Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:13:47.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of connectedness between herds for three pig breeds in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

C. Y. Sun ,
C. K. Wang ,
Y. C. Wang ,
Y. Zhang  and
Q. Zhang
C. Y. Sun
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agriculture, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China The State Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China
C. K. Wang
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agriculture, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China The State Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China
Y. C. Wang
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agriculture, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China The State Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China
Y. Zhang
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agriculture, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China The State Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China
Q. Zhang*
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agriculture, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China The State Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Using data on age at 100 kg of three pig breeds (Large White, Landrace and Duroc) the connectedness between herds in China was evaluated by the connectedness rating (CR) method. The results show that most herds in China have low average CR (0–3.59%) with other herds. In Large White, of the 36 herds analyzed there are 20 herds, which are connected with at least one other herd. In Landrace and Duroc, of the 27 and 18 herds analyzed, only four and five herds, respectively, were found having connectedness with other herds. Generally, the connectedness exists only among two or few herds in the same region. A certain degree of connectedness between herds is a precondition for cross-herd genetic evaluation. A national or regional cross-herd genetic evaluation is not practicable at the present time in China. More intense efforts are needed to establish and enhance the connectedness between herds by means of extensively using artificial insemination (AI) in the swine industry in China.

Keywords

connectednesscross-herd genetic evaluationjoint breeding system
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , April 2009 , pp. 482 - 485
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Foulley, JL, Bouix, J, Goffinet, B, Elsen, JM 1990. Connectedness in genetic evaluation. In Advances in Statistical Methods for Genetic Improvement of Livestock (ed. D Gianola and K Hammond), pp. 302–337. Springer Publishing, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Foulley, JL, Hanocq, E, Boichard, D 1992. A criterion for measuring the degree of connectedness in linear models of genetic evaluation. Genetics Selection Evolution 24, 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fries, LA 1998. Connectability in beef cattle genetic evaluation: the heuristic approach used in MILC.FOR. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Communication No. 27449, Armidale, Australia.Google Scholar
Fu, Y 2005. Swine genetic improvement program in China. Proceedings of the National Swine Improvement Federation Conference, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Huisman, AE, Tier, B, Brown, DJ 2006. On assessing contrasts between groups of animals. Livestock Science 104, 254–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, BW, Trus, D 1993. Consideration on genetic connectedness between management units under an animal model. Journal of Animal Science 71, 2341–2352.Google Scholar
Kuehn, LA, Lewis, RM, Notter, DR 2007. Managing the risk of comparing estimated breeding values across flocks or herds through connectedness: a review and application. Genetics Selection Evolution 39, 225–247.Google Scholar
Laloë, D 1993. Precision and information in linear model of genetic evaluation. Genetics Selection Evolution 25, 557–576.Google Scholar
Laloë, D, Phocas, F, Ménissier, F 1996. Considerations on measures of precision and connectedness in mixed linear model of genetic evaluation. Genetics Selection Evolution 28, 359–378.Google Scholar
Mathur, PK, Sullivan, BP, Chesnais, J 1998. Estimation of the degree of connectedness between herds or management groups in the Canadian swine population. Canadian Centre for Swine Improvement, Otawa, Canada. (Mimeo).Google Scholar
Mathur, PK, Sullivan, BP, Chesnais, JP 2002. Measuring connectedness: concept and application to a large industry breeding program. Proceeding of the 7th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Communication No. 20-13, Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
Roso, VM, Schenkel, FS, Miller, SP 2002. Estimation of the degree of connectedness between test groups of station-tested beef bulls. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Communication No. 02-28, Montpellier, France.Google Scholar