Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:24:57.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of dietary supplementation with selenium-enriched yeast or sodium selenite on selenium tissue distribution and meat quality in commercial-line turkeys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2011

D. T. Juniper ,
R. H. Phipps  and
G. Bertin
D. T. Juniper*
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Group, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AR, UK
R. H. Phipps
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Group, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AR, UK
G. Bertin
Affiliation:
Alltech France, EU Regulatory Affairs Department, 14 Place Marie-Jeanne Bassot, 92300 Levallois-Perret, France
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the concentration of total selenium (Se) and proportions of total Se comprised as selenomethionine (SeMet) and selenocysteine (SeCys) in the tissues of female turkeys offered diets containing graded additions of selenized-enriched yeast (SY), or sodium selenite (SS). Oxidative stability and tissue glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity of breast and thigh muscle were assessed at 0 and 10 days post mortem. A total of 216 female turkey poults were enrolled in the study. A total of 24 birds were euthanized at the start of the study and samples of blood, breast, thigh, heart, liver, kidney and gizzard were collected for determination of total Se. Remaining birds were blocked by live weight and randomly allocated to one of four dietary treatments (n = 48 birds/treatment) that differed either in Se source (SY v. SS) or dose (Con [0.2 mg/kg total Se], SY-L and SS-L [0.3 mg/kg total Se as SY and SS, respectively] and SY-H [0.45 mg total Se/kg]). Following 42 and 84 days of treatment 24 birds per treatment were euthanized and samples of blood, breast, thigh, heart, liver, kidney and gizzard were retained for determination of total Se and the proportion of total Se comprised as SeMet or SeCys. Whole blood GSH-Px activity was determined at each time point. Tissue GSH-Px activity and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances were determined in breast and thigh tissue at the end of the study. There were responses (P < 0.001) in all tissues to the graded addition of dietary Se, although rates of accumulation were highest in birds offered SY. There were notable differences between tissue types and treatments in the distribution of SeMet and SeCys, and the activity of tissue and erythrocyte GSH-Px (P < 0.05). SeCys was the predominant form of Se in visceral tissue and SeMet the predominant form in breast tissue. SeCys contents were greater in thigh when compared with breast tissue. Muscle tissue GSH-Px activities mirrored SeCys contents. Despite treatment differences in tissue GSH-Px activity, there were no effects of treatment on any meat quality parameter.

Keywords

turkeyseleniumselenocysteineselenomethionineglutathione peroxidase
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 5 , Issue 11 , 26 September 2011 , pp. 1751 - 1760
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, PH, Berrett, S, Patterson, DSP 1978. Glutathione peroxidase activity in erythrocytes and muscle of cattle and sheep and its relationship to selenium. Journal of Comparative Pathology 88, 181–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banoch, T, Fajt, Z, Odehnalova, S, Drabek, J, Svoboda, M 2009. Evaluation of selenium status in pure bred Duroc sows and their progeny. Neuroendocrinology Letters 30, 143–147.Google ScholarPubMed
Bierla, K, Vacchina, V, Szpunar, J, Bertin, G, Lobinski, R 2008a. Simultaneous derivatization of selenocysteine and selenomethionine in animal blood prior to their specific determination by 2D size exclusion ion-pairing reversed phase HPLC-ICP MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 23, 508–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bierla, K, Vacchina, V, Szpunar, J, Bertin, G, Lobinski, R 2008b. Determination of selenocysteine and selenomethionine in edible animal tissues by 2D size-exclusion reversed-phase HPLC-ICP MS following carbamidomethylation and proteolytic extraction. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 390, 1789–1798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British United Turkeys 2002. Commercial performance goals. British United Turkeys Limited, Chester, UK.Google Scholar
Burke, RF, Hill, KE, Xia, Y 2005. Selenoproteins and the human selenium requirement. 12th International Symposium on Trace Elements in Man and Animals (TEMA), June 2005, Coleraine, Ireland.Google Scholar
DeVore, VR, Greene, BE 1982. Glutathione peroxidase in post-rigor bovine semitendinosus muscle. Journal of Food Science 47, 1406–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVore, VR, Colnago, GL, Jensen, LS, Greene, BE 1983. Thiobarbituric acid values and glutathione peroxidase activity in meat from chickens fed a selenium supplemented diet. Journal of Food Science 48, 300–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Echevarria, MG, Henry, CB, Ammerman, PV, Miles, RD 1988. Estimation of the relative bioavailability of inorganic selenium sources for poultry 1. Effect of time and high dietary selenium on tissue selenium uptake. Poultry Science 67, 1295–1301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) 2008. Scientific opinion of the panel of food additives, flavourings, processing aids and materials in contact with food (AFC) on a request from the Commission on selenium enriched yeast as a source of selenium. The EFSA Journal 766, 1–43.Google Scholar
Gunter, SA, Beck, PA, Phillips, JM 2003. Effects of supplementary selenium source on the performance of blood measurements in beef cows and their calves. Journal of Animal Science 81, 856–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Home Office 1986. Animal scientific procedures act 1986. Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London.Google Scholar
Honikel, KO 1998. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Science 49, 447–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juniper, DT, Phipps, RH, Ramos-Morales, E, Bertin, G 2008a. Effects of dietary supplementation with selenium enriched yeast or sodium selenite on selenium tissue distribution and meat quality in lambs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 149, 228–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juniper, DT, Phipps, RH, Ramos-Morales, E, Bertin, G 2008b. Effect of dietary supplementation with selenium enriched yeast or sodium selenite on selenium tissue distribution and meat quality in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 86, 3100–3109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, YY, Mahan, DC 2001. Effect of dietary selenium source, level, and pig hair colour on various selenium indices. Journal of Animal Science 79, 949–955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahan, DC, Cline, TR, Richert, B 1999. Effects of dietary levels of selenium-enriched yeast and sodium selenite as selenium sources fed to growing-finishing pigs on performance, tissue selenium, serum glutathione peroxidase activity, carcass characteristics, and loin quality. Journal of Animal Science 77, 2172–2179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateo, RD, Spallholz, JE, Elder, R, Yoon, I, Kim, SW 2007. Efficacy of dietary selenium sources on growth and carcass characteristics of growing finishing pigs fed diets containing high endogenous selenium. Journal of Animal Science 85, 1177–1183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mester, Z, Willie, S, Sturgeon, R, Caruso, JA, Fernandez, M, Fodor, P, Goldschmidt, RJ, Goenaga-Infante, H, Lobinski, R, Wolf, WR 2006. Certification of a new selenized yeast reference material (selm-1) for methionine, selenomethinone and total selenium content and its use in an intercomparison exercise for quantifying of these analytes. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 385, 168–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paglia, DE, Valentine, WN 1967. Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 70, 158–168.Google ScholarPubMed
Pan, C, Huang, K, Zhao, Y, Qin, S, Chen, F, Hu, Q 2007. Effect of selenium source and level in hen's diet on tissue selenium deposition and egg selenium concentrations. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 55, 1027–1032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrovič, V, Boldižárová, K, Faix, S, Mellen, M, Arpášová, H, Leng, L 2006. Antioxidant and selenium status of laying hens fed with diets supplemented with selenite or Se-yeast. Journal of Animal Feed Science 15, 435–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phipps, RH, Grandison, AS, Jones, AK, Juniper, DT, Ramos-Morales, E, Bertin, G 2008. Selenium supplementation of lactating dairy cows: effects on milk production an total selenium content and speciation in blood, milk and cheese. Animal 2, 1610–1618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radmilla, M, Jovanovic, BI, Baltic, ZM, Sefer, D, Petrujkic, B, Sinovec, Z 2008. Effects of selenium supplementation as sodium selenite or selenized yeast and different amounts of vitamin E on selenium and vitamin E status in broilers. Acta Veterinaria-Beograd 58, 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotruck, JT, Pope, AL, Ganther, HE, Swanson, AB, Hafeman, DG, Hoekestra, WG 1973. Selenium: biochemical role as a component of glutathione peroxidase. Science 179, 588–590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rymer, C, Givens, DI 2006. Effect of species and genotype on the efficiency of enrichment of poultry meat with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Lipids 41, 445–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schubert, JR, Muth, OH, Oldfield, JE, Remmert, LF 1961. Experimental results with selenium in white muscle disease of lambs and calves. Federation Proceedings 20, 689–694.Google ScholarPubMed
Skřivanová, E, Marounek, M, De Smet, S, Raes, K 2007. Influence of dietary selenium and vitamin E on quality of veal. Meat Science 76, 495–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sevcikova, S, Skrivan, M, Dlouha, G, Koucky, M 2006. The effect of selenium source on the performance and meat quality of broiler chickens. Czech Journal of Animal Science 51, 449–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surai, PF 2006. Selenium absorption and metabolism. In Selenium nutrition and health, pp. 161–171. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Suzuki, KT, Ogra, Y 2002. Metabolic pathway for selenium in the body: speciation by HPLC-ICP MS with enriched Se. Food Additives and Contaminants 19, 974–983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarladgis, BG, Watts, BM, Younathan, MT 1960. A distillation method for the quantitative determination of malonaldehyde in rancid foods. Journal of the American Chemical Society 37, 44–48.Google Scholar
Taylor, JB, Marchello, MJ, Finley, JW, Neville, TL, Combs, GF, Caton, JS 2008. Nutritive value and display life attributes of selenium enriched beef muscle foods. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 21, 183–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, EJ, Suttle, NF 2001. The mineral nutrition of livestock, 3rd edition. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Van Ryssen, JBJ, Deagen, JT, Beilstein, MA, Whanger, PD 1989. Comparative metabolism of organic and inorganic selenium by sheep. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 37, 1358–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, YB, Xu, BH 2008. Effect of different selenium source (sodium selenite and selenium yeast) on broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 144, 306–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, WP 2003. Selenium nutrition of dairy cows: comparing responses to organic and inorganic selenium forms. Proceedings of the 19th Alltech Annual Symposium Nutritional, Biotechnology in the Feed and Food Industries, Lexington, USA.Google Scholar
Yoon, I, Werner, TM, Butler, JM 2007. Effect of source and concentration of selenium on growth performance and selenium retention in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 86, 727–730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed