Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:29:31.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Replacing soybean meal with flax seed meal: effects on nutrient digestibility, rumen microbial protein synthesis and growth performance in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2020

X. Y. Hao Open the ORCID record for X. Y. Hao [Opens in a new window] ,
S. C. Yu ,
C. T. Mu ,
X. D. Wu ,
C. X. Zhang ,
J. X. Zhao  and
J. X. Zhang
X. Y. Hao
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Mingxian South Road 1th, Taigu030801, China
S. C. Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Mingxian South Road 1th, Taigu030801, China
C. T. Mu
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Mingxian South Road 1th, Taigu030801, China
X. D. Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Mingxian South Road 1th, Taigu030801, China
C. X. Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Mingxian South Road 1th, Taigu030801, China
J. X. Zhao
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Mingxian South Road 1th, Taigu030801, China Collaborative Innovation Center for Efficient and Safe Production of Livestock, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Mingxian South Road 1th, Taigu030801, China
J. X. Zhang*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Mingxian South Road 1th, Taigu030801, China
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Flax seed meal (FSM) is rich in various nutrients, especially CP and energy, and can be used as animal protein feed. In animal husbandry production, it is a long-term goal to replace soybean meal (SBM) in animal feed with other plant protein feed. However, studies on the effects of replacing SBM with FSM in fattening sheep are limited. The aim of this experiment was to study the effects of replacing a portion of SBM with FSM on nutrient digestibility, rumen microbial protein synthesis and growth performance in sheep. Thirty-six Dorper × Small Thin-Tailed crossbred rams (BW = 40.4 ± 1.73 kg, mean ± SD) were randomly assigned into four groups. The dietary treatments (forage/concentrate, 45 : 55) were isocaloric according to the nutrient requirements of rams. Soybean meal was replaced with FSM at different levels (DM basis): (1) 18% SBM (18SBM), (2) 12% SBM and 6% FSM (6FSM), (3) 6% SBM and 12% FSM (12FSM) and (4) 18% FSM (18FSM). The rams were fed in individual pens for 60 days, with the first 10 days for adaptation to diets, and then the digestibility of nutrients was determined. There was no significant difference in DM intake, but quadratic (P < 0.001) effects on the average daily gain and feed efficiency were detected, with the highest values in the 6FSM and 12FSM groups. For DM and NDF digestibility, quadratic effects were observed with the higher values in the 6FSM and 12FSM groups, but the digestibility of CP linearly decreased with the increase in FSM in the diet (P = 0.043). There was a quadratic (P < 0.001) effect of FSM inclusion rate on the estimated microbial CP yield. However, the values of intestinally absorbable dietary protein decreased linearly (P < 0.001). For the supply of metabolisable protein, both the linear (P = 0.001) and quadratic (P = 0.044) effects were observed with the lowest value in the 18FSM group. Overall, the results indicated that SBM can be effectively replaced by FSM in the diets of fattening sheep and the optimal proportion was 12.0% under the conditions of this experiment.

Keywords

average daily gainfeed efficiencynutrient digestibilitypurine derivativerams
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 14 , Issue 9 , September 2020 , pp. 1841 - 1848
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 2000. Official methods of analysis, 17th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Aziza, AE, Panda, AK, Quezada, N and Cherian, G 2013. Nutrient digestibility, egg quality, and fatty acid composition of brown laying hens fed camelina or flaxseed meal. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 22, 832–841.10.3382/japr.2013-00735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bean, LD and Leeson, S 2003. Long-term effects of feeding flaxseed on performance and egg fatty acid composition of brown and white hens. Poultry Science 82, 388–394.10.1093/ps/82.3.388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauchemin, KA, Mcginn, SM, Benchaar, C and Holtshausen, L 2009. Crushed sunflower, flax, or canola seeds in lactating dairy cow diets: effects on methane production, rumen fermentation, and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 2118–2127.10.3168/jds.2008-1903CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bond, JM, Julian, RJ and Squires, EJ 1997. Effect of dietary flaxseed on broiler growth, erythrocyte deformability, and fatty acid composition of erythrocyte membranes. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 77, 279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, XB and Gomes, MJ 1992. Estimation of microbial protein supply to sheep and cattle based on urinary excretion of purine derivatives-an overview of technical details. Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, UK.Google Scholar
Dixon, RM and Stockdale, CR 1999. Associative effects between forages and grains: consequences for feed utilisation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 757–774.10.1071/AR98165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, MA, Aguilera, JF and Alcaide, EM 1995. Voluntary intake and kinetics of degradation and passage of unsupplemented and supplemented pastures from semiarid lands in grazing goats and sheep. Livestock Production Science 44, 245–255.10.1016/0301-6226(95)00076-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gargallo, S, Calsamiglia, S and Ferret, A 2006. Technical note: a modified three-step in vitro procedure to determine intestinal digestion of proteins. Journal of Animal Science 84, 2163–2167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gehman, AM and Kononoff, PJ 2010. Nitrogen utilization, nutrient digestibility, and excretion of purine derivatives in dairy cattle consuming rations containing corn milling co-products. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 3641–3651.10.3168/jds.2009-2598CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadjipanayiotou, M 1995. Effect of feeding heat treated soybean meal on the performance of lactating Damascus goats. Small Ruminant Research 18, 105–111.10.1016/0921-4488(95)00695-HCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjipanayiotou, M, Georghiades, E and Koumas, A 1988. The effect of protein source on the performance of suckling Chios ewes and Damascus goats. Animal Production 46, 249–255.Google Scholar
Hao, XY, Diao, XG, Yu, SC, Ding, N, Mu, CT, Zhao, JX and Zhang, JX 2018. Nutrient digestibility, rumen microbial protein synthesis, and growth performance in sheep consuming rations containing sea buckthorn pomace. Journal of Animal Science 96, 3412–3419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jha, R, Bindelle, J, Kessel, AV and Leterme, P 2011. In vitro fiber fermentation of feed ingredients with varying fermentable carbohydrate and protein levels and protein synthesis by colonic bacteria isolated from pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 165, 191–200.10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, KH, Olomu, JM and Sim, JS 1991. Live performance, carcass yield, protein and energy retention of broiler chickens fed canola and flax full-fat seeds and the restored mixtures of meal and oil. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 71, 897–903.10.4141/cjas91-105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madhusudhan, KT, Ramesh, HP, Ogawa, T, Sasaoka, K and Singh, N 1986. Detoxification of commercial linseed meal for use in broiler rations. Poultry Science 65, 164–171.10.3382/ps.0650164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitrayová, S, Brestenský, M, Heger, J, Patráš, P, Rafay, J and Sirotkin, A 2014. Amino acids and fatty acids profile of chia (Salvia hispanica L.) and flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) seed. Potravinarstvo Scientific Journal for Food Industry 8, 72–76.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NR C) 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 2007. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Oomah, BD 2010. Flaxseed as a functional food source. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 81, 889–894.10.1002/jsfa.898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, ER, Hovell, DDD and Mould, F 1980. The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs. Tropical Animal Production 5, 195–213.Google Scholar
Pekel, AY, Patterson, PH and Hulet, RM 2009. Dietary camelina meal versus flaxseed with and without supplemental copper for broiler chickens: live performance and processing yield. Poultry Science 88, 2392–2398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petit, HV and Gagnon, N 2009. Milk concentrations of the mammalian lignans enterolactone and enterodiol, milk production, and whole tract digestibility of dairy cows fed diets containing different concentrations of flaxseed meal. Animal Feed Science and Technology 152, 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quezada, N and Cherian, G 2012. Lipid characterization and antioxidant status of the seeds and meals of Camelina sativa and flax. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology 114, 974–982.10.1002/ejlt.201100298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schingoethe, DJ, Rook, JA and Ludens, F 1977. Evaluation of sunflower meal as a protein supplement for lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 60, 591–595.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(77)83906-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schogor, ALB, Palin, MF, Santos, GT, Benchaar, C and Petit, HV 2017. β-glucuronidase activity and enterolactone concentration in ruminal fluid, plasma, urine, and milk of Holstein cows fed increased levels of flax (Linum usitatissimum) meal. Animal Feed Science and Technology 223, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, XD, Zhao, JX, Liu, WZ, Jin, YQ, Ren, YS, Zhang, CX, Zhang, WJ, Xiang, BW and Zhang, JX 2017. Effect of replacement of soybean meal by oil cake of flax seed in diet on growth performance, meat quality, fatty acid content and blood biochemical indicators of sheep. Chinese Journal of Animal and Veterinary Science 78, 1260–1270.Google Scholar
Yu, SC, Hao, XY, Wu, XD, Ding, N, Diao, XG, Xiang, BW, Zhang, WJ and Zhang, JX 2018. Effects of replacement of soybean meal by oil cake of flax seed on rumen metabolism in lambs. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition 30, 3033–3042.Google Scholar
Zagorakis, K, Liamadis, D and Milis, C 2015. Nutrient digestibility and in situ, degradability of alternatives to soybean meal protein sources for sheep. Small Ruminant Research 124, 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, R 2011. Evaluation of feed amino acids digestibility in small intestinal in dairy cows. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences 17, 1–13.Google Scholar
Zhu, W, Fu, Y, Wang, B, Wang, C, Ye, JA, Wu, YM and Liu, JX 2013. Effects of dietary forage sources on rumen microbial protein synthesis and milk performance in early lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 1727–1734.10.3168/jds.2012-5756CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed