Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T15:30:35.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioral and physiological changes in early-weaned multiparous and primiparous beef cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2011

R. Ungerfeld ,
M. J. Hötzel ,
A. Scarsi  and
G. Quintans
R. Ungerfeld*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
M. J. Hötzel
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Etologia Aplicada, Departamento de Zootecnia e Desenvolvimento Rural, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
A. Scarsi
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Treinta y Tres, Uruguay
G. Quintans
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Treinta y Tres, Uruguay
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Early weaning is used to advance postpartum ovulation in beef cows, but triggers a stress response, affecting cows’ and calves’ welfare. Our aim was to compare the response to early weaning in multiparous and primiparous cows. Seventy-one days after birth, calves from 14 primiparous and 11 multiparous cows were weaned. Since birth, cow's body weight (BW), body condition (BC), milk yield and calves’ BW were recorded. Basophil/neutrophil relationship, total protein and albumin concentrations were measured before and after weaning. The distance between each cow and its calf before weaning, as well as main behaviors of the cows before and after weaning were recorded using 10 min scan sampling. BW and BC were greater in multiparous than in primiparous cows (P < 0.0001 for both). There was an interaction between parity (P = 0.004) and gender of the calf (P = 0.007): both BW and BC were greater in multiparous than primiparous cows, but multiparous cows with male calves had lower BW and BC than those with females (P < 0.001 for both variables). Milk yield was greater in multiparous than in primiparous cows (P = 0.02), and there was an interaction, with greatest milk yield in multiparous cows that calved males (P = 0.02). Total protein blood concentration increased with time (P < 0.0001), similarly in both groups. Albumin concentration profiles were similar despite parity, and decreased since 10 days after weaning (P < 0.0001). Basophil/neutrophil ratio was not affected by parity, and increased the day of weaning, remaining high until day 10 (P < 0.05). Frequency of standing decreased during the 2 days after weaning, with a greater decrease in multiparous than in primiparous cows (P < 0.0001). Pacing increased after weaning (P = 0.001), but increased significantly more in multiparous cows (P = 0.006), with a significant time after weaning by parity interaction (P = 0.01) reflected in greater frequencies in multiparous cows in the 2 days. Walking increased with time (P < 0.0001), and was more frequent in primiparous cows (P = 0.008). Ruminating, which was less frequent in multiparous cows (P = 0.014), decreased and remained low during the 3 days following weaning (P < 0.0001), but there was a significant time by parity interaction (P < 0.0001). The frequency of vocalizations increased dramatically after weaning (P < 0.0001), and was greater in multiparous cows (P = 0.006), and decreased more slowly during the 2nd and 3rd days after weaning (P = 0.005) in these animals. In conclusion, behavioral changes induced by weaning were greater in multiparous than primiparous cows, indicating a more intense response to cow–calf separation in the multiparous animals.

Keywords

cattlematernal behaviormother–offspring bondparitystress
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 5 , Issue 8 , August 2011 , pp. 1270 - 1275
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arthington, JD, Kalmbacher, RS 2003. Effect of early weaning on the performance of three-year-old, first-calf beef heifers and calves reared in the subtropics. Journal of Animal Science 81, 1136–1141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bath, GF 1998. Management of pain in production animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 59, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanco, M, Casasús, I, Palacio, J 2009. Effect of age at weaning on the physiological stress response and temperament of two beef cattle breeds. Animal 3, 108–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bueno, AR, Rasby, R, Clemens, ET 2003. Age at weaning and the endocrine response to stress. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 55, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, TH, Guinnes, FE, Albon, SD 1982. Red deer behavior and ecology of two sexes. Edinburgh University Press, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Dwyer, CM 2008. Individual variation in the expression of maternal behaviour: a review of the neuroendocrine mechanisms in the sheep. Journal of Neuroendocrinology 20, 526–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, SA, Broom, D 1982. Behavioural interactions of dairy cows with their newborn calves and the effects of parity. Animal Behaviour 30, 525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enríquez, DH, Ungerfeld, R, Quintans, G, Guidoni, AL, Hötzel, MJ 2010. The effects of alternative weaning methods on behavior in beef calves. Livestock Science 128, 20–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, AS 2006. Plasticity of innate behavior. Experiences throughout life affect maternal behavior and its neurobiology. In Attachment and bonding: a new synthesis (ed. CS Carter, L Ahnert, KE Grossmann, SB Hrdy, ME Lamb, SW Porges and N Sachser), pp. 137–168. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google Scholar
Galindo-Gonzalez, S, Arthington, JD, Yelich, JV, Hansen, GR, Lamb, GC, De Vries, A 2007. Effects of cow parity on voluntary hay intake and performance responses to early weaning of beef calves. Livestock Science 110, 148–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haley, DB 2006. The behavioural response of cattle (Bos taurus) to artificial weaning in two stages. PhD thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.Google Scholar
Hudson, SJ, Mullord, MM 1977. Investigations of maternal bonding in dairy cattle. Applied Animal Ethology 3, 271–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolkman, I, Opsomer, G, Aerts, S, Hoflack, G, Laevens, H, Lips, D 2010. Analysis of body measurements of newborn purebred Belgian Blue calves. Animal 4, 661–671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lefcourt, AM, Elsasser, TH 1995. Adrenal responses of Angus × Hereford cattle to the stress of weaning. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2669–2676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehner, PN 1996. Handbook of ethological methods, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Le Neindre, P, D'Hour, P 1989. Effects of a postpartum separation on maternal responses in primiparous and multiparous cows. Animal Behaviour 37, 166–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, EM, Earley, B, McGee, M, Doyle, S 2010. Characterisation of physiological and immunological responses in beef cows to abrupt weaning and subsequent housing. BMC Veterinary Research 6, 37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moberg, JP 2000. Biological response to stress: implications for animal welfare. In The biology of animal stress. Basic principles and implications for animal welfare (ed. JP Moberg and JA Mench), pp. 1–21. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Numan, M, Fleming, AS, Levy, F 2006. Maternal behavior. In Knobil and Neill's physiology of reproduction, 3rd edition (ed. JD Neill), vol. 2, pp. 1921–1993. Elsevier Academic Press, London, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poindron, P, Terrazas, A, Navarro Montes de Oca, ML, Serafín, N, Hernández, H 2007. Sensory and physiological determinants of maternal behavior in the goat (Capra hircus). Hormones and Behaviour 52, 99–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, EO, Smith, VM, Thos, J, Anderson, GB 1986. The effects of twinning and maternal experience on maternal–filial social relationships in confined beef cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 15, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quintans, G, Vázquez, AI, Weigel, KA 2009. Effect of suckling restriction with nose plates and premature weaning on postpartum anestrous interval in primiparous cows under range conditions. Animal Reproduction Science 116, 10–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quintans, G, Banchero, G, Carriquiry, M, López-Mazz, C, Baldi, F 2010. Effect of body condition and suckling restriction with and without presence of the calf on cow and calf performance. Animal Production Science 50, 931–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randel, RD 1990. Nutrition and postpartum rebreeding in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 68, 853–862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Short, RE, Bellows, RA, Staigmiller, RB, Berardinelli, JG, Custer, EE 1990. Physiological mechanisms controlling anestrus and infertility in postpartum beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 68, 799–816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trevisi, E, Bertoni, G 2009. Some physiological and biochemical methods for acute and chronic stress evaluation in dairy cows. Italian Journal of Animal Science 8 (suppl. 1), 265–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenheede, M, Nicks, B, Désiron, A, Canart, B 2001. Mother–young relationships in Belgian Blue cattle after a caesarean section: characterisation and effects of parity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 72, 281–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yavas, Y, Walton, JS 2000. Postpartum acyclicity in suckled beef cows: a review. Theriogenology 54, 25–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed