Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T11:25:51.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors associated with the concentration of immunoglobulin G in the colostrum of dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2013

M. Conneely
Affiliation:
Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
D. P. Berry
Affiliation:
Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
R. Sayers
Affiliation:
Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
J. P. Murphy
Affiliation:
Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
I. Lorenz
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
M. L. Doherty
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
E. Kennedy*
Affiliation:
Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
*
Get access

Abstract

Transfer of sufficient immunoglobulin G (IgG) to the neonatal calf via colostrum is vital to provide the calf with immunological protection and resistance against disease. The objective of the present study was to determine the factors associated with both colostral IgG concentration and colostral weight in Irish dairy cows. Fresh colostrum samples were collected from 704 dairy cows of varying breed and parity from four Irish research farms between January and December 2011; colostral weight was recorded and the IgG concentration was determined using an ELISA method. The mean IgG concentration in the colostrum was 112 g/l (s.d. = 51 g/l) and ranged from 13 to 256 g/l. In total, 96% of the samples in this study contained >50 g/l IgG, which is considered to be indicative of high-quality colostrum. Mean colostral weight was 6.7 kg (s.d. = 3.6 kg) with a range of 0.1 to 24 kg. Factors associated with both colostral IgG concentration and colostral weight were determined using a fixed effects multiple regression model. Parity, time interval from calving to next milking, month of calving, colostral weight and herd were all independently associated with IgG concentration. IgG concentration decreased (P < 0.01) by 1.7 (s.e. = 0.6) g/l per kg increase in the colostral weight. Older parity cows, cows that had a shorter time interval from calving to milking, and cows that calved earlier in spring or in the autumn produced colostrum with higher IgG concentration. Parity (P < 0.001), time interval from calving to milking (P < 0.01), weight of the calf at birth (P < 0.05), colostral IgG concentration (P < 0.01) and herd were all independently associated with colostral weight at the first milking. Younger parity cows, cows milked earlier post-calving, and cows with lighter calves produced less colostrum. In general, colostrum quality of cows in this study was higher than in many previous studies; possible reasons include use of a relatively low-yielding cow type that produces low weight of colostrum, short calving to colostrum collection interval and grass-based nutritional management. The results of this study indicate that colostral IgG concentration can be maximised by reducing the time interval between calving and collection of colostrum.

Type
Physiology and functional biology of systems
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Animal identification and movement statistics report 2011. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Retrieved May 12, 2012, from http://www.agriculture.gov.ie/media/migration/animalhealthwelfare/animalidentificationandmovement/AimBovineStats090512.pdfGoogle Scholar
Baumrucker, CR, Burkett, AM, Magliaro-Macrina, AL, Dechow, CD 2010. Colostrogenesis: mass transfer of immunoglobulin G1 into colostrum. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 30313038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berry, DP, Buckley, R, Dillon, P, Evans, RD, Veerkamp, RR 2004. Genetic relationships among linear type traits, milk yield, body weight, fertility and somatic cell count in primiparous dairy cows. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 43, 161176.Google Scholar
Berry, DP, Shalloo, L, Cromie, AR, Veerkamp, RF, Dillon, P, Amer, PR, Kearney, JF, Evans, RD, Wickham, BW 2007. The economic breeding index: a generation on Technical Report to the Irish Cattle Breeding Federation. Retrieved July 12, 2012, from http://www.icbf.com/publications/files/economic_breeding_index.pdf.Google Scholar
Besser, TE, Garmedia, AE, McGuire, MA, Gay, CC 1985. Effect of colostral immunoglobulin G1 and immunoglobulin M concentrations on immunoglobulin absorption in calves. Journal of Dairy Science 68, 20332037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bielmann, V, Gillan, J, Perkins, NR, Skidmore, AL, Godden, S, Leslie, KE 2010. An evaluation of Brix refractometry instruments for measurement of colostrum quality in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 37133721.Google Scholar
Blecha, F, Bull, RC, Olson, DP, Ross, RH, Curtis, S 1981. Effects of prepartum protein restriction in the beef cow on immunoglobulin content in blood and colostral whey and subsequent immunoglobulin absorption by the neonatal calf. Journal of Animal Science 53, 11741180.Google Scholar
Butler, JE 1969. Bovine immunoglobulins: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 52, 18951909.Google Scholar
DeNise, SK, Robison, JD, Stott, GH, Armstrong, DV 1989. Effects of passive immunity on subsequent production in dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 72, 552554.Google Scholar
Edmonson, AJ, Lean, IJ, Weaver, LD, Farver, T, Webster, G 1989. A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 72, 6878.Google Scholar
Fleenor, WA, Stott, GH 1981. Single radial immunodiffusion analysis for quantitation of colostral immunoglobulin concentration. Journal of Dairy Science 64, 740747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, RP, Gaskins, CT, Hillers, JK, Brinks, JS, Denham, AH 1988. Inbreeding and immunoglobulin G1 concentrations in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 66, 24902497.Google Scholar
Gilmour, AR, Gogel, BJ, Cullis, BR, Thompson, R 2009. ASReml user guide release 3.0. VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK.Google Scholar
Godden, S 2008. Colostrum management for dairy calves. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 24, 1939.Google ScholarPubMed
Gulliksen, SM, Lie, KI, Sølverød, L, Østerås, O 2008. Risk factors associated with colostrum quality in Norwegian dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 704712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gulliksen, SM, Lie, KI, Løken, T, Østerås, O 2009. Calf mortality in Norwegian dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 27822795.Google Scholar
Guy, MA, McFadden, TB, Cockrell, DC, Besser, TE 1994. Regulation of colostrum formation in beef and dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 30023007.Google Scholar
Horan, B, Dillon, P, Faverdin, P, Delaby, L, Buckley, F, Rath, M 2005. The interaction of strain of Holstein–Friesian cows and pasture-based feed systems on milk yield, body weight, and body condition score. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 12311243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hough, RL, McCarthy, FD, Kent, HD, Eversole, DE, Wahlberg, ML 1990. Influence of nutritional restriction during late gestation on production measures and passive immunity in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 68, 26222627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kehoe, SI, Heinrichs, AJ, Moody, ML, Jones, CM, Long, MR 2011. Comparison of immunoglobulin G concentrations in primiparous and multiparous bovine colostrum. The Professional Animal Scientist 27, 176180.Google Scholar
Kruse, V 1970. Yield of colostrum and immunoglobulin in cattle at the first milking after parturition. Animal Production 12, 619629.Google Scholar
Larson, BL, Heary, HL, Devery, JE 1980. Immunoglobulin production and transport by the mammary gland. Journal of Dairy Science 63, 665671.Google Scholar
Lomba, F, Fumiere, I, Tshibangu, M, Chauvaux, G, Bienfet, V 1978. Immunoglobulin transfer to calves and health problems in large bovine units. Annales De Recherches Véterinaires 9, 353360.Google Scholar
Mayne, S, Laidlaw, S 1995. Extending the grazing season – a research review. Paper presented at Discussion Meeting of the British Grassland Society, Reaseheath College, Nantwich, Cheshire, UK, pp. 6–11.Google Scholar
McGuirk, SM, Collins, M 2004. Managing the production, storage, and delivery of colostrum. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 20, 593603.Google Scholar
Moore, MP, Tyler, JW, Chigerwe, M, Dawes, ME, Middleton, JR 2005. Effect of delayed colostrum collection on colostral IgG concentration in dairy cows. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 226, 13751377.Google Scholar
Morin, DE, Nelson, SV, Reid, ED, Nagy, DW, Dahl, GE, Constable, PD 2010. Effect of colostral volume, interval between calving and first milking, and photoperiod on colostral IgG concentration in dairy cows. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 237, 420428.Google Scholar
Morrill, KM, Conrad, E, Lago, A, Campbell, J, Quigley, J, Tyler, H 2012. Nationwide evaluation of quality and composition of colostrum on dairy farms in the United States. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 39974005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrow, DA 1976. Fat cow syndrome. Journal of Dairy Science 59, 16251629.Google Scholar
Muller, LD, Ellinger, DK 1981. Colostral immunoglobulin concentrations among breeds of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 64, 17271730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulligan, FJ, Doherty, ML 2008. Production diseases of the transition cow. The Veterinary Journal 176, 39.Google Scholar
Nowak, W, Mikula, R, Zachwieja, A, Paczynska, K, Pecka, E, Drzazga, K, Slosarz, P 2012. The impact of cow nutrition in the dry period on colostrum quality and immune status of calves. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences 15, 7782.Google Scholar
Park, SC, Jacobson, NL 1993. The mammary gland and lactation. In Dukes’ physiology of domestic animals (ed. MJ Swenson and WO Reece), pp. 711727. Comstock Publishing Company Inc., New York, USA.Google Scholar
Pritchett, LC, Gay, CC, Besser, TE, Hancock, DD 1991. Management and production factors influencing immunoglobulin G1 concentration in colostrum from Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 23362341.Google Scholar
Rivero, MJ, Valderrama, X, Haines, D, Alomar, D 2012. Prediction of immunoglobulin G content in bovine colostrum by near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 14101418.Google Scholar
Robison, JD, Stott, GH, DeNise, SK 1988. Effects of passive immunity on growth and survival in the dairy heifer. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 12831287.Google Scholar
Roche, JR, Friggens, NC, Kay, JK, Fisher, MW, Stafford, KJ, Berry, DP 2009. Invited review: body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 57695801.Google Scholar
Selman, IE, McEwan, AD, Fisher, EW 1971. Absorption of immune lactoglobulin by newborn dairy calves. Attempts to produce consistent immune lactoglobulin absorptions in newborn dairy calves using standardised methods of colostrum feeding and management. Research in Veterinary Science 12, 205210.Google Scholar
Stott, GH, Marx, DB, Menefee, BE, Nightengale, GT 1979. Colostral immunoglobulin transfer in calves. III. Amount of absorption. Journal of Dairy Science 62, 19021907.Google Scholar
Straub, OC, Matthaeus, W 1978. Immunoglobulin composition of colostrum and persistence of acquired immunoglobulins and specific antibodies in calf. Annales De Recherches Veterinaires 9, 269275.Google Scholar
Weaver, DM, Tyler, JW, VanMetre, DC, Hostetler, DE, Barrington, GM 2000. Passive transfer of colostral immunoglobulins in calves. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 14, 569577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed