Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T11:14:54.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of CP concentration in the diet on urea kinetics and microbial usage of recycled urea in cattle: a meta-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2017

E. D. Batista ,
E. Detmann ,
S. C. Valadares Filho ,
E. C. Titgemeyer  and
R. F. D. Valadares
E. D. Batista
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Av. P.H. Rolfs, s/n°, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, 36570-900, Brazil Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-1600, USA
E. Detmann
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Av. P.H. Rolfs, s/n°, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, 36570-900, Brazil
S. C. Valadares Filho
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Av. P.H. Rolfs, s/n°, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, 36570-900, Brazil
E. C. Titgemeyer
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-1600, USA
R. F. D. Valadares
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Av. P.H. Rolfs, s/n°, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, 36570-900, Brazil
Get access

Abstract

In ruminants, urea recycling is considered an evolutionary advantage. The amount of urea recycled mainly depends of the nitrogen (N) intake and the amount of organic matter (OM) digested in the rumen. Because recycled N contributes to meeting microbial N requirements, accurate estimates of urea recycling can improve the understanding of efficiency of N utilization and N losses to the environment. The objective of this study was to evaluate urea kinetics and microbial usage of recycled urea N in ruminants using a meta-analytical approach. Treatment mean values were compiled from 25 studies with ruminants (beef cattle, dairy cows and sheep) which were published from 2001 to 2016, totalling 107 treatment means. The data set was analyzed according to meta-analysis techniques using linear or non-linear mixed models, taking into account the random variations among experiments. Urea N synthesized in the liver (UER) and urea N recycled to the gut (GER) linearly increased (P<0.001) as N intake (g/BW0.75) increased, with increases corresponding to 71.5% and 35.2% of N intake, respectively. The UER was positively associated (P<0.05) with dietary CP concentration and the ratio of CP to digestible OM (CP:DOM). Maximum curvature analyses identified 17% dietary CP as the point where there was a prominent increase in hepatic synthesis of urea N, likely due to an excess of dietary N leading to greater ammonia absorption. The GER:UER decreased with increasing dietary CP concentration (P<0.05). At dietary CP⩾19%, GER:UER reached near minimal values. The fraction of UER eliminated as urinary urea N and the contribution of urea N to total urinary N were positively associated with dietary CP (P<0.05), both reaching values near the plateau when dietary CP was 17%. The fractions of GER excreted in the feces and utilized for anabolism decreased, whereas the fraction of GER returned to the ornithine cycle increased with dietary CP concentration (P<0.05). Recycled urea N assimilated by ruminal microbes (as a fraction of GER) decreased as dietary CP and CP:DOM increased (P<0.05). The efficiency of microbial assimilation of recycled urea N was near plateau values at 194 g CP/kg DOM. The models obtained in this study contribute to the knowledge on N utilization, and they could be used in feeding models to predict urea recycling and thus to improve formulation of diets to reduce N losses that contribute to air and water pollution.

Keywords

cattlemixed modelsproteinrecyclingruminal bacteria
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 8 , August 2017 , pp. 1303 - 1311
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batista, ED, Detmann, E, Titgemeyer, EC, Valadares Filho, SC, Valadares, RFD, Prates, LL, Rennó, LN and Paulino, MF 2016. Effects of varying ruminally undegradable protein supplementation on forage digestion, nitrogen metabolism, and urea kinetics in Nellore cattle fed low-quality tropical forage. Journal of Animal Science 94, 201–216.Google ScholarPubMed
Brake, DW, Titgemeyer, EC, Jones, ML and Anderson, DE 2010. Effect of nitrogen supplementation on urea kinetics and microbial use of recycled urea in steers consuming corn-based diets. Journal of Animal Science 88, 2729–2740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brody, S 1945. Bioenergetics and growth. Reinhold, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Calsamiglia, S, Ferret, A, Reynolds, CK, Kristensen, NB and van Vuuren, AM 2010. Strategies for optimizing nitrogen use by ruminants. Animal 4, 1184–1196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, KL, McKinnon, JJ and Mutsvangwa, T 2013. Effects of dietary ruminally degradable starch and ruminally degradable protein levels on urea recycling, microbial protein production, nitrogen balance, and duodenal nutrient flow in beef heifers fed low crude protein diets. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 93, 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detmann, E, Paulino, MF, Mantovani, HC, Valadares Filho, SC, Sampaio, CB, Souza, MA, Lazzarini, I and Detmann, KSC 2009. Parameterization of ruminal fibre degradation in low-quality tropical forage using Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Livestock Science 126, 136–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, AR 1965. The fate and effects of duodenally infused casein and urea nitrogen in sheep fed on a low-protein roughage. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 16, 169–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firkins, JL, Yu, Z and Morrison, M 2007. Ruminal nitrogen metabolism: perspectives for integration of microbiology and nutrition for dairy. Journal of Dairy Science 90 (suppl. E), E1–E16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harmeyer, J and Martens, H 1980. Aspects of urea metabolism in ruminants with reference to the goat. Journal of Dairy Science 63, 1707–1728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holder, VB, Tricarico, JM, Kim, DH, Kristensen, NB and Harmon, DL 2015. The effects of degradable nitrogen level and slow release urea on nitrogen balance and urea kinetics in Holstein steers. Animal Feed Science and Technology 200, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, GB and Archibeque, SL 2000. Practical aspects of urea and ammonia metabolism in ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 77, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, PM and Milligan, LP 1980. The degradation and utilization of endogenous urea in the gastrointestinal tract of ruminants: a review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 60, 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, NB, Storm, AC and Larsen, M 2010. Effect of dietary nitrogen content and intravenous urea infusion on ruminal and portal-drained visceral extraction of arterial urea in lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 2670–2683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lapierre, H and Lobley, GE 2001. Nitrogen recycling in the ruminant: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 84 (suppl. E), E223–E236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littell, RC, Milliken, GA, Stroup, WW, Wolfinger, RD and Schabenberger, O 2006. SAS system for mixed models, 2nd edition. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Lobley, GE, Bremner, DM and Zuur, G 2000. Effects of diet quality on urea fates in sheep assessed by a refined, non-invasive [15N15N]-urea kinetics. British Journal of Nutrition 84, 459–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maltby, SA, Reynolds, CK, Lomax, MA and Beever, DE 2005. Splanchnic metabolism of nitrogenous compounds and urinary nitrogen excretion in steers fed alfalfa under conditions of increased absorption of ammonia and L-arginine supply across the portal-drained viscera. Journal of Animal Science 83, 1075–1087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marini, JC and Van Amburgh, ME 2003. Nitrogen metabolism and recycling in Holstein heifers. Journal of Animal Science 81, 545–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council (NRC) 1985. Ruminant nitrogen usage. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
National Research Council 1996. Nutrients requirements of beef cattle, 7th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
National Research Council 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, 7th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Parker, DS, Lomax, MA, Seal, CJ and Wilton, JC 1995. Metabolic implications of ammonia production in the ruminant. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 54, 549–563.Google ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, CK and Kristensen, NB 2008. Nitrogen recycling through the gut and the nitrogen economy of ruminants: an asynchronous symbiosis. Journal of Animal Science 86, E293–E305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritzhaupt, A, Breves, G, Schroder, B, Winckler, CG and Shirazi-Beechey, SP 1997. Urea transport in gastrointestinal tract of ruminants: effect of dietary nitrogen. Biochemical Society Transactions 25, S490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Røjen, BA and Kristensen, NB 2012. Effect of time duration of ruminal urea infusions on ruminal ammonia concentrations and portal-drained visceral extraction of arterial urea-N in lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 1395–1409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Røjen, BA, Theil, PK and Kristensen, NB 2011. Effects of nitrogen supply on inter-organ fluxes of urea-N and renal urea-N kinetics in lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 2532–2544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarraseca, A, Milne, E, Metcalf, MJ and Lobley, GE 1998. Urea recycling in sheep: effects of intake. British Journal of Nutrition 79, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Satter, LD and Slyter, LL 1974. Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro . British Journal of Nutrition 32, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmons, NL, Chaudhry, AS, Graham, C, Scriven, ES, Thistelthwaite, A, Smith, CP and Stewart, GS 2009. Dietary regulation of ruminal bovine UT-B urea transporter expression and localization. Journal of Animal Science 87, 3288–3299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, GS, Graham, C, Cattell, S, Smith, TPL, Simmons, NL and Smith, CP 2005. UT-B is expressed in bovine rumen: potential role in ruminal urea transport. American Journal of Physiology – Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 289, R605–R612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
St-Pierre, NR 2001. Integrating quantitative findings from multiple studies using mixed model methodology. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 741–755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valente, TNP, Detmann, E, Queiroz, AC, Valdares Filho, SC, Gomes, DI and Figueiras, JF 2011. Evaluation of ruminal degradation profiles of forages using bags made from different textiles. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40, 2565–2573.Google Scholar
Van Houwelingen, HC, Arends, LR and Stijen, T 2002. Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression. Statistics in Medicine 21, 589–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, PJ 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant, 2nd edition. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walpole, ME, Schurmann, BL, Górka, P, Penner, GB, Loewen, ME and Mutsvangwa, T 2015. Serosal-to-mucosal urea flux across the isolated ruminal epithelium is mediated via urea transporter-B and aquaporins when Holstein calves are abruptly changed to a moderately fermentable diet. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 1204–1213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wickersham, TA, Titgemeyer, EC and Cochran, RC 2009a. Methodology for concurrent determination of urea kinetics and the capture of recycled urea nitrogen by ruminal microbes in cattle. Animal 3, 372–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wickersham, TA, Titgemeyer, EC, Cochran, RC and Wickersham, EE 2009b. Effect of undegradable intake protein supplementation on urea kinetics and microbial use of recycled urea in steers consuming low-quality forage. British Journal of Nutrition 101, 225–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wickersham, TA, Titgemeyer, EC, Cochran, RC, Wickersham, EE and Gnad, DP 2008. Effect of rumen-degradable intake protein supplementation on urea kinetics and microbial use of recycled urea in steers consuming low-quality forage. Journal of Animal Science 86, 3079–3088.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Batista supplementary material

Batista supplementary material

Download Batista supplementary material(File)
File 39.4 KB