Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:20:11.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of soluble fiber inclusion in gestation diets with varying fermentation characteristics on lactational feed intake of sows over two successive parities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2017

C. Q. Tan ,
H. Q. Sun ,
H. K. Wei ,
J. J. Tan ,
G. Long ,
S. W. Jiang  and
J. Peng
C. Q. Tan
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, P.R. China Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, P.R. China
H. Q. Sun
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, P.R. China YangXiang Joint Stock Company, Guigang 53700, P.R. China
H. K. Wei
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, P.R. China
J. J. Tan
Affiliation:
YangXiang Joint Stock Company, Guigang 53700, P.R. China
G. Long
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, P.R. China
S. W. Jiang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Breeding and Genetics of the Agricultural Ministry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan430070, P.R. China
J. Peng*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, P.R. China The Cooperative Innovation Center for Sustainable Pig Production, Wuhan430070, P.R. China
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The effects of soluble fiber inclusion in gestation diets with varying fermentation characteristics (fermentation kinetics and short-chain fatty acids (SCFA)-profile) on lactational feed intake of sows and their piglet growth over two parities were investigated using an in vitro–in vivo methodology. After breeding, 90 multiparous Landrace sows were randomized to one of three experimental diets: the control (CON) diet, konjac flour (KF) diet or sugar beet pulp (SBP) diet. All diets had similar levels of net energy, CP, insoluble fiber and NDF, but KF and SBP diets had higher soluble fiber levels than the CON diet. During gestation, the sows were restrictively fed with three different diets, but during lactation, all the sows were similarly fed ad libitum. The three gestation diets were enzymatically hydrolyzed using pepsin and pancreatin, and enzymolyzed residues were used in in vitro fermentation. Gas and SCFA production were monitored during fermentation. After fermentation, enzymolyzed residues of KF or SBP diets resulted in higher final asymptotic gas volume than those of the CON diet. The enzymolyzed residues of KF diet were mainly part of rapidly fermented fractions, whereas those of SBP diet were mainly part of slowly fermented fractions. In addition, the acetic acid, butyric acid and total SCFA concentrations of enzymolyzed residues of KF diet were higher (P<0.01) than the control and SBP diets. In the in vivo studies, on day 90 of gestation, the KF diet sows had higher plasma SCFA concentration (P<0.05) at 4 h after feeding than the CON diet sows. Furthermore, the KF diet sows had lower plasma free fatty acid (FFA) concentration (P<0.01) at 4 h after feeding, and a lower value of homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-insulin resistance (P<0.05), but a higher value of HOMA-insulin sensitivity (P<0.01). The KF diet sows also consumed more feed during lactation (P<0.01) and weaned significantly heavier pigs (P<0.01) than the CON diet sows. The overall results showed that the high fermentation capacity KF diet contributed to an increased lactational feed intake and improved performance of piglets in the second reproductive cycle.

Keywords

fermentationinsulin sensitivitylactational feed intakesoluble fibersow
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 12 , Issue 7 , July 2018 , pp. 1388 - 1395
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 1999. Official methods of analysis, 16th edition, 5th revised. AOAC, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Bonora, E, Targher, G, Alberiche, M, Bonadonna, RC, Saggiani, F, Zenere, MB, Monauni, T and Muggeo, M 2000. Homeostasis model assessment closely mirrors the glucose clamp technique in the assessment of insulin sensitivity: studies in subjects with various degrees of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Care 23, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosch, G, Pellikaan, W, Rutten, P, van der Poel, A, Verstegen, M and Hendriks, W 2008. Comparative in vitro fermentation activity in the canine distal gastrointestinal tract and fermentation kinetics of fiber sources. Journal of Animal Science 86, 2979–2989.Google Scholar
Brouns, F, Kettlitz, B and Arrigoni, E 2002. Resistant starch and ‘the butyrate revolution’. Trends in Food Science & Technology 13, 251–261.Google Scholar
Chen, H-L, Cheng, H-C, Liu, Y-J, Liu, S-Y and Wu, W-T 2006. Konjac acts as a natural laxative by increasing stool bulk and improving colonic ecology in healthy adults. Nutrition 22, 1112–1119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chua, M, Baldwin, TC, Hocking, TJ and Chan, K 2010. Traditional uses and potential health benefits of Amorphophallus konjac K. Koch ex N.E.Br. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 128, 268–278.Google Scholar
Da, SC, Jj, VDB, Gerrits, WJ, Kemp, B and Bolhuis, JE 2013. Effects of dietary fibers with different physicochemical properties on feeding motivation in adult female pigs. Physiology & Behavior 110–111, 148–157.Google Scholar
Fang, Z, Peng, J, Tang, T, Liu, Z, Dai, J and Jin, L 2007. Xylanase supplementation improved digestibility and performance of growing pigs fed Chinese double-low rapeseed meal inclusion diets: in vitro and in vivo studies. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 20, 1721–1728.Google Scholar
Fernandes, J, Vogt, J and Wolever, TM 2012. Intravenous acetate elicits a greater free fatty acid rebound in normal than hyperinsulinaemic humans. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 66, 1029–1034.Google Scholar
Isken, F, Klaus, S, Osterhoff, M, Pfeiffer, AF and Weickert, MO 2010. Effects of long-term soluble vs. insoluble dietary fiber intake on high-fat diet-induced obesity in C57BL/6J mice. The Journal of nutritional biochemistry 21, 278–284.Google Scholar
Jha, R, Bindelle, J, Van Kessel, A and Leterme, P 2011. In vitro fibre fermentation of feed ingredients with varying fermentable carbohydrate and protein levels and protein synthesis by colonic bacteria isolated from pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 165, 191–200.Google Scholar
Jonathan, MC, Haenen, D, Souza da Silva, C, Bosch, G, Schols, HA and Gruppen, H 2013. Influence of a diet rich in resistant starch on the degradation of non-starch polysaccharides in the large intestine of pigs. Carbohydrate Polymers 93, 232–239.Google Scholar
Judlyn, F, Janet, V and Wolever Thomas, MS 2011. Inulin increases short-term markers for colonic fermentation similarly in healthy and hyperinsulinemic humans. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 65, 1279–1286.Google Scholar
Knudsen, KEB, Hedemann, MS and Lærke, HN 2012. The role of carbohydrates in intestinal health of pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 173, 41–53.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, G and Macfarlane, S 1993. Factors affecting fermentation reactions in the large bowel. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 52, 367–373.Google Scholar
Mosnier, E, Le Floc’h, N, Etienne, M, Ramaekers, P, Seve, B and Pere, MC 2010. Reduced feed intake of lactating primiparous sows is associated with increased insulin resistance during the peripartum period and is not modified through supplementation with dietary tryptophan. Journal of Animal Science 88, 612–625.Google Scholar
National Research Council 2012. Nutrient requirements of swine, 11th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Onishi, N, Kawamoto, S, Ueda, K, Yamanaka, Y, Katayama, A, Suzuki, H, Aki, T, Hashimoto, K, Hide, M and Ono, K 2007. Dietary pulverized konjac glucomannan prevents the development of allergic rhinitis-like symptoms and IgE response in mice. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry 71, 2551–2556.Google Scholar
Pere, MC and Etienne, M 2007. Insulin sensitivity during pregnancy, lactation, and postweaning in primiparous gilts. Journal of Animal Science 85, 101–110.Google Scholar
Regmi, PR, van Kempen, TA, Matte, JJ and Zijlstra, RT 2011. Starch with high amylose and low in vitro digestibility increases short-chain fatty acid absorption, reduces peak insulin secretion, and modulates incretin secretion in pigs. The Journal of Nutrition 141, 398–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schenk, S, Saberi, M and Olefsky, JM 2008. Insulin sensitivity: modulation by nutrients and inflammation. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 118, 2992–3002.Google Scholar
Sun, H, Tan, C, Wei, H, Zou, Y, Long, G, Ao, J, Xue, H, Jiang, S and Peng, J 2015. Effects of different amounts of konjac flour inclusion in gestation diets on physio-chemical properties of diets, postprandial satiety in pregnant sows, lactation feed intake of sows and piglet performance. Animal Reproduction Science 152, 55–64.Google Scholar
Sun, HQ, Zhou, YF, Tan, CQ, Zheng, LF, Peng, J and Jiang, SW 2014. Effects of konjac flour inclusion in gestation diets on the nutrient digestibility, lactation feed intake and reproductive performance of sows. Animal 8, 1089–1094.Google Scholar
Tan, C, Wei, H, Ao, J, Long, G and Peng, J 2016a. Konjac flour inclusion in gestation diet changes gut microbiota, alleviates oxidative stress, and improves insulin sensitivity in sows. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 82, 01374–01316.Google Scholar
Tan, C, Wei, H, Zhao, X, Xu, C, Zhou, Y and Peng, J 2016b. Soluble fiber with high water-binding capacity, swelling capacity, and fermentability reduces food intake by promoting satiety rather than satiation in rats. Nutrients 8, 15.Google Scholar
Tan, C, Wei, H, Sun, H, Ao, J, Long, G, Jiang, S and Peng, J 2015a. Effects of dietary supplementation of oregano essential oil to sows on oxidative stress status, lactation feed intake of sows, and piglet performance. BioMed Research International 2015, 1–9.Google Scholar
Tan, CQ, Wei, HK, Sun, HQ, Long, G, Ao, JT, Jiang, SW and Peng, J 2015b. Effects of supplementing sow diets during two gestations with konjac flour and Saccharomyces boulardii on constipation in peripartal period, lactation feed intake and piglet performance. Animal Feed Science & Technology 210, 254–262.Google Scholar
Tarini, J and Wolever, TM 2010. The fermentable fibre inulin increases postprandial serum short-chain fatty acids and reduces free-fatty acids and ghrelin in healthy subjects. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 35, 9–16.Google Scholar
Van den Brand, H, Heetkamp, M, Soede, N, Schrama, J and Kemp, B 2000. Energy balance of lactating primiparous sows as affected by feeding level and dietary energy source. Journal of Animal Science 78, 1520–1528.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Wang, M, Tang, S and Tan, Z 2011. Modeling in vitro gas production kinetics: derivation of logistic–exponential (LE) equations and comparison of models. Animal Feed Science and Technology 165, 137–150.Google Scholar
Wang, M, Sun, X, Tang, S, Tan, Z and Pacheco, D 2013. Deriving fractional rate of degradation of logistic-exponential (LE) model to evaluate early in vitro fermentation. Animal 7, 920–929.Google Scholar
Williams, BA, Bosch, MW, Boer, H, Verstegen, MW and Tamminga, S 2005. An in vitro batch culture method to assess potential fermentability of feed ingredients for monogastric diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 123, 445–462.Google Scholar
Zheng, Y, Lee, C, Yu, C, Cheng, YS, Zhang, R, Jenkins, BM and Vandergheynst, JS 2013. Dilute acid pretreatment and fermentation of sugar beet pulp to ethanol. Applied Energy 105, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Tan et al supplementary material

Tan et al supplementary material 1

Download Tan et al supplementary material(File)
File 17.3 KB