Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T23:55:36.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of Boswellia serrata resin diet supplementation on production, hematological, biochemical and immunological parameters in broiler chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2017

A. R. M. Al-Yasiry ,
B. Kiczorowska ,
W. Samolińska ,
E. Kowalczuk-Vasilev  and
D. Kowalczyk-Pecka
A. R. M. Al-Yasiry
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition and Bromatology, University of Life Science, 13 Akademicka Street, 20-950 Lublin, Poland Department of Animal Resources, University of Wasit, Al Kut 52001, Wasit, Iraq
B. Kiczorowska*
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition and Bromatology, University of Life Science, 13 Akademicka Street, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
W. Samolińska
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition and Bromatology, University of Life Science, 13 Akademicka Street, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
E. Kowalczuk-Vasilev
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition and Bromatology, University of Life Science, 13 Akademicka Street, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
D. Kowalczyk-Pecka
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Ecology and Wildlife Management, University of Life Science, 13 Akademicka Street, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Boswellia serrata resin (BSR), exhibiting a variety of therapeutic properties, is applied in Asian traditional medicine. These properties can be used in poultry production as well. Application of the resin as a phytobiotic in broiler chicken rearing can increase the productivity and improve meat quality. However, the optimum and maximum levels of BSR in broiler diets need to be assessed. The study determined the effect of different levels of supplementation of BSR (directly derived, unprocessed) in diets for broiler chickens on the production traits, selected slaughter analysis parameters, nutrient digestibility and selected hematological, biochemical and immunological parameters. In total, 200 1-day-old broiler chickens were assigned randomly to four treatments with five replicate cages of 10 broiler chickens/cage (five females and five males). The experiment lasted 6 weeks, and the broiler chickens were fed diets containing 0% (control), 3% (BSR3), 4% (BSR4) or 5% (BSR5). In the broiler chickens receiving diets with addition of resin BSR3 and BSR4, there was an increase in (P<0.05) BW gain, ether extract, ADF, organic matter and energy digestibility of the diets. Moreover, the best carcass quality with a high proportion of muscles and low abdominal fat content (P<0.05) was noted in these groups. The content of uric acid (P<0.01) and the activity of aspartate aminotransferase (P<0.001) and alkaline phosphatase (P<0.05) in blood plasma decreased upon the BSR supplementation. Globulin content increased in blood plasma (P<0.05) along the increasing level of BSR. The blood immunoglobulin A concentration was only affected by the BSR treatments (P<0.05). It may be concluded that BSR can be regarded as a safe and effective dietary additive for broiler chicken.

Keywords

resinperformancedigestibilityblood parametersbroiler chickens
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 11 , November 2017 , pp. 1890 - 1898
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, HH, Abdel-Rahman, M, Salem, FH, Shalby, AB and Lokman, MS 2013. Antitumor efficacy of Boswellia serrata extract in management of colon cancer induced in experimental animal. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 5, 379–389.Google Scholar
Akamatsu, S, Watanabe, A, Tamesada, M, Nakamura, R, Hayashi, S, Kodama, D., Kawase, M and Yagi, K 2004. Hepatoprotective effect of extracts from Lentinus edodes mycelia on dimethylnitrosamine-induced liver injury. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 27, 1957–1960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alipour, F, Hassanabadi, A, Golian, A and Nassiri-Moghaddam, H 2015. Effect of plant extracts derived from thyme on male broiler performance. Poultry Science 94, 2630–2634.Google Scholar
Aliyu, R, Gatsing, D and Jaryum, KH 2007. The effect of Boswellia dalzielii (Buseraceae) aqueous bark extract on rat liver function. Asian Journal of Biochemistry 2, 359–363.Google Scholar
Al-Yasiry, ARM and Kiczorowska, B 2016. Frankincense – therapeutic properties. Advances in Hygiene and Experimental Medicine 70, 380–391.Google Scholar
Ammon, HPT 2010. Modulation of the immune system by Boswellia serrata extracts and boswellic acids. Phytomedicine 17, 862–867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnoldi, A 2001. Thermal processing and foods quality: analysis and control. In Thermal technologies in food processing (ed. P Richardson), pp. 138–159. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 2000. Official methods of analysis, 17th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Aviagen 2014a. Ross 308 broiler: nutrition specifications. Retrieved on 10 April 2016 from http://en.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/Ross308BroilerNutritionSpecs2014-EN.pdf Google Scholar
Aviagen 2014b. Ross broiler management handbook. Retrieved on 10 April 2016 from http://en.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/Ross-Broiler-Handbook-2014i-EN.pdf Google Scholar
Awaad, MHH, Abdel-Alim, GA, Sayed, KSS, Kawkab, AA, Nada, AA, Metwalli, ASZ and Alkhalaf, AN 2010. Immunostimulant effects of essential oils of peppermint and eucalyptus in chickens. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 30, 61–66.Google Scholar
Bou, R, Guardiola, F, Barroeta, AC and Codony, R 2005. Effect of dietary fat sources and zinc and selenium supplements on the composition and consumer acceptability of chicken meat. Poultry Science 84, 1129–1140.Google Scholar
Ekman, P, Emanuelson, H and Fransson, A 1949. Investigations concerning the digestibility of protein in poultry. Kungliga Lantbrukshogskolans Annaler 16, 749–776.Google Scholar
European Union Register of Feed Additives 2016. European Union Register of Feed Additives pursuant Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. Annex I: list of additives, 244th edition. Retrieved on 10 November 2016 from https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/safety/docs/animal-feed-eu-reg-comm_register_feed_additives_1831-03.pdf Google Scholar
Guo, Y, Chen, S, Xia, Z and Yuan, J 2004. Effects of different types of polyunsaturated fatty acids on immune function and PGE2 synthesis by peripheral blood leukocytes of laying hens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 116, 249–257.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, M, Khaja, ZU and Narasu, ML 2011. Hepatoprotective activity of Boswellia serrata extracts: in vitro and in vivo studies. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Applications 2, 89–98.Google Scholar
Isshiki, Y 1979. Effect of lactobacilli in the diet on the concentration of nitrogenous compounds and minerals in blood of chickens. Japanese Poultry Science 16, 254–258.Google Scholar
Khajuria, A, Gupta, A, Suden, P, Singh, S, Malik, F, Singh, J, Gupta, BD, Suri, KA, Srinavas, VK, Ella, K and Quazi, GN 2008. Immunmodulatory activity of biopolymeric fraction BOS 2000 from Boswellia serrata . Phytotherapy Research 22, 340–348.Google Scholar
Kiczorowska, B, Al-Yasiry, ARM, Samolińska, W, Marek, A and Pyzik, E 2016a. The effect of dietary supplementation of the broiler chicken diet with Boswellia serrata resin on growth performance, digestibility, and gastrointestinal characteristics, morphology, and microbiota. Livestock Science 191, 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiczorowska, B, Samolińska, W, Al-Yasiry, ARM and Kowalczyk-Pecka, D 2016b. Effect of Boswellia serrata dietary supplementation on growth performance, gastrointestinal microflora, and morphology of broilers. Annals of Animal Science 16, 835–849.Google Scholar
Kreukniet, MB, Nieuwland, MGB and Van der Zijpp, AJ 1994. Phagocytic activity of two lines of chickens divergently selected for antibody production. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 44, 377–387.Google Scholar
Kussaibat, R and Leclercq, B 1985. A simplified rapid method for the determination of apparent and true metabolizable energy values of poultry feed. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde 49, 54–62.Google Scholar
Larsson, A, Bålöw, RM, Lindahl, TL and Forsberg, PO 1993. Chicken antibodies: taking advantage of evolution – a review. Poultry Science 72, 1807–1812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, TT, Chen, CL, Wang, CC and Yu, B 2012. Growth performance and antioxidant capacity of broilers supplemented with Echinacea purpurea L. in the diet. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 21, 484–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, WF, Rajput, IR, Xu, X, Li, YL, Lei, J, Huang, Q and Wang, MQ 2011. Effects of probiotic (Bacillus subtilis) on laying performance, blood biochemical properties and intestinal microflora of Shaoxing duck. International Journal of Poultry Science 108, 583–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namjoyan, F, Azemi, ME, Khodayar, MJ, Ahmadpour, F, Darvish Padok, A and Panahi, M 2012. The antioxidant capacity and anti-diabetic effect of Boswellia serrata triana and planch aqueous extract in fertile female diabetic rats and the possible effects on reproduction and histological changes in the liver and kidneys. Jundishapur Journal Natural Pharmaceutical Product 7, 168–175.Google Scholar
Pan, D and Yu, Z 2014. Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet. Gut Microbes 5, 108–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panda, AK, Rao, SR, Raju, MVLN and Sunder, GS 2009. Effect of butyric acid on performance, gastrointestinal tract health and carcass characteristics in broiler chickens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 22, 1026–1031.Google Scholar
Polish Standard PN-76/R-64781 1976. Feed. Determination of phosphorus content. Polish Committee for Standardization, Warsaw, Poland (in Polish).Google Scholar
Polish Standard PN-EN ISO 6869 2002. Animal feeding stuffs – determination of the contents of calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, potassium, sodium and zinc – method using atomic absorption spectrometry. Polish Committee for Standardization, Warsaw, Poland (in Polish).Google Scholar
Reece, WO, Erickson, HH, Goff, JP and Uemura, EE (eds) 2015. Dukes’ physiology of domestic animals, 13th edition. Wiley Blackwell, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Roy, NK, Deka, A, Bordoloi, D, Mishra, S, Kumar, AP, Sethi, G and Kunnumakkara, AB 2016. The potential role of boswellic acids in cancer prevention and treatment. Cancer Letters 377, 74–86.Google Scholar
Scanes, CG (ed.) 2015. Sturkie’s avian physiology, 6th edition. Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
Sharma, ML, Kaul, A, Khajuria, A, Singh, S and Singh, GB 1996. Immunomodulatory activity of boswellic acids (pentacyclic triterpene acids) from Boswellia serrata . Phytotherapy Research 10, 107–112.Google Scholar
Singh, GB and Atal, CK 1986. Pharmacology of an extract of salai guggal ex-Boswellia serrata, a new nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent. Agents and Actions 18, 407–412.Google Scholar
Singh, S, Khajuria, A, Taneja, SC, Khajuria, RK, Singh, J, Johri, RK and Qazi, GN 2008. The gastric ulcer protective effect of boswellic acids, a leukotriene inhibitor from Boswellia serrata, in rats. Phytomedicine 15, 408–415.Google Scholar
World’s Poultry Science Association (WPSA) 1986. European table of energy values for poultry feedstuffs, 1st edition, Subcommittee Energy of the Working Group No. 2, Nutrition of the European Federation of Branches of the WPSA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Ziołecki, J and Doruchowski, W 1989. The method of assessment of slaughter poultry. COBRD Publishing, Poznań, Poland (in Polish).Google Scholar