Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:29:12.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diet learning through post-ingestive consequences in sheep: the case of starch and casein variously combined in the same foods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2009

C. Ginane ,
R. Baumont  and
A. J. Duncan
C. Ginane*
Affiliation:
INRA, UR 1213 Herbivore Research Unit, F-63122 Saint Genès Champanelle, France
R. Baumont
Affiliation:
INRA, UR 1213 Herbivore Research Unit, F-63122 Saint Genès Champanelle, France
A. J. Duncan
Affiliation:
The Macaulay Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, UK
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Ruminants generally succeed in selecting an appropriate diet relative to their nutrient requirements, and macronutrients such as energy and protein are considered as playing a primary role in their food preferences. Diet learning through post-ingestive consequences, evidenced by many studies that involved situations with simple discrimination tasks, may explain this ability to select a suitable diet. However, in more complex feeding environments where animals are faced with many plants varying both in their energy and protein contents, the extent to which such a mechanism operates is still uncertain. Our objective was to investigate a more complex feeding situation than previously tested and to determine whether lambs were able to associate three forages with both energy-based and protein-based post-ingestive consequences of various intensities. The doses of starch and casein used to elicit these post-ingestive consequences were chosen so that the apparent metabolisable energy and crude protein values of hays were within the range found in plants normally encountered under field conditions. We applied five treatments: EmPm, EhPm, EmPh, EhPh, where medium (m) or high (h) levels of nutrients (E = energy and P = protein) were associated with different hays, and E0N0 where no stimuli were associated. Each animal experienced only three treatments: E0N0–EmPm–EhPm or E0N0–EmPh–EhPh, each one being associated with one hay during conditioning, on the basis of one treatment per day over three consecutive days. Animals then had a choice between the hay associated with E0N0 and one of the two others, successively on the two following days. This procedure was repeated through five 1-week-long periods, and applied to two groups of lambs (n = 12) maintained at feeding levels sufficient for maintenance or for a 150 g/day growth rate. This experiment was complemented by a methodological trial that aimed to estimate the doses of starch and casein eliciting preferences and a post-trial that aimed to evaluate the effect of our treatments on sheep ruminal environment. The methodological trial showed that lambs perceived the stimuli and the doses, and the post-trial showed that treatments affected the ruminal environment. In the main experiment, the lambs preferred the rewarded hays but did not discriminate in their choices the variation of post-ingestive consequences due to energy and protein. This suggests that in situations closer to reality where animals experience many foods varying in nutrient contents, the learning process may be impaired. The lambs do not seem to have strictly relied on it for shaping their diet choices.

Keywords

conditioningfood learninglambnutritive stimuli
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 135 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council 1980. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, Slough, UK.Google Scholar
Arsenos, G, Kyriazakis, I 1999. The continuum between preferences and aversions for flavoured foods in sheep conditioned by administration of casein doses. Animal Science 68, 605–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arsenos, G, Hills, J, Kyriazakis, I 2000a. Conditioned feeding responses of sheep towards flavoured foods associated with casein administration: the role of long delay learning. Animal Science 70, 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arsenos, G, Kyriazakis, I, Tolkamp, BJ 2000b. Conditioned feeding responses of sheep towards flavoured foods associated with the administration of ruminally degradable and/or undegradable protein sources. Animal Science 71, 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burritt, EA, Provenza, FD 1992. Lambs form preferences for nonnutritive flavors paired with glucose. Journal of Animal Science 70, 1133–1136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassini, MH 1994. Behavioral mechanisms of selection of diet components and their ecological implications in herbivorous mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 75, 733–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, SDB, Kyriazakis, I, Oldham, JD 1994. The effect of late pregnancy on the diet selections made by ewes. Livestock Production Science 40, 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, AJ, Young, SA 2002. Can goats learn about foods through conditioned food aversions and preferences when multiple food options are simultaneously available? Journal of Animal Science 80, 2091–2098.Google ScholarPubMed
Duncan, AJ, Elwert, C, Villalba, JJ, Yearsley, J, Pouloupoulou, I, Gordon, IJ 2007. How does pattern of feeding and rate of nutrient delivery influence conditioned food preferences? Oecologia 153, 617–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egan, AR 1977. Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. VIII. Relationships between the voluntary intake of herbage by sheep and the protein/energy ratio in the digestion products. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 907–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginane, C, Duncan, AJ, Young, SA, Elston, DA, Gordon, IJ 2005. Herbivore diet selection in response to simulated variation in nutrient rewards and plant secondary compounds. Animal Behaviour 69, 541–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INRA 1989. Ruminant nutrition: recommended allowances and feed tables (ed. R Jarrige). John Libbey Eurotext, Paris – London – Rome.Google Scholar
Jouany, JP 1982. Volatile fatty acid and alcohol determination in digestive contents, silage juices, bacterial cultures and anaerobic fermentor contents. Sciences des aliments 2, 131–144.Google Scholar
Kyriazakis, I, Oldham, JD 1993. Diet selection in sheep: the ability of growing lambs to select a diet that meets their crude protein (nitrogen × 6.25) requirements. British Journal of Nutrition 69, 617–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyriazakis, I, Oldham, JD 1997. Food intake and diet selection in sheep: the effect of manipulating the rates of digestion of carbohydrates and protein of the foods offered as a choice. British Journal of Nutrition 77, 243–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyriazakis, I, Oldham, JD, Coop, RL, Jackson, F 1994. The effect of subclinical intestinal nematode infection on the diet selection of growing sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 72, 665–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyriazakis, I, Tolkamp, BJ, Emmans, GC 1999. Diet selection and animal state: an integrative framework. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 58, 765–772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Provenza, FD 1995. Postingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food preference and intake in ruminants. Journal of Range Management 48, 2–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provenza FD and Balph DF 1990. Applicability of five diet-selection models to various foraging challenges ruminants encounter. In Behavioural mechanisms of food selection (ed. RN Hughes), pp. 424–460. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provenza, FD, Scott, CB, Phy, TS, Lynch, JJ 1996. Preference of sheep for foods varying in flavors and nutrients. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2355–2361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis System 1999. SAS/STAT user’s guide, Version 8. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Van Milgen, J, Noblet, J, Dubois, S 2001. Energetic efficiency of starch, protein and lipid utilization in growing pigs. Journal of Nutrition 131, 1309–1318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD 1996. Preference for flavored wheat straw by lambs conditioned with intraruminal administrations of sodium propionate. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2362–2368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD 1997a. Preference for wheat straw by lambs conditioned with intraruminal infusions of starch. British Journal of Nutrition 77, 287–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD 1997b. Preference for flavored wheat straw by lambs conditioned with intraruminal infusions of acetate and propionate. Journal of Animal Science 75, 2905–2914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD 1997c. Preference for flavoured foods by lambs conditioned with intraruminal administration of nitrogen. British Journal of Nutrition 78, 545–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD 1999a. Nutrient-specific preferences by lambs conditioned with intraruminal infusions of starch, casein and water. Journal of Animal Science 77, 378–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD 1999b. Effects of food structure and nutritional quality and animal nutritional state on intake behaviour and food preferences of sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 63, 145–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD, Rogosic, J 1999. Preference for flavored wheat straw by lambs conditioned with intraruminal infusions of starch administered at different times after straw ingestion. Journal of Animal Science 77, 3185–3190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J, Provenza, FD 1996a. Food preference and acceptance of novel foods by lambs depend on the composition of the basal diet. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2349–2354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J, Provenza, FD 1996b. Food deprivation affects preference of sheep for foods varying in nutrients and a toxin. Journal of Chemical Ecology 22, 2011–2021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weatherburn, MW 1967. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Analytical Chemistry 38, 971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar