Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:06:23.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of compensatory growth on performance, carcass composition and plasma IGF-1 in grower finisher pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2010

C. Chaosap ,
T. Parr  and
J. Wiseman
C. Chaosap*
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK
T. Parr
Affiliation:
Division of Nutritional Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK
J. Wiseman
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK
Get access

Abstract

A total of 48 female pigs (Large White × Landrace × Duroc cross) were used to determine whether a compensatory feed regime influenced performance, carcass composition and the level of plasma IGF-1. Pigs of initial age 73 days were fed a commercial diet at 0.70 of ad libitum (R) for 40 days followed by a return to ad libitum feeding for a further 42 days. The control group was fed ad libitum (A) throughout. Groups of animals on R and A feed regimes were slaughtered at the end of restriction period (SL1), 2 days after refeeding ad libitum (SL2) to establish the more immediate effects of refeeding on IGF levels, and after 42 days refeeding (SL3; n = 8 for each group). As expected, during the restriction period, average daily live weight gain in all the slaughter groups of R pigs was significantly lower than A pigs (P < 0.01); there was no significant difference in feed conversion ratios. In the re-alimentation period of SL3, R pigs grew 12.9% faster (P = 0.033), indicating compensatory growth. At SL1, there was a trend for carcass weight (P = 0.108) of A pigs to be higher than R pigs, but at SL2 live weight and carcass weight of A pigs were significantly heavier than R pigs (P < 0.05), but not at SL3. For killing-out percentage, there was no difference in SL1. After refeeding for 2 days (SL2) and 42 days (SL3), R pigs had significantly lower killing-out percentage than A pigs (P < 0.05). As a proportion of live weight, R pigs had smaller heart, kidney and liver (P < 0.05) than A pigs at SL1. At SL2, only the kidney was smaller in the restricted group (P < 0.05) and there were no significant differences in SL3. As a proportion of carcass weight, Longissimus dorsi was heavier in the R pigs at SL1 (P = 0.108) and SL2 (P < 0.05), but not at SL3. At SL1, there was a trend for intramuscular fat of A pigs to be higher than R pigs. The plasma IGF-1 level was lower in R pigs than A pigs (P = 0.010) at SL1, and slightly lower at SL2 (P = 0.110), with no significant differences at SL3. Dietary restriction period influenced plasma IGF-1 levels, which returned to the ad libitum group levels when animals were refed, as did live weight and carcass weight. It appears that the internal organs and possibly fat, but not muscles, underwent a compensatory response when animals were refed.

Keywords

compensatory growthgrowth performanceIGF-1
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 5 , Issue 5 , 04 April 2011 , pp. 749 - 756
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1995. Official methods of analysis, 16th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Bikker, P, Verstegen, MWA, Kemp, B, Bosch, MW 1996. Performance and body composition of finishing gilts (45 to 85 kg) as affected by energy intake and nutrition in earlier life: I. Growth of the body and body components. Journal of Animal Science 74, 806–816.Google Scholar
Brameld, JM, Atkinson, JL, Saunders, JC, Pell, JM, Buttery, PJ, Gilmour, RS 1996. Effects of growth hormone administration and dietary protein intake on insulin-like growth factor I and growth hormone receptor mRNA expression in porcine liver, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue. Journal of Animal Science 74, 1832–1841.Google Scholar
Caperna, TJ, Steele, NC, Komarek, DR, McMurtry, JP, Rosebrough, RW, Solomon, MB, Mitchell, AD 1990. Influence of dietary protein and recombinant porcine somatotropin administration in young pigs: growth, body composition and hormone status. Journal of Animal Science 68, 4243–4252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Critser, DJ, Miller, PS, Lewis, AJ 1995. The effects of dietary protein concentration on compensatory growth in barrows and gilts. Journal of Animal Science 73, 3376–3383.Google Scholar
Donker, R, Hartog, L, Brascamp, E, Merks, J, Noordewier, G, Buiting, G 1986. Restriction of feed intake to optimize the overall performance and composition of pigs. Livestock and Production Science 15, 353–365.Google Scholar
Dunshea, FR, Chung, CS, Owens, PC, Ballard, JF, Walton, PE 2002. Insulin-like growth factor-I and analogues increase growth in artificially-reared neonatal pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 87, 587–593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyer, A, Lebret, B 2007. Compensatory growth response in pigs: effects on growth performance, composition of weight gain at carcass and muscle levels, and meat quality. Journal of Animal Science 85, 769–778.Google Scholar
Hornick, JL, Van Eenaeme, C, Gerrard, O, Dufrasne, I, Istasse, L 2000. Mechanisms of reduced and compensatory growth. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 19, 121–132.Google Scholar
Kristensen, L, Therkildsen, M, Riis, B, Sørensen, MT, Oksbjerg, N, Purslow, PP 2002. Dietary induced changes of muscle growth rate in pigs: effects on in vivo and post-mortem muscle proteolysis and meat quality. Journal of Animal Science 80, 2862–2871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, L, Therkildsen, M, Aaslyng, MD, Oksbjerg, N, Ertbjerg, P 2004. Compensatory growth improves meat tenderness in gilts but not in barrows. Journal of Animal Science 82, 3617–3624.Google Scholar
Mersmann, HJ, MacNeil, MD, Seideman, SC, Pond, WG 1987. Compensatory growth in finishing pigs after feed restriction. Journal of Animal Science 64, 752–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlsson, C, Sjogren, K, Jansson, JO, Isaksson, OGP 2000. The relative importance of endocrine versus autocrine/paracrine insulin-like growth factor-I in the regulation of body growth. Pediatric Nephrology 14, 541–543.Google Scholar
Owens, PC, Conlon, MA, Campbell, RG, Johnson, RJ, King, R, Ballard, FJ 1991. Developmental changes in growth hormone, insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I and IGF-II) and IGF-binding proteins in plasma of young growing pigs. Journal of Endocrinology 128, 439–447.Google Scholar
Picha, ME, Turano, MJ, Tipsmark, CK, Borski, RJ 2008. Regulation of endocrine and paracrine sources of Igfs and Gh receptor during compensatory growth in hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops x Morone saxatilis). Journal of Endocrinology 199, 81–94.Google Scholar
Prince, T, Jungst, S, Kuhlers, D 1983. Compensatory responses to short-term feed restriction during the growing period in swine. Journal of Animal Science 56, 846–852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renaville, R, Van Eenaeme, C, Breier, BH, Vleurick, L, Bertozzi, C, Gengler, N, Hornick, JL, Parmentier, I, Istasse, L, Haezebroeck, V, Massart, S, Portetelle, D 2000. Feed restriction in young bulls alters the onset of puberty in relationship with plasma insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding proteins. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 18, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, CE, Rotwein, P 1996. Growth, differentiation, and survival: multiple physiological functions for insulin-like growth factors. Physiological reviews 76, 1005–1026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Therkildsen, M, Riis, B, Karlsson, A, Kristensen, L, Ertbjerg, P, Purslow, PP, Aaslyng, MD, Oksbjerg, N 2002. Compensatory growth response in pigs, muscle protein turnover and meat texture: effects of restriction/realimentation period. Animal Science 75, 367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Therkildsen, M, Vestergaard, M, Busk, H, Jensen, M, Riis, B, Karlsson, A, Kristensen, L, Ertbjerg, P, Oksbjerg, N 2004. Compensatory growth in slaughter pigs – in vitro muscle protein turnover at slaughter, circulating IGF-I, performance and carcass quality. Livestock Production Science 88, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whang, KY, Kim, SW, Donovan, SM, McKeith, FK, Easter, RA 2003. Effects of protein deprivation on subsequent growth performance, gain of body components, and protein requirements in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 81, 705–716.Google Scholar
Yakar, S, Kim, H, Zhao, H, Toyoshima, Y, Pennisi, P, Gavrilova, O, LeRoith, D 2005. The growth hormone-insulin like growth factor axis revisited: lessons from IGF-1 and IGF-1 receptor gene targeting. Pediatric Nephrology 20, 251–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed