Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T11:55:10.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of unconsciousness in pigs during exposure to nitrogen and carbon dioxide mixtures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2012

P. Llonch ,
P. Rodríguez ,
M. Jospin ,
A. Dalmau ,
X. Manteca  and
A. Velarde
P. Llonch
Affiliation:
IRTA, Animal Welfare Subprogram, Finca Camps i Armet s/n, Monells, 17121 Girona, Spain Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Campus Bellaterra, edifici V. Cerdanyola del Vallès, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
P. Rodríguez
Affiliation:
IRTA, Animal Welfare Subprogram, Finca Camps i Armet s/n, Monells, 17121 Girona, Spain Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Campus Bellaterra, edifici V. Cerdanyola del Vallès, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
M. Jospin
Affiliation:
Department of Automatic Control, Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Technical University of Catalonia (UPC), 08028 Barcelona, Spain
A. Dalmau
Affiliation:
IRTA, Animal Welfare Subprogram, Finca Camps i Armet s/n, Monells, 17121 Girona, Spain
X. Manteca
Affiliation:
Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Campus Bellaterra, edifici V. Cerdanyola del Vallès, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
A. Velarde
Affiliation:
IRTA, Animal Welfare Subprogram, Finca Camps i Armet s/n, Monells, 17121 Girona, Spain
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess unconsciousness in pigs during and after the exposure to gas mixtures of 70% nitrogen (N2) and 30% carbon dioxide (CO2) (70N30C), 80% N2 and 20% CO2 (80N20C) and 85% N2 and 15% CO2 (85N15C) compared with 90% CO2 in air (90C) by means of the Index of Consciousness®(IoC), their behaviour and the absence of brain stem reflexes. The experiment included three trials of 24 pigs divided into four groups according to the number of treatments. Half of the group was exposed for a short time and the other half for a long time (3 and 5 min for the N2/CO2 mixtures exposure and 2 and 3 min in 90C exposure, respectively). During exposure, the IoC and the electroencephalography suppression rate (ESR) were assessed, as well as the time to onset and percentage of gasping, loss of balance, vocalizations, muscular excitation and gagging. At the end of the exposure, the corneal reflex, rhythmic breathing and sensitivity to pain were each assessed at 10 s intervals for 5 min. Brain activity decreased significantly (P < 0.05) 37.60 s after the start of the exposure to 90% CO2, which was significantly earlier than in 70N30C, 80N20C and 85N15C exposure, (45.18 s, 46.92 s and 43.27 s, respectively). Before brain activity decreased, all pigs experienced gasping and loss of balance and a 98% muscular excitation. The duration of the muscular excitation was longer in animals exposed to 70N30C, 80N20C and 85N15C than 90C (P < 0.01). After a long exposure time, all animals exposed to 90C died, whereas the 30.4% of animals exposed to N2/CO2 gas mixtures survived. Pigs exposed to 85N15C recovered corneal reflex and sensitivity to pain significantly earlier than when exposed to 90C. Exposure to 90C causes a higher aversive reaction but a quicker loss of consciousness than N2/CO2 gas mixtures. Exposure to N2/CO2 gas mixtures causes a lower percentage of deaths and an earlier recovery of the brain stem activity than 90C, whereas the time to recover the cortical activity is similar. In conclusion, the inhalation of N2/CO2 gas mixtures reduces the aversion compared with high concentrations of CO2; however, the period of exposure for inducing unconsciousness may be longer in N2/CO2 gas mixtures, and the signs of recovery appear earlier, compared to CO2.

Keywords

animal welfarepigsstunningnitrogenbrain activity
Type
Behaviour, welfare and health
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , March 2013 , pp. 492 - 498
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anil, MH, McKinstry, JL 1991. Reflexes and loss of sensibility following head-to-back electrical stunning in sheep. Veterinary Record 128, 106–107.Google Scholar
Cardenas, K 2008. Analysis of the Update Delay Over Time for Changes in the Index of Consciousness of the IoC-view® Monitor. Morpheus Medical. Retrieved 15, 2012, from http://www.morpheus-medical.com/fileadmin/morpheus_files/ioc_view/update_delay_over_time.pdfGoogle Scholar
Council Regulation (EC) No. 1099/ 2009 2009. EC of 24 September 2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing. European Community Official Journal 303, 1–30.Google Scholar
Dalmau, A, Llonch, P, Rodríguez, P, Ruíz-de-la-Torre, JL, Manteca, X, Velarde, A 2010a. Stunning pigs with different gas mixtures. Part 1: gas stability. Animal Welfare 19, 315–323.Google Scholar
Dalmau, A, Rodríguez, P, Llonch, P, Velarde, A 2010b. Stunning pigs with different gas mixtures. Part 2: aversion in pigs. Animal Welfare 19, 324–333.Google Scholar
Dodman, NH 1977. Observations on the use of the Wernberg dip-lift carbon dioxide apparatus for pre-slaughter anaesthesia of pigs. British Veterinary Journal 133, 71–80.Google Scholar
Ernsting, J 1965. The effect of anoxia on the central nervous system. In A text book of aviation physiology (ed. JA Gillies), pp. 270–289. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2004 . Welfare aspects of animal stunning and killing methods. Scientific report of the Scientific Panel for Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the Commission. Retrieved March 15, 2012, from http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/45.htmGoogle Scholar
Forslid, A 1987. Transient neocortical, hippocampal and amygdaloid EEG silence induced by one minute inhalation of high concentration CO2 in swine. Acta Physiologica Scandinava 130, 1–10.Google Scholar
Forslid, A 1992. Muscle spasms during pre-slaughter carbon dioxide anaesthesia in swine. Fleischwirtschaft 72, 167–168.Google Scholar
Gregory, NG, Moss, B, Leeson, R 1987. An assessment of carbon dioxide stunning in pigs. Veterinary Record 121, 517–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, NG, Raj, ABM, Audsley, ARS, Daly, CC 1990. Effects of carbon dioxide on man. Fleishwirtschaft 70, 1173–1174.Google Scholar
Holst, S 2002. Behaviour in pigs immersed into atmospheric air or different carbon dioxide concentrations Internal report ref. no. 02.709 7295. Danish Meat Research Institute, Roskilde, Denmark.Google Scholar
Llonch, P, Rodríguez, P, Gispert, M, Dalmau, A, Manteca, M, Velarde, A 2012a. Stunning pigs with nitrogen and carbon dioxide mixtures: effects on animal welfare and meat quality. Animal 6, 668–675.Google Scholar
Llonch, P, Dalmau, A, Rodríguez, P, Manteca, X, Velarde, A 2012b. Aversion to nitrogen and CO2 mixtures for stunning pigs. Animal Welfare 21, 33–39.Google Scholar
Llonch, P, Andaluz, A, Rodriguez, P, Dalmau, A, Jensen, E, Manteca, X, Velarde, A 2011. Assessment of consciousness during propofol anaesthesia in pigs. Veterinary Record 169, 496a, doi: 10.1136/vr.d5643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martoft, L, Jensen, EW, Rodriguez, BE, Jorgensen, PF, Forslid, A, Pedersen, HD 2001. Middle-latency auditory evoked potentials during induction of thiopentone anaesthesia in pigs. Laboratory Animals 35, 353–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raj, ABM 1999. Behaviour of pigs exposed to mixtures of gases and time required to stun and kill them: welfare implications. Veterinary Record 144, 165–168.Google Scholar
Raj, ABM 2008. Welfare of pigs during stunning and slaughter. In Welfare of pigs from birth to slaughter (ed. L Faucitano and AL Schaefer), pp. 225–242. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Raj, ABM, Gregory, NG 1995. Welfare implications of the gas stunning of pigs 1. Determination of aversion to the initial inhalation of carbon dioxide or argon. Animal Welfare 4, 273–280.Google Scholar
Raj, ABM, Gregory, NG 1996. Welfare implications of gas stunning of pigs 2. Stress of induction of anaesthesia. Animal Welfare 5, 71–78.Google Scholar
Raj, ABM, Johnson, SP, Wotton, SB, McKinstry, JL 1997. Welfare implications of gas stunning pigs 3. The time to loss of somatosensory evoked potentials and spontaneous electroencephalogram of pigs during exposure to gases. Veterinary Journal 153, 329–340.Google Scholar
Rampil, IJ 1998. Primer for EEG signal processing in anesthesia. Anesthesiology 89, 980–1002.Google Scholar
Revuelta, M, Paniagua, P, Campos, JM, Fernández, JA, Martínez, A, Jospin, M, Litvan, H 2008. Validation of the index of consciousness during sevoflurane and remifentanil anaesthesia: a comparison with the bispectral index and the cerebral state index. British Journal of Anaesthesia 101, 653–658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez, P, Dalmau, A, Ruiz-de-la-Torre, JL, Manteca, X, Jensen, EW, Rodriguez, B, Litvan, H, Velarde, A 2008. Assessment of unconsciousness during carbon dioxide stunning in pigs. Animal Welfare 17, 341–349.Google Scholar
Schaul, N 1998. The fundamental neural mechanisms of electroencephalography. Clinical Neurophysiology 106, 101–107.Google Scholar
Velarde, A, Cruz, J, Gispert, M, Carrión, D, Ruiz-de-la-Torre, JL, Diestre, A, Manteca, X 2007. Aversion to carbon dioxide stunning in pigs: effect of the carbon dioxide concentration and the halothane genotype. Animal Welfare 16, 513–522.Google Scholar
Zeller, W, Schatzmann, U, Imhof, A 1987. Kohlendioxid-Betäubung von Schlachtschweinen. Eine Beurteilung dieser Methode am Schlachtband. Fleischwirtschaft 67, 1519–1522.Google Scholar