Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:43:36.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Administration of dexamethasone peros in finishing bulls. II. Effects on blood parameters used as indicators of animal welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

A. Marin ,
G. Pozza ,
F. Gottardo ,
L. Moro ,
A. L. Stefani ,
G. Cozzi ,
M. Brscic ,
I. Andrighetto  and
L. Ravarotto
A. Marin
Affiliation:
Istituto Zooprofilattico delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
G. Pozza
Affiliation:
Istituto Zooprofilattico delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
F. Gottardo
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
L. Moro
Affiliation:
Istituto Zooprofilattico delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
A. L. Stefani*
Affiliation:
Istituto Zooprofilattico delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
G. Cozzi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
M. Brscic
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
I. Andrighetto
Affiliation:
Istituto Zooprofilattico delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
L. Ravarotto
Affiliation:
Istituto Zooprofilattico delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A set of hormonal, haematological and biochemical parameters was used to evaluate the physiological response and welfare status of 14 finishing Marchigiana bulls treated for 49 days with a low daily dosage (0.75 mg/head per day) of dexamethasone peros. Compared to the Control group, dexamethasone decreased cortisol concentrations (42.3 v. 5.7 nmol/l; s.e.d. = 4.17; P < 0.001), and led to the reversal of the leukocyte formula in the animals treated (P < 0.05). Total serum proteins (70.2 v. 73.9 g/l; s.e.d. = 1.55; P < 0.05), in particular β1 globulins (7.5 v. 9.1 g/l; s.e.d. = 0.24; P < 0.01) and fibrinogen (199 v. 258 mg/dl; s.e.d. = 32.70; P < 0.05), increased as a consequence of treatment. Prolonged dexamethasone administration led the bulls to an apparently chronic stress condition. Moreover, the study indicated various blood parameters that might be used by health officials as effective tools in identifying beef cattle suspected of being illegally treated with dexamethasone.

Keywords

beef cattlebiochemical parametersdexamethasonehaematological parametershormonal parameters
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 2 , Issue 7 , July 2008 , pp. 1080 - 1086
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, DG, Pringle, JK, Smith, DA 2000. Handbook of veterinary drugs. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Hagerstown, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Allersmeier, M, Abraham, G, Schusser, GF, Hoppen, HO, Ungemach, FR 2005. Effects of topically applied dexamethasone on ACTH and cortisol release in horses. Tierarztliche Umschau 60, 664–670.Google Scholar
Anderson, BH, Watson, DL, Colditz, IG 1999. The effect of dexamethasone on some immunological parameters in cattle. Veterinary Research Communications 23, 399–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourdon, E, Blanche, D 2001. The importance of proteins in defence against oxidation. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling 3, 293–311.Google Scholar
Broom, DM 1988. The scientific assessment of animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20, 5–19.Google Scholar
Broom, DM, Johnson, KG 1993. Stress and Animal Welfare, 1st edition. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.Google Scholar
Cagnasso, A, Dotta, U, Aria, G, Monti, F, Prato, S 1987. Evaluation of adrenal cortex function in pre-ruminant fattening calves treated with dexamethasone. Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde 129, 429–435.Google ScholarPubMed
Chacon, G, Garcia-Belenguer, S, Villarroel, M, Maria, GA 2005. Effect of transport stress on physiological responses of male bovines. Deutsche Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 112, 465–469.Google Scholar
Courtheyn, D, Le Bizec, B, Brambilla, G, De Brabander, HF, Cobbeart, E, Van de Wiele, M, Vercammen, J, De Wasch, K 2002. Recent developments in the use and abuse of growth promoters. Analytica Chimica Acta 473, 71–82.Google Scholar
Decreto Legislativo n. 116/1992 1992. Protezione degli animali utilizzati a fini sperimentali o ad altri fini scientifici. Supplemento Ordinario – Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana n. 40.Google Scholar
Dunn, CS 1990. Stress reactions of cattle undergoing ritual slaughter using two methods of restraint. The Veterinary Record 126, 522–525.Google Scholar
Furll, M, Leidel, I 2002. Studies on the stabilization of health status in peri-parturient dairy cows. Tierarztliche Umschau 57, 423–438.Google Scholar
Gottardo F, Brscic M, Pozza G, Ossensi C, Contiero B, Marin A and Cozzi G 2008. Administration of dexamethasone per os in finishing bulls: I. Effects on productive traits, meat quality and cattle behaviour as indicator of welfare. Animal 2, 1073–1079.Google Scholar
Gupta, S, Earley, B, Ting, STL, Crowe, MA 2005. Effect of repeated regrouping and relocation on the physiological, immunological, and haematological variables and performance of steers. Journal of Animal Science 83, 1948–1958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Istasse, L, De Haan, V, Van Eenaeme, C, Buts, B, Baldwin, P, Gielen, M, Demeyer, D, Bienfait, JM 1989. Effect of dexamethasone injections on performance in a pair of monozygotic cattle twin. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 62, 150–158.Google Scholar
Italian Ministry of Health 2005. Report of National Residues Plan of the year 2003. Retrieved January 20, 2005, from http://www.regione.veneto.it/Servizi+alla+Persona/Sanita/Prevenzione/Sanit%C3%A0+veterinaria/Piano+Nazionale+Residui.htmGoogle Scholar
Kaneko, JJ, Harvey, JW, Bruss, ML 1997. Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals, 5th edition. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.Google Scholar
Kramer, JW 2000. Normal Hematology of Cattle, Sheep, and Goats. In Schalm’s Veterinary Hematology, 5th edition (ed. BF Felman, JG Zinkl and NC Jain), pp. 1075–1084. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Baltimora, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Lan, HC, Reddy, PG, Chambers, MA, Walker, G, Srivastava, KK, Ferguson, JA 1995. Effect of stress on interleukin-2 receptor expression by bovine mononuclear leukocytes. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 49, 241–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopes, SO, Claus, R, Lacorn, M, Wagner, A, Mosenthin, R 2004. Effects of dexamethasone application in growing pigs on hormones, N-retention and other metabolic parameters. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A 51, 97–105.Google Scholar
Miller, JK, Brzezinska-Slebodzinska, E, Madsen, FC 1993. Oxidative stress, antioxidants, and animal function. Journal of Dairy Science 76, 2812–2823.Google Scholar
Moberg, GP 1985. Biological response to stress: key to assessment of animal well-being. In Animal stress (ed. GP Moberg), pp. 27–49. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, MD, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldham, G, Howard, CJ 1992. Suppression of bovine lymphocyte responses to mitogens following in vivo and in vitro treatment with dexamethasone. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 30, 161–177.Google Scholar
Raussi, S, Boissy, A, Andanson, S, Kaihilahti, J, Pradel, P, Veissier, I 2006. Repeated regrouping of pair-housed heifers around puberty affects their behavioural and HPA axis reactivities. Animal Research 55, 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijnberk, A, Mol, J 1997. Adrenocortical function. In Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals, 5th edition (ed. JJ Kaneko, JW Harvey and MG Bruss), pp. 553–570. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacher, RA, McPherson, RA 2000. Widmann’s Clinical Interpretation of Laboratory Tests, 11th edition. Davis FA Company, Philadelphia, PA, USA.Google Scholar
SAS 1990. User’s Guide: Statistic. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
SCAHAW – Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare 2001. The welfare of cattle kept for beef production. Retrieved April 25, 2001, from http://europa.eu.int/com/food/fs/sc/scah/outcom_en.htmlGoogle Scholar
Sevaljevic, L, Macvanin, M, Zakula, Z, Kanazir, DT, Ribarac-Septic, N 1998. Adrenalectomy and dexamethasone treatment alter the patterns of basal and acute phase response-induced expression of acute phase protein genes in rat liver. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 66, 347–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorrells, AD, Eicher, SD, Harris, MJ, Pajor, EA, Richert, BT 2007. Periparturient cortisol, acute phase cytokine, and acute phase protein profiles of gilts housed in groups or stalls during gestation. Journal of Animal Science 85, 1750–1757.Google Scholar
Tadich, N, Gallo, C, Bustamante, H, Schwerter, M, van Schaik, G 2005. Effects of transport and lairage time on some blood constituents of Fresian-cross steers in Chile. Livestock Production Sciences 93, 223–233.Google Scholar
Thanasak, J, Jorritsma, R, Hoek, A, Noordhuizen, JPTM, Rutten, VPMG, Müller, KE 2004. The effects of a single injection of dexamethasone-21-isonicotinate on the lymphocyte functions of dairy cows at two weeks post partum. Veterinary Research 35, 103–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van der Wal, P, Berende, PLM, Sprietsma, JE 1975. Effect of anabolic agents on performance of calves. Journal of Animal Science 41, 978–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar