar
Prosky, L, Schweizer, TF, Devries, JW, Furda, I 1988. Determination of insoluble, soluble, and total dietary fibre in foods and food products, interlaboratory study. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 71, 1017–1023.Google ScholarPubMed
Quiniou, N, Dourmad, JY, Noblet, J 1996. Effect of energy intake on the performance of different types of pig from 45 to 100 kg body weight. 1. Protein and lipid deposition. Animal Science 63, 289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, RM, Walker, HG, Kohler, GO 1969. Aleurone cells and the digestibility of wheat mill feeds. Poultry Science 48, 1497–1503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauvant, D, Perez, JMand Tran, G 2004. Tables of composition and nutritional values of feed Materials: pig, poultry, sheep, goats, rabbits, horses, fish. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands; INRA Editions, Paris, France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skiba, F, Noblet, J, Callu, P, Evrard, J, Melcion, JP 2002. Influence du type de broyage et de la granulation sur la valeur énergétique de la graine de colza chez le porc en croissance. Journées de la Recherche Porcine 34, 67–73.Google Scholar
Stein, HH, Bohlke, RA 2007. The effects of thermal treatment of field peas (Pisum sativum L.) on nutrient and energy digestibility by growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 85, 1424–1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Wine, RH 1967. Use detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 50, 50–55.Google Scholar
Vande Ginste, J, De Schrijver, R 1998. Expansion and pelleting of starter, grower and finisher diets for pigs: effects on nitrogen retention, ileal and total tract digestibility of protein, phosphorus and calcium and in vitro protein quality. Animal Feed Science and Technology 72, 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenk, C 2001. The role of dietary fibre in the digestive physiology of the pig. Animal Feed Science and Technology 90, 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilfart, A, Montagne, L, Simmins, H, Noblet, J, van Milgen, J 2007. Digesta transit in different segments of the gastrointestinal tract of pigs as affected by insoluble fibre supplied by wheat bran. The British Journal of Nutrition 98, 54–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wondra, KJ, Hancock, JD, Behnke, KC, Hines, RH, Stark, CR 1995. Effects of particle size and pelleting on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and stomach morphology in finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 73, 757–763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xing, JJ, Heugten, E, Li, DF, Touchette, KJ, Coalson, JA, Odgaard, RL, Odle, J 2004. Effects of emulsification, fat encapsulation, and pelleting on weanling pig performance and nutrient digestibility. Journal of Animal Science 82, 2601–2609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, YL, McEvoy, JDG, Schulze, H, Hennig, U, Souffrant, WB 2000. Apparent digestibility (ileal and overall) of nutrients and endogenous nitrogen losses in growing pigs fed wheat (var. Soissons) or its by-products without or with xylanase supplementation. Livestock Production Science 62, 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zebrowska, H, Low, AG 1987. The influence of diets based on whole wheat, wheat flour and wheat bran on exocrine pancreatic secretion in pigs. The Journal of Nutrition 117, 1212–1216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed