Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T21:14:56.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of footrot on weight gain in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

G. J. Nieuwhof ,
S. C. Bishop ,
W. G. Hill  and
H. W. Raadsma
G. J. Nieuwhof*
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, PO Box 44, Milton Keynes MK6 1AX, UK Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Roslin BioCentre, Midlothian EH25 9PS, UK
S. C. Bishop
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Roslin BioCentre, Midlothian EH25 9PS, UK
W. G. Hill
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK
H. W. Raadsma
Affiliation:
Centre for Advanced Technologies in Animal Genetics and Reproduction (Reprogen), Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, PMB 3, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Footrot is a highly contagious bacterial disease of sheep affecting the interdigital skin and surrounding soft and hard horn of a hoof, often resulting in severe lameness. This study was aimed at estimating the effect of footrot on weight gain of affected animals, and characterising the variation between animals in terms of phenotypic, environmental and genetic components. A general approach was developed describing the relationship between the disease and weight gain, defining new traits such as the maximum weight loss as a result of disease and the time after infection that this occurs. In two trials, 1267 Merino sheep were artificially challenged with footrot when 10 months old and re-infected through exposure to footrot on pasture 33 weeks later. Their feet were scored for footrot and live weights were measured approximately every 3 weeks. From data on animals that were not affected by footrot throughout each trial, normal growth curves were calculated and applied to affected animals to predict their growth had they remained healthy, so that weight loss as a result of footrot could be predicted. Animals with average footrot severity in the two trials suffered weight losses of 0.5 to 2.5 kg live weight, but most animals regained lost live weight later in the trials as footrot healed following vaccination. The estimates of the heritabilities of weight loss, adjusted for the severity of footrot, were about 0.30 and 0.15 in the experimental and natural challenge groups, respectively. Animals with higher genotypic values for weights at the start of each trial appeared to cope better with infections, in terms of lower weight losses. The time of highest footrot score and the time of maximum weight loss after infection had only very small genetic components.

Keywords

sheepfootrotweight losscompensatory growthgenetics
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 2 , Issue 10 , October 2008 , pp. 1427 - 1436
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clements, ACA, Mellor, DJ, Fitzpatrick, JL 2002. Reporting of sheep lameness conditions to veterinarians in the Scottish Borders. Veterinary Record 150, 815–817.Google Scholar
Conington J, Nieuwhof GJ, Hosie B, Bishop SC and Bünger L 2007. Breeding for resistance to footrot in sheep. 58th Annual meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Dublin, Ireland, p. 18.Google Scholar
Coop, RL, Graham, RB, Jackson, F, Wright, SE, Angus, KW 1985. Effect of experimental Ostertagia circumcincta infection on the performance of grazing lambs. Research in Veterinary Science 38, 282–287.Google Scholar
Egerton, JR 2000. Foot-rot and other conditions. In Diseases of sheep, 3rd edition (ed. WB Martin and ID Aitken), pp. 243–249. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Green, LE, Wassink, GJ, Grogono-Thomas, R, Moore, LJ, Medley, GF 2007. Looking after the individual to reduce disease in the flock: A binomial mixed effects model investigating the impact of individual sheep management of footrot and interdigital dermatitis in a prospective longitudinal study on one farm. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 78, 172–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grogono-Thomas, R, Cook, AJ, Johnston, AM 1998. Lame excuses? Proceedings of the Sheep Veterinary Society 22, 77–82.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, AC 1980. Effect of Psoroptes ovis on the weight of sheep. Veterinary Record 107, 469–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovac, M, Groeneveld, E 2003. VCE-5 User’s guide and reference manual Version 5.1. University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Animal Science, Ljubljana, Slovenia & Institute of Animal Science, Federal Agricultural Research Centre, Neustadt, Germany.Google Scholar
Mackay, AD, Betteridge, K, Devantier, BP, Budding, PJ, Niezen, J 1998. Chemical-free hill country sheep and beef livestock production systems. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 60, 15–18.Google Scholar
Marshall, DJ, Walker, RI, Cullis, BR, Luff, MF 1991. The effect of footrot on body weight and wool growth of sheep. Australian Veterinary Journal 68, 45–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nieuwhof, GJ, Bishop, SC 2005. Costs of the major endemic diseases of sheep in Great Britain and the potential benefits of reduction in disease impact. Animal Science 81, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekelder, JJ 1994. Maedi-Visna virus induced indurative lymphocytic mastitis and its effect on preweaning growth of lambs. Proceedings of the sheep veterinary society 18, 53–56.Google Scholar
Raadsma, HW, Egerton, JR, Wood, D, Kristo, C, Nicholas, FW 1994. Disease resistance in Merino sheep. III. Genetic variation in resistance to footrot following challenge and subsequent vaccination with a homologous rDNA pilus vaccine under both induced and natural conditions. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 111, 367–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sargison, ND, Scott, PR, Penny, CD, Pirie, RS 1995. Effect of an outbreak of sheep scab (Psoroptes ovis infestation) during mid-pregnancy on ewe body condition and lamb birth weight. Veterinary Record 136, 287–289.Google Scholar
Skerman, TM, Johnson, DL, Kane, DW, Clarke, JN 1988. Clinical footscald and footrot in a New Zealand Romney flock: phenotypic and genetic parameters. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 39, 907–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute 1989. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, version 6, vol. 2, 4th edition. Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Stewart, DJ, Clark, BL, Jarrett, G 1984. Differences between strains of Bacteriodes nodosus in their effects on the severity of foot-rot, bodyweight and wool growth in Merino sheep. Australian Veterinary Journal 61, 348–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symons, LEA 1978. Experimental foot-rot, wool growth and body mass. Australian Veterinary Journal 54, 362–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wassink, GJ, Green, LE 2001. Farmers’ practices and attitudes towards foot rot in sheep. Veterinary Record 149, 489–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed