Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:56:08.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alteration of gene expression in mammary gland tissue of dairy cows in response to dietary unsaturated fatty acids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

N. Mach ,
A. A. A. Jacobs ,
L. Kruijt ,
J. van Baal  and
M. A. Smits
N. Mach*
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen UR Livestock Research, PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
A. A. A. Jacobs
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
L. Kruijt
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen UR Livestock Research, PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
J. van Baal
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
M. A. Smits
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen UR Livestock Research, PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of supplementing unprotected dietary unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs) from different plant oils on gene expression in the mammary gland of grazing dairy cows. A total of 28 Holstein–Friesian dairy cows in mid-lactation were blocked according to parity, days in milk, milk yield and fat percentage. The cows were then randomly assigned to four UFA sources based on rapeseed, soybean, linseed or a mixture of the three oils for 23 days, after which, all 28 cows were switched to a control diet for an additional 28 days. On the last day of both periods, mammary gland biopsies were taken to study genome-wide differences in gene expression on Affymetrix GeneChip® Bovine Genome Arrays (no. 900493) by ServiceXS (Leiden, The Netherlands). Supplementation with UFAs resulted in increased milk yield but decreased milk fat and protein percentages. Furthermore, the proportion of de novo fatty acids (FAs) in the milk was reduced, whereas that of long-chain FAs increased. Applying a statistical cut-off of false discovery rate of q-values <0.05 together with an absolute fold change of 1.3, a total of 972 genes were found to be significantly affected through UFA supplementation, indicating that large transcriptional adaptations occurred in the mammary gland when grazing dairy cows were supplemented with unprotected dietary UFA. Gene sets related to cell development and remodeling, apoptosis, nutrient metabolic process, as well as immune system response were predominantly downregulated during UFA supplementation. Such molecular knowledge on the physiology of the mammary gland might provide the basis for further functional research on dairy cows.

Keywords

dairy cowmammary glandmicroarrayunsaturated fatty acids
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 5 , Issue 8 , August 2011 , pp. 1217 - 1230
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauman, DE, Griinari, JM 2003. Nutritional regulation of milk fat synthesis. Annual Review of Nutrition 23, 203–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauman, DE, Mather, IH, Wall, RJ, Lock, AL 2006. Major advances associated with the biosynthesis of milk. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 1235–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, DE, Perfield, JW II, Harvatine, KJ, Baumgard, LH 2008. Regulation of fat synthesis by conjugated linoleic acid: lactation and the ruminant model. Journal of Nutrition 138, 403–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernard, L, Leroux, C, Chilliard, Y 2008. Expression and nutritional regulation of lipogenic genes in the ruminant lactating mammary gland. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 606, 67–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bionaz, M, Loor, J 2008a. ACSL1, AGPAT6, FABP3, LPIN1, and SLC27A6 are the most abundant isoforms in bovine mammary tissue and their expression is affected by stage of lactation. The Journal of Nutrition 138, 1019–1024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bionaz, M, Loor, JJ 2008b. Gene networks driving bovine milk fat synthesis during the lactation cycle. BMC Genomics 9, 366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bu, DP, Wang, JQ, Dhiman, TR, Liu, SJ 2007. Effectiveness of oils rich in linoleic and linolenic acids to enhance conjugated linoleic acid in milk from dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 998–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunger, M, van den Bosch, HM, van der Meijde, J, Kersten, S, Hooiveld, GJEJ, Muller, M 2007. Genome-wide analysis of PPAR alpha activation in murine small intestine. Physiological Genomics 30, 192–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calvano, SE, Xiao, W, Richards, DR, Felciano, RM, Baker, HV, Cho, RJ, Chen, RO, Brownstein, BH, Cobb, JP, Tschoeke, SK, Miller-Graziano, C, Moldawer, LL, Mindrinos, MN, Davis, RW, Tompkins, RG, Lowry, SF 2005. A network-based analysis of systemic inflammation in humans. Nature 437, 1032–1037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chilliard, Y, Glasser, F, Ferlay, A, Bernard, L, Rouel, J, Doreau, M 2007. Diet, rumen biohydrogenation and nutritional quality of cow and goat milk fat. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology 109, 828–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, GA 2002. Fundamentals of experimental design for cDNA microarrays. Nature Genetics 32, 490–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Churchill, GA 2004. Using ANOVA to analyze microarray data. Biotechniques 37, 173–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connor, EE, Siferd, S, Elsasser, TH, Evock-Clover, CM, Van Tassell, CP, Sonstegard, TS, Fernandes, VM, Capuco, AV 2008. Effects of increased milking frequency on gene expression in the bovine mammary gland. BMC Genomics 9, 362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cui, XQ, Churchill, GA 2003. Statistical tests for differential expression in cDNA microarray experiments. Genome Biology 4, 210–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Leeuw, WC, Rauwerda, H, Jonker, MJ, Breit, TM 2008. Salvaging Affymetrix probes after probe-level re-annotation. BMC Research Notes 1, 66–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delamaire, E, Guinard-Flament, J 2006. Increasing milking intervals decreases the mammary blood flow and mammary uptake of nutrients in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 3439–3446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delbecchi, L, Ahnadi, CE, Kennelly, JJ, Lacasse, P 2001. Milk fatty acid composition and mammary lipid metabolism in Holstein cows fed protected or unprotected canola seeds. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 1375–1381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farr, VC, Stelwagen, K, Cate, LR, Molenaar, AJ, McFadden, TB, Davis, SR 1996. An improved method for the routine biopsy of bovine mammary tissue. Journal of Dairy Science 79, 543–549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finucane, KA, McFadden, TB, Bond, JP, Kennelly, JJ, Zhao, FQ 2008. Onset of lactation in the bovine mammary gland: gene expression profiling indicates a strong inhibition of gene expression in cell proliferation. Functional Integrative Genomics 8, 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautier, L, Cope, L, Bolstad, BM, Irizarry, R 2004. Affy-analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics 20, 307–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gervais, R, McFadden, JW, Lengi, AJ, Corl, BA, Chouinard, PY 2009. Effects of intravenous infusion of trans-10, cis-12 18:2 on mammary lipid metabolism in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5167–5177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goelema, J, Spreeuwenberg, M, Hof, G, Poel, A, Tamminga, S 1998. Effect of pressure toasting on the rumen degradability and intestinal digestibility of whole and broken peas, lupins and faba beans and a mixture of these feedstuffs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 76, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvatine, KJ, Bauman, DE 2006. SREBP1 and thyroid hormone responsive spot 14 (S14) are involved in the regulation of bovine mammary lipid synthesis during diet-induced milk fat depression and treatment with CLA. Journal of Nutrition 136, 2468–2474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvatine, KJ, Perfield, JW II, Bauman, DE 2009. Expression of enzymes and key regulators of lipid synthesis is upregulated in adipose tissue during CLA-induced milk fat depression in dairy cows. Journal of Nutrition 139, 849–854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Standard Organisation (ISO) 5983 2005. Animal feeding stuffs. determination of nitrogen content and calculation of crude protein content. International Standard Organisation, Genève, Switzerland.Google Scholar
International Standard Organisation (ISO) 5984 2002. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of crude ash. International Standard Organisation, Genève, Switzerland.Google Scholar
International Standard Organisation (ISO) 6492 1999. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of fat content. International Standard Organisation, Genève, Switzerland.Google Scholar
International Standard Organisation (ISO) 6496 1998. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of moisture and other volatile matter content. International Standard Organisation, Genève, Switzerland.Google Scholar
International Standard Organisation (ISO) 9622 1999. Whole milk, determination of milkfat, protein and lactose content Guidance on the operation of mid-infrared instruments. International Standard Organisation, Genève, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Kadegowda, AK, Bionaz, M, Thering, B, Piperova, LS, Erdman, RA, Loor, JJ 2009. Identification of internal control genes for quantitative polymerase chain reaction in mammary tissue of lactating cows receiving lipid supplements. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 2007–2019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, HK, Braynen, W, Keshav, K, Pavlidis, P 2005. ErmineJ: tool for functional analysis of gene expression data sets. BMC Bioinformatics 6, 269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lengi, AJ, Corl, BA 2007. Identification and characterization of a novel bovine stearoyl-CoA desaturase isoform with homology to human SCD5. Lipids 42, 499–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lessard, M, Gagnon, N, Petit, HV 2003. Immune response of postpartum dairy cows fed flaxseed. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2647–2657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mansbridge, RJ, Blake, JS 1997. Nutritional factors affecting the fatty acid composition of bovine milk. British Journal of Nutrition 78, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murrieta, CM, Hess, BW, Scholljegerdes, EJ, Engle, TE, Hossner, KL, Moss, GE, Rule, DC 2006. Evaluation of milk somatic cells as a source of mRNA for study of lipogenesis in the mammary gland of lactating beef cows supplemented with dietary high-linoleate safflower seeds. Journal of Animal Science 84, 2399–2405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ollier, S, Leroux, C, de la Foye, A, Bernard, L, Rouel, J, Chilliard, Y 2009. Whole intact rapeseeds or sunflower oil in high-forage or high-concentrate diets affects milk yield, milk composition, and mammary gene expression profile in goats. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5544–5560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panasyuk, G, Nemazanyy, I, Zhyvoloup, A, Filonenko, V, Davies, D, Robson, M, Pedley, RB, Waterfield, M, Gout, I 2009. mTORbeta splicing isoform promotes cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. Journal of Biology and Chemistry 284, 30807–30814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfaffl, MW, Wittmann, SL, Meyer, HH, Bruckmaier, RM 2003. Gene expression of immunologically important factors in blood cells, milk cells, and mammary tissue of cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 538–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piantoni, P, Bionaz, M, Graugnard, DE, Daniels, KM, Akers, RM, Loor, JJ 2008. Gene expression ratio stability evaluation in prepubertal bovine mammary tissue from calves fed different milk replacers reveals novel internal controls for quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Nutrition 138, 1158–1164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raghow, R, Yellaturu, C, Deng, X, Park, EA, Elam, MB 2008. SREBPs: the crossroads of physiological and pathological lipid homeostasis. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 19, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rawlings, JS, Rosler, KM, Harrison, DA 2004. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Journal of Cell Science 117, 1281–1283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sigal, LH 2006. Basic science for the clinician 39: NF-kappaB-function, activation, control, and consequences. Journal of Clinical Rheumatology 12, 207–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinicropi, D, Cronin, M, Liu, M 2007. Gene expression profiling utilizing microarray technology and RT-PCR. BioMEMS and Biomedical Nanotechnology 1, 23–46.Google Scholar
Subramanian, A, Tamayo, P, Mootha, VK, Mukherjee, S, Ebert, BL, Gillette, MA, Paulovich, A, Pomeroy, SL, Golub, TR, Lander, ES, Mesirov, JP 2005. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proceedings of National Academy of Science USA 102, 15545–15550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swarbrick, A, Roy, E, Allen, T, Bishop, JM 2008. Id1 cooperates with oncogenic Ras to induce metastatic mammary carcinoma by subversion of the cellular senescence response. Proceedings of National Academy of Science USA 105, 5402–5407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thering, BJ, Graugnard, DE, Piantoni, P, Loor, JJ 2009. Adipose tissue lipogenic gene networks due to lipid feeding and milk fat depression in lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 4290–4300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, PJ 1973. Collaborative study of acid-detergent fibre and lignin. Journal of Association of Official Analytical Chemmists 56, 781–784.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB, Lewis, BA 1991. Symposium: carbohydrate methodology, metabolism, and nutritional implications in dairy cattle. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Z, Irizarry, R, Gentleman, R, Martinez-Murillo, F, Spencer, F 2004. A model-based background adjustment for oligonucleotide expression arrays. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99, 909–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, W, Faisal, M 2010. Factorial microarray analysis of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha: Dreissenidae, Bivalvia) adhesion. BMC Genomics 11, 341–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Mach Supplementary Material

Mach Supplementary Material

Download Mach Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 356.1 KB