Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:58:15.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of pre-weaning housing in a multi-suckling system on performance and carbohydrate absorption of relatively light and heavy piglets around weaning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2017

S. E. van Nieuwamerongen ,
J. E. Bolhuis ,
C. M. C. van der Peet-Schwering ,
B. Kemp  and
N. M. Soede
S. E. van Nieuwamerongen
Affiliation:
Adaptation Physiology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
J. E. Bolhuis
Affiliation:
Adaptation Physiology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
C. M. C. van der Peet-Schwering
Affiliation:
Wageningen Livestock Research, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
B. Kemp
Affiliation:
Adaptation Physiology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
N. M. Soede*
Affiliation:
Adaptation Physiology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The low feed intake and stress associated with abrupt weaning in conventional pig farming often result in poor post-weaning performance, which is related to impaired intestinal function. We investigated effects of housing conditions before weaning on performance around weaning of relatively light and heavy piglets. Before weaning, piglets were housed either with five sows and their litters in a multi-suckling (MS) system or in pens with individually housed sows in farrowing crates (FC). After weaning at 4 weeks of age (day 0), 16 groups of four piglets (two light and two heavy litter-mates) were housed under equal conditions in enriched pens. Mannitol (day −5 and day 5) and galactose (day 5) were orally administered as markers for gastrointestinal carbohydrate absorption, and after 20 min a blood sample was taken (sugar absorption test). In addition, BW, feed intake and faecal consistency as an indicator for diarrhoea, were assessed frequently during 2 weeks post-weaning. Pre-weaning housing, weight class and their interaction did not affect post-weaning faecal consistency scores. Weight gain over 2 weeks did not differ between pre-weaning housing treatments, but MS piglets gained more (0.67±0.12 kg) than FC piglets (0.39±0.16 kg) between days 2 and 5 post-weaning, P=0.02), particularly in the ‘heavy’ weight class (interaction, P=0.04), whereas feed intake was similar for both treatments. This indicates a better utilisation of the ingested feed of the MS piglets compared with the FC piglets in the early post-weaning period. Pre-weaning mannitol concentrations were unaffected by pre-weaning housing, weight class and their interaction. On day 5 post-weaning, however, MS piglets had a lower plasma concentration of mannitol (320 v. 592 nmol/ml, SEM=132, P=0.04) and galactose (91 v. 157 nmol/ml, SEM=20, P=0.04) than FC piglets, regardless of weight class. In conclusion, MS and FC piglets differed in aspects of post-weaning gastrointestinal carbohydrate absorption and in weight gain between days 2 and 5 after weaning, but pre-weaning housing did not affect feed intake, weight gain and measures of faecal consistency over the first 2 weeks after weaning.

Keywords

intestinal functiongroup housingmulti-suckling systempigsweaning
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , April 2018 , pp. 802 - 809
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berkeveld, M, Langendijk, P, van Beers-Schreurs, HM, Koets, AP, Taverne, MA and Verheijden, JH 2007. Postweaning growth check in pigs is markedly reduced by intermittent suckling and extended lactation. Journal of Animal Science 85, 258–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkeveld, M, Langendijk, P, Verheijden, JHM, Taverne, MAM, Van Nes, A, Van Haard, P and Koets, AP 2008. Citrulline and intestinal fatty-acid binding protein: longitudinal markers of postweaning small intestinal function in pigs? Journal of Animal Science 86, 3440–3449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolhuis, JE, Schouten, WGP, Schrama, JW and Wiegant, VM 2006. Effects of rearing and housing environment on behaviour and performance of pigs with different coping characteristics. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101, 68–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudry, G, Lallès, JP, Malbert, CH, Bobillier, E and Sève, B 2002. Diet-related adaptation of the small intestine at weaning in pigs is functional rather than structural. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 34, 180–187.Google ScholarPubMed
Boudry, G, Péron, V, Luron, I, Lallès, J and Sève, B 2004. Weaning induces transient and long-lasting modifications of absorptive and secretory properties and epithelial barrier function of piglet intestine. Journal of Nutrition 134, 2256–2262.Google Scholar
Bruininx, EMAM, Binnendijk, GP, Van Der Peet-Schwering, CMC, Schrama, JW, Den Hartog, LA, Everts, H and Beynen, AC 2002. Effect of creep feed consumption on individual feed intake characteristics and performance of group-housed weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science 80, 1413–1418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruininx, EMAM, Van Der Peet-Schwering, CMC, Schrama, JW, Vereijken, PFG, Vesseur, PC, Everts, H, Den Hartog, LA and Beynen, AC 2001. Individually measured feed intake characteristics and growth performance of group-housed weanling pigs: effects of sex, initial body weight, and body weight distribution within groups. Journal of Animal Science 79, 301–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carey, HV, Hayden, UL and Tucker, KE 1994. Fasting alters basal and stimulated ion transport in piglet jejunum. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 267, R156–R163.Google Scholar
English, JGH and Bilkei, G 2004. The effect of litter size and littermate weight on pre-weaning performance of low-birth-weight piglets that have been cross-fostered. Animal Science 79, 439–443.Google Scholar
Hampson, DJ 1986. Alterations in piglet small intestinal structure at weaning. Research in Veterinary Science 40, 32–40.Google Scholar
Heo, M, Opapeju, FO, Pluske, JR, Kim, JC, Hampson, DJ and Nyachoti, CM 2013. Gastrointestinal health and function in weaned pigs: a review of feeding strategies to control post-weaning diarrhoea without using in-feed antimicrobial compounds. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 97, 207–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, CH, Xiao, K, Luan, ZS and Song, J 2013. Early weaning increases intestinal permeability, alters expression of cytokine and tight junction proteins, and activates mitogen-activated protein kinases in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 91, 1094–1101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurley, WL 2015. Composition of sow colostrum and milk. In The gestating and lactating sow (ed. C Farmer), pp. 193–229. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Krugliak, P, Hollander, D, Schlaepfer, CC, Nguyen, H and Ma, TY 1994. Mechanisms and sites of mannitol permeability of small and large intestine in the rat. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 39, 796–801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuller, WI, van Beers-Schreurs, HMG, Soede, NM, Langendijk, P, Taverne, MAM, Kemp, B and Verheijden, JHM 2007. Creep feed intake during lactation enhances net absorption in the small intestine after weaning. Livestock Science 108, 99–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menard, S, Cerf-Bensussan, N and Heyman, M 2010. Multiple facets of intestinal permeability and epithelial handling of dietary antigens. Mucosal Immunology 3, 247–259.Google Scholar
Meyer, E 2008. Influence of creep feeding during the suckling period on daily gain of piglets after weaning depending on body condition and feeding techniques. Zuchtungskunde 80, 224–232.Google Scholar
Miller, H and Slade, R 2003. Digestive physiology of the weaned pig. In Weaning the pig: concepts and consequences (ed. J Pluske, J Le Dividich and M Verstegen), pp. 117–144. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Moeser, AJ, Klok, CV, Ryan, KA, Wooten, JG, Little, D, Cook, VL and Blikslager, AT 2007. Stress signaling pathways activated by weaning mediate intestinal dysfunction in the pig. American Journal of Physiology – Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 292, G173–G181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, CA, Lawrence, AB, Chirnside, J and Deans, LA 2001. Can information about solid food be transmitted from one piglet to another? Animal Science 73, 471–478.Google Scholar
Munsterhjelm, C, Peltoniemi, OAT, Heinonen, M, Hälli, O, Karhapää, M and Valros, A 2009. Experience of moderate bedding affects behaviour of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 118, 42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, CJ and Pope, SJ 1994. Social learning in sibling pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 40, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oostindjer, M, Bolhuis, JE, Mendl, M, Held, S, van den Brand, H and Kemp, B 2011. Learning how to eat like a pig: effectiveness of mechanisms for vertical social learning in piglets. Animal Behaviour 82, 503–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oostindjer, M, Kemp, B, van den Brand, H and Bolhuis, JE 2014. Facilitating ‘learning from mom how to eat like a pig’ to improve welfare of piglets around weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 160, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pajor, EA, Fraser, D and Kramer, DL 1991. Consumption of solid food by suckling pigs: individual variation and relation to weight gain. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32, 139–155.Google Scholar
Pluske, JR, Hampson, DJ and Williams, IH 1997. Factors influencing the structure and function of the small intestine in the weaned pig: a review. Livestock Production Science 51, 215–236.Google Scholar
Spreeuwenberg, M, Verdonk, J, Gaskins, H and Verstegen, M 2001. Small intestine epithelial barrier function is compromised in pigs with low feed intake at weaning. Journal of Nutrition 131, 1520–1527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sulabo, RC, Jacela, JY, Tokach, MD, Dritz, SS, Goodband, RD, Derouchey, JM and Nelssen, JL 2010. Effects of lactation feed intake and creep feeding on sow and piglet performance. Journal of Animal Science 88, 3145–3153.Google Scholar
Turpin, DL, Langendijk, P, Chen, T-Y and Pluske, JR 2016. Intermittent suckling in combination with an older weaning age improves growth, feed intake and aspects of gastrointestinal tract carbohydrate absorption in pigs after weaning. Animals 6, 66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Beers-Schreurs, HM, Nabuurs, MJ, Vellenga, L, Kalsbeek-van der Valk, HJ, Wensing, T and Breukink, HJ 1998. Weaning and the weanling diet influence the villous height and crypt depth in the small intestine of pigs and alter the concentrations of short-chain fatty acids in the large intestine and blood. Journal of Nutrition 128, 947–953.Google Scholar
van Nieuwamerongen, SE, Soede, NM, van der Peet-Schwering, CMC, Kemp, B and Bolhuis, JE 2015. Development of piglets raised in a new multi-litter housing system vs. conventional single-litter housing until 9 weeks of age. Journal of Animal Science 93, 5442–5454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vente-Spreeuwenberg, M and Beynen, A 2003. Diet-mediated modulation of small intestinal integrity in weaned piglets. In Weaning the pig: concepts and consequences (ed. J Pluske, J Le Dividich and M Verstegen), pp. 145–198. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Wijtten, PJ, van der Meulen, J and Verstegen, MW 2011. Intestinal barrier function and absorption in pigs after weaning: a review. British Journal of Nutrition 105, 967–981.Google Scholar