Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:21:54.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of sow nutrition during gestation on within-litter birth weight variation: a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2011

P. H. R. F. Campos ,
B. A. N. Silva ,
J. L. Donzele ,
R. F. M. Oliveira  and
E. F. Knol
P. H. R. F. Campos
Affiliation:
Institute for Pig Genetics BV, Schoenaker 6, 6640 AA Beuningen, The Netherlands Animal Science Department/Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36571-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil
B. A. N. Silva*
Affiliation:
Institute for Pig Genetics BV, Schoenaker 6, 6640 AA Beuningen, The Netherlands
J. L. Donzele
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department/Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36571-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil
R. F. M. Oliveira
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department/Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36571-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil
E. F. Knol
Affiliation:
Institute for Pig Genetics BV, Schoenaker 6, 6640 AA Beuningen, The Netherlands
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The increasing demand for efficiency in pork production requires great specialization of all sectors involved in this activity. In this context, the development of strategies that could reduce undesirable traits related with negative effects on piglet survival and postnatal growth and development are essential for the pig industry. Currently, special attention is given to variation in birth weight, as some evidences suggest an increased within-litter birth weight variation in modern sows. This variation has been shown to be associated with preweaning mortality, variable weights at weaning and deteriorated growth performance, which results in economic losses and lower efficiency. Therefore, understanding the factors that can influence the events that occur during gestation and that have an impact on the fetal growth and development are important to achieve better efficiency and also to develop strategies that can be used to achieve increased within-litter uniformity of piglet birth weight. This study concludes that even at a given placental size, fetal growth may vary because of differences in placental vascularization and efficiency. Feeding extra feed or energy during late gestation only marginally improves birth weight, and positive effects are not consistent between different studies. The detrimental effects of protein restriction on fetal growth during early gestation may be due to altered placental and endometrial angiogenesis and growth, which leads to a reduction in placental-fetal blood flow, nutrient supply from mother to the fetuses and ultimately to fetal growth retardation. The number of studies that attempted to influence within-litter birth weight variation by means of sow nutrition during gestation is limited. Therefore, more research concerning sow nutrition during gestation associated with the provision of balanced diets to meet requirements of the sows and fetuses are still required. This knowledge may subsequently provide starting points for the design of nutritional strategies that can influence within-litter birth variation.

Keywords

gestationsow nutritionwithin-litter variationamino acids
Type
Review
Information
animal , Volume 6 , Special Issue 5: Symposium “Sustainable animal production in the tropics” (SAPT), Guadeloupe, France, November 15–18, 2010 , May 2012 , pp. 797 - 806
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, LL 1975. Embryonic and placental development during prolonged inanition in the pig. American Journal Physiology 229, 1687–1694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashworth, CJ 1991. Effect of pre-mating nutritional status and post-mating progesterone supplementation on embryo survival and conceptus growth in gilts. Animal Reproduction Science 26, 311–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atinmo, T, Pond, WG, Barnes, RH 1974. Effect of maternal energy vs. protein restriction on growth and development of progeny in swine. Journal of Animal Science 39, 703–711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baidoo, SK, Aherne, FX, Kirkwood, RN, Foxcroft, GR 1992. Effect of feed intake during lactation and after weaning on sow reproductive performance. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 72, 911–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, RO, Samuel, RS, Moehn, S 2008. Nutrient requirements of prolific sows. Advances in Pork Production 19, 223–236.Google Scholar
Battaglia, FC 2000. Glutamine and glutamate exchange between the fetal liver and the placenta. Journal of Nutrition 130, 974–977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bee, G 2004. Effect of early gestation feeding, birth weight, and gender of progeny on muscle fiber characteristics of pigs at slaughter. Journal of Animal Science 82, 826–836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biensen, NJ, Wilson, ME, Ford, SP 1998. The impact of either a Meishan or Yorkshire uterus on Meishan or Yorkshire fetal and placental development to days 70, 90, and 110 of gestation. Journal of Animal Science 76, 2169–2176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buitrago, JA, Maner, JH, Gallo, JT, Pond, WG 1974. Effect of dietary energy in gestation on reproductive performance of gilts. Journal of Animal Science 39, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cerisuelo, A, Sala, R, Gasa, J, Chapinal, N, Carrion, D, Coma, J, Baucells, MD 2008. Effects of extra feeding during mid-pregnancy on gilts productive and reproductive performance. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 6, 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christenson, RK 1993. Ovulation rate and embryonic survival in Chinese Meishan and white crossbred pigs. Journal of Animal Science 71, 3060–3066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cromwell, GL, Hall, DD, Clawson, AJ, Combs, GE, Knabe, DA, Maxwell, CV, Noland, PR, Orr, DE Jr, Prince, TJ 1989. Effects of additional feed during late gestation on reproductive performance of sows: a cooperative study. Journal of Animal Science 67, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeMarco, V, McCain, MD, Strauss, D, Chakrabarti, R, Neu, J 1997. Characterization of glutamine synthetase transcript, protein, and enzyme activity in the human placenta. Placenta 18, 541–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dwyer, CM, Stickland, NC, Fletcher, JM 1994. The influence of maternal nutrition on muscle fiber number development in the porcine fetus and on subsequent postnatal growth. Journal of Animal Science 72, 911–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dyck, GW, Palmer, WM, Simaraks, S 1980. Progesterone and luteinizing hormone concentration in serum of pregnant gilts on different levels of feed consumption. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 60, 877–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, EM, Slevin, J, Edwards, SA, Hunter, MG, Ashworth, CJ 2006. Effect of alterations in the quantity and composition of the pre-mating diet on embryo survival and foetal growth in the pig. Animal Reproduction Science 96, 89–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flynn, NE, Meininger, CJ, Haynes, TE, Wu, G 2002. The metabolic basis of arginine nutrition and pharmacotherapy. Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy 56, 427–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, SP 1995. Control of blood flow to the gravid uterus of domestic livestock species. Journal of Animal Science 73, 1852–1860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, SP 1997. Embryonic and fetal development in different genotypes in pigs. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 52, 165–176.Google ScholarPubMed
Ford, SP, Vonnahme, KA, Wilson, ME 2002. Uterine capacity in the pig reflects a combination of uterine environment and conceptus genotype effects. Journal of Animal Science 80, 66–73.Google Scholar
Foxcroft, G 2008. Hyper-prolificacy and acceptable postnatal development – a possible contradiction. Advances in Pork Production 19, 205–211.Google Scholar
Foxcroft, GR, Dixon, WT, Novak, S, Putman, CT, Town, SC, Vinsky, MD 2006. The biological basis for prenatal programming of postnatal performance in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 84, 105–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gatford, KL, Ekert, JE, Blackmore, K, De Blasio, MJ, Boyce, JM, Owens, JA, Campbell, RG, Owens, PC 2003. Variable maternal nutrition and growth hormone treatment in the second quarter of pregnancy in pigs alter semitendinosus muscle in adolescent progeny. British Journal of Nutrition 90, 283–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gondret, F, Lefaucheur, L, Louveau, I, Lebret, B, Pichodo, X, Le Cozler, Y 2005. Influence of piglet birth weight on postnatal growth performance, tissue lipogenic capacity and muscle histological traits at market weight. Livestock Production Science 93, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herpin, P, Damon, M, Le Dividich, J 2002. Development of thermoregulation and neonatal survival in pigs. Livestock Production Science 78, 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jindal, R, Cosgrove, JR, Aherne, FX, Foxcroft, GR 1996. Effect of nutrition on embryonal mortality in gilts: association with progesterone. Journal of Animal Science 74, 620–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, SW, Wu, G, Baker, DH 2005. Amino acid nutrition of breeding sows during gestation and lactation. Pig News Inform 26, 89–99.Google Scholar
Kim, SW, Hurley, WL, Wu, G, Ji, F 2009. Ideal amino acid balance for sows during gestation and lactation. Journal of Animal Science 87, 123–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkwood, RN, Baidoo, SK, Aherne, FX 1990. The influence of feeding level during lactation and gestation on the endocrine status and reproductive performance of second parity sows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 70, 1119–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kongsted, AG 2005. A review of the effect of energy intake on pregnancy rate and litter size-discussed in relation to group-housed non-lactating sows. Livestock Production Science 97, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawlor, PG, Lynch, PB, O'Connell, MK, McNamara, L, Reid, P, Stickland, NC 2007. The influence of over feeding sows during gestation on reproductive performance and pig growth to slaughter. Archives of Animal Breeding 50 (special issue), 82–91.Google Scholar
Lehninger, AL, Nelson, DL, Cox, MM 1993. Principles of Biochemistry, 2nd edition. Worth Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
Liao, CW, Veum, TL 1994. Effects of dietary energy intake by gilts and heat stress from days 3 to 24 or 30 after mating on embryo survival and nitrogen and energy balance. Journal of Animal Science 72, 2369–2377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lund, MS, Puonti, M, Rydhmer, L, Jensen, J 2002. Relationship between litter size and perinatal and pre-weaning survival in pigs. Animal Science 74, 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahan, DC 1998. Relationship of gestation protein and feed intake level over a five-parity period using a high-producing sow genotype. Journal of Animal Science 76, 533–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateo, RD, Wu, G, Bazer, FW, Park, JC, Shinzato, I, Kim, SW 2007. Dietary l-arginine supplementation enhances the reproductive performance of gilts. Journal of Nutrition 137, 652–656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McPherson, RL, Ji, F, Wu, G, Blanton, JR Jr, Kim, SW 2004. Growth and compositional changes of fetal tissues in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 82, 2534–2540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merks, JWM 2000. One century of genetic change in pigs and the future needs. In The challenge of genetic change in animal production (ed. WG Hill, SC Bishop, B McGuirk, JC McKay, G Simm and AJ Webb), BSAS occasional publication no. 27, 8–19. British Society of Animal Science, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Miller, HM, Foxcroft, GR, Aherne, FX 2000. Increasing food intake in late gestation improved sow condition throughout lactation but did not affect piglet viability or growth rate. Animal Science 71, 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musser, RE, Davis, DL, Tokach, MD, Nelssen, JL, Dritz, SS, Goodband, RD 2006. Effects of high feed intake during early gestation on sow performance and offspring growth and carcass characteristics. Animal Feed Science and Technology 127, 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 1988. Nutrients requirements of swine, 9th edition. National Academic of Science, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Neu, J 2001. Glutamine in the fetus and critically ill low birth weight neonate: metabolism and mechanism of action. Journal of Nutrition 131, 2585–2589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nissen, PM, Danielsen, VO, Jorgensen, PF, Oksbjerg, N 2003. Increased maternal nutrition of sows has no beneficial effects on muscle fiber number or postnatal growth and has no impact on the meat quality of the offspring. Journal of Animal Science 81, 3018–3027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noblet, J, Close, WH, Heavens, RP, Brown, D 1985. Studies on the energy metabolism of the pregnant sow. I. Uterus and mammary tissue development. British Journal of Nutrition 53, 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pere, MC, Etienne, M 2000. Uterine blood flow in sows: effects of pregnancy stage and litter size. Reproduction Nutrition Development 40, 369–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petters, RM, Johnson, BH, Reed, ML, Archibong, AE 1990. Glucose, glutamine and inorganic phosphate in early development of the pig embryo in vitro. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 89, 269–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pluske, JR, Williams, IH, Aherne, FX 1995. Nutrition of the neonatal pig. In The neonatal pig: development and survival (ed. MA Varley), pp. 187–235. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Pond, WG, Yen, JT, Maurer, RR, Christenson, RK 1981. Effect of doubling daily energy intake during the last two weeks of pregnancy on pig birth weight, survival and weaning weight. Journal of Animal Science 52, 535–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pond, WG, Maurer, RR, Mersmann, HJ, Cummins, S 1992. Response of fetal and newborn piglets to maternal protein restriction during early or late pregnancy. Growth Development and Aging 56, 115–127.Google ScholarPubMed
Prime, GR, Varley, MA, Symonds, HW 1988. The effect of food intake during lactation and early pregnancy on plasma progesterone concentrations and prolificacy in multiparous sows. Animal Production 46, 499 [abstract].Google Scholar
Prunier, A, Quesnel, H 2000a. Nutritional influences on the hormonal control of reproduction in female pigs. Livestock Production Science 63, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prunier, A, Quesnel, H 2000b. Influence of the nutritional status on ovarian development in female pigs. Animal Reproduction Science 60–61, 185–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quesnel, H, Pasquier, A, Mounier, AM, Prunier, A 1998. Influence of feed restriction during lactation on gonadotropic hormones and ovarian development in primiparous sows. Journal of Animal Science 76, 856–863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quesnel, H, Brossard, L, Valancogne, A, Quiniou, N 2008. Influence of some sow characteristics on within-litter variation of piglet birth weight. Animal 2, 1842–1849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quesnel, H, Boulot, S, Serriere, S, Venturi, E, Martinat-Botté, F 2010. Post-insemination level of feeding does not influence embryonic survival and growth in highly prolific gilts. Animal Reproduction Science 120, 120–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quiniou, N, Dagorn, J, Gaudré, D 2002. Variation of piglets’ birth weight and consequences on subsequent performance. Livestock Production Science 78, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramaekers, P, Kemp, B, van der Lende, T 2006. Progenos in sows increases number of piglets born. Journal of Animal Science 84, 394 [abstract].Google Scholar
Redmer, DA, Wallace, JM, Reynolds, LP 2004. Effect of nutrient intake during pregnancy on fetal and placental growth and vascular development. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 27, 199–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rehfeldt, C, Kuhn, G 2006. Consequences of birth weight for postnatal growth performance and carcass quality in pigs as related to myogenesis. Journal of Animal Science 84, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, LP, Redmer, DA 2001. Angiogenesis in the placenta. Biology of Reproduction 64, 1033–1040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, LP, Ford, SP, Ferrell, CL 1985. Blood flow and steroid and nutrient uptake of the gravid uterus and fetus of sows. Journal Animal Science 61, 968–974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, LP, Killilea, SD, Redmer, DA 1992. Angiogenesis in the female reproductive system. FASEB Journal 6, 886–892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, J, Deen, J 1995. Conformance quality in pig production. The Compendium on Continuing Education for the Practicing Veterinarian 17, 1308–1311.Google Scholar
Schoknecht, PA, Newton, GR, Weise, DE, Pond, WG 1994. Protein restriction in early pregnancy alters fetal and placental growth and allantoic fluid proteins in swine. Theriogenology 42, 217–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Self, JT, Spencer, TE, Johnson, GA, Hu, J, Bazer, FW, Wu, G 2004. Glutamine synthesis in the developing porcine placenta. Biology of Reproduction 70, 1444–1451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sladek, SM, Magness, RR, Conrad, KP 1997. Nitric oxide and pregnancy. American Journal Physiology – Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology 272, 441–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sterling, LG, Cline, TR 1986. The effect of energy level in late gestation and lactation on the sow and litter: growth and reproductive performance. Journal of Animal Science 63, 115 [abstract].Google Scholar
Tribout, T, Caritez, JC, Gogué, J, Gruand, J, Billon, Y, Bouffaud, M, Lagant, H, Le Dividich, J, Thomas, F, Quesnel, H, Guéblez, R, Bidanel, JP 2003. Estimation, par utilisation de semence congelée, du progrès génétique réalisé en France entre 1977 et 1998 dans la race porcine Large White: Résultats pour quelques caractères de reproduction femelle. Journées de la Recherche Porcine en France 35, 285–292.Google Scholar
Van den Brand, H, Soede, NM, Kemp, B 2006. Supplementation of dextrose to the diet during the weaning to estrus interval affects subsequent variation in within-litter piglet birth weight. Animal Reproduction Science 91, 353–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Den Brand, H, Soede, NM, Schrama, JW, Kemp, B 1998. Effects of dietary energy source on plasma glucose and insulin concentration in gilts. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 79, 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Den Brand, H, Van Enckevort, LCM, Van Der Hoeven, EM, Kemp, B 2009. Effects of dextrose plus lactose in the sows diet on subsequent reproductive performance and within litter birth weight variation. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 44, 884–888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, C, Delcros, JG, Cannon, L, Konate, F, Carias, H, Biggerstaff, J, Gardner, RA, Phanstiel O, IV 2003. Defining the molecular requirements for the selective delivery of polyamine conjugates into cells containing active polyamine transporters. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 46, 5129–5138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, ME, Biensen, NJ, Youngs, CR, Ford, SP 1998. Development of Meishan and Yorkshire littermate conceptuses in either a Meishan or Yorkshire uterine environment to day 90 of gestation and to term. Biology of Reproduction 58, 905–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, J, Žáková, E, Groeneveld, E 2008. Within-litter variation of birth weight in hyperprolific Czech Large White sows and its relation to litter size traits, stillborn piglets and losses until weaning. Livestock Science 115, 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, G 2009. Amino acids: metabolism, functions, and nutrition. Amino Acids 37, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, G, Morris, SM Jr 1998. Arginine metabolism: nitric oxide and beyond. Biochemical Journal 336, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, G, Meier, SA, Knabe, DA 1996a. Dietary glutamine supplementation prevents jejunal atrophy in weaned pigs. Journal of Nutrition 126, 2578–2584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, G, Bazer, FW, Tuo, W, Flynn, SP 1996b. Unusual abundance of arginine and ornithine in porcine allantoic fluid. Biology of Reproduction 54, 1261–1265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, G, Ott, TL, Knabe, DA, Bazer, FW 1999. Amino acid composition of the fetal pig. Journal of Nutrition 129, 1031–1038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, G, Bazer, FW, Wallace, JM, Spencer, TE 2006. Board-invited review: intrauterine growth retardation: implications for the animal sciences. Journal of Animal Science 84, 2316–2337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, G, Pond, WG, Flynn, SP, Ott, TL, Bazer, FW 1998. Maternal dietary protein deficiency decreases nitric oxide synthase and ornithine decarboxylase activities in placenta and endometrium of pigs during early gestation. Journal of Nutrition 128, 2395–2402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, G, Bazer, FW, Cudd, TA, Meininger, CJ, Spencer, TE 2004. Maternal nutrition and fetal development. Journal of Nutrition 134, 2169–2172.Google ScholarPubMed
Wu, G, Bazer, FW, Burghardt, RC, Johnson, GA, Kim, SW, Li, XL, Satterfield, MC, Spencer, TE 2010. Impacts of amino acid nutrition on pregnancy outcome in pigs: mechanisms and implications for swine production. Journal of Animal Science 88, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, G, Bazer, FW, Davis, TA, Jaeger, LA, Johnson, GA, Kim, SW, Knabe, DA, Meininger, CJ, Spencer, TE, Yin, Y-L 2007. Important roles for the arginine family of amino acids in swine nutrition and production. Livestock Science 112, 8–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zak, LJ, Cosgrove, JR, Aherne, FX, Foxcroft, GR 1997a. Pattern of feed intake and associated metabolic and endocrine changes differentially affect postweaning fertility in primiparous lactating sows. Journal of Animal Science 75, 208–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zak, LJ, Xu, X, Hardin, RT, Foxcroft, GR 1997b. Impact of different patterns of feed intake during lactation in the primiparous sow on follicular development and oocyte maturation. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 110, 99–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed