Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:40:46.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of a novel synthetic emulsifier product on growth performance of chickens for fattening and weaned piglets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2015

V. Bontempo ,
M. Comi  and
X. R. Jiang
V. Bontempo*
Affiliation:
Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy
M. Comi
Affiliation:
Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy
X. R. Jiang*
Affiliation:
Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy
*
†E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]
†E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of a novel synthetic emulsifier product (AVI-MUL TOP) on the growth performance of chickens for fattening and weaned piglets. The emulsifier product consists of 50% vegetal bi-distillated oleic acid emulsified with 50% glyceryl polyethyleneglycol ricinoleate. In experiment 1, 480 1-day-old female Cobb500 chickens for fattening were assigned to two treatments: (1) a control diet (CTR); and (2) the control diet+the emulsifier (AMT, 1 g/kg from day 0 to day 10, 0.75 g/kg from day 10 to day 20 and 0.5 g/kg from day 20 to day 34 of the trial). AMT supplementation increased BW on days 20 and 34 (P<0.01). Dietary AMT increased the average daily gain and average daily feed intake (ADFI) from day 10 to day 20, from day 20 to day 34 and from day 0 to day 34 (P<0.01). A reduced feed conversion ratio was observed in the AMT group from day 10 to day 20 (P<0.01). In experiment 2, 96 Stambo HBI×Dalland piglets were weaned at 24 days and assigned to two treatments (the basal diet without the product (CTR) or with 2 g/kg emulsifier from day 0 to day 14 and 1.5 g/kg from day 14 to day 42 (AMT)). There was an increase in the ADFI associated with AMT supplementation from day 14 to day 42 (P=0.04). These results indicated that supplementation with the synthetic emulsifier may significantly improve the growth performance of chickens for fattening and numerically improve that of weaned piglets.

Keywords

chickens for fatteningemulsifiergrowth performanceweaned piglets
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , April 2016 , pp. 592 - 597
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Marzooqi, W and Leeson, S 1999. Evaluation of dietary supplements of lipase, detergent, and crude porcine pancreas on fat utilization by young broiler chicks. Poultry Science 78, 1561–1566.Google Scholar
Cobb Vantress 2013. Cobb500 broiler performance and nutrition supplement. Retrieved January 24, 2014, from http://cobb-vantress.com/docs/default-source/cobb-500-guides/cobb500-broiler-performance-nutrition-supplement-(english).pdf.Google Scholar
Deol, HS, Howell, JM, Dorling, PR and Symonds, HW 1992. The effect of copper and heliotrope on the composition of bile in sheep. Research in Veterinary Science 53, 324–330.Google Scholar
Dierick, N and Decuypere, J 2004. Influence of lipase and/or emulsifier addition on the ileal and faecal nutrient digestibility in growing pigs fed diets containing 4% animal fat. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 84, 1443–1450.Google Scholar
Dinev, I, Denev, SA and Edens, FW 2012. Comparative clinical and morphological studies on the incidence of tibial dyschondroplasia as a cause of lameness in three commercial lines of broiler chickens. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 21, 637–644.Google Scholar
European Commission 2003. Opinion of the Scientific Committee for Animal Nutrition on the Use of Copper in Feedingstuffs. In Health & Consumer Protection Directorate General, Directorate C – Scientific Opinions, C2 Management of Scientific Committees, pp. 1–47. Scientific Co-operation and Networks, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Højberg, O, Canibe, N, Poulsen, HD, Hedemann, MS and Jensen, BB 2005. Influence of dietary zinc oxide and copper sulfate on the gastrointestinal ecosystem in newly weaned piglets. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71, 2267–2277.Google Scholar
Jones, DB, Hancock, JD, Harmon, DL and Walker, CE 1992. Effects of exogenous emulsifiers and fat sources on nutrient digestibility, serum lipids, and growth performance in weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science 70, 3473–3482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kestin, SC, Su, G and Sørensen, P 1999. Different commercial broiler crosses have different susceptibilities to leg weakness. Poultry Science 78, 1085–1090.Google Scholar
Lauridsen, C, Bruun Christensen, T, Halekoh, U and Krogh Jensen, S 2007. Alternative fat sources to animal fat for pigs. Lipid Technology 19, 156–159.Google Scholar
Lázaro, R, Latorre, MA, Medel, P, Gracia, M and Mateos, GG 2004. Feeding regimen and enzyme supplementation to rye-based diets for broilers. Poultry Science 83, 152–160.Google Scholar
Lewis, DS, Oren, S, Wang, X, Moyer, ML, Beitz, DC, Knight, TJ and Mott, GE 2000. Developmental changes in cholesterol 7alpha- and 27-hydroxylases in the piglet. Journal of Animal Science 78, 943–951.Google Scholar
Mc Geown, D, Danbury, TC, Waterman-Pearson, AE and Kestin, SC 1999. Effect of carprofen on lameness in broiler chickens. Veterinary Record 144, 668–671.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry, 9th revised edition National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 2012. Nutrient requirements of swine, 11th revised edition. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Price, KL, Lin, X, van Heugten, E, Odle, R, Willis, G and Odle, J 2013. Diet physical form, fatty acid chain length, and emulsification alter fat utilization and growth of newly weaned pigs. Journal of Animal Science 91, 783–792.Google Scholar
Roy, A, Haldar, S, Mondal, S and Ghosh, TK 2010. Effects of supplemental exogenous emulsifier on performance, nutrient metabolism, and serum lipid profile in broiler chickens. Veterinary Medicine International 2010, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, DR and Sillery, J 1976. Lecithin inhibits fatty acid and bile salt absorption from rat small intestine in vivo. Lipids 11, 830–832.Google Scholar
Scheele, C 1997. Pathological changes in metabolism of poultry related to increasing production levels. Veterinary Quarterly 19, 127–130.Google Scholar
Soares, M and Lopez-Bote, CJ 2002. Effects of dietary lecithin and fat unsaturation on nutrient utilisation in weaned piglets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 95, 169–177.Google Scholar
Van der Heijden, M and de Haan, D 2010. Optimising moisture while maintaining feed quality. All About Feed 1, 29–31.Google Scholar
Xing, JJ, van Heugten, E, Lit, DF, Touchette, KJ, Coalson, JA, Odgaard, RL and Odle, J 2004. Effects of emulsification, fat encapsulation, and pelleting on weanling pig performance and nutrient digestibility. Journal of Animal Science 82, 2601–2609.Google Scholar
Zubair, AK and Leeson, S 1996. Compensatory growth in the broiler chicken: a review. World’s Poultry Science Journal 52, 189–201.Google Scholar