Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:57:16.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of cull potatoes in the diet for finishing Belgian Blue double-muscled cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2012

L. O. Fiems ,
J. L. De Boever ,
J. M. Vanacker  and
D. L. De Brabander
L. O. Fiems*
Affiliation:
ILVO –Animal Sciences Unit, Scheldeweg 68, B-9090 Melle, Belgium
J. L. De Boever
Affiliation:
ILVO –Animal Sciences Unit, Scheldeweg 68, B-9090 Melle, Belgium
J. M. Vanacker
Affiliation:
ILVO –Animal Sciences Unit, Scheldeweg 68, B-9090 Melle, Belgium
D. L. De Brabander
Affiliation:
ILVO –Animal Sciences Unit, Scheldeweg 68, B-9090 Melle, Belgium
*
†Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The use of culled potatoes was investigated in Belgian Blue double-muscled finishing cows, confined in tie stalls. The control diet (Treatment 1) consisted of concentrate and maize silage (50/50 on a dry matter (DM) basis). Potatoes either replaced 60% maize silage (Treatment 2) or 60% concentrate (Treatment 3). Diets were formulated to be isocaloric and isonitrogenous. They were fed ad libitum. Approximately 18 kg potatoes were fed daily in Treatments 2 and 3. Daily gain was not significantly altered; it decreased from 1.09 kg (Treatment 1) to 1.04 kg (Treatment 2) or increased to 1.20 kg (Treatment 3), although potatoes stimulated DM intake by 5% to 8% (P < 0.05). Feed conversion was unaffected in comparison with the control diet, when expressed in terms of DM, but energy efficiency (MJ/kg live weight gain) was substantially lower for Treatment 2 compared with Treatment 1 (89.9 v. 79.0; P = 0.046). Carcass weight, grading and composition were not affected by treatments, but potatoes increased dressing percentage (P = 0.009). Treatment had no significant effect on meat quality parameters. However, potatoes (Treatments 2 and 3) tended to decrease moisture content (P = 0.090) and tended to increase drip loss (P = 0.059) compared with Treatment 1. Because of a better animal performance and a lower feed cost, it is most appropriate to use potatoes as a replacement for concentrate. Feeding large amounts of potatoes besides concentrate may have an adverse effect on the fibrousness of the diet, resulting in a tendency (−5%) for a reduced daily gain and a lower energy efficiency (P < 0.05).

Keywords

cowsdouble-muscledpotatoesperformancemeat quality
Type
Nutrition
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 93 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agabriel, J, Giraud, JM, Petit, M 1986. Détermination et utilisation de la note d’état d'engraissement en élevage allaitant. Bulletin Technique du C.R.Z.V. de Theix. INRA 66, 43–50.Google Scholar
Anonymous 1971a. Community methods of analysis for the official control of feedingstuffs. Directive 71/250 EEC. Official Journal of the European Communities L155, 13–37.Google Scholar
Anonymous 1971b. Community methods of analysis for the official control of feedingstuffs. Directive 71/393 EEC. Official Journal of the European Communities L279, 7–18.Google Scholar
Anonymous 1972. Community methods of analysis for the official control of feedingstuffs. Directive 72/199 EEC. Official Journal of the European Communities L123, 6–34.Google Scholar
Anonymous 1981. Classification scheme for beef carcass classes. Council Regulations No. 1208/81 and 2930/81. Official Journal of the European Communities L123, 3–6; L293, 6–7.Google Scholar
Anonymous 1998. Community methods of analysis for the determination of amino-acids, crude oils and fats, and olaquindox in feedingstuffs and amending Directive 71/393/EEC. Directive 98/64/EC. Official Journal of the European Communities L 257, 14–28.Google Scholar
Beyer, M, Jentsch, W, Wittenburg, H, Voigt, J 1993. The effect of starch sources barley, corn and potatoes and their ration proportions on nutrient digestibility and energy utilization in ruminants. 2. Fractions of ruminally and postruminally digested nutrients in cattle. Archives of Animal Nutrition 43, 63–77.Google ScholarPubMed
Boccard, R, Buchter, L, Casteels, M, Cosentino, E, Dransfield, E, Hood, DE, Joseph, RL, MacDougall, DB, Rhodes, DN, Schön, I, Tinbergen, BJ, Touraille, C 1981. Procedures for measuring meat quality characteristics in beef production experiments. Livestock Production Science 8, 382–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucqué, CV, Fiems, LO, Cottyn, BG 1994. Beet fed as such or ensiled with maize and fresh potatoes in diets for finishing bulls. Archives Animal Nutrition 46, 93–101.Google Scholar
Boucqué, CV, Fiems, LO, Cottyn, BG, Buysse, FX 1979. The effect of straw bedded loose houses or tie stalls on the performances of finishing bulls. Livestock Production Science 6, 369–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucqué, CV, Fiems, LO, Cottyn, BG, Casteels, M, Buysse, FX 1982. L'utilisation de pommes de terres crues par les taurillons de boucherie. Revue de l'Agriculture 35, 2999–3015.Google Scholar
Clinquart, A, Van Eenaeme, C, Mayombo, AP, Gauthier, S, Istasse, L 1995. Plasma hormones and metabolites in cattle in relation to breed (Belgian Blue vs Holstein) and conformation (double-muscled vs dual-purpose type). Veterinary Research Communications 19, 185–194.Google Scholar
De Boever, JL, Cottyn, BG, Fiems, LO, Boucqué, CV 1992. Determination of chemical composition of beef meat by NIRS. In Near Infra-red Spectroscopy. Bridging the Gap Between Data Analysis and NIR Applications (ed. KI Hildrum, T Isaksson, T Naes and A Tandberg), pp. 339–344. Ellis Horwood Ltd, London, UK.Google Scholar
De Boever, JL, Cottyn, BG, Aerts, JV, Vanacker, JM, Buysse, FX 1983. Composition chimique, digestibilité et valeur alimentaire des pommes de terre crues (Solanum tuberosum). Revue de l'Agriculture 36, 403–413.Google Scholar
De Boever, JL, Cottyn, BG, Buysse, FX, Wainman, FW, Vanacker, JM 1986. The use of an enzymatic technique to predict digestibility, metabolizable and net energy of compound feedstuffs for ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 14, 203–214.Google Scholar
De Boever, JL, Cottyn, BG, De Brabander, DL, Vanacker, JL, Boucqué, CV 1999. Equations to predict digestibility and energy value of grass silages, maize silages, grass hays, compound feeds and raw materials for cattle. Nutrition Abstract and Reviews B 69, 835–850.Google Scholar
De Brabander, DL, De Boever, JL, Vanacker, JM, Geerts, NE 2002. Evaluation and effects of physical structure in dairy cattle nutrition. In Recent developments and perspectives in bovine medicine (ed. M Kaske, H Scholz and M Höltershinken), pp. 182–197. Klinik für Rinderkrankheiten, Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, Germany.Google Scholar
De Campeneere, S, Fiems, LO, De Brabander, DL 2004. Determination of a standard for physical structure requirement for Belgian Blue bulls. Journal of Animal Feed Science 13 (Suppl. 1), 623–626.Google Scholar
Dulphy, JP, Demarquilly, C 1981. Problèmes particuliers aux ensilages. In Prévision de la valeur des aliments des ruminants. (ed. C Demarquilly), pp. 81–104. INRA Publications, Versailles, France.Google Scholar
Drake, DA, Foster, KA, Perry, TW, Petritz, DC 1994. An economic analysis of alternative feeds in midwestern beef cattle finishing rations. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 4, 21–39.Google Scholar
Eriksson, T, Murphy, M 2004. Ruminal digestion of leguminous forage, potatoes and fodder beets in batch culture: I. Fermentation pattern. Animal Feed Science and Technology 111, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiems, LO, De Campeneere, S, Van Caelenbergh, W, De Boever, JL, Vanacker, JM 2003. Carcass and meat quality in double-muscled Belgian Blue bulls and cows. Meat Science 63, 345–352.Google Scholar
Fiems, LO, Van Caelenbergh, W, Vanacker, JM, De Campeneere, S, Seynaeve, M 2005. Prediction of empty body composition of double-muscled beef cows. Livestock Production Science 92, 249–259.Google Scholar
Fiems, LO, Cottyn, BG, Boucqué, CV, Bogaerts, DF, Van Eenaeme, C, Vanacker, JM 1997. Effect of beef type, body weight and dietary protein content on digestibility, voluntary feed intake, blood and urine metabolites and nitrogen retention. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 77, 1–9.Google Scholar
Forbes, JM 1995. Voluntary food intake and diet selection in farm animals. CAB International, Oxon, UK.Google Scholar
Fussell, RJ, McCalley, DV 1987. Determination of volatile fatty acids (C2–C5) and lactic acid in silage by gas chromatography. Analyst 12, 1213–1216.Google Scholar
Gawehn, K 1984. Lactate dehydrogenase. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis (ed. HU Bergmeyer), vol. 4, pp. 588–592. Deerfield Beach, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
Grau, R, Hamm, R 1957. Über das Wasserbindungsvermögen des Säugetiermuskels. Zeitschrift für Lebensmitteluntersuchung und -Forschung A 105, 446–460.Google Scholar
Gregory, NG, Benson, T, Mason, CW 2009. Cattle handling and welfare standards in livestock markets in the UK. Journal of Agricultural Science 147, 345–354.Google Scholar
Hall, MB 2002. Rumen acidosis: carbohydrate feeding considerations. Proceedings of the Pennsylvania State Dairy Cattle Nutrition Workshop, Grantville, Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Hanset, R, Stasse, A, Michaux, C 1987. Feed intake and efficiency in double-muscled and conventional cattle. Zeitschrift für Tierzüchtung und Züchtungsbiologie 96, 260–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisińka, G, Leszczyński, W 1989. Potato science and technology. Elsevier Applied Science, London, UK.Google Scholar
Monteils, V, Jurjanz, S, Colin-Schoellen, O, Blanchart, G, Laurent, F 2002. Kinetics of ruminal degradation of wheat and potato starches in total mixed rations. Journal of Animal Science 80, 235–241.Google Scholar
Mottram, DS 1998. Flavour formation in meat and meat products: a review. Food Chemistry 62, 415–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, ML, Busboom, JR, Cronrath, JD, Falen, L, Blankenbaker, A 2000. Effects of graded levels of potato by-products in barley- and corn-based beef feedlot diets: I. Feedlot performance, carcass traits, meat composition, and appearance. Journal of Animal Science 78, 1829–1836.Google Scholar
NIS 2008. Statistiques agricoles. Direction Générale Statistique et Information Economique. Brussels, Belgium, 184 pp.Google Scholar
Radunz, AE, Lardy, GP, Bauer, ML, Marchello, MJ, Loe, ER, Berg, PT 2003. Influence of steam-peeled potato-processing waste inclusion level in beef finishing diets: effects on digestion, feedlot performance, and meat quality. Journal of Animal Science 81, 2675–2685.Google Scholar
StatSoft 2009. STATISTICA, Version 9. StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA.Google Scholar
Swingle, RS, Roubicek, CB, Wooten, RA, Marchello, JA, Dryden, FD 1979. Realimentation of cull range cows. I. Effect of final body condition and dietary energy level on rate, efficiency and composition of gains. Journal of Animal Science 48, 913–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamminga, S, Van Straalen, WM, Subnel, APJ, Meijer, RGM, Steg, A, Wever, CJG, Blok, MC 1994. The Dutch protein evaluation system: the DVE/OEB-system. Livestock Production Science 40, 139–155.Google Scholar
van Es, AJH 1978. Feed evaluation for ruminants. I. The systems in use from May 1977 onwards in the Netherlands. Livestock Production Science 5, 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB, Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Verbeke, R, Van de Voorde, G 1978. Détermination de la composition de demi-carcasses de bovins par la dissection d'une seule côte. Revue de l'Agriculture 31, 875–880.Google Scholar
Wolin, MJ 1960. A theoretical rumen fermentation balance. Journal of Dairy Science 43, 1452–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar