Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T21:17:12.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of feeding and rearing systems on growth, carcass composition and meat quality in pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

B. Lebret
B. Lebret*
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR 1079, Livestock Production Systems, Animal and Human Nutrition, F-35000 Rennes, France
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Animal growth performance and quality of pork depend on the interactive effects of pig genotype, rearing conditions, pre-slaughter handling, and carcass and meat processing. This paper focuses on the effects of feeding and rearing systems (feeding level and diet composition, housing, production system, etc.) on growth performance, carcass composition, and eating and technological qualities of pork. The feeding level and protein : energy ratio can be used to manipulate growth rate or composition of weight gain. Restricted feed allowance strongly reduces growth rate and carcass fatness and also intramuscular fat (IMF) level, resulting in decreased meat tenderness or juiciness. Expression of compensatory growth due to restricted followed by ad libitum feeding modifies the composition of weight gain at both carcass and muscle levels, and may improve meat tenderness due to higher in vivo protein turnover. Decreasing the protein : energy ratio of the diet actually increases IMF and improves eating quality, but gives fatter carcasses. In contrast, a progressive reduction in the protein : energy ratio leads to similar carcass composition at slaughter but with higher IMF. Technological meat traits (pH1, pHu, colour, drip loss) are generally not affected by the level or protein : energy in feed. Modification of fatty acid composition and antioxidant level in meat can be obtained through diet supplementations (e.g. vegetable sources with high n-3 fatty acids), thereby improving the nutritional quality of pork. Influences of pig rearing system on animal performance, carcass and meat traits result from interactive effects of housing (floor type, space allowance, ambient temperature, physical activity), feeding level and genotype in specific production systems. Indoor enrichment (more space, straw bedding) generally increases growth rate and carcass fatness, and may improve meat juiciness or flavour through higher IMF. Outdoor rearing and organic production system have various effects on growth rate and carcass fatness, depending on climatic conditions and feed allowance. Influence on meat quality is also controversial: higher drip and lower pHu and tenderness have been reported, whereas some studies show improved meat juiciness with outdoor rearing. Discrepancies are likely due to differences between studies in rearing conditions and physiological responses of pigs to pre-slaughter handling. Specific production systems of the Mediterranean area based on local breeds (low growth rate, high adiposity) and free-range finishing (pasture, forests), which allows pig to express their genetic potential for IMF deposition, clearly demonstrate the positive effects of genotype × rearing system interactions on the quality of pork and pork products.

Keywords

pigsfeedingrearing conditionscarcass compositionmeat quality
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 2 , Issue 10 , October 2008 , pp. 1548 - 1558
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andres, AI, Cava, R, Mayoral, AI, Tejeda, JF, Morcuende, D, Ruiz, J 2001. Oxidative stability and fatty acid composition of pig muscles as affected by rearing system, crossbreeding and metabolic type of muscle fibre. Meat Science 59, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton-Gade PA 2008. Effect of rearing system and mixing at loading on transport and lairage behaviour and meat quality: comparison of outdoor and conventionally raised pigs. Animal 2, 902–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, VE, O’Connell, NE, Moss, BW 2000. Influence of environmental enrichment on the behaviour, performance and meat quality of domestic pigs. Livestock Production Science 65, 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bee, G, Guex, G, Herzog, W 2004. Free-range rearing of pigs during the winter: adaptations in muscle fiber characteristics and effects on adipose tissue composition and meat quality traits. Journal of Animal Science 82, 1206–1218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bikker, P, Verstegen, MWA, Kemp, B, Bosch, MW 1996. Performance and body composition of finishing gilts (45 to 85 kilograms) as affected by energy intake and nutrition in earlier life: I. Growth of the body and body components. Journal of Animal Science 74, 806–816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, RG, Taverner, MR, Curic, DM 1983. Effects of feeding level from 20 to 45 kg on the performance and carcass composition of pigs grown to 90 kg live weight. Livestock Production Science 10, 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candek-Potokar, M, Lefaucheur, L, Zlender, B, Bonneau, M 1998. Effects of age and/or weight at slaughter on pig longissimus dorsi muscle: biochemical traits and sensory quality in pigs. Meat Science 48, 287–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Candek-Potokar, M, Lefaucheur, L, Zlender, B, Bonneau, M 1999. Effect of slaughter weight and/or age on histological characteristics of pig longissimus dorsi muscle as related to meat quality. Meat Science 52, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castell, AG, Cliplef, RL, Poste-Flynn, LM, Butler, G 1994. Performance, carcass and pork characteristics of castrates and gilts self-fed diets differing in protein content and lysine : energy ratio. Canandian Journal of Animal Science 74, 519–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cava, R, Ventanas, J, Ruiz, J, Andres, AI, Antequera, T 2000. Sensory characteristics of Iberian ham: influence of rearing system and muscle location. Food Science and Technology International 6, 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheah, KS, Cheah, AM, Krausgrill, DI 1995. Effect on dietary supplementation of vitamin E on pig meat quality. Meat Science 39, 255–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cisneros, R, Ellis, M, Baker, DH, Easter, RA, McKeith, FK 1996. The influence of short-term feeding of amino-acid deficient diets and high dietary leucine levels on the intramuscular fat content of pig muscle. Animal Science 63, 517–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daza, A, Lopez-Bote, CJ 2007. Modèles de production pour l’obtention de produits secs de qualité en Espagne. Journées de la Recherche Porcine 39, 325–330.Google Scholar
De Jong, IC, Prelle, IT, Van de Burgwal, JA, Lambooij, E, Korte, SM, Blokhuis, HJ, Koolhaas, JM 2000. Effects of rearing conditions on behavioural and physiological responses of pigs to preslaughter hanling and mixing transport. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 80, 451–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVol, DL, McKeith, FK, Bechtel, PJ, Novakofski, FK, Shanks, RD, Carr, TR 1988. Variation in composition and palatability traits and relationships between muscle characteristics and palatability in a random sample of pork carcasses. Journal of Animal Science 66, 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dransfield, E, Ngapo, TM, Nielsen, NA, Bredahl, L, Sjöden, PO, Magnusson, M, Campo, MM, Nute, GR 2005. Consumer choice and suggested price for pork as influenced by its appearance, taste and information concerning country of origin and organic pig production. Meat Science 69, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, SA 2005. Product quality attributes associated with outdoor pig production. Livestock Production Science 94, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, SA, Casabianca, F 1997. Perception and reality of product quality from outdoor pig production systems in Northern and Southern Europe. In Livestock farming systems: more than food production (ed. JT Sorensen), pp. 145–156. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Ellis, M, Webb, AJ, Avery, PJ, Brown, I 1996. The influence of terminal sire genotype, sex, slaughter weight, feeding regime and slaughter-house on growth performance and carcass and meat quality in pigs and on the organoleptic properties of fresh pork. Animal Science 62, 521–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfält, AC, Lundström, K, Hansson, I, Lundeheim, N, Nyström, PE 1997. Effects of outdoor rearing and sire breed (Duroc or Yorkshire) on carcass composition and sensory and technological meat quality. Meat Science 45, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Essén-Gustavsson, B, Karlsson, A, Lundström, K, Enfält, AC 1994. Intramuscular fat and muscle lipid contents in halothane-gene-free pigs fed high or low protein diets and its relation to meat quality. Meat Science 38, 269–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandez, X, Monin, G, Talmant, A, Mourot, J, Lebret, B 1999. Influence of intramuscular fat content on the quality of pig meat – 1. Composition of the lipid fraction and sensory characteristics of m. longissimus lumborum. Meat Science 53, 59–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flanzy, J, François, AC, Rerat, A 1970. Utilisation métabolique des acides gras chez le porc. Annales de Biologie Animale, Biochimie et Biophysique 10, 603–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandemer, G, Pichou, D, Bouguennec, B, Caritez, JC, Berge, P, Briand, E, Legault, C 1990. Influence du système d’élevage et du génotype sur la composition chimique et les qualités organoleptiques du muscle long dorsal chez le porc. Journées de la Recherche Porcine en France 22, 101–110.Google Scholar
Gentry, JG, McGlone, JJ, Blanton, JR, Miller, MF 2002a. Alternative housing systems for pigs: influences on growth, composition and pork quality. Journal of Animal Science 80, 1781–1790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentry, JG, McGlone, JJ, Miller, MF, Blanton, JR 2002b. Diverse birth and rearing environment effects on pig growth and meat quality. Journal of Animal Science 80, 1707–1715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geverink, NA, De Jong, IC, Lambooij, E, Blokhuis, HJ, Wiegant, VM 1999. Influence of housing conditions on responses of pigs to preslaughter treatment and consequences for meat quality. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 79, 285–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gondret, F, Lebret, B 2002. Feeding intensity and dietary protein level affect adipocyte cellularity and lipogenic capacity of muscle homogenates in growing pigs, without modification of the expression of sterol regulatory element binding protein. Journal of Animal Science 80, 3184–3193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
González, E, Tejeda, JF 2007. Effects of dietary incorporation of different anti-oxidant extracts and free-range rearing on fatty acid composition and lipid oxidation of Iberian pig meat. Animal 1, 1060–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueblez, R, Labroue, F, Mercat, MJ 2002. Performances de croissance, carcasse et qualité de viande de 4 races locales. Techni-Porc 25, 5–15.Google Scholar
Guy, JH, Rowlinson, P, Chadwick, JP, Ellis, M 2002. Behaviour of two genotypes of growing-finishing pig in three different housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 75, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, LL, Claudi-Magnussen, C, Jensen, SK, Andersen, HJ 2006. Effect of organic pig production systems on performance and meat quality. Meat Science 74, 605–615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hauser, N, Mourot, J, De Clercq, L, Genart, C, Remacle, C 1997. The cellularity of developing adipose tissues in Pietrain and Meishan pigs. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development 37, 617–625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyer, A, Lebret, B 2007. Compensatory growth response in pigs: effects on growth performance, composition of weight gain at carcass and muscle levels, and meat quality. Journal of Animal Science 85, 769–778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klont, RE, Hulsegge, B, Hoving-Bolink, AH, Gerritzen, MA, Kurt, E, Winkelman-Goedhart, HA, De Jong, IC, Kranen, RW 2001. Relationships between behavioral and meat quality characteristics of pigs raised under barren and enriched housing conditions. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2835–2843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kristensen, L, Therkildsen, M, Aaslyng, MD, Oksbjerg, N, Ertbjerg, P 2004. Compensatory growth improves meat tenderness in gilts but not in barrows. Journal of Animal Science 82, 3617–3624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Dividich, J, Noblet, J, Herpin, P, Van Milgen, J, Quiniou, N 1998. Thermoregulation. In Progress in pig science (ed. J Wiseman, MA Varley and JP Chadwick), pp. 229–263. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Lebret, B, Guillard, AS 2005. Outdoor rearing of cull sows: effects on carcass, tissue composition and meat quality. Meat Science 70, 247–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebret, B, Juin, H, Noblet, J, Bonneau, M 2001. The effects of two methods for increasing age at slaughter on carcass and muscle traits and meat sensory quality in pigs. Animal Science 72, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebret, B, Massabie, P, Granier, R, Juin, H, Mourot, J, Chevillon, P 2002. Influence of outdoor rearing and indoor temperature on growth performance, carcass, adipose tissue and muscle traits in pigs, and on the technological and eating quality of dry-cured hams. Meat Science 62, 447–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebret, B, Meunier-Salaün, MC, Foury, A, Mormède, P, Dransfield, E, Dourmad, JY 2006a. Influence of rearing conditions on performance, behavioral, and physiological responses of pigs to preslaughter handling, carcass traits, and meat quality. Journal of Animal Science 84, 2436–2447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebret, B, Foury, A, Mormède, P, Terlouw, EMC, Vautier, A, Chevillon, P 2006b. Muscle traits, preslaughter stress and meat quality indicators as influenced by pig rearing system. In Proceedings of the 52nd International Congress of Meat Science and Technology (ed. D Troy, R Pearce, B Byrne and J Kerry), pp. 145–146. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Lebret, B, Heyer, A, Gondret, F, Louveau, I 2007. The response of various muscle types to a restriction–re-alimentation feeding strategy in growing pigs. Animal 1, 849–857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, YB, Kauffman, RG 1974. Cellular and enzymatic changes with animal growth in porcine intramuscular adipose tissue. Journal of Animal Science 38, 532–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lefaucheur, L, Le Dividich, J, Mourot, J, Monin, G, Ecolan, P, Krauss, D 1991. Influence of environmental temperature on growth, muscle and adipose tissue metabolism, and meat quality in swine. Journal of Animal Science 69, 2844–2854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legrand, P, Mourot, J 2002. Le point sur les apports nutritionnels conseillés en acides gras. Implication sur les lipides de la viande. Hors Série Viandes et Produits Carnés, 9èmes Journées des Sciences du Muscle et Technologie de la Viande, 49–57.Google Scholar
Lonergan, SM, Stalder, KJ, Huff-Lonergan, E, Knight, TJ, Goodwin, RN, Prusa, KJ, Beitz, DC 2007. Influence of lipid content on pork sensory quality within pH classification. Journal of Animal Science 85, 1074–1079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez-Bote, CJ 1998. Sustained utilization of the Iberian pig breed. Meat Science 49, S17–S27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, CAP, Bruce, JM, Fowler, VR, English, PR 1995. A comparison of productivity and welfare of growing pigs in four intensive systems. Livestock Production Science 43, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maw, SJ, Fowler, VR, Hamilton, M, Petchey, AM 2001. Effect of husbandry and housing of pigs on the organoleptic properties of bacon. Livestock Production Science 68, 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meunier-Salaün, MC, Dourmad, JY, Lebret, B 2006. Evaluation comparée de deux systèmes d’élevage par la réponse comportementale des porcs à l’introduction d’un nouvel objet dans le milieu de vie. Journées de la Recherche Porcine 38, 417–422.Google Scholar
Millet, S, Raes, K, Van den Broeck, W, De Smet, S, Janssens, GPJ 2005. Performance and meat quality of organically versus conventionally fed and housed pigs from weaning till slaughtering. Meat Science 69, 335–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monahan, FJ, Buckley, DJ, Gray, JI, Morissey, PA, Asghar, A, Hanrahan, TJ, Lynch, PB 1990. Effect of dietary vitamin E on the stability of raw and cooked pork. Meat Science 27, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monahan FJ, Asghar A, Gray JI, Buckley DJ and Morrissey PA 1992. Influence of dietary vitamin E (a-tocopherol) on the color stability of pork chops. In Proceedings of the 38th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, vol. 3, pp. 543–546. Clermont-Ferrand, France.Google Scholar
Monin, G 2003. Abattage des porcs et qualités des carcasses et des viandes. INRA Productions Animales 16, 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mourot, J, Chauvel, J, Le Denmat, M, Mounier, A, Peiniau, P 1991. Variations de taux d’acide linoléique dans le régime du porc: effets sur les dépôts adipeux et sur l’oxydation du C18:2 au cours de la conservation de la viande. Journées de la Recherche Porcine en France 23, 357–364.Google Scholar
Nilzen, V, Babol, J, Dutta, PC, Lundeheim, N, Enfält, AC, Lundström, K 2001. Free range rearing of pigs with access to pasture grazing – effect on fatty acid composition and lpid oxidation products. Meat Science 58, 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, BS, Huff-Lonergan, E, Honeyman, MS, Kerr, BJ, Lonergan, SM 2008. Effects of space allocation within a deep-bedded finishing system on pig growth performance, fatty acid composition and pork quality. Animal 2, 471–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, V, Simonsen, HB, Lawson, LG 1995. The effect of environmental stimulation on the development of behaviour in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 45, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, JS, Henckel, P, Oksbjerg, N, Sorensen, MT 1998. Adaptations in muscle fibre characteristics induced by physical activity in pigs. Animal Science 66, 733–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pugliese, C, Bozzi, R, Campodoni, G, Acciaioli, A, Franci, O, Gandini, G 2005. Performance of Cinta Senese pigs reared outdoors and indoors. 1. Meat and subcutaneous fat characteristics. Meat Science 69, 459–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quiniou, N, Noblet, J, van Milgen, J, Dourmad, JY 1995. Effect of energy intake on performance, nutrient and tissue gain and protein and energy utilization in growing boars. Animal Science 61, 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainelli, P 2001. L’image de la viande de porc en France – attitude des consommateurs. Courrier de l’environnement de l’INRA 42, 47–60.Google Scholar
Reeds, PJ, Burrin, DG, Davis, TA, Fiorotto, MA, Mersmann, HJ, Pond, WG 1993. Growth regulation with particular reference to the pig. In Growth of the pig (ed. GR Hollis), pp. 1–32. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Rey, AI, Lopez-Bote, CJ, Sanz Arias, R 1997. Effect of extensive feeding on α-tocopherol concentration and oxidative stability of muscle microsomes from Iberian pigs. Animal Science 65, 515–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, AI, Daza, A, Lopez-Carrasco, C, Lopez-Bote, CJ 2006. Feeding Iberian pigs with acorns and grass in either free-range or confinment affects the carcass characteristics and fatty acids and tocopherols accumulation in Longissimus dorsi muscle and backfat. Meat Science 73, 66–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rinaldo, D, Le Dividich, J 1991. Effects of warm exposure on adipose tissue and muscle metabolism in growing pigs. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiolgy. A: Comparative Physiology 100, 995–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rincker, PJ, Killefer, J, Ellis, M, Brewer, MS, McKeith, FK 2008. Intramuscular fat content has little influence on the eating quality of fresh pork loin chops. Journal of Animal Science 86, 730–737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenvold, K, Andersen, HJ 2003. Factors of significance for pork quality – a review. Meat Science 64, 219–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sather, AP, Jones, SDM, Schaefer, AL, Colyn, J, Robertson, WM 1997. Feedlot performance, carcass composition and meat quality of free-range reared pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 77, 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secondi, F, Gandemer, G, Luciani, A, Santucci, PM, Casabianca, F 1992. Evolution, chez le porc corse, des lipides des tissus adipeux et musculaires au cours de la période d’engraissement traditionnelle sous châtaigneraie. Journées de la Recherche Porcine en France 24, 77–84.Google Scholar
Secondi F, Gandemer G and Casabianca F 2007. Finishing period and accumulation of intramuscular fat for the Corsican pig. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on the Mediterranean Pig (ed. A Audiot, F Casabianca and G Monin), p.165. Options Méditerranéennes A-76, CIHEAM, Zaragoza, Spain.Google Scholar
Sellier, P 1998. Genetics of meat and carcass traits. In The genetics of the pig (ed. MF Rotschild and A Ruvinsky), pp. 463–510. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Sundrum, A, Büftering, L, Henning, M, Hoppenbrock, KH 2000. Effects of on-farm diets for organic pig production on performance and carcass quality. Journal of Animal Science 78, 1199–1205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terlouw, EMC 2005. Stress reactions at slaughter and meat quality in pigs: genetic background and prior experience. A brief review of recent findings. Livestock Production Science 94, 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terlouw EMC, Astruc T and Monin G 2004. Effect of genetic background, rearing and slaughter conditions on behaviour, physiology and meat quality of pigs. In Proceedings of the EU Workshop on Sustainable Pork Production: Welfare, Quality, Nutrition and Consumer Attitudes (ed. AH Karlsson and HJ Andersen), pp 113–125. Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Therkildsen, M, Riis, B, Karlsson, A, Kristensen, L, Ertbjerg, P, Purslow, PP, Aaslyng, MD, Oksbjerg, N 2002. Compensatory growth response in pigs, muscle protein turnover and meat texture: effects of restriction/realimentation period. Animal Science 75, 367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Therkildsen, M, Vestergaard, M, Busk, H, Jensen, MT, Riis, B, Karlsson, AH, Kristensen, L, Ertbjerg, P, Oksbjerg, N 2004. Compensatory growth in slaughter pigs – in vitro muscle protein turnover at slaughter, circulating IGF-I, performance and carcass quality. Livestock Production Science 88, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ventanas, S, Ruiz, J, Garcia, C, Ventanas, J 2007a. Preference and juiciness of Iberian dry-cured loin as affected by intramuscular fat content, crossbreeding and rearing system. Meat Science 77, 324–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ventanas, S, Ventanas, J, Tovar, J, Garcia, C, Estevez, M 2007b. Extensive feeding versus oleic acid and tocopherol enriched mixed diets for the production of Iberian dry-cured hams: effect on chemical composition, oxidative status and sensory traits. Meat Science 77, 246–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ventanas, S, Tejeda, JF, Estevez, M 2008. Chemical composition and oxidative status of tissues from Iberian pigs as affected by diets: extensive feeding v. oleic acid- and tocopherol-enriched mixed diets. Animal 2, 621–630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilfart, A, Ferreira, JM, Mounier, A, Robin, G, Mourot, J 2004. Effet de différentes teneurs en acides gras n-3 sur les performances de croissance et la qualité nutritionnelle de la viande de porc. Journées de la Recherche Porcine 36, 195–202.Google Scholar
Wood, JD, Brown, SN, Nute, GR, Whittington, FM, Perry, AM, Johnson, SP, Enser, M 1996. Effects of breed, feed level and conditioning time on the tenderness of pork. Meat Science 44, 105–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, JD, Nute, GR, Richardson, RI, Whittington, FM, Southwood, O, Plastow, G, Mansbridge, R, da Costa, N, Chang, KC 2004a. Effects of breed, diet and muscle on fat deposition and eating quality in pigs. Meat Science 67, 651–667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, JD, Richardson, RI, Nute, GR, Fisher, AV, Campo, MM, Kasapidou, E, Sheard, PR, Enser, M 2004b. Effects of fatty acids on meat quality: a review. Meat Science 66, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed