Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T00:45:29.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of different PMSG doses on estrus behavior and pregnancy rate in Angora goats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2018

M. B. Tirpan ,
K. Tekin ,
B. Cil ,
H. Alemdar ,
M. E. Inanc ,
K. T. Olgac ,
C. Stelletta  and
A. Daskin
M. B. Tirpan
Affiliation:
Department of Artificial Insemination, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
K. Tekin*
Affiliation:
Department of Artificial Insemination, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
B. Cil
Affiliation:
Department of Artificial Insemination, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
H. Alemdar
Affiliation:
Department of Artificial Insemination, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
M. E. Inanc
Affiliation:
Department of Artificial Insemination, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey
K. T. Olgac
Affiliation:
Department of Artificial Insemination, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
C. Stelletta
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
A. Daskin
Affiliation:
Department of Artificial Insemination, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Artificial insemination protocols depend on efficient behavioral estrus detection and insemination time in Angora goat. Therefore, we aim to determine the accuracy of an estrus scoring system in Angora goats with different PMSG doses during the breeding season. Does (n: 260) were randomly divided into three groups: group-1 (n: 93), group-2 (n: 85) and group-3 (n: 82). All animals received an intravaginal sponge on day 0 for 11 days, and on the day of sponge insertion 150 μg prostaglandin F2Α was administered. Pregnant mare’s serum gonadotropin was injected 300, 400 and 500 IU intramuscularly 24 h before sponge removal to groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Estrus signs were detected with a teaser buck, 24 h after sponge removal according to a visual scoring system. Artificial insemination was performed with 0.25 ml fresh diluted semen at 43 to 45 h after sponge removal. Differences were observed within PMSG groups in terms of standing, tail wagging, courtship behavior, vaginal discharge and vaginal hyperemia (P<0.001). Nevertheless, the most accurate indicators of estrus that result in pregnancy were tail wagging and courtship behavior followed by standing estrus (P<0.05). According to the results obtained, 300 IU PMSG dose is sufficient, both to inseminate at a fixed time (43 to 45 h after sponge removal) and to record the estrus behavior by teaser male 24 h after sponge removal. Higher PMSG doses (400 to 500 IU) altered the timing of ovulation; specifically, 500 IU dose shortened the duration of estrus behaviors. In conclusion, even though the different doses of PMSG displayed similar effects on estrus synchronization and pregnancy rates, we concluded that tail wagging, courtship behavior and standing heat are the most reliable estrus signs for artificial insemination in Angora goat.

Keywords

estrus scoringMohair goatPMSGsynchronizationtimed artificial insemination
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , March 2019 , pp. 564 - 569
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abecia, JA, Forcada, F and González-Bulnes, A 2012. Hormonal control of reproduction in small ruminants. Animal Reproduction Science 130, 173–179.Google Scholar
Ak, K, Ozturkler, Y, Kasikci, G, Horoz, H, Kilicarslan, R and Ileri, K 1998. Investigation of different oestrus synchronization techniques and serum progesterone, LH levels in Angora goats. Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University 24, 367–377.Google Scholar
Amoah, EA and Gelaye, S 1990. Superovulation, synchronization and breeding of does. Small Ruminant Research 3, 63–72.Google Scholar
Baril, G, Leboeuf, B and Saumande, J 1993. Synchronization of estrus in goats: the relationship between time of occurrence of estrus and fertility following artificial insemination. Theriogenology 40, 621–628.Google Scholar
Baril, G, Remy, B, Vallet, JC and Beckers, JF 1992. Effect of repeated use of progestagen‐PMSG treatment for estrus control in dairy goats out of breeding season. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 27, 161–168.Google Scholar
Boland, MP, Crosby, TF and Gordon, I 1981. Effect of mating management and PMSG dose on lambing outcome in ewes bred in late anoestrus. The Journal of Agricultural Science 97, 445–447.Google Scholar
De Castro, T, Rubianes, E, Menchaca, A and Rivero, A 1999. Ovarian dynamics, serum estradiol and progesterone concentrations during the interovulatory interval in goats. Theriogenology 52, 399–411.Google Scholar
Ginther, OJ and Kot, K 1994. Follicular dynamics during the ovulatory season in goats. Theriogenology 42, 987–1001.Google Scholar
Greyling, JPC and Van Niekerk, CH 1990. Effect of pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin (PMSG) and route of administration after progestagen treatment on oestrus and LH secretion in the Boer goat. Small Ruminant Research 3, 511–516.Google Scholar
Jainudeen, MR, Wahid, H and Hafez, ESE 2000. Ovulation induction, embryo production and transfer. In Reproduction in farm animals (ed. B, Hafez, ESE and Hafez ), pp. 405–430. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Kulaksız, R, Ucar, O and Daskin, A 2013. Effects of oestrus synchronization by double FGA-sponge or split administrations upon the reproductive traits in angora goats during the breeding season. Ataturk University Journal of Veterinary Sciences 8, 1–8.Google Scholar
Lehloenya, KC, Greyling, JPC and Schwalbach, LMJ 2005. Reproductive performance of South African indigenous goats following oestrous synchronization and AI. Small Ruminant Research 57, 115–120.Google Scholar
Motlomelo, KC, Greyling, JPC and Schwalbach, LMJ 2002. Synchronisation of oestrus in goats: the use of different progestagen treatments. Small Ruminant Research 45, 45–49.Google Scholar
Muna, MM, Ahmed, SE, Makawi, AS and Jubara, AS 1998. Synchronization of oestrus in Nubian goats. Small Ruminant Research 30, 113–120.Google Scholar
Nasr, RE, Haddad, SG and Al-Karablieh, EK 2002. Economic assessments of hormonal and nutritional treatments for improvement of Awassi sheep production in Jordan. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 15, 1110–1114.Google Scholar
Ozer, MO and Dogruer, G 2011. The effects of long and short-term applications of progestagen containing vaginal sponges and subcutaneous implants on fertility during breeding season in Damascus goats. Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafkas University 17, 47–52.Google Scholar
Powell, MR, Kaps, M, Lamberson, WR and Keisler, DH 1996. Use of melengestrol acetate-based treatments to induce and synchronize estrus in seasonally anestrous ewes. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2292–2302.Google Scholar
Roelofs, JB, Van Eerdenburg, FJ, Soede, NM and Kemp, B 2005. Various behavioral signs of estrous and their relationship with time of ovulation in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 63, 1366–1377.Google Scholar
Romano, JE 2004. Synchronization of estrus using CIDR, FGA or MAP intravaginal pessaries during the breeding season in Nubian goats. Small Ruminant Research 55, 15–19.Google Scholar
Rubianes, E and Menchaca, A 2003. The pattern and manipulation of ovarian follicular growth in goats. Animal Reproduction Science 78, 271–287.Google Scholar
Schwarz, T and Wierzchoś, E 2000. Growth of the ovary follicles in the oestrus cycle in goats. Medycyna Weterynaryjna 56, 194–197.Google Scholar
Stelletta, C, Tekin, K, Tirpan, MB, Alemdar, H, Cil, B, Stelletta, FO, Olgac, KT, Inanc, ME and Daskin, A. 2017. Vulvar thermal pattern following synchronization of estrus is linked to fertility after timed artificial insemination in goat. Theriogenology 103, 137–142.Google Scholar
Timurkan, H and Yildiz, H 2005. Synchronization of oestrus in Hamdani ewes: the use of different PMSG doses. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy 49, 311–314.Google Scholar
Whitley, NC and Jackson, DJ 2004. An update on estrus synchronization in goats: a minor species. Journal of Animal Science 82, 270–276.Google Scholar
Zeleke, M, Greyling, JPC, Schwallbach, LMJ, Muller, T and Erasmus, JA 2005. Effect of progestagen and PMSG on oestrous synchronization and fertility in Dorper ewes during the transition period. Small Ruminant Research 56, 47–53.Google Scholar