Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:40:48.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selection for nutrients by pregnant goats on a microphyll desert scrub

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2011

M. Mellado ,
C. N. Aguilar ,
J. R. Arévalo ,
A. Rodríguez ,
J. E. García  and
J. Mellado
M. Mellado*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition, Agrarian Autonomous University Antonio Narro, Saltillo 25315, Mexico
C. N. Aguilar
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science and Technology, School of Chemistry, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Saltillo, 25280, Coahuila, México
J. R. Arévalo
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Ecology and Genetics, University of La Laguna, 38207, La Laguna, Spain
A. Rodríguez
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition, Agrarian Autonomous University Antonio Narro, Saltillo 25315, Mexico
J. E. García
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition, Agrarian Autonomous University Antonio Narro, Saltillo 25315, Mexico
J. Mellado
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition, Agrarian Autonomous University Antonio Narro, Saltillo 25315, Mexico
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The behavioral consequences of pregnancy in goats were studied to test the hypothesis that pregnant females on rangeland select a diet richer in nutrients once the demands of gestation increase, and that nutrient content in goat diets changes with the grazing season. A total of 12 mature mixed breed goats either pregnant (n = 6) or non-pregnant (n = 6) were used during the dry period (February to May). Dietary samples obtained from the oral cavity of grazing goats (restrained with a short light rope permanently tightened around their neck) were used for chemical analyses. Across months, pregnant goats selected diets higher (P < 0.01) in crude protein (CP) than non-pregnant goats; this nutrient did not meet the requirements of late gestating goats. Pregnant goats made use of less (P < 0.01) fibrous feeds than non-pregnant goats. In order to cope with changing nutrient demands for pregnancy, goats adjusted their diet by increasing the selection of plants with 32% higher calcium content compared to forages selected by non-pregnant goats. The physiological state of goats did not alter the levels of phosphorus (P), magnesium (Mg) and sodium (Na) in their diets; these minerals were adequate to meet the demands of pregnancy. There were no effects of physiological state on concentrations of copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn) and iron (Fe) in the goat diets during the dry season, with levels adequate for sustainability of pregnancy. Pregnant goats did not seek forages lower in tannins, alkaloids, saponins and terpenes. It was concluded that to cope with increasing pregnancy costs, goats adjusted their diets increasing selection of forages or plant parts with high nutritional value to maximize their net nutrient budget.

Keywords

reproductive statusnutrient selectiontanninsalkaloidsminerals
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 5 , Issue 6 , June 2011 , pp. 972 - 979
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdelrahman, MM 2008. The effect of high calcium intake by pregnant Awassi ewes at late gestation on minerals status and performance of ewes and newborn lambs. Livestock Science 117, 15–23.Google Scholar
Abijaoude, JA, Morand-Fehr, P, Tesie, J, Schimidely, PH, Sauvant, D 2000. Diet effect on the daily feeding behaviour, frequency and characteristics of meals in dairy goats. Livestock Production Science 64, 29–37.Google Scholar
Alm, U, Birgersson, B, Leimar, O 2002. The effect of food quality and relative abundance on food choice in fallow deer. Animal Behaviour 64, 439–445.Google Scholar
Alonso-Díaz, MA, Torres-Acosta, JFJ, Sandoval-Castro, CA, Hoste, H, Aguilar-Caballero, AJ, Capetillo-Leal, CM 2008. Is goats’ preference of forage trees affected by their tannin or fiber content when offered in cafeteria experiments? Animal Feed Science and Technology 141, 36–48.Google Scholar
Ambreen, N, Hanif, NQ, Khatoon, S 2006. Chemical composition of rice polishing from different sources. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 26, 190–192.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 1996. Official methods of analysis, 16th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Arthun, D, Holecheck, JL, Wallace, JD, Galyean, ML, Cardenas, M, Rafique, S 1992. Forbs and shrubs influences on steer nitrogen retention. Journal of Range Management 45, 133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, TG, Varner, LW, Blankenship, LH, Fillinger, TJ, Heiman, SC 1990. Macro and trace mineral content of selected South Texas deer forages. Journal of Range Management 43, 220–224.Google Scholar
Barry, TN, Manley, TR, Duncan, SJ 1986. The role of condensed tannins in the nutritional value of Lotus peduculatus for sheep 4. Sites of carbohydrate and protein digestion as influenced by dietary reactive tannin concentration. British Journal of Nutrition 55, 123–137.Google Scholar
Bartolome, J, Franch, J, Plaixats, J, Seligman, NG 1998. Diet selection by sheep and goats on Mediterranean heath-woodland range. Journal of Range Management 51, 383–391.Google Scholar
Berteaux, D, Crête, M, Huot, J, Maltais, J, Ouellet, JP 1998. Food choice by white-tailed deer in relation to protein and energy content of the diet, a field experiment. Oecologia 115, 84–92.Google Scholar
Bhatti, SA, Bowman, JGP, Firkins, JL, Grove, AV, Hunt, CW 2008. Effect of intake level and alfalfa substitution for grass hay on ruminal kinetics of fiber digestion and particle passage in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 86, 134–145.Google Scholar
Bugalho, MN, Milne, JA 2003. The composition of the diet of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a Mediterranean environment: a case of summer nutritional constraint? Forest Ecolofy and Management 181, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceacero, F, Landete-Castillejos, T, García, AJ, Estévez, JA, Gallego, L 2010. Physiological variables explain mineral intake in Iberian red deer. Physiology and Behavior 100, 122–127.Google Scholar
Cerrillo, MA, López, OO, Nevárez, CG, Ramírez, RG, Juárez, RAS 2006. Nutrient content, intake and in vitro gas production of diets by Spanish goats browsing a thorn shrubland in North Mexico. Small Ruminant Research 66, 76–84.Google Scholar
Cheeke, PR 1988. Toxicity and metabolism of pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Journal of Animal Science 66, 2343–2350.Google Scholar
Cline, HJ, Neville, BW, Lardy, GP, Caton, JS 2009. Influence of advancing season on dietary composition, intake, site of digestion, and microbial efficiency in beef steers grazing a native range in western North Dakota. Journal of Animal Science 87, 375–383.Google Scholar
Codron, D, Lee-Thorp, JA, Sponheimer, M, Codron, J 2007. Nutritional content of savanna plant foods, implications for browser/grazer models of ungulate diversification. European Journal of Wildlife Research 53, 100–111.Google Scholar
Cooper, SDB, Kyriazakis, I, Oldham, JD 1994. The effect of late pregnancy on the diets selection made by ewes. Livestock Production Science 40, 263–275.Google Scholar
Food Chemical Codex 1981. Food chemical codex, 3rd edition. National Academic Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Fowden, AL, Giussani, DA, Forhead, AJ 2006. Intrauterine programming of physiological systems, causes and consequences. Physiology 21, 29–37.Google Scholar
Frost, RA, Wilson, LM, Launchbaugh, KL, Hovde, EM 2008. Seasonal change in forage value of rangeland weeds in northern Idaho. Invasive Plant Science and Management 1, 343–351.Google Scholar
Galindo, FW, Rosales, M, Murgueitio, E, Larrahondo, J 1989. Sustancias antinutricionales en las hojas de guamo, nacedero y mataratón. Livestock Research for Rural Development 1, 1–15.Google Scholar
Ganskopp, D, Bohnert, D 2003. Mineral concentration dynamics of 7 northern Great Basin grasses. Journal of Range Management 54, 640–647.Google Scholar
Gilbert, JS, Lang, AL, Grant, AR, Nijland, MJ 2005. Maternal nutrient restriction in sheep, hypertension and decreased nephron number in offspring at 9 months of age. Journal of Physiology 565, 137–147.Google Scholar
Holechek, JL, Munshikpu, AV, Saiwana, L, Nunez-Hernandez, G, Valdez, R, Wallace, JD, Cardenas, M 1990. Influences of six shrub diets varying in phenol content on intake and nitrogen retention by goats. Tropical Grasslands 24, 93–98.Google Scholar
Idikut, L, Boga, M, Atalay, AI, Kara, SN, Kamalak, A 2009. Effect of previous plant on chemical composition of sweet corn grain. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 8, 1979–1981.Google Scholar
Ikeda, S, Kitagawa, M, Imai, H, Yamada, M 2005. The roles of vitamin A for cytoplasmic maturation of bovine oocytes. Journal of Reproduction and Development 51, 23–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Illius, AW, Gordon, IJ 1987. The allometry of food intake in grazing ruminants. Journal of Animal Ecology 56, 989–999.Google Scholar
Jaquiery, AL, Oliver, MH, Rumball, CWH, Bloomfield, FH, Harding, JE 2009. Undernutrition before mating in ewes impairs the development of insulin resistance during pregnancy. Obstetric and Gynecology 114, 869–876.Google Scholar
Juárez-Reyes, AS, Cerrillo-Soto, MA, Meza-Herrera, CA, Nevárez-Carrasco, G 2004. Diet composition, intake, plasma metabolites, reproductive and metabolic hormones during pregnancy in goats under semi-arid grazing conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science 142, 697–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juárez-Reyes, AS, Nevarez-Carrasco, G, Cerrillo-Soto, MA, Murillo-Ortiz, M, Luginbuhl, JM, Bernal Barragan, H, Ramírez, RG 2008. Dietary chemical composition, plasma metabolites and hormones in range goats. Journal of Applied Animal Research 34, 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, HG, Vogel, KP 1986. Influence of lignin on digestibility of forage cell wall material. Journal of Animal Science 62, 1703–1712.Google Scholar
Jung, HG, Mertens, DR, Payne, AJ 1997. Correlation of acid detergent lignin and Klason lignin with digestibility of forage dry matter and neutral detergent fiber. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 1622–1628.Google Scholar
Kawas, J, Armienta, G, Kawas, J, Olivares, E, Torres, O 1997. Seasonal changes of mineral concentrations of tropical grasses in Mexico. In XVIII International Grassland Congress Winnipeg, Manitoba and Saskatoon. Saskatchewan, Canada, 123pp.Google Scholar
Kawashima, C, Kida, K, Schweigert, FJ, Miyamoto, A 2009. Relationship between plasma β-carotene concentrations during the peripartum period and ovulation in the first follicular wave postpartum in dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science 111, 105–111.Google Scholar
Knubel, BFR, Panter, KE, Provenza, FD 2004. Pregnancy in goats does not influence intake of novel or familiar foods with or without toxins. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 85, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krojerová-Prokešová, J, Barančeková, M, Šustr, P, Heurich, M 2010. Feeding patterns of red deer Cervus elaphus along an altitudinal gradient in the Bohemian Forest: effect of habitat and season. Wildlife Biology 16, 173–184.Google Scholar
Kronberg, SL, Malechek, JC 1997. Relationship between nutrition and foraging behavior of free-ranging sheep and goats. Journal of Animal Science 75, 1756–1763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kronberg, SL, Walker, JW 2007. Learning through foraging consequences: a mechanism of feeding niche separation in sympatric ruminants. Rangeland Ecology and Management 60, 195–198.Google Scholar
Kyriazakis, I, Tolkamp, BJ, Emmans, G 1999. Diet selection and animal state: an integrative framework. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 58, 765–772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liesegang, A, Risteli, J 2005. Influence of different calcium concentrations in the diet on bone metabolism in growing dairy goats and sheep. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition (Berl) 89, 113–119.Google Scholar
Liesegang, A, Risteli, J, Wanner, M 2006. The effects of first gestation and lactation on bone metabolism in dairy goats and milk sheep. Bone 38, 792–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisonbee, LD, Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD 2009. Effects of tannin on selection by sheep of forages containing alkaloids, tannins and saponins. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 89, 2668–2677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Trujillo, R, Garcia-Elizondo, R 1995. Botanical composition and diet quality of goats grazing natural and gross reseeded shrublands. Small Ruminant Research 16, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkar, HPS, Singh, B, Vats, SK, Sood, RP 2003. Total phenols, tannins and condensed tannins in different parts of Rumex hast. Bioresearch Technology 45, 69–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mali, S, Borges, RM 2003. Phenolics, fibre, alkaloids, saponins, and cyanogenic glycosides in a seasonal cloud forest in India. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 31, 1221–1246.Google Scholar
Masters, DG, Rintoul, AJ, Dynes, RA, Pearce, KL, Norman, HC 2005. Feed intake and production in sheep fed diets high in sodium and potassium. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 427–434.Google Scholar
Mellado, M, Foote, RH, Rodríguez, A, Zárate, P 1991. Botanical composition and nutrient content of diets selected by goats grazing on desert grassland in northern Mexico. Small Ruminant Research 6, 141–150.Google Scholar
Mellado, M, Valdez, R, Lara, LM, López, R 2003. Stocking rate effects on goats. A research observation. Journal of Range Management 56, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellado, M, Gonzalez, H, Garcia, JE, Garcia, R 2004a. Anthelmintic treatment of goats on an arid range and its effects on milk production in late lactation. Journal of Applied Animal Research 25, 91–95.Google Scholar
Mellado, M, Olvera, A, Dueñez, J, Rodríguez, A 2004b. Effects of continuous or rotational grazing on goat diets in a desert rangeland. Journal of Applied Animal Research 26, 93–100.Google Scholar
Mellado, M, Valdez, R, Lara, LM, García, JE 2004c. Risk factors involved in conception, abortion, and kidding rates of goats under extensive conditions. Small Ruminant Research 55, 191–198.Google Scholar
Mellado, M, Olivares, L, Lopez, R, Mellado, J 2005. Influence of lactation, liveweight and lipid reserves at mating on reproductive performance of grazing goats. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 4, 420–423.Google Scholar
Mellado, M, Olvera, A, Quero, A, Mendoza, G 2005a. Diet of prairie dogs, goats and sheep on a desert rangeland. Rangeland Ecology and Management 58, 373–379.Google Scholar
Mellado, M, Rodriguez, A, Villarreal, JA, Olvera, A 2005b. The effect of pregnancy and lactation on diet composition and dietary preference of goats in a desert rangeland. Small Ruminant Research 58, 79–85.Google Scholar
Mellado, M, Estrada, R, Olivares, L, Pastor, F, Mellado, J 2006. Diet selection among goats of different milk production potential on a Chihuahuan desert grassland. Journal of Arid Environments 66, 127–134.Google Scholar
Moore, JE, Coleman, SW 2001. Forage intake, digestibility, NDF and ADF, How well are they related? In Proceedings of American Forage and Grassland Council (ed. T Terrill), pp. 238–242. Springdale, AR AFGC, Georgetown, TX, USA.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 2007. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants, sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Olson, KC, Cochran, RC, Titgemeyer, EC, Mathis, CP, Jones, TJ, Heldt, JS 2008. Prediction of the energy content of tallgrass prairie hay. Journal of Animal Science 86, 1372–1381.Google Scholar
Panter, KE, Weinzweig, J, Gardner, DR, Stegelmeier, BL, James, LF 2000. Comparison of cleft palate induction by Nicotiana glauca in goats and sheep. Theratology 61, 203–210.Google Scholar
Papachristou, TG, Nastis, AS 1993. Diets of goats grazing oak shrublands of varying cover in northern Greece. Journal of Range Management 46, 220–226.Google Scholar
Pfister, JA, Panter, KE, Gardner, DR, Stegelmeier, BL, Ralphs, MH, Molyneux, RJ, Lee, ST 2001. Alkaloids as anti-quality factors in plants on western US rangelands. Journal of Range Management 54, 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinchak, WE, Greene, LW, Heitschmidt, RK 1989. Mineral dynamics in beef cattle diets from a southern mixed-grass prairie. Journal of Range Management 43, 431–435.Google Scholar
Ramírez, RG, Rodriguez, A, Tagle, LA, Del Valle, AC, Gonzalez, J 1990. Nutrient content and intake of forage grazed by range goats in northeastern Mexico. Small Ruminant Research 3, 435–448.Google Scholar
Ramírez-Orduña, R, Ramírez, RG, Romero-Vadillo, E, González-Rodríguez, H, Armenta-Quintana, JA, Avalos-Castro, R 2008. Diet and nutrition of range goats on a sarcocaulescent shrubland from Baja California Sur, Mexico. Small Ruminant Research 76, 3166–3176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapport, DJ 1980. Optimal foraging for complementary resources. American Naturalist 116, 324–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redmer, DA, Wallace, JM, Reynolds, LP 2004. Effect of nutrient intake during pregnancy on fetal and placental growth and vascular development. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 27, 199–217.Google Scholar
Rogosic, J, Estell, RE, Skobic, D, Martinovic, A, Maric, S 2006. Role of species diversity and secondary compound complementarity on diet selection of Mediterranean shrubs by goats. Journal of Chemical Ecology 32, 1279–1287.Google Scholar
Rumball, CWH, Bloomfield, FH, Harding, JE 2008. Cardiovascular adaptations to pregnancy in sheep and effects of periconceptional undernutrition. Placenta 29, 89–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sales, JNS, Dias, LMK, Viveiros, ATM, Pereira, MN, Souza, JC 2007. Embryo production and quality of Holstein heifers and cows supplemented with ß-carotene and tocopherol. Animal Reproduction Science 106, 77–89.Google Scholar
Scrivner, JH, Vaughn, CE, Jones, MB 1988. Mineral concentrations of black-tailed deer diets in California chaparral. Journal of Wildlife Management 52, 37–41.Google Scholar
Swain, T, Hillis, WE 1959. The phenolic constituents of Pronus domestica I: the quantitative analysis of phenolic compounds. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 10, 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, VM, Kott, RW 1995. A review of Montana winter range ewe nutrition research. Sheep and Goat Research Journal 11, 17–24.Google Scholar
Tovar-Luna, I, Goetsch, AL, Puchala, R, Sahlu, T, Carstens, GE, Freetly, HC, Johnson, ZB 2007. Efficiency of energy use for pregnancy by meat goat does with different litter size. Small Ruminant Research 71, 83–91.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Wine, RH 1968. Determination of lignin and cellulose in acid-detergent fiber with permanganate. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 51, 780–785.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB, Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Verheyden-Tixier, H, Renaud, PC, Morellet, N, Jamot, J, Besle, JM, Dumont, B 2008. Selection for nutrients by red deer hinds feeding on a mixed forest edge. Oecologia 156, 715–726.Google Scholar
Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD, Bryant, JP 2002. Consequences of the interaction between nutrients and plant secondary metabolites on herbivore selectivity, benefits or detriment for plants? Oikos 97, 282–292.Google Scholar
Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD, Hall, JO 2008. Learned appetites for calcium, phosphorus, and sodium in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 86, 738–747.Google Scholar
Villalba, JJ, Soder, KJ, Laca, EA 2009. Understanding diet selection in temperate biodiverse pasture systems. Rangeland Ecology and Management 62, 387–388.Google Scholar
Vonnahme, KA, Hess, BW, Hansen, TR, McCormick, RJ, Rule, DC, Moss, GE, Murdoch, WJ, Nijland, MJ, Skinner, DC, Nathanielsz, PW, Ford, SP 2003. Maternal undernutrition from early to mid gestation leads to growth retardation, cardiac ventricular hypertrophy and increased liver weight in the fetal sheep. Biology of Reproduction 69, 133–140.Google Scholar
Waghorn, G 2008. Beneficial and detrimental effects of dietary condensed tannins for sustainable sheep and goat production – progress and challenges. Animal Feed Science and Technology 147, 116–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilmshurst, JF, Fryxell, JM 1995. Patch selection by red deer in relation to energy and protein intake, a re-evaluation of Langvatn and Hanley's (1993) results. Oecologia 104, 297–300.Google Scholar