Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:29:36.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sexual dimorphism in Hucul horses using discriminant analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2010

H. Purzyc ,
F. Kobryńczuk  and
J. Bojarski
H. Purzyc*
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland Department of Biostructure and Animal Physiology, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, ul. Kożuchowska 1/3, 51-631 Wroclaw, Poland
F. Kobryńczuk
Affiliation:
Department of Morphological Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, ul. Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
J. Bojarski
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mathematics, University of Zielona Góra, Computer Science and Econometrics, ul. prof. Z. Szafrana 4a, 65-516 Zielona Góra, Poland
Get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study has been to evaluate the applicability of discriminant function analysis to determine gender dimorphism in Hucul horses, based on morphological indices obtained in different stages of life. A total of 243 horses, divided into six age groups, have been examined in its course. For each horse we have measured 12 metric traits, which were then used to calculate 13 biometric indices commonly used in horse breeding in Poland. These have become the basis for defining functions classifying the animals by gender in each of the six age groups. This study answers the question of what parameters play the greatest role in the course of shaping of body proportions of male and female horses in post-foetal development. The following indices have been found to significantly contribute in discriminant models: boniness, smaller trunk length, height at the croup, pelvis width and width of chest.

Keywords

conformationhorseindiceslinear measurementssexual dimorphism
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , 23 February 2011 , pp. 506 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boujenane, I, Touati, I, Machmoum, M 2008. Mensurations corporelles des cheveux Arabe-Barbes au Maroc. Revue de Médicine Vétérinaire 159, 144–149.Google Scholar
Glucksmann, A 1974. Sexual dimorphism in mammals. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 49, 423–475.Google Scholar
Hintz, RL, Hintz, HF, Van Vleck, LD 1979. Growth rate of Thoroughbred. Effects of age of dam, year and month of birth, and sex of foal. Journal of Animal Science 48, 480–487.Google Scholar
Kashiwamura, F, Avgaandorj, A, Furumura, K 2001. Relationships among body size, conformation, and racing performance in Banei Draft Racehorses. Journal of Equine Science 12, 1–7.Google Scholar
Kobryń, H, Kobryńczuk, F 1985. Próba zastosowania funkcji dyskryminacyjnej do różnicowania wielkości kości konia w materiałach archeozoologicznych. Archeologia Polski 30, 7–15.Google Scholar
Koch, W 1954. Lehrbuch der allgemeinen Tierzucht. Ferdinand Enke Ferlag, Stuttgard.Google Scholar
Kolstrung, R 2006. Wskaźniki biometryczne kuców felińskich w wieku trzech lat. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio EE: Zootechnica 35, 257–266.Google Scholar
Lovšin, E, Fazarinc, G, Pogačnik, A, Bavdek, SV 2001. Growth dynamics of Lipizzan horses and their comparison to other horse breeds. Pflügers Archiv: European Journal of Physiology 442, 211–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinto, LFB, de Almeida, FQ, Quirino, CR, Cabral, GC, de Azevedo, PCN, Santos, EM 2005. Multivariate analysis of body measures in Mangalarga Marchador Foals: discriminant analysis. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia – Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 34, 600–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, LFB, de Almeida, FQ, Quirino, CR, de Azevedo, PCN, Cabral, GC, Santos, EM, Corassa, A 2008. Evaluation of the sexual dimorphism in Mangalarga Marchador horses using discriminant analysis. Livestock Science 119, 161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruski, W 2007. Hodowla koni. Wyd. PWRiL, Warszawa.Google Scholar
Purzyc, H 2006. Cechy konia huculskiego w świetle badań morfometrycznych (The Traits of Hucul Horse In the Light of Morphometric Research). PhD, The Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW.Google Scholar
Purzyc, H 2007. Remarks on the history of breeding Hucul horses. Acta Scientarum Polonorum – Medicina Veterinaria 6, 69–76.Google Scholar
Purzyc, H, Kobryń, H, Komosa, M, Bojarski, J 2007. Ocena eksterieru konia huculskiego na podstawie wybranych wskaźników morfometrycznych (część I). Acta Scientarum Polonorum – Medicina Veterinaria 6, 47–64.Google Scholar
Purzyc, H, Kobryń, H, Komosa, M, Bojarski, J 2008a. Ocena eksterieru konia huculskiego na podstawie wybranych wskaźników morfometrycznych. Wskaźniki klatki piersiowej i miednicy. Acta Scientarum Polonorum – Medicina Veterinaria 7, 33–46.Google Scholar
Purzyc, H, Kobryń, H, Komosa, M, Bojarski, J 2008b. Ocena eksterieru konia huculskiego na podstawie wybranych wskaźników morfometrycznych. Wskaźniki głowy. Acta Scientarum Polonorum – Medicina Veterinaria 7, 21–32.Google Scholar
Rastija, T, Baban, M, Antunović, Z, Mandić, I 2004. A comparison and development of morphometric characteristics of stallions and mares on the Lipizzaner stud of Đakovo. Acta agriculturae slovenica. Suppl. 1, 195–200.Google Scholar
Saastamoinen, M 1990. Factors affecting growth and development of foals and young horses. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 40, 387–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasimowski, E, Kaproń, M, Pietrzak, S, Kolstrung, R, Słomiany, J, Wojciechowski, J 1990. Wzrost oraz rozwój źrebiąt i młodzieży konika polskiego w Roztoczańskim Parku Narodowym. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych, Seria B 106, 125–132.Google Scholar
Timm, NH 2002. Applied multivariate analysis, 1st edition. Springer, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Zechner, P, Zohman, F, Sölkner, J, Bodo, I, Habe, F, Marti, E, Brem, G 2001. Morphological description of the Lipizzan horse population. Livestock Production Science 69, 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar