Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:05:54.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of immunization against GnRH on gonadotropins, the GH-IGF-I-axis and metabolic parameters in barrows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2008

A. Bauer ,
M. Lacorn ,
K. Danowski  and
R. Claus
A. Bauer
Affiliation:
Institut für Tierhaltung und Tierzüchtung, Universität Hohenheim, Garbenstr. 17, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
M. Lacorn
Affiliation:
Institut für Tierhaltung und Tierzüchtung, Universität Hohenheim, Garbenstr. 17, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
K. Danowski
Affiliation:
Institut für Tierhaltung und Tierzüchtung, Universität Hohenheim, Garbenstr. 17, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
R. Claus*
Affiliation:
Institut für Tierhaltung und Tierzüchtung, Universität Hohenheim, Garbenstr. 17, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Surgically castrated male piglets (barrows) reveal an increase in LH and a decrease in GH compared to untreated boars. Boars that were castrated by immunization against gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) have decreased LH but maintain GH. The difference in GH levels between barrows and immunological castrated boars cannot be explained by testicular steroids because they are low in surgical and immunocastrated boars as well. Therefore, differences in GH concentrations might be due to an interaction between GnRH and growth hormone releasing hormone (GRH) in the hypothalamus or the pituitary. This hypothesis was tested with twelve male piglets that had been castrated within 1 week postnatally and fitted with indwelling cephalic vein catheters at 17 weeks of age. They were split into a control group and an immunized group (each n = 6). Vaccination with Improvac® was performed at 18 and 22 weeks of age. Specific radioimmunoassays were used for hormone determinations (GH, LH, FSH, testosterone and IGF-I). Additionally, metabolic responses were evaluated by measuring analytical parameters that characterize protein synthesis and breakdown, and body fat content. The second vaccination led to a rapid decrease of LH below the limit of detection whereas FSH decreased more slowly, over a period of 5 weeks, from 2.2 to 0.5 ng/ml. This level of FSH, which corresponds to boar-specific concentrations, was maintained thereafter. GH decreased with increasing age but was not influenced by vaccination and remained at a low concentration typical for barrows. Similarly, IGF-I was not altered by vaccination. Consequently, metabolic status was not changed by immunization. It is concluded that the difference in GH levels between surgical and immunocastrated boars is not explained by an interaction between GnRH and GRH.

Keywords

pigGnRH immunizationmetabolismGHFSH
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 2 , Issue 8 , August 2008 , pp. 1215 - 1222
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Breier, BH, Gluckman, PD, Blair, HT, McCutcheon, SN 1989. Somatotrophic receptors in hepatic tissue of the developing male pig. Journal of Endocrinolgy 123, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Childs, GV 2000. Growth hormone cells as co-gonadotropes: partners in the regulation of reproductive system. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 11, 168–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Childs, GV, Unabia, G 1997. Cytochemical studies of the effects of activin on gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) binding by pituitary gonadotropes and growth hormone cells. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 45, 1603–1610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Childs, GV, Unabia, G, Wu, P 2000. Differential expression of growth hormone messenger ribonucleic acid by somatotropes and gonadotropes in male and cycling female rats. Endocrinology 141, 1560–1570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claus, R, Hoffmann, B 1980. Oestrogens, compared to other steroids of testicular origin, in bloodplasma of boars. Acta Endocrinologica 94, 404–411.Google Scholar
Claus, R, Weiler, U 1994. Endocrine regulation of growth and metabolism in the pig: a review. Livestock Production Science 37, 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claus, R, Bingel, A, Hofäcker, S, Weiler, U 1990. Twenty-four hour profiles of growth hormone (GH) concentrations in mature female and entire male domestic pigs in comparison with mature wild boars (Sus scrofa L.). Livestock Production Science 25, 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claus, R, Weiler, U, Hofäcker, S, Herzog, A, Meng, H 1992. Cycle dependent changes of growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and insulin in blood plasma of sows and their relation to progesterone and oestradiol. Growth Regulation 1, 115–121.Google Scholar
Claus, R, Lacorn, M, Danowski, K, Pearce, MC, Bauer, A 2007. Short term endocrine and metabolic reactions before and after second immunization against GnRH in boars. Vaccine 25, 4689–4696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunshea, FR, Colantoni, C, Howard, K, McCauley, I, Jackson, P, Long, KA, Lopaticki, S, Nugent, EA, Simons, JA, Walker, J, Hennessy, DP 2001. Vaccination of boars with a GnRH vaccine (Improvac) eliminates boar taint and increases growth performance. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2524–2535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eggum, BO 1989. Biochemical and methodological principles. In Protein metabolism in farm animals (ed. HD Bock, BO Eggum, AG Low, O Simon and T Zebrowska), pp. 1–52. Oxford University Press, Oxford, GB.Google Scholar
Gregory, SJ, Lacza, CT, Detz, AA, Xu, S, Petrillo, LA, Kaiser, UB 2005. Synergy between activin A and gonadotropin-releasing hormone in transcriptional activation of the rat follicle stimulating hormone-ß gene. Molecular Endocrinology 19, 237–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, BI 1942. Significance levels for the ratio of the mean square successive difference to the variance. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 13, 445–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansson, J-O, Ekberg, S, Isaksson, O, Mode, A, Gustafsson, J-A 1985. Imprinting of growth hormone secretion, body growth, and hepatic steroid metabolism by neonatal testosterone. Endocrinology 117, 1881–1889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kauffold, J, Schneider, F, Zaremba, W, Brüssow, K-P 2005. Lamprey GnRH-III stimulates FSH secretion in barrows. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 40, 475–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, MD, Macdonald, JG, Wise, T, Ford, JJ 1998. Positive association between expression of follicle-stimulating hormone ß and activin ß8-subunit genes in boars. Biology of Reproduction 59, 978–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z-H, Shintani, Y, Wakatsuki, M, Sakamoto, Y, Harada, K, Zhang, C-Y, Saito, S 1996. Regulation of immunoreactive activin A secretion from cultured rat anterior pituitary cells. Endocrine Journal 43, 39–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metz C 2003. Endokrine reaktionen von ebern auf die aktive Immunisierung gegen gonadotropin-releasing-hormon (GnRH). Diss. med. vet., Gießen, Germany.Google Scholar
Metz, C, Claus, R 2003. Active immunization of boars against GnRH does not affect growth hormone but lowers IGF-I in plasma. Livestock Production Science 81, 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, LF, Judge, MD, Schanbacher, BD 1990. Intramuscular collagen and serum hydroxyproline as related to implanted testosterone, dihydrotestosterone and estradiol-17ß in growing wethers. Journal of Animal Science 68, 1044–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, J von 1941. Distribution of the ratio of the mean square successive difference to the variance. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 12, 367–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oonk, HB, Turkstra, JA, Schaaper, WM, Erkens, M, Schuitemaker-de Weerd, MH, van Nes, A, Verheijden, JHM, Meloen, RH 1998. New GnRH-like peptide construct to optimize efficient immunocastration of male pigs by immunoneutralization of GnRH. Vaccine 16, 1074–1082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, RLS 1968. 5-α-Androst-16-en-3-one: compound responsible for taint in boar fat. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 19, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prunier, A, Bonneau, M 2006. Y a-t-il des alternatives à la castration chirurgicale des porcelets? Productions Animales 19, 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, HCB, Melrose, DR, Patterson, RLS 1974. Androgen steroids as an aid to the detection of oestrus in pig artificial insemination. British Veterinary Journal 130, 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzenberger, F, Toole, GS, Christie, HL, Raeside, JI 1993. Plasma levels of several androgens and estrogens from birth to puberty in male domestic pigs. Acta Endocrinologica 128, 173–177.Google ScholarPubMed
Shupnik, MA, Weck, J 1998. Hormonal and autocrine regulation of the gonadotropin genes. Current Opinion in Endocrinology and Diabetes 5, 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thun, R, Gajewski, Z, Janett, F 2006. Castration in male pigs: techniques and animal welfare issues. Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 57 (Suppl. 8), 189–194.Google ScholarPubMed
Turkstra, JA, Oonk, HB, Schaaper, WMM, Meloen, RH 2001. The role of individual amino acids of a GnRH tandem dimer peptide used as antigen for immunocastration of male piglets determined with systematic alanine replacements. Vaccine 20, 406–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turkstra, JA, Zeng, XY, van Diepen, JThM, Jongbloed, AW, Oonk, HB, van de Wiel, DFM, Meloen, RH 2002. Performance of male pigs immunized against GnRH is related to the time of onset of biological response. Journal of Animal Science 80, 2953–2959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, A, Claus, R 2004. Involvement of glucocorticoids in testicular involution after active immunization of boars against GnRH. Reproduction 127, 275–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waterlow, JC, Garlick, PJ, Millward, DJ 1978. General principles of the measurement of whole body protein turnover. In Turnover in mammalian tissues and in the whole body (ed. JC Waterlow, PJ Garlick and DJ Millward), pp. 225–249. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Zöls, S, Ritzmann, M, Heinritzi, K 2006. Effect of analgesics on castration of male piglets. Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 119, 193–196.Google ScholarPubMed