Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T02:53:31.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimation of the tryptophan requirement in piglets by meta-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2011

A. Simongiovanni*
Affiliation:
AJINOMOTO EUROLYSINE S.A.S., 153 rue de Courcelles, F-75817 Paris cedex 17, France
E. Corrent
Affiliation:
AJINOMOTO EUROLYSINE S.A.S., 153 rue de Courcelles, F-75817 Paris cedex 17, France
N. Le Floc'h
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1079 Systèmes d'Elevage Nutrition Animale et Humaine, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1079 Systèmes d'Elevage Nutrition Animale et Humaine, F-35000 Rennes, France
J. van Milgen
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1079 Systèmes d'Elevage Nutrition Animale et Humaine, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1079 Systèmes d'Elevage Nutrition Animale et Humaine, F-35000 Rennes, France
*
Get access

Abstract

There is no consensus concerning the Trp requirement for piglets expressed relative to Lys on a standardized ileal digestible basis (SID Trp : Lys). A meta-analysis was performed to estimate the SID Trp : Lys ratio that maximizes performance of weaned piglets between 7 and 25 kg of BW. A database comprising 130 experiments on the Trp requirement in piglets was established. The nutritional values of the diets were calculated from the composition of feed ingredients. Among all experiments, 37 experiments were selected to be used in the meta-analysis because they were designed to express the Trp requirement relative to Lys (e.g. Lys was the second-limiting amino acid in the diet) while testing at least three levels of Trp. The linear-plateau (LP), curvilinear-plateau (CLP) and asymptotic (ASY) models were tested to estimate the SID Trp : Lys requirement using average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI) and gain-to-feed ratio (G : F) as response criteria. A multiplicative trial effect was included in the models on the plateau value, assuming that the experimental conditions affected only this parameter and not the requirement or the shape of the response to Trp. Model choice appeared to have an important impact on the estimated requirement. Using ADG and ADFI as response criteria, the SID Trp : Lys requirement was estimated at 17% with the LP model, at 22% with the CLP model and at 26% with the ASY model. Requirement estimates were slightly lower when G : F was used as response criterion. The Trp requirement was not affected by the composition of the diet (corn v. a mixture of cereals). The CLP model appeared to be the best-adapted model to describe the response curve of a population. This model predicted that increasing the SID Trp : Lys ratio from 17% to 22% resulted in an increase in ADG by 8%.

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, DH 1986. Problems and pitfalls in animal experiments designed to establish dietary requirements for essential nutrients. Journal of Nutrition 116, 23392349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, DH 2000. Recent advances in use of the ideal protein concept for swine feed formulation. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 13, 294301.Google Scholar
Baker, DH, Allen, NK, Boomgaardt, J, Graber, G, Norton, HW 1971. Quantitative aspects of d- and l-tryptophan utilization by the young pig. Journal of Animal Science 33, 4246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barea, R, Brossard, L, Le Floc'h, N, Primot, Y, Melchior, D, van Milgen, J 2009. The standardized ileal digestible valine-to-lysine requirement ratio is at least seventy percent in post weaned piglets. Journal of Animal Science 87, 935947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boisen, S 2003. Ideal dietary amino acid profiles for pigs. In Amino acids in animal nutrition (ed. JPF D'Mello), pp. 157168. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, BS, Libal, GW, Wahlstrom, RC 1987. Typtophan and threonine requirements of young pigs and their effects on serum calcium, phosphorus and zinc concentrations. Journal of Animal Science 64, 10701078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brossard, L, Dourmad, JY, Rivest, J, van Milgen, J 2009. Modelling the variation in performance of a population of growing pig as affected by lysine supply and feeding strategy. Animal 3, 11141123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bubenik, GA, Pang, SF, Hacker, RR, Smith, PS 1996. Melatonin concentration in serum and tissues of porcine gastrointestinal tract and their relationship to the intake and passage of food. Journal of Pineal Research 21, 251256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curnow, RN 1973. A smooth population response curve based on an abrupt threshold and plateau model for individuals. Biometrics 29, 110.Google Scholar
Danish Pig Production 2010. Danish nutrient standards (pdf.). Retrieved December 1, 2010, from http://www.pigresearchcentre.dk/Aboutus/Nutrientstandards.aspx.Google Scholar
Eder, K, Peganova, S, Kluge, H 2001. Studies on the tryptophan requirement of piglets. Archives of Animal Nutrition 55, 281297.Google ScholarPubMed
Ettle, T, Roth, FX 2004. Specific dietary selection for tryptophan by the piglet. Journal of Animal Science 82, 11151121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernstrom, JD 1977. Effects of diet on brain neurotransmitters. Metabolism 26, 207223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernstrom, JD 1985. Dietary effects on brain serotonin synthesis: relationship to appetite regulation. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 42, 10721082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, C, Morris, TR, Jennings, RG 1973. A model for the description and prediction of the response of laying hens to amino acid intake. British Poultry Science 14, 469484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fundación Española para el Desarrollo de la Nutrición Animal (FEDNA) 2006. Necesidades nutricionales para ganado porcino: normas FEDNA. Fundación Española para el Desarrollo de la Alimentación Animal, Ediciones Peninsular, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Han, Y, Chung, TK, Baker, DH 1993. Tryptophan requirement of pigs in the weight category 10 to 20 kilograms. Journal of Animal Science 71, 139143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harper, AE, Peters, JC 1989. Protein intake, brain amino acid and serotonin concentrations and protein self-selection. Journal of Nutrition 119, 677689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harper, AE, Rogers, QR 1965. Amino acid imbalance. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 24, 173190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hauschild, L, Pomar, C, Lovatto, PA 2010. Systematic comparison of the empirical and factorial methods used to estimate the nutrient requirements of growing pigs. Animal 4, 714723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, Y 1993. Affinement du concept de la protéine idéale pour le porc en croissance. INRA Productions Animales 6, 199212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Y, Sève, B, Mounier, A, Ganier, P 1996. Growth performance and brain neurotransmitters in pigs as affected by tryptophan, protein and sex. Journal of Animal Science 74, 27002710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inui, A, Asakawa, A, Bowers, YC, Mantovani, G, Laviano, A, Meguid, M, Fujimiya, M 2004. Ghrelin, appetite and gastric mobility: the emerging role of the stomach as en endocrine organ. The Journal of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 18, 439456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansman, AJM, van Diepen, JTM, Melchior, D 2010. The effect of diet composition on tryptophan requirement of young piglets. Journal of Animal Science 88, 10171027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Floc'h, N, Sève, B 2007. Biological roles of tryptophan and its metabolism: potential implications for pig feeding. Livestock Science 112, 2332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Floc'h, N, Melchior, D, Sève, B 2008. Dietary tryptophan helps to preserve tryptophan homeostasis in pigs suffering from lung inflammation. Journal of Animal Science 86, 34733479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Floc'h, N, Matte, JJ, Melchior, D, van Milgen, J, Sève, B 2010. A moderate inflammation caused by the deterioration of housing conditions modifies Trp metabolism but not Trp requirement for growth of post-weaned piglets. Animal 4, 18911898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leclercq, B, Beaumont, C 2000. Etude par simulation de la réponse des troupeaux de volailles aux apports d'acides aminés et de protéines. INRA Productions Animales 13, 4759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, AJ, Peo, ER, Cunningham, PJ, Moser, BD 1977. Determination of the optimum dietary proportions of lysine and tryptophan for growing pigs based on growth, food intake and plasma metabolites. Journal of Nutrition 107, 13691376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melchior, D, Sève, B, Le Floc'h, N 2004. Chronic lung inflammation affects plasma amino acid concentrations in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 82, 10911099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melchior, D, Mézière, N, Sève, B, Le Floc'h, N 2005. Is tryptophan catabolism increased under indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase activity during chronic lung inflammation in pigs? Reproduction Nutrition Development 45, 175183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercer, LP, May, HE, Dodds, SJ 1989. The determination of nutritional requirements in rats: mathematical modelling of sigmoidal, inhibited nutrient–response curves. Journal of Nutrition 119, 14651471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, TR 1983. The interpretation of response data from animal feeding trials. In Recent advances in animal nutrition (ed. W Haresign), pp. 223. Butterworths, London, UK.Google Scholar
Naatjes, M, Htoo, JK, Tölle, KH, Susenbeth, A 2010. Effect of dietary tryptophan to lysine ratio on performance of growing pigs fed wheat–barley or corn–soybean meal based diets. In Energy and protein metabolism and nutrition EAAP Publication No. 127, (ed. G Matteo Crovetto), pp. 605606. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine, 10th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Noblet, J, Valancogne, A, Tran, G, Ajinomoto Eurolysine SAS EvaPig®. [1.0.1.4] 2008. Computer program. INRA, AFZ, Ajinomoto Eurolysine S.A.S., Saint-Gilles, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Pesti, GM, Vedenov, D, Cason, JA, Billard, L 2009. A comparison of methods to estimate nutritional requirements from experimental data. British Poultry Science 50, 1632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pomar, C, Kyriazakis, I, Emmans, GC, Knap, PW 2003. Modeling stochasticity: dealing with populations rather than individual pigs. Journal of Animal Science 81, E178E186.Google Scholar
Ratkowsky, DA 1990. Handbook of non-linear regression models. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Salfen, BE, Carroll, JA, Keisler, DH, Strauch, TA 2004. Effects of exogenous ghrelin on feed intake, weight gain, behavior, and endocrine response in weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science 82, 19571966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, H, Kobayashi, T, Jones, RW, Easter, RA 1987. Tryptophan availability of some feedstuffs determined by pig growth assay. Journal of Animal Science 64, 191200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sauvant, D, Perez, JM, Tran, G 2004. Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials, INRA Editions and AFZ. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Paris, France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauvant, D, Schmidely, P, Daudin, JJ, St-Pierre, NR 2008. Meta-analyses of experimental data in animal nutrition. Animal 2, 12031214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sève, B 1999. Physiological roles of tryptophan in pig nutrition. In Advances in experimental medicine and biology. Tryptophan, serotonin, and melatonin. Basics aspects and applications (ed. G Hueter, W Kochen, TJ Simat and H Steinhart), vol. 467, pp. 729741. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Shearer, KD 2000. Experimental design, statistical analysis and modeling of dietary nutrient requirement studies for fish: a critical review. Aquaculture Nutrition 6, 91102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc. 2008. SAS/STAT® 9.2 user's guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Stein, HH, Sève, B, Fuller, MF, Moughan, PJ, de Lange, CFM 2007. Invited review: amino acid bioavailability and digestibility in pig feed ingredients: terminology and application. Journal of Animal Science 85, 72180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Susenbeth, A 2006. Optimum tryptophan : lysine ratio in diets for growing pigs: analysis of literature data. Livestock Science 101, 3245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Susenbeth, A, Lucanus, U 2005. The effect of tryptophan supplementation of diets of restricted and unrestricted fed young pigs. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 89, 331336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trevisi, P, Melchior, D, Mazzoni, M, Casini, L, Filippi, SD, Minieri, L, Lalatta-Costerbosa, G, Bosi, P 2009. A tryptophan-enriched diet improves feed intake and growth performance of susceptible weanling pigs orally challenged with Escherichia coli K88. Journal of Animal Science 87, 148156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, TC, Fuller, MF 1989. The optimum dietary amino acid pattern for growing pigs. 1. Experiments by amino acid deletion. British Journal of Nutrition 62, 7789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wellock, IJ, Emmans, GC, Kyriazakis, I 2004. Modeling the effects of stressors on the performance of populations of pigs. Journal of Animal Science 82, 24422450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittemore, CT, Hazzledine, MJ, Close, WH 2003. Nutrient requirement standards for pigs. British Society of Animal Science (BSAS), Penicuik, Scotland, UK.Google Scholar
Wiltafsky, MK, Pfaffl, MW, Roth, FX 2010. The effects of branched-chain amino acid interactions on growth performance blood metabolites enzyme kinetics and transcriptomics in weaned pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 103, 964976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, H, Jingdong, Y, Defa, L, Xuan, Z, Xilong, L 2007. Tryptophan enhances ghrelin expression and secretion associated with increased food intake and weight gain in weanling pigs. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 33, 4761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Simongiovanni Supplementary Tables

Simongiovanni Supplementary Tables

Download Simongiovanni Supplementary Tables(PDF)
PDF 74.7 KB