Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:58:03.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic parameters of fat quality in pigs measured by near-infrared spectroscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2011

E. Gjerlaug-Enger*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, The Norwegian University of Life Sciences(UMB), PO Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway Norsvin, PO Box 504, 2304 Hamar, Norway
L. Aass
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, The Norwegian University of Life Sciences(UMB), PO Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway
J. Ødegård
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, The Norwegian University of Life Sciences(UMB), PO Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway Nofima Marin, PO Box 5010, 1432 Ås, Norway
J. Kongsro
Affiliation:
Norsvin, PO Box 504, 2304 Hamar, Norway
O. Vangen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, The Norwegian University of Life Sciences(UMB), PO Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway
*
Get access

Abstract

Subcutaneous fat from Norwegian Landrace (n = 3230) and Duroc (n = 1769) pigs was sampled to investigate the sources of variation and genetic parameters of various fatty acids, fat moisture percentage and fat colour, with the lean meat percentage (LMP) also included as a trait representing the leanness of the pig. The pigs were from half-sib groups of station-tested boars included in the Norwegian pig breeding scheme. They were fed ad libitum to obtain an average of 113 kg live weight. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) was applied for prediction of the fatty acids and fat moisture percentage, and Minolta was used for the fat colour measurements. Heritabilities and genetic correlations were estimated with a multi-trait animal model using average information-restricted maximum likelihood (AI-REML) methodology. Fat from Landrace pigs had considerably more monounsaturated fatty acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and fat moisture, as well as less saturated fatty acids (SFAs) than fat from Duroc pigs. The heritability estimates (s.e. 0.03 to 0.08) for the various fatty acids were as follows: Palmitic, C16:0 (0.39 and 0.51 for Landrace and Duroc pigs, respectively); Palmitoleic, C16:1n-7 (0.41 and 0.50); Steric, C18:0 (0.46 and 0.54); Oleic, C18:1n-9 (0.67 and 0.57); Linoleic, C18:2n-6 (0.44 and 0.46); α-linolenic, C18:3n-3 (0.37 and 0.25) and n-6/n-3 ratio (0.06 and 0.01). The other fat quality traits revealed the following heritabilities: fat moisture (0.28 and 0.33), colour values in subcutaneous fat: L* (whiteness; 0.22 and 0.21), a* (redness; 0.13 and 0.24) and b* (yellowness; 0.07 and 0.17) and LMP (0.46 and 0.47). LMP showed high positive genetic correlations to PUFA (C18:2n-6 and C18:3n-3), which implies that selecting leaner pigs changes the fatty acid composition and deteriorates the quality of fat. Higher concentrations of PUFA are not beneficial as the ratio of n-6 and n-3 fatty acids becomes unfavourably high. Owing to the high genetic correlation between C18:2n-6 and C18:3n-3 and a low heritability for this ratio, the latter is difficult to change through selection. However, a small reduction in the ratio should be expected if selection aims at reducing the level of C18:2n-6. Selection for more C18:1n-9 is possible in view of the genetic parameters, which are favourable for eating quality, technological quality and human nutrition. The NIRS technology and the high heritabilities found in this study make it possible to implement fat quality traits to achieve the breeding goal in the selection of a lean pig with better fat quality.

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bout, J, Girard, JP, Runavot, JP, Sellier, P 1989. Genetic variation in chemical composition of fat depots in pigs. 40th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production 27–31 August 1989, Dublin, Ireland, paper GP3.12, 7pp.Google Scholar
Cameron, ND 1990. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for carcass traits, meat and eating quality traits in pigs. Livestock Production Science 26, 119135.Google Scholar
Cameron, ND, Enser, M, Nute, GR, Whittington, FM, Penman, JC, Fisken, AC, Perry, AM, Wood, JD 2000. Genotype with nutrition interaction on fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat and the relationship with flavour of pig meat. Meat Science 55, 187195.Google Scholar
Carnier, P, Sturaro, E, Noventa, M, Gallo, L 2003. Quality of subcutaneous fat of raw hams for dry-curing: nongenetic effects and genetic parameters for iodine number and linoleic acid percentage. 54th Annual Meeting of European Association for Animal Production, Roma, Italy, 31 August to 3 September.Google Scholar
Clop, A, Ovilo, C, Perez-Enciso, M, Cercos, A, Tomas, A, Fernandez, A, Coll, A, Folch, JM, Barragan, C, Diaz, I, Oliver, MA, Varona, L, Silio, L, Sanchez, A, Noguera, JL 2003. Detection of QTL affecting fatty acid composition in the pig. Mammalian Genome 14, 650656.Google Scholar
de Pedro, E, Garrido, A, Bares, I, Casillas, M, Murray, I 1992. Application of near-infrared spectroscopy for quality control of Iberian pork industry. In Near-infrared spectroscopy bridging the gap between data analysis and NIR applications (ed. KI Hildrum, T Isaksson, T Naes and A Tandberg), pp. 345348. Ellis Horwood, UK.Google Scholar
de Smet, S, Raes, K, Demeyer, D 2004. Meat fatty acid composition as affected by fatness and genetic factors: a review. Animal Research 53, 8198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enser, M, Richardson, RI, Wood, JD, Gill, BP, Sheard, PR 2000. Feeding linseed to increase the n-3 PUFA of pork: fatty acid composition of muscle, adipose tissue, liver and sausages. Meat Science 55, 201212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandez, A, de Pedro, E, Nunez, N, Silio, L, Garcia-Casco, J, Rodriguez, C 2003. Genetic parameters for meat and fat quality and carcass composition traits in Iberian pigs. Meat Science 64, 405410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia-Olmo, J, Garrido-Varo, A, de Pedro, E 2001. The transfer of fatty acid calibration equations using four sets of unsealed liquid standardisation samples. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy 9, 4962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrido-Varo, A, Perez-Marin, D, Bautista-Cruz, J, Guerrero-Ginel, JE 2008. Near-infrared spectroscopy for quantification of animal-origin fats in fat blends. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy 16, 281283.Google Scholar
Gjerlaug-Enger, E, Kongsro, J, Aass, L, Ødegård, J, Vangen, O 2010a. Prediction of fat quality in pig carcasses by near-infrared spectroscopy. Animal (submitted).Google Scholar
Gjerlaug-Enger, E, Aass, L, Ødegård, J, Vangen, O 2010b. Genetic parameters of meat quality traits in two pig breeds measured by rapid methods. Animal 4, 18321843.Google Scholar
Haug, A, Olesen, I, Christophersen, OA 2010. Individual variation and intraclass correlation in arachidonic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid in chicken muscle. Lipids in Health and Disease 9, 37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irie, M, Sakimoto, M 1992. Fat characteristics of pigs fed fish oil containing eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids. Journal of Animal Science 70, 470477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaturasitha, S, Srikanchai, T, Chakeredza, S, ter Meulen, U, Wicke, M 2008. Backfat characteristics of barrows and gilts fed on tuna oil supplemented diets during the growing-finishing periods. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 21, 12141219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, P, Jensen, J 2008. A user's guide to DMU. A package for analysing multivariate mixed models. Version 6, release 4.7. Danish Institute of Agricutural Sciences (DIAS), Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Research Center Foulum. Tjele, Denmark.Google Scholar
Raj, St, Skiba, G, Weremko, D, Fandrejewski, H, Migdał, W, Borowiec, F, Poławska, E 2010. The relationship between the chemical composition of the carcass and the fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat and backfat of several pig breeds slaughtered at different weights. Meat Science 86, 324330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwörer, D, Morel, P, Rebsamen, A 1988. Genetic parameters of fatty acids of pork fat. Proceedings of the International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, 29 August to 2 September 1988, Brisbane, Australia, part B, 598–600pp.Google Scholar
Schwörer, D, Rebsamen, A, Lorenz, D 1994. Twenty years of selection for meat quality in Swiss pig breeding. Pig News and Information (United Kingdom) 15, 63N66N.Google Scholar
Schwörer, D, Lorenz, D, Rebsamen, A 1999. Evaluation of the fat score by NIR-Spectroscopy. 50th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, August 22–26, 1999, Zürich, Switzerland, Commission on Pig Production, Session P3.27.Google Scholar
Sellier, P 1998. Genetics of meat and carcass traits. In The genetics of the pig (ed. MF Rothschild and A Ruvinsky), pp. 463510. CAB International, New York.Google Scholar
Sellier, P, Maignel, L, Bidanel, JP 2010. Genetic parameters for tissue and fatty acid composition of backfat, perirenal fat and longissimus muscle in Large White and Landrace pigs. Animal 4, 497504.Google Scholar
Simopoulos, AP 1999. Essential fatty acids in health and chronic disease. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 70, 560S569S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, K, Ishida, M, Kadowaki, H, Shibata, T, Uchida, H, Nishida, A 2006. Genetic correlations among fatty acid compositions in different sites of fat tissues, meat production, and meat quality traits in Duroc pigs. Journal of Animal Science 84, 20262034.Google Scholar
Tikk, K, Tikk, M, Aaslyng, MD, Karlsson, AH, Lindahl, G, Andersen, HJ 2007. Significance of fat supplemented diets on pork quality – connections between specific fatty acids and sensory attributes of pork. Meat Science 77, 275286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winzig, M, Beutling, D 2006. The objective determination of fat tissue colour in pig slaughter carcasses 1. Basis and measurement with consideration of sex and technological factors. Fleischwirtschaft 86, 97100.Google Scholar
Wood, JD, Wiseman, J, Cole, DJA 1994. Control and manipulation of meat quality. In Principles of pig science (ed. DJA Cole, J Wiseman and MA Varley), pp. 433456. Nottingham University Press, Loughborough.Google Scholar