Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:50:17.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Implications of white striping and wooden breast abnormalities on quality traits of raw and marinated chicken meat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2014

S. Mudalal
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum – University of Bologna, 47521 Cesena (FC), Italy
M. Lorenzi
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum – University of Bologna, 47521 Cesena (FC), Italy
F. Soglia
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum – University of Bologna, 47521 Cesena (FC), Italy
C. Cavani
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum – University of Bologna, 47521 Cesena (FC), Italy
M. Petracci*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum – University of Bologna, 47521 Cesena (FC), Italy
*
Get access

Abstract

One of the consequences of intense genetic selection for growth of poultry is the recent appearance of abnormalities in chicken breast muscles, such as white striping (characterised by superficial white striations) and wooden breast (characterised by pale and bulged areas with substantial hardness). The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality traits of chicken fillets affected by white striping and wooden breast abnormalities. In two replications, 192 fillets were divided into the following four classes: normal (n=48; absence of any visual defects), white striping (n=48, presence of white striations), wooden breast (n=48; diffusely presence of hardened areas) and white striping/wooden breast (n=48; fillets affected by both abnormalities). Morphology, raw meat texture and technological properties were assessed in both unprocessed (pH, colour, drip loss, cooking loss and cooked meat shear force) and marinated meat (marinade uptake, purge loss, cooking loss and cooked meat shear force). Fillets affected by white striping, wooden breast or both abnormalities exhibited higher breast weights compared with normal fillets (305.5, 298.7, 318.3 and 244.7 g, respectively; P<0.001). Wooden breast, either alone or in combination with white striping, was associated with a significant (P<0.001) increase of fillet thickness in the caudal area and raw meat hardness compared with both normal and the white striping abnormality, for which there was no difference. Overall, the occurrence of the individual and combined white striping and wooden breast abnormalities resulted in substantial reduction in the quality of breast meat, although these abnormalities are associated with distinct characteristics. Wooden breast fillets showed lower marinade uptake and higher cooking losses than white-striped fillets for both unprocessed and marinated meats. On the other hand, white-striped fillets showed a moderate decline in marinade and cooking yield. Fillets affected by both abnormalities had the highest (P<0.001) ultimate pH values. In contrast, the effects on colour of raw and cooked meat, drip loss, purge loss and cooked meat shear force were negligible or relatively low and of little practical importance. Thus, the presence of white striping and wooden breast abnormalities impair not only breast meat appearance but also the quality of both raw and marinated meats mainly by reducing water holding/binding abilities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbut, S, Sosnicki, AA, Lonergan, SM, Knapp, T, Ciobanu, DC, Gatcliffe, LJ and Wilson, EW 2008. Progress in reducing the pale, soft and exudative (PSE) problem in pork and poultry meat. Meat Science 79, 4663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berri, C, Wacrenier, N, Millet, N and Le Bihan-Duval, E 2001. Effect of selection for improved body composition on muscle and meat characteristics of broilers from experimental and commercial lines. Poultry Science 80, 833838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berri, C, Le Bihan-Duval, E, Debut, M, Santé-Lhoutellier, V, Baéza, E, Gigaud, V, Jégo, Y and Duclos, MJ 2007. Consequence of muscle hypertrophy on characteristics of pectoralis major muscle and breast meat quality of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Science 85, 20052011.Google Scholar
Brewer, VB, Kuttappan, VA, Emmert, JL, Meullenet, JF and Owens, CM 2012. Big-bird programs: effect of strain, sex and debone time on meat quality of broilers. Poultry Science 91, 248254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dransfield, E and Sosnicki, AA 1999. Relationship between muscle growth and poultry meat quality. Poultry Science 78, 743746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, DL 2002. Poultry meat quality. World’s Poultry Science Journal 58, 131145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeacocke, RE 1977. Continuous measurement of the pH of beef muscle in intact beef carcasses. Journal of Food Technology 12, 375386.Google Scholar
Kuttappan, VA, Brewer, VB, Apple, JK, Waldroup, PW and Owens, CM 2012a. Influence of growth rate on the occurrence of white striping in broiler breast fillets. Poultry Science 91, 26772685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuttappan, VA, Lee, YS, Erf, GF, Meullenet, JF, McKee, SR and Owens, CM 2012b. Consumer acceptance of visual appearance of broiler breast meat with varying degrees of white striping. Poultry Science 91, 12401247.Google Scholar
Kuttappan, VA, Brewer, VB, Clark, FD, McKee, SR, Meullenet, JF, Emmert, JL and Owens, CM 2009. Effect of white striping on the histological and meat quality characteristics of broiler fillets. Poultry Science 88 (E-Suppl. 1), 136137.Google Scholar
Kuttappan, VA, Shivaprasad, HL, Shaw, DP, Valentine, BA, Hargis, BM, Clark, FD, McKee, SR and Owens, CM 2013a. Pathological changes associated with white striping in broiler breast muscles. Poultry Science 92, 331338.Google Scholar
Kuttappan, VA, Huff, GR, Huff, WE, Hargis, BM, Apple, JK, Coon, C and Owens, CM 2013b. Comparison of hematologic and serologic profiles of broiler birds with normal and severe degrees of white striping in breast fillets. Poultry Science 92, 339345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lubritz, DL 1997. A statistical model for white meat yield in broilers. Journal Applied of Poultry Research 6, 253259.Google Scholar
Mahon, M 1999. Muscle abnormalities: morphological aspects. In Poultry meat science – poultry science symposium series. Vol. 25 (ed. RI Richardson and GC Mead), pp. 1964. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Mehaffey, JM, Pradhan, SP, Meullenet, JF, Emmert, JL, McKee, SR and Owens, CM 2006. Meat quality evaluation of minimally aged broiler breast fillets from five commercial genetic strains. Poultry Science 85, 902908.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, MA 1999. Muscle abnormalities – pathophysiological mechanisms. In Poultry meat science – Poultry science symposium series. Vol. 25 (ed. RI Richardson and GC Mead), pp. 6598. CABI International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Mudalal, S, Babini, E, Cavani, C and Petracci, M 2014. Quantity and functionality of protein fractions in chicken breast fillets affected by white striping. Poultry Science 96, 21082116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, RY and Marks, BP 2000. Effect of meat temperature on proteins, texture, and cook loss for ground chicken breast patties. Poultry Science 79, 99104.Google Scholar
Petracci, M and Baeza, E 2011. Harmonization of methodologies for the assessment of poultry meat quality features. World’s Poultry Science Journal 68, 137153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petracci, M and Cavani, C 2012. Muscle growth and poultry meat quality issues. Nutrients 4, 112.Google Scholar
Petracci, M, Mudalal, S, Bonfiglio, A and Cavani, C 2013a. Occurrence of white striping and its impact on breast meat quality in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 92, 16701675.Google Scholar
Petracci, M, Bianchi, M, Mudalal, S and Cavani, C 2013b. Functional ingredients for poultry meat products. Trends in Food Science & Technology 33, 2739.Google Scholar
Petracci, M, Mudalal, S, Babini, E and Cavani, C 2014. Effect of white striping on chemical composition and nutritional value of chicken breast meat. Italian Journal of Animal Science 13, 179183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puolanne, E and Ruusunen, M 2014. The utilization of poultry breast muscle of different quality. Retrieved February 12, 2014, from http://prezi.com/a_woinbvnrvy/the-utilization-of-poultry-breast-muscle-of-different-qualit/ Google Scholar
Sams, AR, Janky, DM and Woodward, SA 1990. Comparison of two shearing methods for objective tenderness evaluation and two sampling times for physical-characteristic analyses of early harvested broiler breast meat. Poultry Science 69, 348353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandercock, DA, Barker, ZE, Mitchell, MA and Hocking, PM 2009. Changes in muscle cell cation regulation and meat quality traits are associated with genetic selection for high body weight and meat yield in broiler chickens. Genetics, Selection and Evolution 41, 18.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 1988. SAS/STAT Guide for personal computers (Version 6.03 Ed). SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Schreurs, FJG 2000. Post-mortem changes in chicken muscle. World’s Poultry Science Journal 56, 319346.Google Scholar
Sihvo, HK, Immonen, K and Puolanne, E 2014. Myodegeneration with fibrosis and regeneration in the pectoralis major muscle of broilers. Veterinary Pathology 51, 619623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sosnicki, AA and Wilson, BW 1991. Pathology of turkey skeletal muscle: implications for the poultry industry. Food Structure 10, 317326.Google Scholar
Swatland, HJ 2008. How pH causes paleness or darkness in chicken breast meat. Meat Science 80, 396400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, BW 1990. Developmental and maturational aspects of inherited avian myopathies. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 194, 8796.Google Scholar