Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:47:20.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of calf nutrition on the performance of dairy herd replacements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2011

S. J. Morrison ,
H. C. F. Wicks ,
A. F. Carson ,
R. J. Fallon ,
J. Twigge ,
D. J. Kilpatrick  and
S. Watson
S. J. Morrison*
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, Northern Ireland
H. C. F. Wicks
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, Northern Ireland
A. F. Carson
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, Northern Ireland
R. J. Fallon
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Grange Research Station, Dunsany, Co Meath, Ireland
J. Twigge
Affiliation:
Nutreco Ruminant Research Centre, 5830 AE Boxmeer, The Netherlands
D. J. Kilpatrick
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland
S. Watson
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Sixty-five Holstein–Friesian calves were randomly allocated to one of eight nutritional treatments at 4 days of age. In this factorial design study, the treatments comprised of four levels of milk replacer (MR) mixed in 6 l of water (500, 750, 1000 and 1250 g/day) × two crude protein (CP) concentrations (230 and 270 g CP/kg dry matter (DM)). MR was fed via automatic teat feeders and concentrates were offered via automated dispensers during the pre-wean period. MR and calf starter concentrate intake were recorded until weaning with live weight and body measurements recorded throughout the rearing period until heifers entered the dairy herd at a targeted 24 months of age. There was no effect of MR protein concentration on concentrate or MR intake, and no effect on body size or live weight at any stage of development. During the pre-weaning period, for every 100 g increase in MR allowance, concentrate consumption was reduced by 39 g/day. While, for every 100 g increase in the amount of MR offered, live weight at days 28 and 270 increased by 0.76 and 2.61 kg, respectively (P < 0.05). Increasing MR feed levels increased (P < 0.05) heart girth and body condition score at recordings during the first year of life, but these effects disappeared thereafter. Increasing MR feeding level tended to reduce both age at first observed oestrus and age at first service but no significant effect on age at first calving was observed. Neither MR feeding level nor MR CP content affected post-calving live weight or subsequent milk production. Balance measurements conducted using 44 male calves during the pre-weaning period showed that increasing milk allowance increased energy and nitrogen (N) intake, diet DM digestibility, true N digestibility and the biological value of the dietary protein. Increasing the MR protein content had no significant effect on the apparent digestibility of N or DM.

Keywords

calf nutritionheifer rearingmilk replacerprotein
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 6 , Issue 6 , June 2012 , pp. 909 - 919
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aikman, PC, Gould, M, Bleach, ECL 2007. First lactation milk yield and fertility of Holstein heifers reared using three milk replacer feeding regimes. Journal of Dairy Science 90 (suppl. 1), M343, 112.Google Scholar
Bar-Peled, U, Robinson, B, Maltz, E, Tagari, H, Folman, Y, Bruckental, I, Voet, H, Gacitua, H, Lehrer, AR 1997. Increased weight gain and effects on production parameters of Holstein heifer calves that were allowed to suckle from birth to six weeks of age. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 2523–2528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartlett, KS, McKeith, FK, VandeHaar, MJ, Dahl, GE, Drackley, JK 2006. Growth and body composition of dairy calves fed milk replacers containing different amounts of protein at two feeding rates. Journal of Animal Science 84, 1454–1467.Google Scholar
Bleach, E, Gould, M, Blackie, N, Beever, D 2005. Growth performance of Holstein–Friesian heifer calves reared using three milk replacer rearing regimes. In Recent advances in animal nutrition (ed. PC Garnsworthy and J Wiseman), pp. 347–357. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Blome, RM, Drackley, JK, McKeith, FK, Hutjens, MF, McCoy, GC 2003. Growth, nutrient utilization, and body composition of dairy calves fed milk replacers containing different amounts of protein. Journal of Animal Science 81, 1641–1655.Google Scholar
Bork, AL, Smith, JM, Foote, MR, Van Amburgh, ME 2000. The somatotrophic axis of young calves can be modulated by nutrition and bST. Journal of Dairy Science 83 (suppl. 1), 143.Google Scholar
Brown, EG, VandeHaar, MJ, Daniels, KM, Liesman, JS, Chapin, LT, Keisler, DH, Weber Nielsen, MS 2005a. Effect of increasing energy and protein intake on body growth and carcass composition of heifer calves. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 585–594.Google Scholar
Brown, EG, VandeHaar, MJ, Daniels, KM, Liesman, JS, Chapin, LT, Forrest, JW, Akers, RM, Pearson, RE, Weber Nielsen, MS 2005b. Effect of increasing energy and protein intake on mammary development in heifer calves. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 595–603.Google Scholar
Cushnahan, AC, Gordon, FJ 1995. The effects of grass preservation on intake, apparent digestibility and rumen degradation characteristics. Animal Science 60, 429–438.Google Scholar
Daniels, KM, McGilliard, ML, Meyer, MJ, Van Amburgh, ME, Capuco, AV, Akers, RM 2009. Effects of body weight and nutrition on histological mammary development in Holstein heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 499–505.Google Scholar
Dawson, DP, Morrill, JL, Reddy, PG, Minocha, HC 1988. Soy protein concentrate and heated soy flours as protein sources in milk replacer for preruminant calves. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 1301–1309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis-Rincker, L, VandeHaar, M, Wolf, C, Liesman, J, Chapin, L, Weber-Nielsen, M 2006. Effects of an intensified compared to a moderate feeding program during the preweaning phase on long-term growth, age at calving, and the first lactation milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 89 (suppl. 1), 438.Google Scholar
Diaz, MC, Van Amburgh, ME, Smith, JM, Kelsey, JM, Hutten, EL 2001. Composition of growth of Holstein calves fed milk replacer from birth to 105-kilogram body weight. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 830–842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donnelly, PE, Hutton, JB 1976a. Effects of dietary protein and energy on the growth of Friesian bull calves. I. Food intake, growth, and protein requirements. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 289–297.Google Scholar
Donnelly, PE, Hutton, JB 1976b. Effects of dietary protein and energy on the growth of Friesian bull calves. II. Effects of level of feed intake and dietary protein content on body composition. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 409–414.Google Scholar
Drackley, JK 2000. Calf nutrition related to heifer growth and longevity. Proceedings of the Minnesota Nutrition Conference, 19–20 September 2000, Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA, pp. 153–168.Google Scholar
Drackley, JK 2005. Early growth effects on subsequent health and performance of dairy heifers. In Calf and heifer rearing: principles of rearing the modern dairy heifer from calf to calving (ed. PC Garnsworthy), pp. 1–12. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Drackley, JK 2008. Calf nutrition from birth to breeding. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 24, 55–86.Google Scholar
Drackley, JK, Pollard, BC, Dann, HM, Stamey, JA 2007. First-lactation milk production for cows fed control or intensified milk replacer programs as calves. Journal of Dairy Science 90 (suppl. 1), 614.Google Scholar
Edmondson, AJ, Lean, IJ, Weaver, JD, Farver, T, Webster, G 1989. A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 72, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallon, RJ 1983. The effect of feeding and management factors on calf performance. PhD thesis, National University of Ireland, Dublin.Google Scholar
Fallon, RJ, Wicks, HCF, Twigge, J 2005. Effect of offering two levels of crude protein and two levels of milk replacer on calf performance. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, Annual Meeting 4–6 April 2005, York, UK, 186p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrichs, AJ, Lesmeister, KE 2005. Rumen development in the dairy calf. In Calf and heifer rearing (ed. PC Garnsworthy), pp. 53–65. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Hill, SR, Knowlton, KF, Daniels, KM, James, RE, Pearson, RE, Capuco, AV, Akers, RM 2008. Effects of milk replacer composition on growth, body composition and nutrient excretion in preweaned Holstein heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 3145–3155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, PC 1997. Optimum body size of Holstein replacement heifers. Journal of Animal Science 75, 836–845.Google Scholar
Holmes, CW, Davey, AWF 1976. The energy metabolism of young Jersey and Friesian calves fed fresh milk. Animal Production 23, 43–53.Google Scholar
Jasper, J, Weary, DM 2002. Effects of ad libitum milk intake on dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 3054–3058.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust 2002. GenStat VI release 6.1. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden.Google Scholar
Meyer, MJ, Capuco, AV, Ross, DA, Lintault, LM, Van Amburgh, ME 2006a. Developmental and nutritional regulation of the prepubertal heifer mammary gland: I. Parenchyma and fat pad mass and composition. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 4289–4297.Google Scholar
Meyer, MJ, Capuco, AV, Ross, DA, Lintault, LM, Van Amburgh, ME 2006b. Developmental and nutritional regulation of the prepubertal heifer mammary gland: II. epithelial cell proliferation, parenchymal accretion rate, and allometric growth. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 4298–4304.Google Scholar
Meyer, MJ, Rhoads, RP, Capuco, AV, Connor, EE, Hummel, A, Boisclair, YR, Van Amburgh, ME 2007. Ontogenic and nutritional regulation of steroid receptor and ICF-I transcript abundance in the prepubertal heifer mammary gland. Journal of Endocrinology 195, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, SJ, Carson, AF, Matthews, D, Mulholland, M 2009a. An investigation of calf rearing practices on dairy farms in Northern Ireland. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science Conference, Annual Meeting 30 March–1 April 2009, Southport, UK, 84p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, SJ, Wicks, HCF, Fallon, RJ, Twigge, J, Dawson, LER, Wylie, ARG, Carson, AF 2009b. Effects of feeding level and protein content of milk replacer on the performance of dairy herd replacements. Animal 3, 1570–1579.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, 7th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Raeth-Knight, M, Chester-Jones, H, Hayes, S, Linn, J, Larson, R, Ziegler, D, Ziegler, B, Broadwater, N 2009. Impact of conventional or intensive milk replacer programs on Holstein heifer performance through six months of age and during first lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 799–809.Google Scholar
Shamay, A, Werner, D, Moallem, U, Barash, H, Bruckental, I 2005. Effect of nursing management and skeletal size at weaning on puberty, skeletal growth rate, and milk production during first lactation of dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 1460–1469.Google Scholar
Speijers, MHM, Langa, JRSO, Struthers, J, Twigge, J, Scaife, JS 2005. The performance of Holstein-Friesian and Jersey calves when fed two concentrations of a high protein milk replacer. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, Annual Meeting 4–6 April 2005, York, UK, 187p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, RWJ 1989. A comparison of soya-bean, sunflower and fish meals as protein supplements for yearling cattle offered grass silage-based diets. Animal Production 48, 81–89.Google Scholar
Terre, M, Tejero, C, Bach, A 2009. Long-term effects on heifer performance of an enhanced-growth feeding programme applied during the preweaning period. Journal of Dairy Research 76, 331–339.Google Scholar
Van Amburgh, M, Tikofsky, J 2001. The advantages of accelerated growth in heifer rearing. Advances in Dairy Technology 13, 79.Google Scholar
Van Amburgh, M, Tikofsky, J, Smith, J 2001. Requirements for and regulation of growth of Holstein calves – implications for decreasing age at first calving. Proceedings of Tri-State Dairy Nutrition Conference 1991–2001, Michigan State University, MI, USA.Google Scholar