Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:08:21.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gastrointestinal development of dairy calves fed low- or high-starch concentrate at two milk allowances

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2010

A. Kosiorowska ,
L. Puggaard ,
M. S. Hedemann ,
J. Sehested ,
S. K. Jensen ,
N. B. Kristensen ,
P. Kuropka ,
K. Marycz  and
M. Vestergaard
A. Kosiorowska
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health and Bioscience, Aarhus University, PO Box 50, Blichers Allé 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark Faculty of Biology and Animal Sciences, Department of Animal Hygiene and Animal Welfare, Wroclaw University of Life and Environmental Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
L. Puggaard
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health and Bioscience, Aarhus University, PO Box 50, Blichers Allé 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
M. S. Hedemann
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health and Bioscience, Aarhus University, PO Box 50, Blichers Allé 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
J. Sehested
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health and Bioscience, Aarhus University, PO Box 50, Blichers Allé 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
S. K. Jensen
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health and Bioscience, Aarhus University, PO Box 50, Blichers Allé 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
N. B. Kristensen
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health and Bioscience, Aarhus University, PO Box 50, Blichers Allé 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
P. Kuropka
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Animal Anatomy and Histology, Wroclaw University of Life and Environmental Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
K. Marycz
Affiliation:
Faculty of Biology and Animal Sciences, Department of Animal Hygiene and Animal Welfare, Wroclaw University of Life and Environmental Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
M. Vestergaard*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health and Bioscience, Aarhus University, PO Box 50, Blichers Allé 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The objective was to study the effect of type of concentrate with varying starch and fibre content on growth and gastrointestinal development in preweaned dairy calves. Thirty-two newborn Danish Holstein male calves were allocated to four treatment groups in eight blocks of four calves. An experimental low-starch, high-molasses, high-fibre (EXP) concentrate or a traditional high-starch (TRA) concentrate were fed either at a high (HIGH; 2 × 3.2 kg/day) or a low (LOW; 2 × 1.6 kg/day) whole milk allowance in a 2 × 2 factorial design. TRA contained 350 and EXP 107 g starch/kg dry matter (DM), whereas the NDF content was 136 and 296 g/kg DM, respectively. Metabolizable energy (ME) was 11.2 and 12.2 MJ ME/kg DM in EXP and TRA, respectively. All calves had free access to artificially dried grass hay (9.8 MJ ME/kg DM). Four calves were culled during the experiment. The calves were euthanized either at 38 (12 calves) or 56 days (16 calves) of age. Evaluated across both slaughter ages, there was no difference between TRA and EXP in concentrate and hay intake, rumen weight and papillation. EXP resulted in increased villi number in duodenum and jejunum compared with TRA. Concentrate intake and reticulo-rumen weight was higher for LOW compared with HIGH milk allowance, whereas live weight gain was 20% lower. The results show that a low-starch, high-molasses, high-fibre concentrate with 8% lower ME content tended to reduce daily gain compared with a traditional calf starter concentrate, but resulted in similar ruminal development in preweaned calves both on a high and a low milk allowance fed along with grass hay. Furthermore, the results suggest that the experimental concentrate stimulated intestinal villi growth over that of the traditional concentrate.

Keywords

calfstarter concentratemilk allowancegastrointestinal developmentgrowth performance
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , February 2011 , pp. 211 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdelsamei, AH, Fox, DG, Tedeschi, LO, Thonney, ML, Ketchen, DJ, Stouffer, JR 2005. The effect of milk intake on forage intake and growth of nursing calves. Journal of Animal Science 83, 940–947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, RD, Le Du, YLP, Barker, JM 1976. Milk-fed calves: 1. The effect of milk intake upon the herbage intake and performance of grazing calves. Journal of Agricultural Science 87, 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, RL 2000. Sheep gastrointestinal development in response to different dietary treatments. Small Ruminant Research 35, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, RL, McLeod, KR, Klotz, JL, Heitmann, RN 2004. Rumen development, intestinal growth and hepatic metabolism in the pre- and post-weaning ruminant. Journal of Dairy Science 87(E. suppl.), E55–E65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beharka, AA, Nagaraja, TG, Morrill, JL, Kennedy, GA, Klemm, RD 1998. Effects of form of the diet on anatomical, microbial and fermentative development of the rumen of neonatal calves. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 1946–1955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bodas, R, Giráldez, FJ, López, S, Rodríguez, AB, Mantecón, AR 2007. Inclusion of sugar beet pulp in cereal-based diets for fattening lambs. Small Ruminant Research 71, 250–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bühler, C, Hammon, H, Rossi, GL, Blum, JW 1998. Small intestinal morphology in eight-day-old calves fed colostrums for different durations or only milk replacer and treated with long-R3-insulin-like growth factor and growth hormone. Journal of Animal Science 76, 758–765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chamberlain, DG, Robertson, S, Choung, JJ 1993. Sugars versus starch as supplements to grass silage: effects on ruminal fermentation and the supply of microbial protein to the small intestine, estimated from the urinary excretion of purine derivatives, in sheep. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 63, 189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedemann, MS, Mikkelsen, LL, Naughton, P, Jensen, BB 2005. Effect of feed particle size and feed processing on morphological characteristics in the small and large intestine of pigs and on adhesion of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT12 in the ileum in vitro. Journal of Animal Science 83, 1554–1562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, TM, Bateman, HG, Aldrich, JM, Schlotterbeck, RL 2008. Effects of feeding different carbohydrate sources and amounts to young calves. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 3128–3137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikeda, H, Yang, CL, Tong, J, Nishimaki, H, Masuda, K, Takeo, T, Kasai, K, Ihoh, G 2002. Rat small intestinal goblet cell kinetics in the process of restitution of surface epithelium subjected to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 47, 590–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jahn, E, Chandler, PT, Polan, CE 1970. Effects of fiber and ratio of starch to sugar on performance of ruminating calves. Journal of Dairy Science 53, 466–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasper, J, Weary, DM 2002. Effects of ad libitum milk intake on dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 3054–3058.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jin, L, Reynold, LP, Redmer, DA, Caton, JS, Crenshaw, JD 1994. Effects of dietary fiber on intestinal growth, cell proliferation, and morphology in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 72, 2270–2278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khalili, H, Crosse, S, Varvikko, T 1992. The performance of crossbred dairy calves given different levels of whole milk and weaned at different ages. Animal Production 54, 191–195.Google Scholar
Khan, MA, Lee, HJ, Lee, WS, Kim, HS, Kim, SB, Ki, KS, Park, SJ, Ha, JK, Choi, YJ 2007. Starch evaluation in calf starter: I. Feed consumption, body weight gain, structural growth, and blood metabolites in Holstein calves. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 5259–5268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiernan, JA 1990. Histological and histochemical methods: theory and practice, 2nd edition. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kristensen, NB, Sehested, J, Jensen, SK, Vestergaard, M 2006. Delayed introduction of a low-starch concentrate induces normal ruminal development in dairy calves at weaning. Journal of Animal Science 84 (suppl. 1), 365.Google Scholar
Kristensen, NB, Sehested, J, Jensen, SK, Vestergaard, M 2007. Effects of milk allowance on concentrate intake, ruminal environment, and ruminal development in milk-fed Holstein calves. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 4346–4355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhla, S, Rudolph, PE, Albrecht, D, Schoenhusen, U, Zitnan, R, Tomek, W, Huber, K, Voigt, J, Metges, CC 2007. A milk diet partly containing soy protein does not change growth but regulates jejunal proteins in young goats. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 4334–4345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesmeister, KE, Heinrichs, AJ 2005. Effects of adding extra molasses to a texturized calf starter on rumen development, growth characteristics, and blood parameters in neonatal dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 411–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Margerison, JK, Reynolds, GW, Laven, R 2008. Effect of the addition of plant extracts (Queen of Calves) to milk and differing levels of milk on gastro intestinal tract development of calves. Journal of Dairy Science 91(E-suppl. 1), 183.Google Scholar
Miller, WJ, Martin, YG, Fowler, PR 1969. Effects of addition of fiber to simplified and to complex starters fed to young calves. Journal of Dairy Science 52, 672–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mir, PS, Bailey, DRC, Mir, Z, Morgan Jones, SD, Douwes, H, McAllister, TA, Weselake, RJ, Lozeman, FJ 1997. Activity of intestinal musocal membrane carbohydrases in cattle of different breeds. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 77, 441–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montagne, L, Crévieu-Gabriel, I, Toullec, R, Lallès, JP 2003. Influence of dietary protein level and source on the course of protein digestion along the small intestine of the veal calf. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 934–943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, RJ, Kornegay, ET, Grayson, RL, Lindemann, MD 1988. Growth, nutrient utilization and intestinal morphology of pigs fed high-fiber diets. Journal of Animal Science 66, 1570–1579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porter, JC, Warner, RG, Kertz, AF 2007. Effect of fiber level and physical form of starter on growth and development of dairy calves fed no forage. The Professional Animal Scientist 23, 395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puggaard, L 2008. A starter concentrate with low content of starch and high content of sugar and digestible fibres. MSc, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 93pp.Google Scholar
Sander, EG, Warner, RG, Harrison, HN, Loosli, JK 1959. The stimulatory effect of sodium butyrate and sodium propionate on the development of rumen mucosa in the young calf. Journal of Dairy Science 42, 1600–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seegraber, FJ, Morrill, JL 1982. Effect of soy protein on calves intestinal absorptive ability and morphology determined by scanning electron microscopy. Journal of Dairy Science 65, 1962–1970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shirazi-Beechey, SP, Hirayama, BA, Wang, Y, Scott, D, Smith, MW, Wright, EM 1991. Ontogenic development of lamb intestinal sodium-glucose co-transporter is regulated by diet. Journal of Physiology 437, 699–708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skrzypek, T, Piedra, JLV, Skrzypek, H, Wolinski, J, Kazimierczak, W, Szymanczyk, S, Pawlowska, M, Zabielski, R 2005. Light and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the postnatal small intestinal mucosa development in pigs. Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 56(suppl. 3), 71–87.Google ScholarPubMed
Stobo, IJF, Roy, JHB, Gaston, HJ 1966. Rumen development in calf. 1. Effect of diets containing different proportions of concentrates to hay on rumen development. British Journal of Nutrition 20, 171–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamate, H, McGilliard, AD, Jacobson, NL, Getty, R 1962. Effect of various dietaries on the anatomical development of the stomach in the calf. Journal of Dairy Science 45, 408–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terré, M, Devant, M, Bach, A 2007. Effect of level of milk replacer fed to Holstein calves on performance during the preweaning period and starter digestibility at weaning. Livestock Science 110, 82–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velayudhan, BT, Daniels, KM, Horrell, DP, Hill, SR, McGilliard, ML, Corl, BA, Jiang, H, Akers, RM 2008. Developmental histology, segmental expression, and nutritional regulation of somatotropin axis genes in small intestine of preweaned dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 3343–3352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volmerhaus, B, Schnorr, B 1967. Elektronenmikroskopische untersuchungen an lysosomen im pansenepithel der ziege. Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin A 14, 761–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, RG, Flatt, WP, Loosli, JK 1956. Dietary factors influencing the development of the ruminant stomach. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 4, 788–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zitnan, R, Voigt, J, Schönhusen, U, Wegner, J, Kokardova, M, Hagemeister, H, Levkut, M, Kuhla, S, Sommer, A 1998. Influence of dietary concentrate to forage ratio on the development of rumen mucosa in calves. Archives of Animal Nutrition 51, 279–291.Google ScholarPubMed
Zitnan, R, Kuhla, S, Nürnberg, K, Schönhusen, U, Ceresnakova, Z, Sommer, A, Baran, M, Greserova, G, Voigt, J 2003. Influence of the diet on the morphology of ruminal and intestinal mucosa and on intestinal carbohydrase levels in cattle. Veterinary Medicine – Czech 48, 177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar