Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:18:31.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Editorial: Greenhouse Gases and Animal Agriculture Conference, Dublin, 2013

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2013

R. J. Dewhurst
R. J. Dewhurst*
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal and Grassland Research & Innovation Centre, Grange, Dunsany, County Meath, Ireland
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue s2: Greenhouse Gases & Animal Agriculture Conference (GGAA 2013), 23rd ‐ 26th June 2013, Dublin, Ireland , June 2013 , pp. 203 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basarab, JA, Beauchemin, KA, Baron, VS, Ominski, KH, Guan, LL, Miller, SP 2013. Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on enteric methane production. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 303–315.Google Scholar
Berndt, A, Tomkins, N 2013. Measurement and mitigation of methane emissions from beef cattle in tropical grazing systems. A perspective from Australia and Brazil. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 363–372.Google Scholar
Cederberg, C, Henriksson, M, Berglund, M 2013. An LCA researcher's wish list – data and emission models needed to improve LCA studies of animal production. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 212–219.Google Scholar
Chagunda, MGG 2013. Opportunities and challenges in the use of the Laser Methane Detector to monitor enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 394–400.Google Scholar
Cieslak, A, Szumacher-Strabel, M, Stochmal, A, Oleszek, W 2013. Plant components with specific activities against rumen methanogens. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 253–265.Google Scholar
Clark, H 2013. Nutritional and host effects on methanogenesis in the grazing ruminant. Animal 7 (suppl. 1), 141–148.Google Scholar
Clough, TJ, Müller, C, Laughlin, RJ 2013. Using stable isotopes to follow excreta N dynamics and N2O emissions in animal production systems. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 418–426.Google Scholar
de Klein, CAM, Cameron, KC, Di, HJ, Rys, G, Monaghan, RM, Sherlock, RR 2011. Repeated annual use of the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) does not alter its effectiveness in reducing N2O emissions from cow urine. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 480–491.Google Scholar
del Prado, A, Crosson, P, Olesen, JE, Rotz, CA 2013. Whole-farm models to quantify greenhouse gas emissions and their potential use for linking climate change mitigation and adaptation in temperate grassland ruminant-based farming systems. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 373–385.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, J, Oenema, O, van Groenigen, JW, Spek, JW, van Vuuren, AM, Bannink, A 2013. Diet effects on urine composition of cattle and N2O emissions. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 292–302.Google Scholar
Gerber, PJ, Hristov, AN, Henderson, B, Makkar, H, Oh, J, Lee, C, Meinen, R, Montes, F, Ott, T, Firkins, J, Rotz, AL, Dell, C, Adesogan, A, Yang, WZ, Tricarico, J, Kebreab, E, Waghorn, G, Dijkstra, J, Oosting, S 2013. Technical options for the mitigation of direct methane and nitrous oxide emissions from livestock – a review. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 220–234.Google Scholar
Hegarty, RS 2013. Applicability of short term emission measurements for on-farm quantification of enteric methane. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 401–408.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, I 2013. Adaptation to climate change – exploring the potential of locally adapted breeds. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 346–362.Google Scholar
Janzen, HH 2011. What place for livestock on a re-greening earth? Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 783–796.Google Scholar
Leahy, SC, Kelly, WJ, Ronimus, RS, Wedlock, N, Altermann, E, Attwood, GT 2013. Genome sequencing of rumen bacteria and archaea and its application to methane mitigation strategies. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 235–243.Google Scholar
McCartney, CA, Bull, ID, Dewhurst, RJ 2013. Chemical markers for rumen methanogens and methanogenesis. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 409–417.Google Scholar
McGinn, SM 2013. Developments in micrometeorlogical methods for methane measurements. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 386–393.Google Scholar
Muldowney, J, Mounsey, J, Kinsella, L 2013. Agriculture in the climate change negotiations; ensuring that food production is not threatened. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 206–211.Google Scholar
Murphy, P, Crosson, P, O'Brien, D, Schulte, RPO 2013. The Carbon Navigator – a decision support tool to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production systems. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 427–436.Google Scholar
Petersen, SO, Blanchard, M, Chadwick, D, del Prado, A, Edouard, N, Mosquera, J, Sommer, SG 2013. Manure management for greenhouse gas mitigation. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 266–282.Google Scholar
Pinares-Patiño, CS, Clark, H 2008. Reliability of the sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique for methane emission measurement from individual animals: an overview. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 223–229.Google Scholar
Pinares-Patiño, CS, Hickey, SM, Young, EA, Dodds, KG, MacLean, S, Molano, G, Sandoval, E, Kjestrup, H, Harland, R, Pickering, NK, McEwan, JC 2013. Heritability estimates of methane emissions from sheep. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 316–321.Google Scholar
Pucker, J, Jungmeier, G, Siegl, S, Pötsch, EM 2013. Anaerobic digestion of agricultural and other substrates – implications for greenhouse gas emissions. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 283–291.Google Scholar
Skuce, PJ, Morgan, ER, van Dijk, J, Mitchell, M 2013. Animal health aspects of adaptation to climate change: beating the heat and parasites in a warming Europe. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 333–345.Google Scholar
Subbarao, GV, Rao, IM, Nakahara, K, Sahrawat, KL, Ando, Y, Kawashima, T 2013. Potential for biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) to reduce nitrification and N2O emissions in pasture-crop-livestock systems. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 322–332.Google Scholar
Wedlock, DN, Janssen, PH, Leahy, S, Shu, D, Buddle, BM 2013. Progress in the development of vaccines against rumen methanogens. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 244–252.Google Scholar
Wheeler, DM, Ledgard, SF, Boyes, M 2013. Farm-specific methodology for carbon footprinting to the farm gate agricultural co-products using the OVERSEER® model. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 437–443.Google Scholar