Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:39:08.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of continuous v. daytime grazing on feed intake and growth of sheep grazing in a semi-arid grassland steppe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2011

K. Müller ,
L. Lin ,
C. Wang ,
T. Glindemann ,
A. Schiborra ,
P. Schönbach ,
H. Wan ,
U. Dickhoefer  and
A. Susenbeth
K. Müller
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Christian-Albrechts-University, 24118 Kiel, Germany
L. Lin
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Christian-Albrechts-University, 24118 Kiel, Germany
C. Wang
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Christian-Albrechts-University, 24118 Kiel, Germany
T. Glindemann
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Christian-Albrechts-University, 24118 Kiel, Germany
A. Schiborra
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Christian-Albrechts-University, 24118 Kiel, Germany
P. Schönbach
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Christian-Albrechts-University, 24118 Kiel, Germany
H. Wan
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Christian-Albrechts-University, 24118 Kiel, Germany
U. Dickhoefer
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Christian-Albrechts-University, 24118 Kiel, Germany
A. Susenbeth*
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Christian-Albrechts-University, 24118 Kiel, Germany
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In the Inner Mongolian steppe, China, sheep generally graze during daytime and are kept in yards overnight. Hence, nutrients are not returned to the grassland, which might reduce its long-term productivity. Furthermore, the restricted grazing time may limit forage intake and thus the performance of sheep. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the impact of continuous 24-h grazing (CG) v. the common daytime grazing (DG) on herbage mass (HM), feed quality, feed organic matter intake (OMI) and live weight gain (LWG) of sheep in the Inner Mongolian steppe. Experiments were carried out from July to September, between 2005 and 2007 on two 2-ha plots per grazing treatment. Each month, the external faecal marker titanium dioxide (TiO2) was orally administered to six sheep per plot on 10 consecutive days. Faecal grab samples were obtained from day 6 to 10 and analysed for CP concentrations to estimate digestibility of organic matter (dOM). Faecal TiO2 concentrations were used to determine the total faecal output and hence OMI of sheep. Concomitant to faeces collection, HM and quality, as well as LWG of the animals were measured. HM and herbage quality did not differ between treatments. However, as the season progressed, concentrations of NDF, ADF and ADL increased, whereas HM and CP concentrations declined. HM and herbage quality parameters differed between years according to the annual precipitation. dOM was similar in CG (0.577) and DG (0.572) sheep, but it decreased from July (0.583) to September (0.558) and differed between years. Accordingly, the OMI of sheep was similar for both treatments across the entire grazing season and all study years. Although mean LWG differed between months and years, it was identical in CG (101.5 g/day) and DG sheep (101.8 g/day). Additional time on pasture during night does not increase feed intake or animal performance. Positive effects of a nutrient reflux on grassland productivity and herbage quality when animals remained on the plots overnight were not found, most likely because of the fact that sheep crowded together in one corner of the plots during darkness and faecal and urinary excretions were thus not evenly distributed across the entire pasture. Considering the risk of animal theft as well as the importance of sheep manure as fuel, the common penning of sheep at night seems to be an adequate management practice for pastoralists in the Inner Mongolian steppe.

Keywords

sheeplive weight gainfeed intakegrazingInner Mongolia
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 6 , Issue 3: 61th EAAP Annual Meeting, 2010, Heraklion, Greece: 10th International Workshop on Biology of Lactation in Farm Animals (BOLFA) and Session “Evolution of mammary gland and milk secretion: consequences for lactation in farm animals” , 27 January 2012 , pp. 526 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allden, WG, Whittaker, IA 1970. Determinants of herbage intake by grazing sheep: interrelationship of factors influencing herbage intake and availability. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 21, 755–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, GW 1985. Ingestive behaviour. In Ethology of farm animals (ed. A Fraser), pp. 183–200. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Arnold, GW, Dudzinski, ML 1978. Ethology of free ranging domestic animals. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Ayantunde, AA, Fernandez-Rivera, S, Hiernaux, PH, Van Keulen, H, Udo, HMJ 2002. Day and night grazing by cattle in the Sahel. Journal of Range Management 55, 144–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayantunde, AA, Fernandez-Rivera, S, Hiernaux, PHY, van Keulen, H, Udo, HMJ, Chanono, M 2000. Effect of nocturnal grazing and supplementation on diet selection, eating time, forage intake and weight changes of cattle. Animal Science 71, 333–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayantunde, AA, Fernandez-Rivera, S, Hiernaux, PHY, van Keulen, H, Udo, HMJ, Chanono, M 2001. Effect of timing and duration of grazing of growing cattle in the West African Sahel on diet selection, faecal output, eating time, forage intake and live-weight changes. Animal Science 72, 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, YF, Han, XG, Wu, JG, Chen, ZZ, Li, LH 2004. Ecosystem stability and compensatory effects in the Inner Mongolia grassland. Nature 431, 181–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumont, R, Prache, S, Meuret, M, Morand-Fehr, P 2000. How forage characteristics influence behaviour and intake in small ruminants: a review. Livestock Production Science 64, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumont, R, Cohen-Salmon, D, Prache, S, Sauvant, D 2004. A mechanistic model of intake and grazing behaviour in sheep integrating sward architecture and animal decisions. Animal Feed Science and Technology 112, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, W 1990. Behavioral compensation for limited grazing time by herded cattle in Central Nigeria. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 27, 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, M, Allam, SM 1987. Analytik von TiO2 im Darminhalt und Kot nach Kjeldahlaufschluß. Archives of Animal Nutrition 37, 453–454.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Rivera, A, Ayantunde, AA, Hiernaux, P, Turner, M 1996. Nocturnal grazing effects on the nutrition of cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science 74 (suppl.), 200.Google Scholar
Glindemann, T, Tas, BM, Wang, C, Alvers, S, Susenbeth, A 2009. Evaluation of titanium dioxide as an inert marker for estimating fecal excretion in grazing sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 152, 186–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iason, GR, Mantecon, AR, Sim, DA, Gonzalez, J, Foreman, E, Bermudez, FF, Elston, DA 1999. Can grazing sheep compensate for a daily foraging time constraint? Journal of Animal Ecology 68, 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IUSS Working Group WRB 2007. World reference base for soil resources 2006, 2nd edition. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. First Update FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Joblin, ADH 1960. The influence of night grazing on the growth rates of zebu cattle in East Africa. Journal of the British Grassland Society 15, 212–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, L, Dickhoefer, U, Müller, K, Wurina, , Susenbeth, A 2011. Grazing behavior of sheep at different stocking rates in the Inner Mongolian steppe, China. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 129, 36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, DR 1994. Regulation of forage intake. In Forage quality, evaluation, and utilization (ed. GC Fahey Jr.), pp. 450–493. American Society of Agronomy Inc., Crop Science Society of America Inc. and Soil Science Society of America Inc., Madison, USA.Google Scholar
Minson, DJ 1990. Forage in ruminant nutrition. Academic Press, San Diego, USA.Google Scholar
Moore, JE, Mott, GP 1973. Structural inhibitors of quality in tropical grasses. In Anti-quality components of forages, pp. 53–98. Crop Science Society of America, Special Publication No. 4, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
Newman, JA, Parsons, AJ, Thornley, JHM, Penning, PD, Krebs, JR 1995. Optimal diet selection by a generalist grazing herbivore. Functional Ecology 9, 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, MJ 1987. Effects of night enclosure and extensive walking on the productivity of zebu cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science 109, 445–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfander, WH 1970. Forage intake and digestibility research – now and when? Proceedings of the National Conference on Forage Quality, Evaluation and Utilization, p. 27. University Nebraska, USA.Google Scholar
Prache, S, Gordon, IJ, Rook, AJ 1998. Foraging behaviour and diet selection in domestic herbivores. Annales De Zootechnie 47, 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, RL, Jung, GA, Thayne, WV 1988. Relationships between nutritive quality and fiber components of cool season and warm season forages – a retrospective study. Journal of Animal Science 66, 1275–1291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS 2000. SAS/STAT user's guide, release 9.1 edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Schiborra, A 2007. Short-term effects of defoliation on herbage productivity and herbage quality in a semi-arid grassland ecosystem of Inner Mongolia, P.R. China. PhD thesis, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Germany.Google Scholar
Schlecht, E, Blummel, M, Becker, K 1999. The influence of the environment on feed intake of cattle in semi-arid Africa. In Regulation of Feed Intake (ed. D van der Heide, EA Huisman, E Kanis, JWM Osse and MWA Verstegen), pp. 167–185. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Schönbach, P, Wan, HW, Schiborra, A, Gierus, M, Bai, YF, Müller, K, Glindemann, T, Wang, C, Susenbeth, A, Taube, F 2009. Short-term management and stocking rate effects of sheep grazing on herbage quality and productivity of Inner Mongolia steppe. Crop and Pasture Science 60, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, CA 1961. Studies on Northern Rhodesia Hyparrhenia Veld. 3. Effect on growth and grazing-behaviour of indigenous cattle of restricting their daily grazing time by night kraaling. Journal of Agricultural Science 56, 243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, CJ, Tas, BM, Glindemann, T, Rave, G, Schmidt, L, Weissbach, F, Susenbeth, A 2009. Fecal crude protein content as an estimate for the digestibility of forage in grazing sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 149, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, XM, Wang, YF, Jiang, S, Ojima, DS, Bonham, CD 1995. Interannual variation in the climate and aboveground biomass of Leymus chinensis Steppe and Stipa grandis Steppe in the Xilin River Basin, Inner-Mongolia, China. Journal of Arid Environments 31, 283–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, M, Ellis, JE, Epstein, HE 2004. Regional analysis of climate, primary production, and livestock density in Inner Mongolia. Journal of Environmental Quality 33, 1675–1681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed