Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:02:25.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of fertility on the economics of pasture-based dairy systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

L. Shalloo ,
A. Cromie  and
N. McHugh
L. Shalloo*
Affiliation:
Livestock Systems Department, Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
A. Cromie
Affiliation:
Irish Cattle Breeding Federation, Bandon, Co. Cork, Ireland
N. McHugh
Affiliation:
Livestock Systems Department, Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

There are significant costs associated with reproductive inefficiency in pasture-based dairy herds. This study has quantified the economic effect of a number of key variables associated with reproductive inefficiency in a dairy herd and related them to 6-week calving rate for both cows and heifers. These variables include: increased culling costs, the effects of sub optimum calving dates, increased labour costs and increased artificial insemination (AI) and intervention costs. The Moorepark Dairy Systems Model which is a stochastic budgetary simulation model was used to simulate the overall economic effect at farm level. The effect of change in each of the components was simulated in the model and the costs associated with each component was quantified. An analysis of national data across a 4-year period using the Irish Cattle Breeding Federation database was used to quantify the relationship between the 6-week calving rate of a herd with survivability (%), calving interval (days) and the level of AI usage. The costs associated with increased culling (%), calving date slippage (day), increased AI and intervention costs (0.1 additional inseminations), as well as, increased labour costs (10%) were quantified as €13.68, €3.86, €4.56 and €29.6/cow per year. There was a statistically significant association between the 6-week calving rate and survivability, calving interval and AI usage at farm level. A 1% change in 6-week calving rate was associated with €9.26/cow per annum for cows and €3.51/heifer per annum for heifers. This study does not include the indirect costs such as reduced potential for expansion, increased costs associated with failing to maintain a closed herd as well as the unrealised potential within the herd.

Keywords

simulationsurvivabilitycalving intervalAI costslabourdairy systems
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 8 , Supplement s1: New Science ‐ New Practices International Cow Fertility Conference 18‐21 May 2014, Westport, Ireland , May 2014 , pp. 222 - 231
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berry, DP and Cromie, AR 2009. Associations between age at first calving and subsequent performance in Irish spring calving Holstein–Friesian dairy cows. Livestock Science 123, 44–54.Google Scholar
Berry, DP, Buckley, F, Dillon, P, Evans, RD, Rath, M and Veerkamp, RF 2003. Genetic relationships among body condition score, body weight, milk yield and fertility in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2193–2204.Google Scholar
Boichard, D 1990. Estimation of the economic value of conception rate in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 24, 187–204.Google Scholar
Buckley, FP, Dillon, P, Rath, M and Veerkamp, RF 2000. The relationship between genetic merit for yield and live-weight, condition score and energy balance of spring-calving Holetein Friesian dairy cows on grass-based systems of milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 1878–1886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, S, Shalloo, L and Murphy, JJ 2010. Extended lactations in a seasonal-calving pastoral system of production to modulate the effects of reproductive failure. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 1283–1295.Google Scholar
Central Statistics Office (CSO) 2013. Principal statistics in relation to agriculture. Central Statistics Office, Skehard Rd., Cork, Ireland. Retrieved December 12, 2013, from http://www.statcentral.ie/viewstats.asp?type=Agriculture%20and%20Fishing Google Scholar
Coleman, J, Pierce, KM, Berry, DP and Horan, B 2009. The influence of genetic selection and feed system on the reproductive performance of spring calving dairy cows within post EU milk quota pasture-based production systems. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5258–5269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crump, RE, Wray, NR, Thompson, R and Simm, G 1997. Assigning pedigree beef performance records to contemporary groups taking account of within-herd calving patterns. Journal of Animal Science 65, 193–198.Google Scholar
Darwash, AO, Lamming, GE and Wooliams, JA 1997. The phenotypic association between the interval to post-partum ovulation and traditional measures of fertility in dairy cattle. Animal Science 65, 9–16.Google Scholar
de Jong, G 1997. Index for daughters fertility in the Netherlands. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Genetic Improvement of functional traits in cattle; Fertility and Reproduction, Grub, Germany, 23rd–25th November. INTERBULL Bulletin 18, 102–105.Google Scholar
De Vries, A, Crane, MB, Bartolome, JA, Melendez, P, Risco, CA and Archbald, LF 2006. Economic comparison of timed artificial insemination and exogenous progesterone as treatments for ovarian cysts. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 3028–3037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dekkers, JCM 1991. Estimation of economic values for dairy cattle breeding goals: Bias due to sub-optimal management policies. Livestock Production Science 29, 131–149.Google Scholar
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, 2010. Food Harvest 2020. Retrieved 4 March 2012, from http://www.agriculture.gov.ie/media/migration/agri-foodindustry/foodharvest2020/2020FoodHarvestEng240810.pdf Google Scholar
Dillon, P 2011. The Irish Dairy Industry – planning for 2020. In National Dairy Conference, pp. 1–24. Cork & Athlone, Ireland.Google Scholar
Dillon, P, Crosse, S, Stakelum, G and Flynn, F 1995. The effect of calving date and stocking rate on the performance of spring-calving dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 50, 286–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disken, MG, Murphy, JJ and Sreenan, JM 2006. Embryo survival in dairy cows managed under pastoral conditions. Animal Reproduction Science 96, 297–311.Google Scholar
Esslemont, RJ, Kossaibati, MA and Allcock., J 2001. Economics of fertility in dairy cows. Recording and evaluation of fertility traits in UK dairy herd. In Proceedings of a workshop, 19th and 20th November, 2001, Edinburgh Scotland, pp. 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geary, U, Lopez-Villalobos, N, Garrick, DJ and Shalloo, L 2012. An analysis of the implications of a change to the seasonal milk profile in the Irish dairy industry utilising a seasonal processing sector model. Journal of Agricultural Science 150, 389–407.Google Scholar
Gilmour, AR, Gogel, BJ, Cullis, BR and Thompson, R 2012. ASReml User Guide Release 3.0. VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, HP1 1ES, UK.Google Scholar
Herlihy, MM, Berry, DP, Crowe, MA, Diskin, MG and Butler, ST 2013. Evaluation of protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation in seasonal calving pasture-based dairy production systems. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 4488–4501.Google Scholar
Horan, B, Mee, JF, Rath, M, O’Connor, P and Dillon, P 2004. The effect of strain of Holstein–Friesian cow and feed system on reproductive performance in seasonal-calving milk production systems. Journal of Animal Science 79, 453–467.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, IA, Shalloo, L and Butler, ST 2013aExpanding the the dairy herd in pasture-based systems: the role of sexed semen use on virgin heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 1312–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, IA, Shalloo, L and Butler, ST 2013bExpanding the dairy herd in pasture-based systems: the role of sexed semen use on virgin heifers and dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 6742–6752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrige, R, (ed.) 1989. Ruminant nutrition, Recommended allowances and feed tables. John Libbey Eurotext, Montrougue, France.Google Scholar
Jones, WP, Hansen, LB and Chester-Jones, H 1994. Response of health care to selection for milk yield of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 3137–3152.Google Scholar
Kadarmideen, HN and Simm, G 2002. Selection responses expected from index selection including disease resistance, routine national fertility and longevity in dairy cattle. In Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 19th 23rd August, Montpellier, France. CD-ROM communication No. 01-19.Google Scholar
Kennedy, E, O’Donovan, M, O’Mara, FP and Delaby, L 2007. Effect of herbage allowance and concentrate supplementation on dry matter intake, milk production and energy balance of early lactating dairy cows. Livestock Science 117, 275–286.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J, Dillon, P, O’Sullivan, K, Buckley, F and Rath, M 2003. Effect of genetic merit and concentrate feeding level on the reproductive performance of Holstein Friesian dairy cows in a grass-based milk production system. Journal of Animal Science 76, 297–308.Google Scholar
LIC 2012. New Zealand Dairy Statistics 2012/2013. Retrieved December 8, 2013, from http://www.lic.co.nz/lic_Publications.cfm Google Scholar
McCarthy, S, Mee, JF, O’Connor, P, Rath, M and Dillon, P 2005. The effect of strain of Holstein–Friesian cow and feeding system on selected plasma metabolic hormones and reproductive performance. In Proceedings of. Agricultural Research Forum, 14th and 15th March, Tullamore, Ireland, pp 23.Google Scholar
McCarthy, S, Horan, B, Dillon, PG, O'Connor, P, Rath, M and Shalloo, L 2007. Economic comparison of divergent strains of Holstein–Friesian cows in various pasture-based production systems. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 1493–1505.Google Scholar
McDonald, R, Shalloo, L, Pierce, KM and Horan, B 2013. Evaluating expansion strategies for startup European Union dairy farm businesses. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 4059–4069.Google Scholar
McEvoy, M, O’Donovan, M and Shalloo, L 2011. Development and application of an economic ranking index for perennial ryegrass cultivars. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 1627–1639.Google Scholar
O’Brien, B, O’Donovan, K, Gleeson, D, Ruane, DJ and Kinsella, J 2006. Improving labour productivity to facilitate viability on smaller Irish Dairy Farms. Journal of International Farm Management 3, Retrieved December 12, 2013, http://www.ifmaonline.org/pdf/journals/Brien_etal.pdf Google Scholar
Plaizier, JCB, King, GJ, Dekkers, JCM and Lissemore, K 1998. Modeling the relationship between reproductive performance and net revenue in dairy herds. Agricultural Systems 56, 305–322.Google Scholar
Ramsbottom, G, Cromie, AR, Horan, B and Berry, DP 2012. Relationship between dairy cow genetic merit and profit on commercial spring calving dairy farms. Animal 6, 1031–1039.Google Scholar
Roche, JR, Friggens, NC, Kay, JK, Fisher, MW, Stafford, KJ and Berry, DP 2009. Invited review: body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5769–5801.Google Scholar
Shalloo, L, Geary, U and Villalobos, N 2013. ICBF Dairy and Beef Industry meeting. Retrieved December 12, 2013, http://www.icbf.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Overall_081013.pdf Google Scholar
Shalloo, L, O’Donnell, S and Horan, B 2007. ProfiTable dairying in an increased EU milk quota scenario. Exploiting the Freedom to Milk. In National Dairy Conference, 22 November 2007, Kilkenny and Cavan, pp. 20–45.Google Scholar
Shalloo, L, Dillon, PG, Rath, M and Wallace, M 2004. Description and validation of the Moorepark Dairy System Model. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 1945–1959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shalloo, L 2009. Pushing the barriers on milk costs/outputs. In National Dairy Conference, 18th–19th November 2009, Mullingar & Killarney, pp. 19–39.Google Scholar
Teagasc 2013. Management data for farm planning. Teagasc, Oakpark Co, Carlow, Ireland.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, RF, Dillon, P, Kelly, E, Cromie, AR and Groen, AF 2002. Dairy cattle breeding objectives combining yield, survival and calving interval for pasture-based systems in Ireland under different milk quota scenarios. Livestock Production Science 76, 137–151.Google Scholar
Wall, E, Brotherstone, S, Woolliams, JA, Banos, G and Coffey, MP 2003. Genetic evaluation of fertility using direct and correlated traits. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 4093–4102.Google Scholar