Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:21:07.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grazing behaviour and performance of lactating suckler cows, ewes and goats on partially improved heathlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

R. Celaya ,
R. Benavides ,
U. García ,
L. M. M. Ferreira ,
I. Ferre ,
A. Martínez ,
L. M. Ortega-Mora  and
K. Osoro
R. Celaya
Affiliation:
Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), Apartado 13 – 33300, Villaviciosa, Asturias, Spain
R. Benavides
Affiliation:
Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), Apartado 13 – 33300, Villaviciosa, Asturias, Spain
U. García
Affiliation:
Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), Apartado 13 – 33300, Villaviciosa, Asturias, Spain
L. M. M. Ferreira
Affiliation:
CECAV – Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, PO Box 1013, 5000-911 Vila Real, Portugal
I. Ferre
Affiliation:
SALUVET – Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
A. Martínez
Affiliation:
Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), Apartado 13 – 33300, Villaviciosa, Asturias, Spain
L. M. Ortega-Mora
Affiliation:
SALUVET – Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
K. Osoro*
Affiliation:
Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), Apartado 13 – 33300, Villaviciosa, Asturias, Spain
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The foraging behaviour (grazing time and diet composition), live-weight (LW) changes and parasitic infection (faecal egg counts of gastrointestinal nematodes) of 12 beef cows, 84 ewes and 84 goats suckling their offspring, managed in mixed grazing on heathlands with 24% of improved pasture of perennial ryegrass-white clover, were studied during the years 2003 and 2006. The results showed that goats tended to graze for a longer time, and utilised significantly more heathland vegetation than cattle and sheep, including in their diet in an average of 0.39 herbaceous plants, 0.11 gorse and 0.51 heather over the grazing season, comparing with respective mean values of 0.85, 0.02 and 0.13 in cattle and sheep. Dietary overlap was higher between cattle and sheep (0.76) than between sheep and goats (0.53) or between cattle and goats (0.47). Despite the high performance of autumn-calving cows in spring, sheep had the best LW changes per livestock unit (LU) during the whole grazing season. Goats’ performance per LU was lower than in sheep but higher than in spring-calving cows. Regarding offspring production, lambs had higher LW gains per LU than calves and kids. Mean nematode eggs/g fresh faeces (epg) during the grazing season were higher in goats (91 epg) compared with sheep (34 epg) and cattle (14 epg), particularly from September to December. In conclusion, sheep performed best on these heathlands with improved pasture areas if the entire grazing season was considered, despite the good level of production in spring from autumn-calving cows. The results suggested the complementary use of goats in order to increase the effective utilisation of the available vegetation, achieving production levels similar to those from spring-calving cows. Therefore, mixed flocks of sheep and goats would be the most appropriate sustainable systems from the animal production and vegetation use points of view.

Keywords

domestic ruminantsgastrointestinal nematodegrazinglive weightmarginal land
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 2 , Issue 12 , December 2008 , pp. 1818 - 1831
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldezabal A 2001. El sistema de pastoreo del Parque Nacional de Ordesa y Monte Perdido (Pirineo central, Aragón). Interacción entre la vegetación supraforestal y los grandes herbívoros. Consejo de Protección de la Naturaleza de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 2006. Official methods of analysis, 18th edition (1st revision)AOAC, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Baker, RD, Alvarez, F, Le Du, YLP 1981. The effect of herbage allowance upon the herbage intake and performance of suckler cows and calves. Grass and Forage Science 36, 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthram, GT 1986. Experimental techniques: the HFRO swardstick. In The Hill Farming Research Organisation Biennial Report 1984–85. HFRO, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, UK, pp. 29–30.Google Scholar
Bartolomé, J, Franch, J, Plaixats, J, Seligman, NG 1998. Diet selection by sheep and goats on Mediterranean heath-woodland range. Journal of Range Management 51, 383–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, DJ 1985. Annual diets of hill sheep and feral goats in southern Scotland. Journal of Applied Ecology 22, 423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celaya, R, Martínez, A, Osoro, K 2002. Relationship between sward height and available biomass in lowland, hill and mountain pastures. In Multi-function grasslands. Quality forages, animal products and landscapes (ed. JL Durand, JC Emile, C Huyghe and G Lemaire), pp. 286–287. P. Oudin, Poitiers, France.Google Scholar
Celaya, R, Oliván, M, Ferreira, LMM, Martínez, A, García, U, Osoro, K 2007. Comparison of grazing behaviour, dietary overlap and performance in non-lactating domestic ruminants grazing on marginal heathland areas. Livestock Science 106, 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chestnutt, DMB 1984. Some effects of changes in cow live weight in the autumn calving suckler herd. In Grassland beef production (ed. W Holmes), pp. 35–43. Martinus Nijhoffrs, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, DA, Lambert, MG, Rolston, MP, Dymock, N 1982. Diet selection by goats and sheep on hill country. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 42, 155–157.Google Scholar
Demment, MW, Van Soest, PJ 1985. A nutritional explanation for body size patterns of ruminant and nonruminant herbivores. The American Naturalist 125, 641–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dove, H, Mayes, RW 1991. The use of plant wax alkanes as markers substances in studies of the nutrition of herbivores: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 913–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dove, H, Moore, AD 1995. Using a least-squares optimisation procedure to estimate diet composition based on the alkanes of plant cuticular wax. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 1535–1544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, LMM, Oliván, M, Rodrigues, MAM, Garcia, U, Osoro, K 2005. Validation of the alkane technique to estimate diet selection of goats grazing heather–gorse vegetation communities. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 85, 1636–1646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, LMM, Garcia, U, Rodrigues, MAM, Celaya, R, Dias-da-Silva, A, Osoro, K 2007a. The application of the n-alkane technique for estimating the composition of diets consumed by equines and cattle feeding on upland vegetation communities. Animal Feed Science and Technology 138, 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, LMM, Oliván, M, Celaya, R, García, U, Rodrigues, MAM, Osoro, K 2007b. The use of the alkane technique to estimate diet selection of sheep grazing grass-clover/heather–gorse vegetation communities. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 87, 274–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzhugh, HA 1978. Animal size and efficiency with special reference to the breeding female. Animal Production 27, 393–401.Google Scholar
Forbes, TDA, Beattie, MM 1987. Comparative studies of the influence of sward conditions on the ingestive behaviour of cows and sheep. Grass and Forage Science 40, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frutos P, Moreno-Gonzalo J, Hervás G, García U, Ferreira LMM, Celaya R, Toral PG, Ortega-Mora LM, Ferre I and Osoro K 2008. Is the anthelmintic effect of heather supplementation to grazing goats always accompanied by antinutritional effects? Animal 2, 1449–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, IJ 1989. Vegetation community selection by ungulates on the isle of Rhum. II. Vegetation community selection. Journal of Applied Ecology 26, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, IJ 2003. Browsing and grazing ruminants: are they different beasts? Forest Ecology and Management 181, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, SA 1981. Sward components. In Sward measurement handbook (ed. J Hodgson, RD Baker, A Davies, AS Laidlaw and JD Leaver), pp. 71–92. British Grassland Society, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK.Google Scholar
Grant, SA, Hodgson, J 1986. Grazing effects on species balance and herbage production in indigenous plant communities. In Grazing research at northern latitudes (ed. O Gudmundsson), pp. 69–77. Plenum Press, London, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, SA, Bolton, GR, Russel, AJF 1984. The utilization of sown and indigenous plant species by sheep and goats grazing hill pastures. Grass and Forage Science 39, 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J 1985. The control of herbage intake in the grazing ruminant. The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 44, 339–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmann, RR 1989. Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia 78, 443–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoste, H, Torres-Acosta, JFJ, Aguilar-Caballero, AJ 2008. Nutrition–parasite interactions in goats: is immunoregulation involved in the control of gastrointestinal nematodes? Parasite Immunology 30, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Illius, AW, Gordon, IA 1993. Diet selection in mammalian herbivores: constraints and tactics. In Diet selection. An interdisciplinary approach to foraging behaviour (ed. RN Hughes), pp. 157–181. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Lechner-Doll, M, Hume, ID, Hofmann, RR 1995. Comparison of herbivore forage selection and digestion. In Recent developments in the nutrition of herbivores (ed. M Journet, E Grenet, M-H Farce, M Thériez and C Demarquilly), pp. 231–248. INRA, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Lowman BG, Scott NA and Somerville SH 1976. Condition scoring in suckler cows. East of Scotland College of Agricuture, Bulletin No. 6, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Lu, CD 1988. Grazing behaviour and diet selection of goats. Small Ruminant Research 1, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAFF 1986. Manual of veterinary parasitological laboratory techniques, 3rd edition. Reference book 418. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London, UK.Google Scholar
Maxwell, TJ, Grant, SA, Milne, JA, Sibbald, AR 1986. Systems of sheep production on heather moorland. In Hill land symposium (ed. MA O’Toole), pp. 187–211. An Foras Talúntais, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
Mayes, RW, Lamb, CS, Colgrove, PM 1986. The use of dosed and herbage n-alkanes as markers for the determination of herbage intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, M, Riach, DJ 1994. The intake and performance of cashmere goats grazing sown swards. Grass and Forage Science 49, 429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, JA 1994. Comparative abilities of different herbivorous species to graze in upland areas: consequences for productivity and vegetation. Annales de Zootechnie 43, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliván, M, Osoro, K 1999. Effect of temperature on alkane extraction from faeces and herbage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 132, 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, RJ, Parsons, AJ, Penning, PD, Treacher, TT 1990. Sward composition, animal performance and the potential production of grass/white clover swards continuously stocked by sheep. Grass and Forage Science 45, 325–336.Google Scholar
Osoro, K, Martínez, A 1995. Grazing behaviour and performance of goats and sheep on natural and improved vegetation. In The nutrition and grazing ecology of speciality fibre producing animals (ed. JP Laker and AJF Russel), pp. 109–125. Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Aberdeen, UK.Google Scholar
Osoro, K, Oliván, M, Celaya, R, Martínez, A 2000a. The effect of Calluna vulgaris cover on the performance and intake of ewes grazing hill pastures. Grass and Forage Science 55, 300–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osoro, K, Ormazabal, JJ, Celaya, R 2000b. Suckler cows performance during the spring under different sward heights and grazing systems. In Beef from grass and forage (ed. D Pullar), pp. 159–163. British Grassland Society, Occasional Symposium No. 35, Hurley, UK.Google Scholar
Osoro, K, Martínez, A, Celaya, R 2002. The effect of breed and sward height on sheep performance and production per hectare during the spring and autumn in Northern Spain. Grass and Forage Science 57, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osoro, K, García, U, Jáuregui, BM, Ferreira, LMM, Rook, AJ, Celaya, R 2007a. Diet selection and live-weight changes of two breeds of goats grazing on heathlands. Animal 1, 449–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osoro, K, Mateos-Sanz, A, Frutos, P, García, U, Ortega-Mora, LM, Ferreira, LMM, Celaya, R, Ferre, I 2007b. Anthelmintic and nutritional effects of heather supplementation on Cashmere goats grazing perennial ryegrass-white clover pastures. Journal of Animal Science 85, 861–870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radcliffe, JE 1986. Gorse – a resource for goats? New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 14, 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, AJ, Dumont, B, Isselstein, J, Osoro, K, WallisDeVries, MF, Parente, G, Mills, J 2004. Matching type of grazing animal to desired biodiversity outcomes – a review. Biological Conservation 119, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, AJF 1990. Body condition scoring of goats. Scottish Cashmere Producers Association Newsletter 10, 3.Google Scholar
Russel, AJF, Doney, JM, Gunn, RG 1969. Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72, 451–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, AJF, Wright, IA, Hodgson, J, Hunter, EA 1986. Factors affecting production from grazing beef cows and calves. In Hill Land Symposium, Galway 1984 (ed. MA O’Toole), pp. 300–329. An Foras Talúntais, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB, Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Wyk, JA, Cabaret, J, Michael, LM 2004. Morphological identification of nematode larvae of small ruminants and cattle simplified. Veterinary Parasitology 119, 277–306.Google Scholar
Vercruysse, J, Claerebout, E 2001. Treatment vs non-treatment of helminth infections in cattle: defining the threshold. Veterinary Parasitology 98, 195–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, IA, Connolly, J 1995. Improved utilization of heterogeneous pastures by mixed species. In Recent developments in the nutrition of herbivores (ed. M Journet, E Grenet, M-H Farce, M Thériez and C Demarquilly), pp. 425–436. INRA, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Wright, IA, Whyte, TK 1989. Effects of sward surface height on the performance of continuously stocked spring-calving beef cows and their calves. Grass and Forage Science 44, 259–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar