Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T19:38:44.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of low- and high-forage diets on meat quality and fatty acid composition of Alentejana and Barrosã beef breeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2012

P. Costa ,
J. P. Lemos ,
P. A. Lopes ,
C. M. Alfaia ,
A. S. H. Costa ,
R. J. B. Bessa  and
J. A. M. Prates
P. Costa*
Affiliation:
CIISA, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, Pólo Universitário do Alto da Ajuda, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
J. P. Lemos
Affiliation:
CIISA, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, Pólo Universitário do Alto da Ajuda, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
P. A. Lopes
Affiliation:
CIISA, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, Pólo Universitário do Alto da Ajuda, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
C. M. Alfaia
Affiliation:
CIISA, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, Pólo Universitário do Alto da Ajuda, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
A. S. H. Costa
Affiliation:
CIISA, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, Pólo Universitário do Alto da Ajuda, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
R. J. B. Bessa
Affiliation:
Unidade de Investigacão em Produção Animal, Instituto Nacional de Recursos Biológicos, Fonte Boa, Vale de Santarém, Portugal
J. A. M. Prates
Affiliation:
CIISA, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, Pólo Universitário do Alto da Ajuda, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of genotype and diet on meat fat composition and palatability obtained from Alentejana (AL) and Barrosã (BA) breeds. Herein, 20 males from each breed allocated at 11 months of age were fed ad libitum a low-forage diet or a high-forage diet and slaughtered at 18 months of age. Trained sensory panel analysis found that the longissimus lumborum (Ll) muscle from BA had higher tenderness, juiciness and overall acceptability scores than the AL breed. The highest scores for those attributes were observed in the BA breed fed the high-forage diet. Regarding the semitendinosus (St) muscle, breed was a source of variation of tenderness scores. In contrast to the Ll muscle, the highest tenderness scores for the St muscle were observed in the AL breed. The intramuscular fat (IMF) content was positively correlated with tenderness, juiciness and overall acceptability in Ll muscle and negatively correlated with flavour in the St muscle. The levels of 14:0 and 16:0, 16:1c9, 18:1c9 and 18:1c11 were positively correlated to juiciness, tenderness and overall acceptability in the Ll muscle. These correlations were not observed in the St muscle, which may be related to its low IMF content. Nonetheless, negative correlations were observed for the St muscle between flavour and 14:0, 16:0 and 18:0 FA contents.

The IMF varied widely in the Ll but not in the St muscle. The latter had higher levels of 16:1c9 and trans fatty acids (∑TFA) in the BA than in the AL breed. Regarding the Ll muscle, the BA had higher amounts of 14:0, 16:0, 16:1c9, 18:0, 18:1c9, 18:1c11, saturated fatty acids (∑SFA), cis monounsaturated fatty acids (∑cis MUFA), ∑TFA and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (∑n-3 PUFA) than the AL breed. The diet exerted an influence on the IMF content and on the levels of 14:0, 16:0, 16:1c9, 18:0, 18:1c9, 18:1c11, ∑SFA, ∑cis MUFA and ∑TFA in both Ll and St muscles. Moreover, the levels of ∑n-3 PUFA in the Ll muscle and 18:2n-6, 20:4n-6, ∑n-6 PUFA and ∑PUFA in the St muscle were influenced by diet. The results obtained in this study, with two Portuguese breeds, confirm that genetic background plays a major role in the determination of meat eating quality.

Keywords

meat qualityfatty acidstrained sensory panelforage dietyoung bulls
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 6 , Issue 7 , 28 May 2012 , pp. 1187 - 1197
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

a

Authors who contributed equally.

References

Aldai, N, Murray, BE, Oliván, N, Martínez, A, Troy, DJ, Osoro, K, Nájera, AI 2006. The influence of breed and mh-genotype on carcass conformation, meat physico-chemical characteristics, and the fatty acid profile of muscle from yearling bulls. Meat Science 72, 486–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aldai, N, Nájera, AI, Dugan, MER, Celaya, R, Osoro, K 2007. Characterisation of intramuscular, intermuscular and subcutaneous adipose tissues in yearling bulls of different genetic groups. Meat Science 76, 682–691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alfaia, CMM, Castro, MLF, Martins, SIV, Portugal, APV, Alves, SPA, Fontes, CMGA, Bessa, RJB, Prates, JAM 2007. Effect of slaughter season on fatty acid composition, conjugated linoleic acid isomers and nutritional value of intramuscular fat in Barrosã-PDO veal. Meat Science 75, 44–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alfaia, CMM, Ribeiro, VSS, Lourenço, MRA, Quaresma, MAG, Martins, SIV, Portugal, APV, Fontes, CMGA, Bessa, RJB, Castro, MLF, Prates, JAM 2006. Fatty acid composition, conjugated linoleic acid isomers and cholesterol in beef from crossbred bullocks intensively produced and from Alentejana purebred bullocks reared according to Carnalentejana-PDO specifications. Meat Science 72, 425–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alves, SP, Bessa, RJB 2009. Comparison of two gas–liquid chromatograph columns for the analysis of fatty acids in ruminant meat. Journal of Chromatography A 1216, 5130–5139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 1990. Official methods of analysis, vol. I, 15th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Banovic, M, Grunert, KG, Barreira, MM, Fontes, MA 2009. Beef quality perception at the point of purchase: a study from Portugal. Food Quality and Preference 20, 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banovic, M, Grunert, KG, Barreira, MM, Fontes, MA 2010. Consumers’ quality perception of national branded, national store branded, and imported store branded beef. Meat Science 84, 54–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beja-Pereira, A, Alexandrino, P, Bessa, I, Carretero, Y, Dunner, S, Ferrand, N, Jordana, J, Laloe, D, Moazami-Goudarzi, K, Sanchez, A, Canon, J 2003. Genetic characterization of Southwestern European bovine breeds: a historical and biogeographical reassessment with a set of 16 microsatellites. Journal of Heredity 94, 243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernués, A, Olaizola, A, Corcoran, K 2003. Labelling information demanded by European consumers and relationships with purchasing motives, quality and safety of meat. Meat Science 65, 1095–1106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bredahl, L 2004. Cue utilisation and quality perception with regard to branded beef. Food Quality and Preference 15, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brosh, A, Aharoni, Y, Levy, D, Holzer, Z 1995. Effect of diet energy concentration and of age of Holstein–Friesian bull calves on growth rate, urea space and fat deposition, and ruminal volume. Journal of Animal Science 73, 1666–1673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calkins, CR, Hodgen, JM 2007. A fresh look at meat flavor. Meat Science 77, 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camfield, PK, Brown, AH, Lewis, PK, Rakes, LY, Johnson, ZB 1997. Effects of frame size and time-on-feed on carcass characteristics, sensory attributes, and fatty acid profiles of steers. Journal of Animal Science 75, 1837–1844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campo, MM, Nute, GR, Wood, JD, Elmore, SJ, Mottramand, DS, Enser, M 2003. Modelling the effect of fatty acids in odour development of cooked meat in vitro: part I – sensory perception. Meat Science 63, 367–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambaz, A, Scheeder, MRL, Kreuzer, M, Dufey, PA 2003. Meat quality of Angus, Simmental, Charolais and Limousin steers compared at the same intramuscular fat content. Meat Science 63, 491–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clegg, KM 1956. The application of the anthrone reagent to the estimation of starch in cereals. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 70, 40–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, P, Costa, AF, Lopes, PA, Alfaia, CM, Bessa, RJB, Roseiro, LC, Prates, JAM 2011. Fatty acid composition, cholesterol and α-tocopherol of Barrosã-PDO veal produced in farms located in lowlands, ridges and mountains. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 24, 987–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, P, Roseiro, LC, Bessa, RJB, Padilha, M, Partidário, A, Marques de Almeida, J, Bessa, RJB, Calkins, CR, Santos, C 2008. Muscle fiber and fatty acid profiles of Mertolenga-PDO meat. Meat Science 78, 502–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, P, Roseiro, LC, Partidário, A, Alves, V, Bessa, RJB, Calkins, CR, Santos, C 2006. Influence of slaughter season and sex on fatty acid composition, cholesterol and α-tocopherol contents on different muscles of Barrosã-PDO veal. Meat Science 72, 130–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cross, HR, Moen, R, Stanfield, MS 1978. Training and testing of judges for sensory analysis of meat quality. Food Technology 32, 48–54.Google Scholar
Cuvelier, C, Clinquart, A, Hocquette, JF, Cabaraux, JF, Dufrasne, I, Istasse, L, Hornick, JL 2006. Comparison of composition and quality traits of meat from young finishing bulls from Belgian Blue, Limousin and Aberdeen Angus breeds. Meat Science 74, 522–531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Smet, S, Katleen, R, Daniel, D 2004. Meat fatty acid composition as affected by fatness and genetic factors: a review. Animal Research 53, 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dikeman, ME, Pollak, EJ, Zhang, Z, Moser, DW, Gill, CA, Dressler, EA 2005. Phenotypic ranges and relationships among carcass and meat palatability traits for fourteen cattle breeds, and heritabilities and expected progeny differences for Warner–Bratzler shear force in three beef cattle breeds. Journal of Animal Science 83, 2461–2467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dryden, FD, Marchello, JA 1970. Influence of total lipid and fatty acid composition upon the palatability of three bovine muscles. Journal of Animal Science 31, 36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckett, SK, Wagner, DG, Yates, LD, Dolezal, HG, May, SG 1993. Effects of time on feed on beef nutrient composition. Journal of Animal Science 71, 2079–2088.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elmore, JS, Mottram, DS 2006. The role of lipid in the flavour of cooked beef. Developments in Food Science 43, 375–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, AV, Enser, M, Richardson, RI, Wood, JD, Nute, GR, Kurt, E, Sinclair, LA, Wilkinson, RG 2000. Fatty acid composition and eating quality of lamb types derived from four diverse breed × production systems. Meat Science 55, 141–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folch, JL, Stanley, GHS 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry 226, 427–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griebenow, RL, Martz, FA, Morrow, RE 1997. Forage-based beef finishing systems: a review. Journal of Production Agriculture 10, 84–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, D, Erickson, GE, Calkins, CR, Klopfenstein, TJ, Milton, T, Klemesrud, M 1998. Dietary calcium and phosphorous: relationship to beef tenderness and carcass maturity. NBC Reports, University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.Google Scholar
Hocquette, JF, Gondret, F, Baéza, E, Médale, F, Jurie, C, Pethick, DW 2010. Intramuscular fat content in meat-producing animals: development, genetic and nutritional control, and identification of putative markers. Animal 4, 303–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huffman, KL, Miller, MF, Hoover, LC, Wu, CK, Brittin, HC, Ramsey, CB 1996. Effect of beef tenderness on consumer satisfaction with steaks consumed in the home and restaurant. Journal of Animal Science 74, 91–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Killinger, KM, Calkins, CR, Umberger, WJ, Feuz, DM, Eskridge, KM 2004. Consumer sensory acceptance and value for beef steaks of similar tenderness, but differing in marbling level. Journal of Animal Science 82, 3294–3301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melton, SL 1983. Effect of forage feeding on beef flavor. Food Technology 3, 239–248.Google Scholar
Melton, SL 1990. Effects of feeds on flavor of red meat: a review. Journal of Animal Science 68, 4421–4435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, AJ, Scramlin, SM, Dilger, AC, Souza, CM, McKeith, FK, Killefer, J 2009. Contribution of lean, fat, muscle color and degree of doneness to pork and beef species flavor. Meat Science 82, 59–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neely, TR, Lorenzen, CL, Miller, RK, Tatum, JD, Wise, JW, Taylor, JF, Buyck, MJ, Reagan, JO, Savell, JW 1998. Beef customer satisfaction: role of cut, USDA quality grade, and city on in-home consumer ratings. Journal of Animal Science 76, 1027–1033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliveira, V 2007. Produtos tradicionais com nomes protegidos: Apresentação de dados sobre producão, preços e comercializacão. DGADR, Lisboa, Portugal.Google Scholar
Otremba, MM, Dikeman, ME, Milliken, GA, Stroda, SL, Unruh, JA, Chambers, E 1999. Interrelationships among evaluations of beef longissimus and semitendinosus muscle tenderness by Warner–Bratzler shear force, a descriptive-texture profile sensory panel, and a descriptive attribute sensory panel. Journal of Animal Science 77, 865–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partida, JA, Olleta, JL, Sañudo, C, Albertí, P, Campo, MM 2007. Fatty acid composition and sensory traits of beef fed palm oil supplements. Meat Science 76, 444–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pethick, DW, Harper, GS, Oddy, VH 2004. Growth, development and nutritional manipulation of marbling in cattle: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 7, 705–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platter, WJ, Tatum, JD, Belk, KE, Chapman, PL, Scanga, JA, Smith, GC 2003. Relationships of consumer sensory ratings, marbling score, and shear force value to consumer acceptance of beef strip loin steaks. Journal of Animal Science 81, 2741–2750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polkinghorne, R, Philpott, J, Gee, A, Doljanin, A, Innes, J 2008. Development of a commercial system to apply the Meat Standards Australia grading model to optimize the return on eating quality in a beef supply chain. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1451–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raes, K, De Smet, S, Demeyer, D 2001. Effect of double-muscling in Belgian Blue young bulls on the intramuscular fatty acid composition with emphasis on conjugated linoleic acid and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Animal Science 73, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resconi, VC, Campo, MM, Font i Furnols, M, Montossi, F, Sañudo, C 2010. Sensory quality of beef from different finishing diets. Meat Science 86, 865–869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhee, MS, Wheeler, TL, Shackelford, SD, Koohmaraie, M 2004. Variation in palatability and biochemical traits within and among eleven beef muscles. Journal of Animal Science 82, 534–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandoval y Col J 1986. Bases anatómicas, tecnológicas y comerciales de la carnizacion del vacuno. Departamento de Anatomia y Embriologia, Facultad de Veterinaria de Cáceres, Cáceres, Spain.Google Scholar
Sañudo, C, Alfonso, M, Sánchez, A, Delfa, R, Teixeira, A 2000. Carcass and meat quality in light lambs from different fat classes in the EU carcass classification system. Meat Science 56, 89–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shackelford, SD, Wheeler, TL, Meade, MK, Reagan, JO, Byrnes, BL, Koohmaraie, M 2001. Consumer impressions of Tender Select beef. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2605–2614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simões, JA, Mendes, MI, Lemos, JPC 2005. Selection of muscles as indicators of tenderness after seven days of ageing. Meat Science 69, 617–620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, GC, Tatum, JD, Belk, KE 2008. International perspective: characterisation of United States Department of Agriculture and Meat Standards Australia systems for assessing beef quality. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1465–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, SB, Crouse, JD 1984. Relative contributions of acetate, lactate and glucose to lipogenesis in bovine intramuscular and subcutaneous adipose tissue. Journal of Nutrition 114, 792–800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sukhija, PS, Palmquist, DL 1988. Rapid method for determination of total fatty acid content and composition of feedstuffs and feces. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 36, 1202–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Eenaeme, C, Istasse, L, Gabriel, A, Clinquart, A, Maghuin-Rogister, G, Bienfait, JM 1990. Effects of dietary carbohydrate composition on rumen fermentation, plasma hormones and metabolites in growing-fattening bulls. Animal Science 50, 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB, Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voges, KL, Mason, CL, Brooks, JC, Delmore, RJ, Griffin, DB, Hale, DS, Henning, WR, Johnson, DD, Lorenzen, CL, Maddock, RJ, Miller, RK, Morgan, JB, Baird, BE, Gwartney, BL, Savell, JW 2007. National beef tenderness survey – 2006: assessment of Warner–Bratzler shear and sensory panel ratings for beef from US retail and foodservice establishments. Meat Science 77, 357–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westerling, DB, Hedrick, HB 1979. Fatty acid composition of bovine lipids as influenced by diet, sex and anatomical location and relationship to sensory characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 48, 1343–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, TL, Cundiff, LV, Shackelford, SD, Koohmaraie, M 2005. Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle VII): carcass, yield, and longissimus palatability traits. Journal of Animal Science 83, 196–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheeler, TL, Shackelford, SD, Johnson, LP, Miller, MF, Miller, RK, Koohmaraie, M 1997. A comparison of Warner–Bratzler shear force assessment within and among institutions. Journal of Animal Science 75, 2423–2432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheeler, TL, Shackelford, SD, Koohmaraie, M 1996. Sampling, cooking, and coring effects on Warner–Bratzler shear force values in beef. Journal of Animal Science 74, 1553–1562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed