Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:29:48.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamics of energy utilization in male and female turkeys during growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2010

V. Rivera-Torres ,
J. Noblet ,
S. Dubois  and
J. van Milgen
V. Rivera-Torres
Affiliation:
Techna, BP10, F-44220 Couëron, France AgroParisTech, UFR Nutrition animale, qualité des produits et bien-être, F-75005 Paris, France
J. Noblet
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1079 SENAH, F-35590 Saint Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1079 SENAH, F-35000 Rennes, France
S. Dubois
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1079 SENAH, F-35590 Saint Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1079 SENAH, F-35000 Rennes, France
J. van Milgen*
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1079 SENAH, F-35590 Saint Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1079 SENAH, F-35000 Rennes, France
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Determining energy utilization in growing animals enables to adjust the nutritional constraints to nutrient requirements while maximizing the ratio between lean retention and fat retention to improve feed efficiency. In turkey production, the important sexual dimorphism and differences between strains may contribute to differences in basal energy metabolism and the partitioning of energy retention between protein and lipid. The objective of this study was to determine the dynamics of energy utilization in males and females of a heavy strain of turkeys fed ad libitum from 1 to 23 weeks of age. Heat production (HP) was determined by indirect calorimetry and retained energy (RE) was calculated as the difference between metabolizable energy (ME) intake and HP. The RE as protein was determined by a nitrogen balance, while the remaining RE was assumed to be lipid. A modeling procedure allowed partitioning HP between fasting HP (FHP), activity-related HP and thermic effect of feeding. A multiple regression analysis was used to estimate the maintenance energy expenditure (MEm) and the energy efficiencies of protein and lipid retention (kp and kf, respectively). Results were expressed either per day or per kg BW0.75 per day. In comparison with females, males consumed more feed (440 v. 368 g/day), grew faster (163 v. 147 g/day) and retained more protein (38 v. 28 g/day) during the experimental period. Expressed per kg BW0.75 per day, ME intake decreased linearly with increasing age and was not affected by gender. Similarly, RE as protein decreased with increasing age and tended to be greater in males than in females, whereas RE as lipid increased with increasing age and was lower in males than in females. In addition, HP decreased with increasing age and was greater in males than in females, because of greater activity-related HP and FHP (47% and 9% greater in males compared with females). The FHP averaged 417 kJ/(kg BW)0.75 per day during the first 3 weeks of age and decreased to 317 and 277 kJ/(kg BW)0.75 per day in males and females, respectively, from 20 weeks of age onwards. Similar to FHP, MEm was lower in females than in males ((586 to 12 × BW) and (586 to 5 × BW) kJ/(kg BW)0.75 per day, respectively) and the kp and kf were estimated at 0.63 and 0.87, respectively. This study shows that the partitioning of RE and HP differs between genders in growing turkeys, which likely results in differences in nutrient requirements.

Keywords

turkeyenergygrowthheat productionrequirement
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , February 2011 , pp. 202 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brouwer, E 1965. Report of sub-committee on constants and factors. In Energy Metabolism, Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Energy Metabolism (ed. KL Baxter), pp. 441–443. Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
de Lange, K, van Milgen, J, Noblet, J, Dubois, S, Birkett, S 2006. Previous feeding level influences plateau heat production following a 24 h fast in growing pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 95, 1082–1087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmans, GC 1987. Growth, body composition and feed intake. World’s Poultry Science Journal 43, 208–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmans, GC 1989. The growth of turkeys. In Recent advances in turkey science (ed. C Nixey and TC Grey), pp. 135–166. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Ferrell, CL, Koong, LJ, Nienaber, JA 1986. Effect of previous nutrition on body composition and maintenance energy costs of growing lambs. British Journal of Nutrition 56, 595–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurwitz, S, Wax, E, Bengal, I 1983. Performance and energy needs of 20-week-old male turkeys at different environmental temperatures. Poultry Science 62, 1327–1329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurwitz, S, Weiselberg, M, Eisner, U, Bartov, I, Riesenfeld, G, Sharvit, M, Niv, A, Bornstein, S 1980. The energy-requirements and performance of growing chickens and turkeys as affected by environmental temperature. Poultry Science 59, 2290–2299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jadhao, SB, Tiwari, CM, Khan, MY 1999. Energy balance by carbon and nitrogen balance technique in White Leghorn and Rhode Island Red hens fed maize- and broken rice-based diets. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science 12, 1080–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, M, Neubert, M, Strobel, E, Hoffmann, L 1998. Energy metabolism in laying hens of different body weight-genotypes. Archives of Animal Nutrition 51, 263–277.Google ScholarPubMed
Labussière, E, Maxin, G, Dubois, S, van Milgen, J, Bertrand, G, Noblet, J 2009. Effect of feed intake on heat production and protein and fat deposition in milk-fed veal calves. Animal 3, 557–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez, G, Leeson, S 2008. Aspects of energy metabolism and energy partitioning in broiler chickens. In Mathematical modelling in animal nutrition (ed. J France and E Kebreab), pp. 339–352. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, MG, Lundy, H, Jewitt, TR 1985. Heat production by the mature male turkey (Meleagris-gallopavo) – preliminary measurements in an automated, indirect, open-circuit multi-calorimeter system. British Poultry Science 26, 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, MG, Tullett, SG, Jewitt, TR 1979. Effects of food intake regulation on the energy metabolism of hens and cockerels of a layer strain. British Poultry Science 20, 521–531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noblet, J, Dubois, S, van Milgen, J, Warpechowski, M, Carre, B 2007. Heat production in broilers is not affected by dietary crude protein. In Energy and protein metabolism and nutrition (ed. I Ortigues-Marty), pp. 479–481. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Nertherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noblet, J, Karege, C, Dubois, S, van Milgen, J 1999. Metabolic utilization of energy and maintenance requirements in growing pigs: effects of sex and genotype. Journal of Animal Science 77, 1208–1216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noblet, J, Shi, XS, Dubois, S 1994. Effect of body-weight on net energy value of feeds for growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 72, 648–657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council (NRC) 1994. Nutrient requirements for poultry, 9th edition. National Academic Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Ratkowsky, DA 1983. Nonlinear regression modeling. A unified practical approach. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Rivera-Torres, V, Noblet, J, Dubois, S, van Milgen, J 2010. Energy partitioning in male growing turkeys. Poultry Science 89, 530–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakomura, NK, Longo, FA, Oviedo-Rondon, EO, Boa-Viagem, C, Ferraudo, A 2005. Modeling energy utilization and growth parameter description for broiler chickens. Poultry Science 84, 1363–1369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakomura, NK, Silva, R, Couto, HP, Coon, C, Pacheco, CR 2003. Modeling metabolizable energy utilization in broiler breeder pullets. Poultry Science 82, 419–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sauvant, D, Perez, JM, Tran, G 2004. Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials. Pigs, poultry, cattle, sheep, goats, rabbits, horses, fish. INRA Editions, Paris, France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalev, BA, Pasternak, H 1998. The relative energy requirement of male vs female broilers and turkeys. Poultry Science 77, 859–863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tess, MW, Dickerson, GE, Nienaber, JA, Ferrell, CL 1984. The effects of body-composition on fasting heat-production in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 58, 99–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomas, FM, Pym, RA, Johnson, RJ 1991. Muscle protein turnover in chickens selected for increased growth rate, food consumption or efficiency of food utilization: effects of genotype and relationship to plasma IGF-I and growth hormone. British Poultry Science 32, 363–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Milgen, J 2002. Modeling biochemical aspects of energy metabolism in mammals. Journal of Nutrition 132, 3195–3202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Milgen, J, Bernier, JF, Lecozler, Y, Dubois, S, Noblet, J 1998. Major determinants of fasting heat production and energetic cost of activity in growing pigs of different body weight and breed/castration combination. British Journal of Nutrition 79, 509–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Milgen, J, Noblet, J, Dubois, S, Bernier, JF 1997. Dynamic aspects of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production in swine. British Journal of Nutrition 78, 397–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Milgen, J, Noblet, J, Dubois, S, Carré, B, Juin, H 2001. Utilization of metabolizable energy in broilers. Poultry Science 80 (Suppl.1), 170.Google Scholar