Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T05:01:27.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of lactation trimester and parity on eating behavior, milk production and efficiency traits of dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2019

Y. A. Ben Meir Open the ORCID record for Y. A. Ben Meir [Opens in a new window] ,
M. Nikbachat ,
S. Jacoby ,
Y. Portnik ,
H. Levit ,
A. Kleinjan Elazary ,
E. Gershon ,
G. Adin ,
M. Zinder-Cohen  and
A. Shabtay
...Show all authors
Y. A. Ben Meir
Affiliation:
Department of Ruminant Science, Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), HaMaccabim Road 68, P.O.B 15159, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel Department of Animal Sciences, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food, and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot, Israel
M. Nikbachat
Affiliation:
Department of Ruminant Science, Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), HaMaccabim Road 68, P.O.B 15159, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel
S. Jacoby
Affiliation:
Department of Ruminant Science, Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), HaMaccabim Road 68, P.O.B 15159, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel
Y. Portnik
Affiliation:
Department of Ruminant Science, Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), HaMaccabim Road 68, P.O.B 15159, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel
H. Levit
Affiliation:
Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) Lab, Institute of Agricultural Engineering, ARO, P.O.B. 15159, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel
A. Kleinjan Elazary
Affiliation:
Department of Ruminant Science, Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), HaMaccabim Road 68, P.O.B 15159, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel Department of Animal Sciences, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food, and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot, Israel
E. Gershon
Affiliation:
Department of Ruminant Science, Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), HaMaccabim Road 68, P.O.B 15159, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel
G. Adin
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Extension Service, Ministry of Agriculture, HaMaccabim road 68, P.O.B. 15159, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel
M. Zinder-Cohen
Affiliation:
Beef Cattle Section, Institute of Animal Science, ARO, Newe Ya’ar Research Center, P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30950, Israel
A. Shabtay
Affiliation:
Beef Cattle Section, Institute of Animal Science, ARO, Newe Ya’ar Research Center, P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30950, Israel
M. Zachut
Affiliation:
Department of Ruminant Science, Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), HaMaccabim Road 68, P.O.B 15159, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel
S. J. Mabjeesh
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food, and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot, Israel
I. Halachmi
Affiliation:
Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) Lab, Institute of Agricultural Engineering, ARO, P.O.B. 15159, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel
J. Miron*
Affiliation:
Department of Ruminant Science, Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), HaMaccabim Road 68, P.O.B 15159, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

There is absence knowledge about the effects of lactation trimester and parity on eating behavior, production and efficiency of dairy cows. Objective of this study was to identify and characterize in 340 dairy cows, the 20% high efficient (HE), 20% low efficient (LE) and 60% mid efficient (ME) cows according to their individual residual feed intake (RFI) values, within and between lactation trimesters and between 1st and 2nd parities. Efficiency effect within each lactation trimester, was exhibited in daily dry matter intake (DMI), eating rate and meal size, that were the highest in LE cows, moderate in the ME cows and lowest in the HE group. Daily eating time, meal frequency, yields of milk and energy-corrected milk (ECM) and BW were similar in the three efficiency groups within each trimester. The lower efficiency of the LE cows in each trimester attributes to their larger metabolic energy intake, heat production and energy losses. In subgroup of 52 multiparous cows examined along their 1st and 2nd trimesters, milk and ECM production, DMI, eating behavior and efficiency traits were similar with high Pearson’s correlation (r=0.78 to 0.89) between trimesters. In another subgroup of 42 multiparous cows measured at their 2nd and 3rd trimesters, milk and ECM yield, DMI and eating time were reduced (P<0.01) at the 3rd trimester, but eating rate, meal frequency and meal size remained similar with high Pearson’s correlation (r=0.74 to 0.88) between trimesters. In subgroup of 26 cows measured in 1st and 2nd parities, DMI, BW, milk and ECM yield, and ECM/DMI increased in the 2nd lactation, but eating behavior and RFI traits were similar in both parities. These findings encourage accurate prediction of DMI based on a model that includes eating behavior parameters, together with individual measurement of ECM production. This can be further used to identify HE cows in commercial herd, a step necessary for potential genetic selection program aimed to improve herd efficiency.

Keywords

individual feedingenergy balanceresidual feed intakeenergy-corrected milklow-roughage diet
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 13 , Issue 8 , August 2019 , pp. 1736 - 1743
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, MS and Bradford, BJ 2006. Metabolic regulation of food intake in ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 84, 120–121.Google Scholar
Asher, A, Shabtay, A, Haim, A, Aharoni, Y, Miron, J, Adin, G, Tamir, A, Arieli, A, Halachmi, I, Moallem, U, Orlov, A and Brosh, A 2014. Time required to determine performance variables and production efficiency of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 4340–4353.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 1990. Official methods of analysis volume 1, 15th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Azizi, O, Kaufmann, O and Hasselmann, L 2009. Relationship between feeding behaviour and feed intake of dairy cows depending on their parity and milk yield. Livestock Science 122, 156–161.Google Scholar
Ben Meir, YA, Nikbachat, M, Fortnik, Y, Jacoby, S, Levit, H, Adin, G, Cohen Zinder, M, Shabtay, A, Gershon, E, Zachut, M, Mabjeesh, SJ, Halachmi, I and Miron, J 2018. Eating behavior, milk production, rumination and digestibility characteristics of high and low efficient lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 1–12.Google Scholar
Ben Shabat, SK, Sasson, G, Doron-Faigenboim, A, Durman, T, Jacoby, S, Miller, MEB., White, BA, Shterzer, N and Mizrahi, I 2016. Specific microbiome-dependent mechanisms underlie the energy harvest efficiency of ruminants. ISME Journal 10, 2958–2972.Google Scholar
Bland, JM and Altman, DG 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet I, 307–310.Google Scholar
Connor, EE, Hutchison, JL, Norman, HD, Olson, KM, Van Tassell, CP, Leith, JM and Baldwin, RL 2013. Use of residual feed intake in Holsteins during early lactation shows potential to improve feed efficiency through genetic selection. Journal of Animal Science 91, 3978–3988.Google Scholar
DeVries, TJ, von Keyserlingk, MAG, Weary, DM and Beauchemin, KA 2003. Measuring the feeding behavior of lactating dairy cows in early to peak lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 3354–3361.Google Scholar
Drissler, M, Gaworski, M, Tucker, CB and Weary, DM 2005. Free-stall maintenance: effects on lying behavior of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 2381–2387.Google Scholar
Halachmi, I, Ben Meir, Y, Miron, J and Maltz, E 2016. Feeding behavior improves prediction of dairy cow voluntary feed intake but cannot serve as the sole indicator. Animal 10, 1501–1506.Google Scholar
Halachmi, I, Edan, Y, Maltz, E, Peiper, UM, Moallem, U and Brukental, I 1998. A real-time control system for individual dairy cow food intake. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 20, 131–144.Google Scholar
Hayes, BJ, Lewin, H A and Goddard, ME 2013. The future of livestock breeding: genomic selection for efficiency, reduced emissions intensity, and adaptation. Trends in Genetics 29, 206–214.Google Scholar
Israeli Dairy Board Association 2017. The profitability of Israeli dairy cattle branch in 2016. Israeli Dairy Board, Yahud, Israel.Google Scholar
Kokkinos, A, le Roux, CW, Alexiadou, K, Tentolouris, N, Vincent, RP, Kyriaki, D, Perrea, D, Ghatei, MA, Bloom, SR and Katsilambros, N 2010. Eating slowly increases the postprandial response of the anorexigenic gut hormones, peptide yy and glucagon-like peptide-1. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 95, 333–337.Google Scholar
Li, B, Berglund, B, Fikse, WF, Lassen, J, Lidauer, MH, Mäntysaari, P and Løvendahl, P 2017. Neglect of lactation stage leads to naive assessment of residual feed intake in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 9076–9084.Google Scholar
Lu, Y, Vandehaar, MJ, Spurlock, DM, Weigel, KA, Armentano, LE, Staples, CR, Connor, EE, Wang, Z, Coffey, M, Veerkamp, RF, de Haas, Y and Tempelman, RJ 2017. Modeling genetic and nongenetic variation of feed efficiency and its partial relationships between component traits as a function of management and environmental factors. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 412–427.Google Scholar
Manafiazar, G, Goonewardene, L, Miglior, F, Crews, DH, Basarab, JA, Okine, E and Wang, Z 2016. Genetic and phenotypic correlations among feed efficiency, production and selected conformation traits in dairy cows. Animal 10, 381–389.Google Scholar
NRC 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 7th revised edition, Subcommittee on Dairy Cattle Nutrition, Committee on Animal Nutrition and Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Ohkuma, T, Hirakawa, Y, Nakamura, U, Kiyohara, Y, Kitazono, T and Ninomiya, T 2015. Association between eating rate and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Obesity 39, 1589–1596.Google Scholar
Potts, SB, Boerman, JR, Lock, AL, Allen, MS and VandeHaar, MJ 2015. Residual feed intake is repeatable for lactating Holstein dairy cows fed high and low starch diets. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 4735–4747.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc 2009. JMP® 9. Modeling and multivariate methods.. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc 2016. JMP® 13 fitting linear models. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Shaani, Y, Eliyahu, D, Mizrahi, I, Yosef, E, Ben-Meir, Y, Nikbachat, M, Solomon, R, Mabjeesh, SJ and Miron, J 2016. Effect of feeding ensiled mixture of pomegranate pulp and drier feeds on digestibility and milk performance in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 83, 35–41.Google Scholar
Swartz, TH, McGilliard, ML and Petersson-Wolfe, CS 2016. Technical note: the use of an accelerometer for measuring step activity and lying behaviors in dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 9109–9113.Google Scholar
Tolkamp, BJ, Allcroft, DJ, Austin, EJ, Nielsen, BL and Kyriazakis, I 1998. Satiety split feeding behavior into bouts. Journal of Theoretical Biology 194, 235–250.Google Scholar
Tolkamp, BJ, Schweitzer, DPN and Kyriazakis, I 2000. The biologically relevant unit for the analysis of short-term feeding behavior of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 2057–2068.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Weller, JI and Ezra, E 2016. Genetic and phenotypic analysis of daily Israeli Holstein milk, fat, and protein production as determined by a real-time milk analyzer. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 9782–9795.Google Scholar
Xi, YM, Wu, F, Zhao, DQ, Yang, Z, Li, L, Han, ZY and Wang, GL 2016. Biological mechanisms related to differences in residual feed intake in dairy cows. Animal 10, 1311–1318.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ben Meir et al. supplementary material

Ben Meir et al. supplementary material 1

Download Ben Meir et al. supplementary material(File)
File 135.5 KB