Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:52:20.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An integrated fish–plankton aquaculture system in brackish water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2012

S. Gilles ,
L. Fargier ,
X. Lazzaro ,
E. Baras ,
N. De Wilde ,
C. Drakidès ,
C. Amiel ,
B. Rispal  and
J-P. Blancheton
S. Gilles*
Affiliation:
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), UMR 226, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (ISEM), Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonía Peruana (IIAP), apartado postal 185, 99422 Iquitos, Peru
L. Fargier
Affiliation:
LIttoral ENvironnement et Sociétés (LIENSs), UMR 6250 CNRS, Université de La Rochelle, 17000 La Rochelle, France
X. Lazzaro
Affiliation:
IRD, UMR 207 BOREA, Unidad de Limnología y Recursos Acuáticos (ULRA), Universidad Mayor se San Simón (UMSS), CP 2352, Cochabamba, Bolivia
E. Baras
Affiliation:
IRD, UMR 226, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (ISEM), GAMET, BP 5095, 361 rue Jean-François Breton, 34196 Montpellier cedex 5, France
N. De Wilde
Affiliation:
Tropo Farms Ltd, PO Box OS-2404, Osu, Accra, Ghana
C. Drakidès
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Hydroscience, UMR 5569, Université Montpellier II, 34095 Montpellier cedex 5, France
C. Amiel
Affiliation:
Université de Montpellier 2 – Creufop, Station Méditerranéenne d'Environnement Littoral, 1, quai de la daurade, 34200 Sète, France
B. Rispal
Affiliation:
1, rue de plaisance, 92340, Bourg-la-Reine, France
J-P. Blancheton
Affiliation:
Ifremer, Laboratoire Aquaculture Languedoc-Roussillon, Station Ifremer de Palavas, Chemin de Maguelone, 34250, Palavas-Les-Flots. UMR ECOSYM, USTL, place Eugène Bataillon, Montpellier, France
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture takes advantage of the mutualism between some detritivorous fish and phytoplankton. The fish recycle nutrients by consuming live (and dead) algae and provide the inorganic carbon to fuel the growth of live algae. In the meanwhile, algae purify the water and generate the oxygen required by fishes. Such mechanism stabilizes the functioning of an artificially recycling ecosystem, as exemplified by combining the euryhaline tilapia Sarotherodon melanotheron heudelotii and the unicellular alga Chlorella sp. Feed addition in this ecosystem results in faster fish growth but also in an increase in phytoplankton biomass, which must be limited. In the prototype described here, the algal population control is exerted by herbivorous zooplankton growing in a separate pond connected in parallel to the fish–algae ecosystem. The zooplankton production is then consumed by tilapia, particularly by the fry and juveniles, when water is returned to the main circuit. Chlorella sp. and Brachionus plicatilis are two planktonic species that have spontaneously colonized the brackish water of the prototype, which was set-up in Senegal along the Atlantic Ocean shoreline. In our system, water was entirely recycled and only evaporation was compensated (1.5% volume/day). Sediment, which accumulated in the zooplankton pond, was the only trophic cul-de-sac. The system was temporarily destabilized following an accidental rotifer invasion in the main circuit. This caused Chlorella disappearance and replacement by opportunist algae, not consumed by Brachionus. Following the entire consumption of the Brachionus population by tilapias, Chlorella predominated again. Our artificial ecosystem combining S. m. heudelotii, Chlorella and B. plicatilis thus appeared to be resilient. This farming system was operated over one year with a fish productivity of 1.85 kg/m2 per year during the cold season (January to April).

Keywords

IMTAtilapiaChlorellaBrachionus plicatilisphotosynthetic recycling aquaculture system
Type
Farming systems and environment
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , February 2013 , pp. 322 - 329
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bendschneider, K, Robinson, RJ 1952. A new spectrophotometric determination of nitrite in sea water. Journal of Marine Research 11, 87–96.Google Scholar
Beveridge, MCM, Phillips, MJ, Clarke, RM 1991. A quantitative and qualitative assessment of wastes from aquatic animal production. In Aquaculture and water quality (ed. DE Brune and JR Tomaso), Advances in World Aquaculture, vol. 3, pp. 506–527. World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.Google Scholar
Blancheton, JP 2000. Developments in recirculation systems for Mediterranean fish species. Aquacultural Engineering 22, 17–31.Google Scholar
Brune, DE, Reed, S, Schwartz, G, Collier, J 2001. High rate algal systems for aquaculture. AES Issues Forum IV 81–110.Google Scholar
Brune, DE, Schwartz, G, Eversole, AG, Collier, JA, Schewedler, TE 2003. Intensification of pond aquaculture and high rate photosynthetic systems. Aquacultural Engineering 28, 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burford, MA, Thompson, PJ, McIntosh, RP, Bauman, RH, Pearson, DC 2003. Nutrient and microbial dynamics in high-intensity, zero-exchange shrimp ponds in Belize. Aquaculture 219, 393–411.Google Scholar
Chin, KK, Ong, SL, Foo, SC 1993. A water treatment and recycling system for intensive fish farming. Water Science and Technology 27, 141–148.Google Scholar
Deviller, G, Aliaume, C, Franco Nava, MA, Casellas, C, Blancheton, JP 2004. High-rate algal pond treatment for water reuse in an integrated marine fish recirculating system: effect on water quality and sea bass growth. Aquaculture 235, 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diab, S, Kochba, M, Mires, D, Avnimelech, Y 1992. Combined intensive-extensive (CIE) pond system. Part A: inorganic nitrogen transformations. Aquaculture 101, 33–39.Google Scholar
Drapcho, CM, Brune, DE 2000. The partitioned aquaculture system: impact of design and environmental parameters on algal productivity and photosynthetic oxygen production. Aquacultural Engineering 21, 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drenner, RW, Hambright, KD, Vinyard, GL, Gophen, M, Pollingher, U 1987. Experimental study of size-selective phytoplankton grazing by a filter-feeding cichlid and the cichlid's effects on plankton community structure. Limnology and Oceanography 32, 1138–1144.Google Scholar
Dvir, O, van Rijn, J, Neori, A 1999. Nitrogen transformations and factors leading to nitrite accumulation in a hypertrophic marine fish culture system. Marine Ecology Progress Series 181, 97–106.Google Scholar
Elser, JJ, Marzolf, E, Goldman, CR 1990. The roles of phosphorus and nitrogen in limiting phytoplankton growth in freshwaters: a review of experimental enrichments. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47, 1468–1477.Google Scholar
Falk, TM, Teugels, GG, Abban, EK 2000. Genetic characterization of West African populations of Sarotherodon melanotheron (Teleostei, Cichlidae). In biodiversity and sustainable use of fish in the coastal zone (ed. EK Abban, CMV Casal, TM Falk and RSV Pullin), pp. 8–11. ICLARM Conference Proceedings 63, Manila, The Philippines.Google Scholar
Gilles, S, Lacroix, G, Corbin, D, Bâ, N, Ibañez Luna, C, Nandjui, J, Ouattara, A, Ouédraogo, O, Lazzaro, X 2008. Mutualism between euryhaline tilapia Sarotherodon melanotheron heudelotii and Chlorella sp. – implications for nano-algal production in warm water phytoplankton-based recirculating systems. Aquacultural Engineering 39, 113–121.Google Scholar
Grasshoff, K 1976. Methods of seawater analysis. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim and New York.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, JA 2001. Pond catfish production: practices, problems and potentials. AES Issues Forum IV, 57–71.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, JA 2006. Photosynthetic suspended-growth systems in aquaculture. Aquacultural Engineering 34, 344–363.Google Scholar
King, DL 1970. The role of carbon in eutrophication. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 42, 2035–2051.Google Scholar
Koroleff, F 1969. Direct determination of ammonia in natural waters as indophenols blue. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, C.M. 1969C 9–22.Google Scholar
Lavens, P, Sorgeloos, P 1996. Manual on the production and use of live food for aquaculture. FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Lazzaro, X 1987. A review of planktivorous fishes: their evolution, feeding behaviours, selectivities, and impacts. Hydrobiologia 146, 97–167.Google Scholar
Liao, IC, Chen, TP 1983. Status and prospects of tilapia culture in Taiwan. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture (ed. L Fishelson and Z Yaron), pp. 588–598. Tel Aviv University Press, Tel Aviv, Israel.Google Scholar
McQueen, DJ, Post, JR, Mills, EL 1986. Trophic relationships in freshwater pelagic ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 43, 1571–1581.Google Scholar
Metaxa, E, Deviller, G, Pagand, P, Aliaume, C, Casellas, C, Blancheton, JP 2006. High rate algal pond treatment for water reuse in a marine fish recirculation system: water purification and fish health. Aquaculture 252, 92–101.Google Scholar
Mires, D, Amit, Y 1992. Intensive culture of tilapia in quasi-closed water-cycled flow-through ponds – the Dekel Aquaculture system. Bamidgeh 44, 82–86.Google Scholar
Mires, D, Amit, Y, Avnimelech, Y, Diab, S, Cochaba, M 1990. Water quality in a recycled intensive fish culture system under field conditions. Bamidgeh 42, 110–121.Google Scholar
Murphy, J, Riley, JP 1962. A modified simple solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 27, 31–36.Google Scholar
Neori, A, Chopin, T, Troell, M, Buschmann, AH, Kraemer, GP, Halling, C, Shpigel, M, Yarish, C 2004. Integrated aquaculture: rationale, evolution and state of the art emphasizing seaweed biofiltration in modern mariculture. Aquaculture 231, 361–391.Google Scholar
Northcote, TG 1988. Fish in the structure and function of freshwater ecosystems: a “top-down” view. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45, 361–379.Google Scholar
Pagand, P, Blancheton, JP, Lemoalle, J, Casellas, C 2000. The use of high rate algal pond for the treatment of marine effluent from a recirculating fish rearing system. Aquaculture Research 31, 729–736.Google Scholar
Pauly, D 1976. The biology, fishery and potential for aquaculture of Tilapia melanotheron in a small West African lagoon. Aquaculture 7, 33–49.Google Scholar
Rimon, A, Shilo, M 1982. Factors which affect the intensification of fish breeding in Israel. Bamidgeh 34, 87–100.Google Scholar
Shnel, N, Barak, Y, Ezer, T, Dafni, Z, van Rijn, J 2002. Design and performance of a zero-discharge tilapia recirculating system. Aquacultural Engineering 26, 191–203.Google Scholar
Trewavas, E 1983. Tilapiine Fishes of the Genera Sarotherodon, Oreochromis and Danakilia. British Museum (Natural History), London, UK.Google Scholar
Turker, H, Eversole, AG, Brune, DE 2003. Filtration of green algae and cyanobacteria by Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, in the Partitioned Aquaculture System. Aquaculture 215, 93–101.Google Scholar
van Rijn, J 1996. The potential for integrated biological treatment systems in recirculating fish culture – a review. Aquaculture 139, 181–201.Google Scholar
Witt, U, Koske, PH, Kuhlmann, D, Lenz, J, Nellen, W 1981. Production of Nannochloris sp. (Chlorophyceae) in large-scale outdoor tanks and its use as food organism in marine aquaculture. Aquaculture 23, 171–181.Google Scholar