Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T11:58:45.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differential adaptations during growth spurt and in young adult rat muscles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2009

K. M. F. T. Barros ,
R. Manhaes-de-Castro ,
F. Goubel  and
F. Canon
K. M. F. T. Barros*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Nutricao, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Moraes Rego 1235, 50670-901 Recife, PE, Brazil Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Moraes Rego 1235, 50670-901 Recife, PE, Brazil Département de Génie Biologique, UMR CNRS 6600, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, BP20529, F-60205 Compiègne cedex, France
R. Manhaes-de-Castro
Affiliation:
Departamento de Nutricao, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Moraes Rego 1235, 50670-901 Recife, PE, Brazil
F. Goubel
Affiliation:
Département de Génie Biologique, UMR CNRS 6600, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, BP20529, F-60205 Compiègne cedex, France
F. Canon
Affiliation:
Département de Génie Biologique, UMR CNRS 6600, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, BP20529, F-60205 Compiègne cedex, France
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

During the post-weaning growth and maturation period (25/90 days after birth), rat limb muscles are submitted to specific adaptations. Our aim was to characterize the mechanical properties of two muscles that are opposite in terms of fibre-type distribution, the soleus and the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles of male Wistar rats. Results showed a fast-to-slow fibre-type transition in soleus while no modification in fibre-type distribution was observed in EDL. A growth-induced increase in muscle force was observed. Soleus underwent an increase in twitch kinetics, but EDL showed no modification. Resistance to fatigue was higher in 90-day-old soleus but not modified in the EDL. Surprisingly, analysis of maximal shortening velocity showed a decrease in both soleus and EDL. Finally, tension/extension curves indicated a growth-induced increase in series elastic stiffness in the two muscles. These results suggest that during this growth period, skeletal muscles are submitted to differential adaptations. Moreover, whereas adaptation of biomechanical properties observed can be explained partly by an adaptation of fibre profile in soleus, this is not the case for EDL. It is suggested that changes in muscle architecture, which are often disregarded, could explain some variations in mechanical properties, especially when muscles undergo an increase in both mass and length.

Keywords

musclebiomechanicsgrowthrat
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 72 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeida-Silveira, MI, Perot, C, Pousson, M, Goubel, F 1994. Effects of stretch-shortening cycle training on mechanical properties and fibre type transition in the rat soleus muscle. Pflügers Archiv 427, 289–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alnaqeeb, MA, Al Zaid, NS, Goldspink, G 1984. Connective tissue changes and physical properties of developing and ageing skeletal muscle. Journal of Anatomy 139, 677–689.Google ScholarPubMed
Bottinelli, R, Canepari, M, Reggiani, C, Stienen, GJ 1994. Myofibrillar ATPase activity during isometric contraction and isomyosin composition in rat single skinned muscle fibres. Journal of Physiology 481, 663–675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooke, MH, Kaiser, KK 1970. Muscle fiber types: how many and what kind? Archive of Neurology 23, 369–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burke, RE, Levine, DN, Tsairis, P, Zajac, FE 1973. Physiological types and histochemical profiles in motor units of the cat gastrocnemius. Journal of Physiology 234, 723–748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canon, F, Goubel, F 1995. Changes in stiffness induced by hindlimb suspension in rat soleus muscle. Pflügers Archiv 429, 332–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Close, R 1964. Dynamic properties of fast and slow skeletal muscles of the rat during development. Journal of Physiology 173, 74–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Close, RI 1972. Dynamic properties of mammalian skeletal muscles. Physiological Reviews 52, 129–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diffee, GM, Caiozzo, VJ, Herrick, RE, Baldwin, KM 1991. Contractile and biochemical properties of rat soleus and plantaris after hindlimb suspension. American Journal of Physiology 260, C528–C534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eken, T, Gundersen, K 1988. Electrical stimulation resembling normal motor-unit activity: effects on denervated fast and slow rat muscles. Journal of Physiology 402, 651–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ettema, GJC, Huijing, PA 1990. Architecture and elastic properties of the series element of muscle-tendon complex. In Muscle multiple systems: biomechanics and movement organization (ed. JM Winters and SLY Woo), pp. 57–68. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goubel, F, Marini, JF 1987. Fibre type transition and stiffness modification of soleus muscle of trained rats. Pflügers Archiv 410, 321–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gundersen, K, Eken, T 1992. The importance of frequency and amount of electrical stimulation for contractile properties of denervated rat muscles. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 145, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hennig, R, Lomo, T 1987. Effects of chronic stimulation on the size and speed of long-term denervated and innervated rat fast and slow skeletal muscles. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 130, 115–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, AV 1951. The effect of series compliance on the tension developed in muscle twitch. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 138, 325–329.Google Scholar
Ho, KW, Heusner, WW, Van Huss, WD 1983. Postnatal muscle fibre histochemistry in the rat. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 76, 37–49.Google ScholarPubMed
Huijing, PA, Nieberg, SM, van der Veen, EA, Ettema, GJC 1994. A comparison of rat extensor digitorum longus and gastrocnemius medialis muscle architecture and length-force characteristics. Acta Anatomica 149, 111–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huxley, AF, Simmons, RM 1971. Proposed mechanism of force generation in striated muscle. Nature 233, 533–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishihara, A, Taguchi, S 1991. Histochemical differentiation of fibers in the rat slow and fast twitch muscles. Japanese Journal of Physiology 41, 251–258.Google ScholarPubMed
Konishi, M, Iwamoto, S, Ohara, H, Shimada, M 2000. Two-dimensional changes of muscle fiber types in growing rat hind limb. Acta Anatomica Nipponica 75, 267–273.Google ScholarPubMed
Kovanen, V 1989. Effects of ageing and physical training on rat skeletal muscle. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica Supplementum 577, 1–56.Google ScholarPubMed
Lensel-Corbeil, G, Goubel, F 1989. Series elasticity in frog sartorius muscle during release and stretch. Archive International de Physiology et de Biochimie 97, 499–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lodder, MA, de Haan, A, Sargeant, AJ 1994. Effect of growth on efficiency and fatigue in extensor digitorum longus muscle of the rat. European Journal of Applied Physiology 69, 429–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petit, J, Filippi, GM, Emonet-Denand, F, Hunt, CC, Laporte, Y 1990. Changes in muscle stiffness produced by motor units of different types in peroneus longus muscle of cat. Journal of Neurophysiology 63, 190–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierobon-Bormioli, S, Sartore, S, Libera, LD, Vitadello, M, Schiaffino, S 1981. “Fast” isomyosins and fiber types in mammalian skeletal muscle. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 29, 1179–1188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pousson, M, Perot, C, Goubel, F 1991. Stiffness changes and fibre type transitions in rat soleus muscle produced by jumping training. Pflügers Archiv 419, 127–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, PL, Roy, RR, Kanim, P, Bello, MA, Edgerton, VR 1984. Predictability of skeletal muscle tension from architectural determinations in guinea pig hindlimbs. Journal of Applied Physiology 57, 1715–1721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Punkt, K, Krug, H, Huse, J, Punkt, J 1998. Region and age-dependent variations of muscle fibre properties. Acta Histochemica 100, 37–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Punkt, K, Naupert, A, Asmussen, G 2004. Differentiation of rat skeletal muscle fibres during development and ageing. Acta Histochemica 106, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiser, PJ, Moss, RL, Giulian, GG, Greaser, ML 1985. Shortening velocity in single fibers from adult rabbit soleus muscles is correlated with myosin heavy chain composition. Journal of Biology and Chemistry 260, 9077–9080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segal, SS, Faulkner, JA 1985. Temperature-dependent physiological stability of rat skeletal muscle in vitro. American Journal of Physiology 248, C265–C270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, D, Green, H, Thomson, J, Sharratt, M 1988. Oxidative potential in developing rat diaphragm, EDL, and soleus muscle fibers. American Journal of Physiology 254, C661–C668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, ED, Renaud, JM 1985. Use of dP/dt and rise time to estimate speed of shortening in muscle. American Journal of Physiology 249, R510–R513.Google ScholarPubMed
Sugiura, T, Matoba, H, Miyata, H, Kawai, Y, Murakami, N 1992. Myosin heavy chain isoform transition in ageing fast and slow muscles of the rat. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 144, 419–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umezu, Y, Hachisuka, K, Ueda, H, Yoshizuka, M, Ogata, H, Fujimoto, S 1992. Histochemical and immunological analyses of differentiating skeletal muscle fibers of the postnatal rat. Acta Anatomica 143, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamaguchi, A, Horio, Y, Sakuma, K, Katsuta, S 1993. The effect of nutrition on the size and proportion of muscle fibre types during growth. Journal of Anatomy 182, 29–36.Google ScholarPubMed