Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T01:29:26.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of chestnut and quebracho tannins on fatty acid profile in rumen liquid- and solid-associated bacteria: an in vitro study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2011

A. Buccioni ,
S. Minieri ,
S. Rapaccini ,
M. Antongiovanni  and
M. Mele
A. Buccioni*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Agrarie sez Scienze Animali, University of Florence, Via delle Cascine, 5 – 50144 Firenze, Italy
S. Minieri
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Agrarie sez Scienze Animali, University of Florence, Via delle Cascine, 5 – 50144 Firenze, Italy
S. Rapaccini
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Agrarie sez Scienze Animali, University of Florence, Via delle Cascine, 5 – 50144 Firenze, Italy
M. Antongiovanni
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Agrarie sez Scienze Animali, University of Florence, Via delle Cascine, 5 – 50144 Firenze, Italy
M. Mele
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Agronomia e Gestione dell'Agro-Ecosistema sez Scienze Zootecniche, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto, 80 – 56124 Pisa, Italy
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Tannins are phenolic compounds that interfere with biohydrogenation (BH) of polyunsaturated fatty acids (FAs). The aim of the present in vitro study was to investigate the effects of two different sources of tannins on FA profiles of rumen bacteria, with particular reference to rumenic and vaccenic acid. A control diet (C; composed of 300 g/kg of wheat straw, 132 g/kg of soyabean meal, 96 g/kg of barley meal, 152 g/kg of maize meal, 300 g/kg of maize gluten and 20 g/kg of mineral vitamin premix, all expressed on dry matter (DM)) and four diets, obtained by adding to C two different types of tannins from chestnut (TC) and from quebracho (TQ) at two concentration levels (49 and 82 g/kg DM), were compared. The content of the main unsaturated FAs (C18:1 cis9, C18:1 trans11, C18:2 cis9, cis12 and C18:3 cis9, cis12, cis15) from solid-associated bacteria (SAB) and liquid-associated bacteria (LAB) was affected by the presence of tannins in the diets. In particular, C18:1 trans11 content was significantly increased, especially with TC1, whereas the decreasing of C18:1 cis9 was unaffected, regardless of the presence or the kind of tannins added to feeds. SAB contained higher amounts of intermediates of polyunsaturated FA BH (as C18:1 trans11 and C18:2 cis9, trans11) than LAB that were characterized by a higher amount of C18:0. In the concentration range adopted in this study, the effect of TC and TQ on changes of bacterial FA profile was comparable. Tannins seem to be a good means to modulate the FA profile of rumen bacteria, favouring the accumulation of C18:1 trans11 during in vitro rumen fermentation.

Keywords

tanninsrumenic acidvaccenic acidin vitro rumen fermentation
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 5 , Issue 10 , 26 August 2011 , pp. 1521 - 1530
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Animut, G, Puchala, R, Goetsch, AL, Patra, AK, Sahlu, T, Varel, VH, Wells, J 2008. Methane emission by goats consuming diets with different levels of condensed tannins from lespedeza. Animal Feed Science and Technology 144, 212–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antongiovanni, M 1998. Exploration of Mediterranean Roughage and by-products. Proceedings of the European Project No. 8001-CT91-0307 – Option Méditerranéennes, Série B, number 17. CIHEAM-IAMZ, Zaragoza, Spain.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 1990. Official methods of analysis, vols. 1 and 2, 15th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Benjamin, S, Spener, F 2009. Conjugated linoleic acids as functional food: an insight into their health benefits. Nutrition & Metabolism 6, 36–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bento, MHL, Acamovick, T, Makkar, HPS 2005. The influence of tannin, pectin, and polyethylene glycol on attachment of 15N-labelled rumen microorganisms to cellulose. Animal Feed Science and Technology 122, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessa, RJB, Maia, MRG, Jeronimo, E, Belo, AT, Cabrita, ARJ, Dewhurst, RJ, Fonseca, AJM 2009. Using microbial fatty acids to improve understanding of the contribution of solid associated bacteria to microbial mass in the rumen. Animal Feed Science and Technology 150, 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buccioni, A, Antongiovanni, M, Minieri, S, Rapaccini, S, Pratesi, V, Mele, M 2009. Effect of three species of herbage (Medicago sativa, Lolium multiflorum, Avena sativa) in in vitro ruminal production of conjugated linoleic and vaccenic acids. Italian Journal of Animal Science 8, 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buccioni, A, Rapaccini, S, Antongiovanni, M, Minieri, S, Conte, G, Mele, M 2010. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and C18:1 isomers content in milk fat of sheep and their transfer to Pecorino Toscano D.O.P. cheese. International Dairy Journal 20, 190–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, RE 1963. Methods of tannin analysis for forage crop evaluation. Technical Bulletin number 32. Georgia Agricultural Experiment Station, Athens, GA, USA.Google Scholar
Cone, JW, Van Gelder, AH, Visscher, AH, Oudshoorn, L 1996. Influence of rumen fluid and substrate concentration on fermentation kinetics measured with a fully automated time related gas production apparatus. Animal Feed Science and Technology 61, 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Destaillas, F, Trottier, JP, Galvez, JMG, Angers, P 2005. Analysis of alpha-linolenic acid biohydrogenation intermediates in milk fat with emphasis on conjugated linolenic acid. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 3231–3239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2009a. Opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to alpha linolenic acid and maintenance of normal blood cholesterol concentrations (ID 493) and maintenance of normal blood pressure (ID625) pursuant to article 13(1) of regulation (EC) No. 1924/2006. EFSA Journal 7 (9), 1252, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2009b. ALA and contribution to brain development. Scientific substantiation of health claim related to ALA and contribution to brain development pursuant to article 14 of regulation (EC) No. 1924/2006. EFSA Journal 1005, 1–9.Google Scholar
Franci, O, Antongiovanni, M, Acciaioli, A, Bruni, R, Martini, A 1997. Response surface analyses of the associative effects of lucerne hay, wheat straw and maize glutein feed on growing lambs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 67, 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getachew, G, Pittroff, W, Putnam, DH, Dandekar, A, Goyal, S, DePeters, EJ 2008. The influence of addition of gallic acid, tannic acid, or quebracho tannins to alfalfa hay on in vitro rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis. Animal Feed Science and Technology 140, 444–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griinari, JM, Bauman, DE 1999. Biosynthesis of conjugated linoleic acid and its incorporation into meat and milk in ruminants. In Advances in conjugated linoleic acid research (ed. MP Yurawecz, MM Mossoba, JKG Kramer, MW Pariza and GJ Nelson), vol. 1, pp. 180–200. AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Jones, WT, Mangan, JL 1977. Complexes of the condensed tannins of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia scop.) with fraction 1 leaf protein and with submaxillary mucoprotein, and their reversal by polyethylene glycol and pH. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 126–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, JKG, Fellner, V, Dugan, MER, Sauer, FD, Mossoba, MM, Yurawecz, MP 1997. Evaluating acid and base catalysts in the methylation of milk and rumen fatty acids with special emphasis on conjugated dienes and total trans fatty acids. Lipids 32, 1219–1228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legay-Carmier, F, Bauchart, D 1989. Distribution of bacteria in the rumen contents of dairy cows given a diet supplemented with soya-bean oil. British Journal of Nutrition 61, 725–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Licitra, G 1996. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feed. Animal Feed Science and Technology 57, 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, SA, Jenkins, TC 2002. Factors affecting conjugated linoleic acid and trans C18:1 fatty acid production by mixed ruminal bacteria. Journal of Animal Science 80, 3347–3352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, C, Williams, AG, Michalet-Doreau, B 1994. Isolation and characteristics of the protozoal and bacterial fraction from bovine ruminal contents. Journal of Animal Science 72, 2962–2968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDougall, EI 1948. Studies on ruminant saliva. The composition and output of sheep's saliva. Biochemical Journal 43, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Min, BR, Barry, TN, Attwood, GT, McNabb, WC 2003. The effect of condensed tannins on the nutrition and health of ruminants fed fresh temperate forages: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 106, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdiati, TB, McSweeney, CS, Lowry, JB 1992. Metabolism in sheep of garlic acid, tannic acid and hydrolysable tannin from Terminalia oblongata. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 1307–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, PK, Albright, KJ, Cai, ZY, Pariza, MW 2001. Comparison of methylation procedures for conjugated linoleic acid artefact formation by commercial (trimethylsilyl)diazomethane. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 49, 1158–1164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS Institute 1999. SAS user's guide: statistics, version 8.0. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Sniffen, CJ, O’ Connor, JD, Van Soest, PJ, Fox, DG, Russell, JB 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. Journal of Animal Science 70, 3562–3577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB, Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasta, V, Makkar, HPS, Mele, M, Priolo, A 2008. Ruminal biohydrogenation as affected by tannins in vitro. British Journal of Nutrition 102, 82–92. doi:10.1017/S0007114508137898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasta, V, Mele, M, Serra, A, Scerra, M, Luciano, G, Lanza, M, Priolo, A 2009. Metabolic fate of fatty acids involved in ruminal biohydrogenation in sheep fed concentrate or herbage with or without tannins. Journal of Animal Science 87, 2674–2684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasta, V, Yáñez-Ruiz, DR, Mele, M, Serra, A, Luciano, G, Lanza, M, Biondi, L, Priolo, A 2010. Bacterial and protozoal communities and fatty acid profile in the rumens of sheep fed a diet containing added tannins. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76, 2549–2555. doi:10.1128/AEM 02583-09.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vlaeminck, B, Fievez Van Laar, H, Demeyer, D 2004. Rumen odd and branched chain fatty acids in relation to in vitro rumen volatile fatty acid productions and dietary characteristics of incubated substrates. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 88, 401–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vlaeminck, B, Fievez, V, Demeyer, D, Dewhurst, R 2006a. Effect of forage:concentrate ratio on fatty acid composition of rumen bacteria isolated from ruminal duodenal digesta. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 2668–2678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vlaeminck, B, Fievez, V, Cabrita, ARJ, Fonseca, AJM, Dewhurst, R 2006b. Factors affecting odd- and branched-chain fatty acids in milk: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 131, 389–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waghorn, G 2008. Beneficial and detrimental effects of dietary condensed tannins for sustainable sheep and goat production – progress and challenges. Animal Feed Science and Technology 147, 116–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar