Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:33:43.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of feed consumption levels on growth performance and carcass composition during the force-feeding period in foie gras production of male Mule ducks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2016

Z. G. Wen ,
Y. Jiang ,
J. Tang ,
M. Xie ,
P. L. Yang  and
S. S. Hou
Z. G. Wen
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Y. Jiang
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
J. Tang
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
M. Xie
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
P. L. Yang
Affiliation:
Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
S. S. Hou*
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
*
† E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In order to avoid excess feed consumption during the force-feeding period in foie gras production, a dose-response experiment with seven feed consumption levels (450, 540, 630, 720, 810, 900, 990 g/day per bird) was conducted to evaluate the effects of feed consumption levels on growth performance and carcass composition of male Mule ducks from 91 to 102 days of age. One-day-old Mule ducklings (sterile and artificial hybrid of male Albatre Muscovy duck and female Pekin duck were fed a two-phase commercial diets for ad libitum intake from hatching to 91 days of age, followed by graded feeding levels of a corn diet by force-feeding from 91 to 102 days of age. Fifty-six 91-day-old male Mule ducks with similar BW were randomly assigned to seven treatments, with eight birds per treatment. Birds were housed in individual pens. At 102 days of age, final BW was measured and BW gain and feed conversion ratio of ducks from each treatment were calculated from day 91 to 102, and then all ducks were slaughtered to evaluate the yields of skin with subcutaneous fat, abdominal fat, breast meat (including pectoralis major and pectoralis minor), leg meat (including thigh and drum stick), and liver. Significant differences in BW gain, total liver weight and liver relative weight were observed among the treatments (P<0.001). According to the broken-line regression analysis, the optimal feed consumption levels of male Mule ducks from 91 to 102 days of age for maximum BW gain, total liver weight and liver relative weight were 217, 227 and 216 g feed/kg BW0.75·per day, respectively.

Keywords

ducksfeed consumption levelforce-feedingproduction performancefoie gras
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 10 , Issue 9 , September 2016 , pp. 1417 - 1422
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

a

These two authors contributed equally to this work.

References

André, J, Guy, G, Gontier-Latonnelle, K, Bernadet, M, Davail, B, Hoo-Paris, R and Davail, S 2007. Influence of lipoprotein-lipase activity on plasma triacylglycerol concentration and lipid storage in three genotypes of ducks. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology-Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 148, 899–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chartrin, P, Bernadet, MD, Guy, G, Mourot, J, Hocquette, JF, Rideau, N, Duclos, MJ and Baéza, E 2006a. Does overfeeding enhance genotype effects on energy metabolism and lipid deposition in breast muscle of ducks? Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology-Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 145, 413–418.Google Scholar
Chartrin, P, Bernadet, MD, Guy, G, Mourot, J, Hocquette, JF, Rideau, N, Duclos, MJ and Baéza, E 2006b. Does overfeeding enhance genotype effects on liver ability for lipogenesis and lipid secretion in ducks? Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology-Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 145, 390–396.Google Scholar
Chartrin, P, Bernadet, MD, Guy, G, Mourot, J, Hocquette, JF, Rideau, N, Duclos, MJ and Baéza, E 2007. Do age and feeding levels have comparable effects on fat deposition in breast muscle of mule ducks? Animal 1, 113–123.Google Scholar
Chartrin, P, Schiavone, A, Bernadet, MD, Guy, G, Mourot, J, Duclos, MJ and Baéza, E 2005. Effect of genotype and overfeeding on lipid deposition in myofibres and intramuscular adipocytes of breast and thigh muscles of ducks. Reproduction Nutrition Development 45, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davail, S, Guy, G, André, JM, Hermier, D and Hoo-Paris, R 2000. Metabolism in two breeds of geese with moderate or large overfeeding induced liver-steatosis. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 126, 91–99.Google Scholar
Davail, S., Rideau, N, Guy, G, André, JM, Hermier, D and Hoo-Paris, R 2003. Hormonal and metabolic responses to overfeeding in three genotypes of ducks. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology-Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 134, 707–715.Google Scholar
Fournier, E, Peresson, R, Guy, G and Hermier, D 1997. Relationships between storage and secretion of hepatic lipids in two breeds of geese with different susceptibility to liver steatosis. Poultry Science 76, 599–607.Google Scholar
Hansen, R and Walzem, R 1993. Avian fatty liver hemorrhagic syndrome: a comparative review. Advances in Veterinary Science and Comparative Medicine 37, 451–468.Google ScholarPubMed
Hermier, D, Saadoun, A, Salichon, MR, Sellier, N, Rousselot-Paillet, D and Chapman, MJ 1991. Plasma lipoproteins and liver lipids in two breeds of geese with different susceptibility to hepatic steatosis: changes induced by development and force-feeding. Lipids 26, 331–339.Google Scholar
Janan, J, Bárdos, L, Karsai, M, Ágota, G, Rudas, P, Kozak, J and Bódi, L 2000. Relationships between force-feeding and some physiological parameters in geese bred for fatty liver. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica 48, 89–97.Google Scholar
Luo, Z, Liu, YJ, Mai, KS, Tian, LX, Tan, XY and Shi, JF 2006. Effects of feeding levels on growth performance, feed utilization, body composition, and apparent digestibility coefficients of nutrients for grouper Epinephelus coioides juveniles. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 37, 32–40.Google Scholar
Molee, W, Bouillier-Oudot, M, Auvergne, A and Babilé, R 2005. Changes in lipid composition of hepatocyte plasma membrane induced by overfeeding in duck. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 141, 437–444.Google Scholar
Pingel, H 2009. Waterfowl production for food security. Paper presented at: IV World Waterfowl Conference, 11 to 13 November, 2009, Thrissur, India.Google Scholar
Robbins, K, Saxton, A and Souther, L 2006. Estimation of nutrient requirements using broken-line regression analysis. Journal of Animal Science 84, E155–E165.Google Scholar
Saadoun, A and Leclercq, B 1987. In vivo lipogenesis of genetically lean and fat chickens: effects of nutritional state and dietary fat. The Journal of Nutrition 117, 428–435.Google Scholar
SAS Institute 2003. SAS user’s guide: statistics. Version 9.0. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Su, SY, Dodson, MV, Li, XB, Li, QF, Wang, HW and Xie, Z 2009. The effects of dietary betaine supplementation on fatty liver performance, serum parameters, histological changes, methylation status and the mRNA expression level of Spot14α in Landes goose fatty liver. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 154, 308–314.Google Scholar
Wen, ZG, Xie, M, Fouad, AM, Tang, J, Huang, W and Hou, SS 2015. The effect of feed consumption levels on growth performance and apparent digestibility of nutrients in White Pekin ducks. Journal of Applied Animal Research 43, 112–117.Google Scholar
Yokota, HO 1976. Adaptation of amino acid absorptive ability to different protein levels of diets by chickens. Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science 47, 233–235.Google Scholar
Yokota, H and Ueda, H 1981. The effect in chicks [Gallus gallus] of feeding a diet containing excess l-methionine on the ability of the intestine to absorb methionine. Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science 52, 53–57.Google Scholar
Yuan, YC, Yang, HJ, Gong, SY, Luo, Z, Yuan, HW and Chen, XK 2010. Effects of feeding levels on growth performance, feed utilization, body composition and apparent digestibility coefficients of nutrients for juvenile Chinese sucker, Myxocyprinus asiaticus . Aquaculture Research 41, 1030–1042.Google Scholar
Zanusso, J, Rémignon, H, Guy, G, Manse, H and Babilé, R 2003. The effects of overfeeding on myofibre characteristics and metabolical traits of the breast muscle in Muscovy ducks (Caïrina moschata). Reproduction Nutrition Development 43, 105–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, CL, Hou, SS, Wang, YH, Liu, FZ and Xie, M 2007. Feed input and excreta collection time in metabolisable energy assays for ducks. Czech Journal of Animal Science 52, 463–468.Google Scholar
Zhou, ZX, Isshiki, Y, Yamauchi, K and Nakahiro, Y 1990. Effects of force-feeding and dietary cereals on gastrointestinal size, intestinal absorptive ability and endogenous nitrogen in ducks. British Poultry Science 31, 307–317.Google Scholar
Zhu, YW, Xie, M, Huang, W, Yang, L and Hou, SS 2012. Effects of biotin on growth performance and foot pad dermatitis of starter White Pekin ducklings. British Poultry Science 53, 646–650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed