Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:39:51.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strong heterozygote deficit in Tibetan Mastiff of China based on microsatellite loci

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

D. R. Ren ,
Q. Y. Yang ,
J. H. Ye ,
L. Xu ,
H. A. Zhao  and
X. P. Wu
D. R. Ren*
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, 330045 Nanchang, China
Q. Y. Yang
Affiliation:
Ministry of Public Security, Police Dog Base in Nanchang, 330100 Nanchang, China
J. H. Ye
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, 330045 Nanchang, China
L. Xu
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, 330045 Nanchang, China
H. A. Zhao
Affiliation:
Jiangxi Forensic Science Institute, 330006 Nanchang, China
X. P. Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology, Nanchang University, 330047 Nanchang, China
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Tibetan Mastiff is one of the most archaic, ferocious and the largest dogs in the world. A total of 140 individuals from four geographically separated populations in China (Tibet, Gansu, Qinghai and Beijing) were sampled and genetic diversity was assessed using 10 microsatellite loci on eight different chromosomes. The mean number of alleles per locus ranged from 6 to 13. The mean observed and expected heterozygosities, polymorphism information content and allelic richness were 0.69, 0.79, 0.76 and 7.59, respectively, indicating relatively high genetic diversity in Tibetan Mastiff. However, a highly significant deficiency in heterozygote was observed within populations (mean FIS = 0.11, bootstrap 95% confidence interval (0.06, 0.17)) and total inbreeding (mean FIT = 0.12, bootstrap 95% confidence interval (0.06, 0.18)), along with strong inbreeding coefficients within populations (Fis > 0.09), all of which suggested that intense inbreeding practices occurred in Tibetan Mastiff. Therefore, effective and appropriate breeding management projects in present Tibetan Mastiff will be desirable and urgent. Low genetic differentiation was obtained with a mean FST of 0.01 (bootstrap 95% confidence interval (0.007, 0.019)). Additionally, the four Tibetan Mastiff populations showed close relationships in the neighbor-joining polygenetic tree based on the coancestral genetic distances. Tibetan Mastiff was investigated by using microsatellite loci at the first time, which could facilitate the better understanding of present situation at the molecular level, breed conservation and utilization in Tibetan Mastiff.

Keywords

Tibetan Mastiffgenetic diversitymicrosatellite
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 3 , Issue 9 , September 2009 , pp. 1213 - 1215
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Both authors contributed equally to this work and should be therefore considered as first coauthors.

References

Botstein, D, White, RL, Skolnick, M, Davis, RW 1980. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. The American Journal Human Genetics 32, 314–331.Google ScholarPubMed
DeNise, S, Johnston, E, Halverson, J, Marshall, K, Rosenfeld, D, McKenna, S, Sharp, T, Edwards, J 2004. Power of exclusion for parentage verification and probability of match for identity in American Kennel Club breeds using 17 canine microsatellite markers. Animal Genetics 35, 14–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, QF, Liu, ZS, Li, YX, Zhao, XB, Dong, LY, Pan, ZX, Sun, YR, Li, N, Xu, YX, Xie, Z 2008. Origin and phylogenetic analysis of Tibetan Mastiff based on the mitochondrial DNA sequence. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 35, 335–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, TC, Slate, J, Kruuk, L, Pemberton, JM 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology 7, 639–655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ni, Z 2004. Tibetan Mastiff. China Youth Press, Beijing (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Rousset, F 2008. Genepop’007: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Notes 8, 103–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, YQ, Shi, LY, Yu, DY, Feng, BM, Song, L 2003. Textual research on Tibetan Mastiff. Journal of Dalian University 24, 108–112.Google Scholar
Weir, BS 1996. Genetic data analysis II. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers, Sunderland, MA, USA.Google Scholar
Weir, BS, Cockerham, CC 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358–1370.Google ScholarPubMed