Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:41:21.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of replacing lactose by starch on protein and fat digestion in milk-fed veal calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2016

A. M. Pluschke ,
M. S. Gilbert ,
B. A. Williams ,
J. J. G. C. van den Borne ,
H. A. Schols  and
W. J. J. Gerrits
A. M. Pluschke*
Affiliation:
ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Cell Walls, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
M. S. Gilbert
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
B. A. Williams
Affiliation:
ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Cell Walls, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
J. J. G. C. van den Borne
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
H. A. Schols
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Food Chemistry, Wageningen University, PO Box 17, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
W. J. J. Gerrits
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Replacing dairy components from milk replacer (MR) with vegetable products has been previously associated with decreased protein and fat digestibility in milk-fed calves resulting in lower live weight gain. In this experiment, the major carbohydrate source in MR, lactose, was partly replaced with gelatinized corn starch (GCS) to determine the effect on protein and fat digestibility in milk-fed calves. In total, 16 male Holstein-Friesian calves received either MR with lactose as the carbohydrate source (control) or 18% GCS at the expense of lactose. In the adaptation period, calves were exposed to an increasing dose of GCS for 14 weeks. The indigestible marker cobalt ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid was incorporated into the MR for calculating apparent nutrient digestibility, whereas a pulse dose of chromium (Cr) chloride was fed with the last MR meal 4 h before slaughter as an indicator of passage rates. The calves were anesthetized and exsanguinated at 30 weeks of age. The small intestine was divided in three; small intestine 1 and 2 (SI1 and SI2, respectively) and the terminal ileum (last ~100 cm of small intestine) and samples of digesta were collected. Small intestinal digesta was analysed for α-amylase, lipase and trypsin activity. Digestibility of protein was determined for SI1, SI2, ileum and total tract, whereas digestibility of fat was determined for SI1, SI2 and total tract. Apparent protein digestibility in the small intestine did not differ between treatments but was higher in control calves at total tract level. Apparent crude fat digestibility tended to be increased in SI1 and SI2 for GCS calves, but no difference was found at total tract level. Activity of α-amylase in SI2 and lipase in both SI1 and SI2 was higher in GCS calves. Activity of trypsin tended to be higher in control calves and was higher in SI1 compared with SI2. A lower recovery of Cr in SI2 and a higher recovery of Cr in the large intestine suggest an increased rate of passage for GCS calves. Including 18% of GCS in a milk replacer at the expense of lactose increased passage rate and decreased apparent total tract protein digestibility. In the small intestine, protein digestion did not decrease when feeding GCS and fat digestion even tended to increase. Overall, effects on digestion might be levelled when partially replacing lactose with GCS, because starch digestion is lower than that of lactose but fat digestion may be slightly increased when feeding GCS.

Keywords

milk-fed calfstarchα-amylaselipasetrypsin
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 10 , Issue 8 , August 2016 , pp. 1296 - 1302
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akinyele, IO and Harshbarger, KE 1983. Performance of young calves fed soybean protein replacers. Journal of Dairy Science 4, 825–832.Google Scholar
Blaxter, KL and Mitchell, HH 1948. The factorization of the protein requirements of ruminants and of the protein values of feeds, with particular reference to the significance of the metabolic nitrogen. Journal of Animal Science 3, 351–372.Google Scholar
Brannon, PM 1990. Adaptation of the exocrine pancreas to diet. Annual Review of Nutrition 1, 85–105.Google Scholar
Coombe, NB and Smith, RH 1974. Digestion and absorption of starch, maltose and lactose by the preruminant calf. British Journal of Nutrition 31, 227–235.Google Scholar
Cummings, JH and Macfarlane, GT 1991. The control and consequences of bacterial fermentation in the human colon. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 6, 443–459.Google Scholar
Flipse, RJ, Huffman, CF, Webster, HD and Duncan, CW 1950. Carbohydrate utilization in the young calf. I. Nutritive value of glucose, corn syrup and lactose as carbohydrate sources in synthetic milk. Journal of Dairy Science 8, 548–556.Google Scholar
Gerrits, WJJ, Bosch, MW and Van den Borne, JJGC 2012. Quantifying resistant starch using novel, in vivo methodology and the energetic utilization of fermented starch in pigs. The Journal of Nutrition 2, 238–244.Google Scholar
Gilbert, MS, Pantophlet, AJ, Berends, H, Pluschke, AM, Van den Borne, JJGC, Hendriks, WH, Schols, HA and Gerrits, WJJ 2015a. Fermentation in the small intestine contributes substantially to intestinal starch disappearance in calves. The Journal of Nutrition 145, 1147–1155.Google Scholar
Gilbert, MS, Van den Borne, JJGC, Berends, H, Pantophlet, AJ, Schols, HA and Gerrits, WJJ 2015b. A titration approach to identify the capacity for starch digestion in milk-fed calves. Animal 2, 249–257.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, AJ, Wells, SJ and Losinger, WC 1995. A study of the use of milk replacers for dairy calves in the United States. Journal of Dairy Science 12, 2831–2837.Google Scholar
Huber, JT, Jacobson, NL, Allen, RS and Hartman, PA 1961. Digestive enzyme activities in the young calf. Journal of Dairy Science 8, 1494–1501.Google Scholar
Huber, JT, Jacobson, NL, McGilliard, AD and Allen, RS 1961. Utilization of carbohydrates introduced directly into the omaso-abomasal area of the stomach of cattle of various ages. Journal of Dairy Science 2, 321–330.Google Scholar
Huber, JT, Natrajan, S and Polan, CE 1968. Varying levels of starch in calf milk replacers. Journal of Dairy Science 7, 1081–1084.Google Scholar
Huber, JT and Slade, LM 1967. Fish flour as a protein source in calf milk replacers. Journal of Dairy Science 8, 1296–1300.Google Scholar
ISO 1999a. Animal feeding stuffs – determination of fat content. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
ISO 1999b. Animal feeding stuffs – determination of moisture and other volatile matter content. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
ISO 2005. Animal feeding stuffs – determination of nitrogen content and calculation of crude protein content. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Kreikemeier, KK, Harmon, DL, Brandt, RT, Avery, TB and Johnson, DE 1991. Small intestinal starch digestion in steers – effect of various levels of abomasal glucose, corn starch and corn dextrin infusion on small intestinal disappearance and net glucose absorption. Journal of Animal Science 1, 328–338.Google Scholar
Labussière, E, Berends, H, Gilbert, MS, Van den Borne, JJGC and Gerrits, WJJ 2014. Estimation of milk leakage into the rumen of milk-fed calves through an indirect and repeatable method. Animal 10, 1643–1652.Google Scholar
Lairon, D, Nalbone, G, Lafont, H, Leonardi, J, Domingo, N, Hauton, JC and Verger, R 1978. Inhibition of lipase adsorption at interfaces. Role of bile salt micelles and colipase. Biochemistry 2, 205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layer, P, Liang, V, Go, W and Dimagno, EP 1986. Fate of pancreatic enzymes during small intestinal aboral transit in humans. American Journal of Physiology 4, 475–480.Google Scholar
Le Huerou-Luron, I, Guilloteau, P, Wicker-Planquart, C, Chayvialle, J-A, Burton, J, Mouats, A, Toullec, R and Puigserver, A 1992a. Gastric and pancreatic enzyme activities and their relationship with some gut regulatory peptides during postnatal development and weaning in calves. The Journal of Nutrition 7, 1434–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Huerou-Luron, I, Guilloteau, P, Wicker, C, Mouats, A, Chayvialle, J-A, Bernard, C, Burton, J, Toullec, R and Puigserver, A 1992b. Activity distribution of seven digestive enzymes along small intestine in calves during development and weaning. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 1, 40–46.Google Scholar
Liang, YT, Morrill, JL and Noordsy, JL 1967. Absorption and utilization of volatile fatty acids by the young calf. Journal of Dairy Science 7, 1153–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayes, RW and Ørskov, ER 1974. The utilization of gelled maize starch in the small intestine of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 1, 143–153.Google Scholar
Morrill, JL, Stewart, WE, McCormick, RJ and Fryer, HC 1970. Pancreatic amylase secretion by young calves. Journal of Dairy Science 1, 72–78.Google Scholar
Mosenthin, R and Sauer, WC 1993. Exocrine pancreatic secretions in pigs as influenced by the source of carbohydrate in the diet. Zeitschrift Fur Ernahrungswissenschaft 2, 152–155.Google Scholar
Mu, HL and Hoy, CE 2004. The digestion of dietary triacylglycerols. Progress in Lipid Research 2, 105–133.Google Scholar
Natrajan, S, Chandler, PT, Huber, JT, Polan, CE and Jahn, E 1972. Ruminal and post-ruminal utilization of starch in young bovine. Journal of Dairy Science 2, 238–244.Google Scholar
Nitsan, Z, Ben-Asher, A, Nir, I and Zoref, Z 1990. Utilization of raw or heat-treated starch fed in liquid diet to pre-ruminants. 1. Calves. Reproduction Nutrition Development 30, 507–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radostits, OM and Bell, JM 1970. Nutrition of the pre-ruminant dairy calf with special reference to the digestion and absorption of nutrients: a review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 3, 405–452.Google Scholar
Soliman, HS, Orskov, ER, Atkinson, T and Smart, RI 1979. Utilization of partially hydrolysed starch in milk replacers by the newborn lamb. The Journal of Agricultural Science 92, 343–349.Google Scholar
Sternby, B, Nilsson, Å, Melin, T and Borgström, B 1991. Pancreatic lipolytic enzymes in human duodenal contents radioimmunoassay compared with enzyme activity. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 8, 859–866.Google Scholar
Swanson, KC, Matthews, JC, Woods, CA and Harmon, DL 2002. Postruminal administration of partially hydrolyzed starch and casein influences pancreatic α-amylase expression in calves. The Journal of Nutrition 3, 376–381.Google Scholar
Toofanian, F, Hill, FWG and Kidder, DE 1973. The mucosal disaccharidases in the small intestine of the calf. Annales De Recherches Veterinaires 4, 57–69.Google Scholar
Van den Borne, JJGC, Verstegen, MWA, Alferink, SJJ, Giebels, RMM and Gerrits, WJJ 2006. Effects of feeding frequency and feeding level on nutrient utilization in heavy preruminant calves. Journal of Dairy Science 9, 3578–3586.Google Scholar
Van Es, AJH, Nijkamp, HJ, Van Weerden, EJ and Van Hellemond, KK 1969. Energy, carbon and nitrogen balance experiments with veal calves. In Energy metabolism of farm animals (ed. KL Blaxter, J Kielanowski and G Thorbek), vol. 12, pp. 197–201. Oriel Press, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.Google Scholar
Verdonk, JMAJ, Gerrits, WJJ, Beynen, AC and Blok, MC 2002. Replacement of milk protein by vegetable protein in milk replacer diets for veal calves: digestion in relation to intestinal health. In Nutrition and health of the gastrointestinal tract (ed. MC Blok, HA Vahl, L De Lange, AE Van de Braak, G Hemke and M Hessing), pp. 183–198. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Walker, JA and Harmon, DL 1995. Influence of ruminal or abomasal starch hydrolysate infusion on pancreatic exocrine secretion and blood glucose and insulin concentrations in steers. Journal of Animal Science 73, 3766–3774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, C, Wensing, T, Van der Meer, R and Beynen, AC 1997. Mechanism explaining why dietary soya protein vs. skim-milk protein lowers fat digestion in veal calves. Livestock Production Science 3, 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar