Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:48:31.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Economic impact of clinical mastitis in a dairy herd assessed by stochastic simulation using different methods to model yield losses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2008

C. Hagnestam-Nielsen*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7023, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
S. Østergaard
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Aarhus, Research Centre Foulum, P.O. Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
Get access

Abstract

The main aim of the present study was to examine the economic consequences of a reduction in the incidence of clinical mastitis (CM) at herd level under current Swedish farming conditions. A second objective was to ask whether the estimated cost of CM alters depending upon whether the model reflects the fact that in different stages of lactation, CM gives rise to different yield-loss patterns or postulates just one type of yield-loss pattern irrespective of when, during lactation, CM occurs. A dynamic and stochastic simulation model, SimHerd, was used to study the effects of CM in a herd with 150 cows (9000 kg of energy-corrected milk per cow-year). Four herd types, defined by production level and reproductive performance, were modelled to investigate possible interactions between herd type and response to a reduction in the risk of CM. Technical and economic results, given the initial incidence of CM (25.6 per 100 cow-years), were studied together with the consequences of reducing the initial risk of CM by 50% and 90% throughout lactation and the consequences of reducing the initial risk by 50% and 90% before peak yield. A conventional way of modelling yield losses – i.e. one employing a single yield-loss pattern irrespective of when, during the lactation period, the cow develops CM – was compared with a new modelling strategy in which CM was assumed to affect production differently depending on its lactational timing. The effect of the choice of reference level when estimating yield losses was investigated by comparing the results obtained using the potential yield of mastitic cows, had they not developed CM, with those obtained using the yield of non-mastitic cows. The yearly maximum avoidable cost of CM at herd level was estimated at €14 504, corresponding to 6.9% of the net return given the initial incidence of CM. Expressed per cow-year, the maximum avoidable cost was €97. The cost per case of CM was estimated at €428. Herd types all responded in a similar manner to the reduced relative risk of CM. There were no major differences in the results obtained using the new and the conventional modelling strategy, with the exception of the cost per case of CM. Similarities between the results obtained using the two methods were particularly evident when the mastitic cows’ own yield level, had they not developed CM, was used as the reference for production in healthy cows when yield losses were estimated. It was concluded that the conventional way of modelling yield losses is adequate and should, for the foreseeable future, be used in decision support systems.

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agriwise 2006. Databoken 2006. Retrieved September 15, 2006, from http://www.agriwise.org/databoken/databok2k6/databok2006htm/index.htmGoogle Scholar
Allore, HG, Erb, HN 1999. Approaches to modeling intramammary infections in dairy cattle. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 39, 279293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arla Foods 2006. Kvalitetsprogrammet Arlagården (Quality assurance program for milk production). Retrieved September 15, 2006, from http://www.arlafoods.se/upload/V2a-1370-SE%20Arla%20kval.prog.%20mappe%20opdat.08-SE.pdfGoogle Scholar
Degraves, FJ, Fetrow, J 1993. Economics of mastitis and mastitis control. Veterinary Clinics of North America. Food Animal Practice 9, 421434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijkhuizen, AA, Huirne, RBM, Jalvingh, AW 1995. Economic analysis of animal diseases and their control. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 25, 135149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enevoldsen C and Madsen P 2006. A random coefficient regression analysis of lactation curves for dairy herd management. Proceedings of the International Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics XI, Queensland, Australia, p. 236.Google Scholar
Hagnestam, C, Emanuelson, U, Berglund, B 2007. Yield losses associated with clinical mastitis occurring in different weeks of lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 22602270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halasa, T, Huijps, K, Osteras, O, Hogeveen, H 2007. Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management: a review. Veterinary Quarterly 29, 1831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huijps, K, Lam, TJ, Hogeveen, H 2008. Costs of mastitis: facts and perception. Journal of Dairy Research 75, 113120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kossaibati, MA, Esslemont, RJ 1997. The costs of production diseases in dairy herds in England. Veterinary Journal 154, 4151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kristensen, E, Østergaard, S, Krogh, MA, Enevoldsen, C 2008. Technical indicators of financial performance in the dairy herd. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 620631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucey, S, Rowlands, GJ 1984. The association between clinical mastitis and milk yield in dairy cows. Animal Production 39, 165175.Google Scholar
McInerney, JP, Howe, KS, Schepers, JA 1992. A framework for the economic analysis of disease in farm livestock. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 13, 137154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development 2007. Consumer price indices. Retrieved September 17, 2007, from http://stats.oecd.org/wbos/Google Scholar
Østergaard, S, Chagunda, MGG, Friggens, NC, Bennedsgaard, TW, Klaas, IC 2005. A stochastic model simulating pathogen-specific mastitis control in a dairy herd. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 42434257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajala-Schultz, PJ, Grohn, YT, McCulloch, CE, Guard, CL 1999. Effects of clinical mastitis on milk yield in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 12131220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schepers, JA, Dijkhuizen, AA 1991. The economics of mastitis and mastitis control in dairy cattle – a critical analysis of estimates published since 1970. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 10, 213224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seegers, H, Fourichon, C, Beaudeau, F 2003. Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. Veterinary Research 34, 475491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swedish Dairy Association 2005a. Djurhälsovård (Animal health care) 2004/2005. Svensk Mjölk, Eskilstuna, Sweden.Google Scholar
Swedish Dairy Association 2005b. Husdjursstatistik (Cattle statistics) 2005. Svensk Mjölk, Eskilstuna, Sweden.Google Scholar
Swedish Dairy Association 2006. Avräkningspris för mjölk (Output price for milk). Retrieved September 15, 2006, from http://www.svenskmjolk.se/ImageVault/Images/id_463/scope_128/ImageVaultHandler.aspxGoogle Scholar
Swedish Meats 2006. Avräkningsnotering (Output price for meat). Retrieved September 18, 2006, from http://www.swedishmeats.com/aciro/bilddb/objektvisa.asp?idnr=9tqSAdDfItOJ9sx82KcMq8FooMRiHLMV85BUGjCWEnB6F40SsqKMiOpanJV9Google Scholar
Yalcin, C 2000. Cost of mastitis in Scottish dairy herds with low and high subclinical mastitis problems. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 24, 465472.Google Scholar