Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:37:35.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Real-time PCR genotyping and frequency of the myostatin F94L mutation in beef cattle breeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2009

D. M. Vankan ,
D. R. Waine  and
M. R. S. Fortes
D. M. Vankan*
Affiliation:
Animal Genetics Laboratory, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
D. R. Waine
Affiliation:
Animal Genetics Laboratory, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
M. R. S. Fortes
Affiliation:
Animal Genetics Laboratory, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This research developed two real-time PCR assays, employing high-resolution melt and allele-specific analysis to accurately genotype the F94L mutation in cattle. This mutation (g.433C > A) in the growth differentiation factor 8 or myostatin gene has recently been shown to be functionally associated with increased muscle mass and carcass yield in cattle. The F94L mutation is not, like other myostatin mutations, associated with reduced fertility and dystocia. It is therefore a candidate for introgression into other breeds to improve retail beef yield and the development of a simple and accurate test to genotype this specific mutation is warranted. Variations in the efficiency of enzyme cleavage compromised the accuracy of genotyping by published methods, potentially resulting in an overestimation of the frequency of the mutant allele. The frequency of the F94L mutation was determined by real-time PCR in 1140 animals from 15 breeds of cattle in Australia. The mutation was present in Simmental (0.8%), Piedmontese (2%), Droughtmaster (4%) and Limousin (94.2%) but not found in Salers, Angus, Poll Hereford, Hereford, Gelbvieh, Charolais, Jersey, Brahman, Holstein, Shorthorn or Maine Anjou. The low prevalence of F94L in all beef breeds except Limousin indicates the significant potential for this mutation to improve retail yield in Australian beef cattle.

Keywords

beef cattleF94Lmarker-assisted selectionmyostatinreal-time PCR
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , April 2010 , pp. 530 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, JH 2004. WINPEPI (PEPI-for-Windows): computer programs for epidemiologists. Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations 1, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, LJ, Geary, TW, Snelling, WM, Macneil, MD 2007. Quantitative trait loci with additive effects on growth and carcass traits in a Wagyu-Limousin F2 population. Animal Genetics 38, 413–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aljanabi, SM, Martinez, I 1997. Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques. Nucleic Acids Research 25, 4692–4693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arthur, PF, Makarechian, M, Price, MA 1988. Incidence of Dystocia and Perinatal calf mortality resulting from reciprocal crossing of double-muscled and normal cattle. Canadian Veterinary Journal 29, 163–167.Google Scholar
Arthur, PF, Makarechian, M, Price, MA, Berg, RT 1989. Heterosis, maternal and direct effects in double-muscled and normal cattle: I. Reproduction and growth traits. Journal of Animal Science 67, 902–910.Google Scholar
Bellinge, RH, Liberles, DA, Iaschi, SP, O’Brien, PA, Tay, GK 2005. Myostatin and its implications on animal breeding: a review. Animal Genetics 36, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casas, E, Keele, JW, Fahrenkrug, SC, Smith, TP, Cundiff, LV, Stone, RT 1999. Quantitative analysis of birth, weaning, and yearling weights and calving difficulty in Piedmontese crossbreds segregating an inactive myostatin allele. Journal of Animal Science 77, 1686–1692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennis, JA, Healy, PJ 2001. Genotyping shorthorn cattle for generalized glycogenosis. Australian Veterinary Journal 79, 773–775.Google Scholar
Dunner, S, Miranda, ME, Amigues, Y, Canon, J, Georges, M, Hanset, R, Williams, J, Menissier, F 2003. Haplotype diversity of the myostatin gene among beef cattle breeds. Genetics Selection Evolution 35, 103–118.Google Scholar
Esmailizadeh, AK, Bottema, CD, Sellick, GS, Verbyla, AP, Morris, CA, Cullen, NG, Pitchford, WS 2008. Effects of the myostatin F94L substitution on beef traits. Journal of Animal Science 86, 1038–1046.Google Scholar
Fahrenkrug, SC, Casas, E, Keele, JW, Smith, TP 1999. Technical note: direct genotyping of the double-muscling locus (mh) in Piedmontese and Belgian Blue cattle by fluorescent PCR. Journal of Animal Science 77, 2028–2030.Google Scholar
Grobet, L, Poncelet, D, Royo, LJ, Brouwers, B, Pirottin, D, Michaux, C, Menissier, F, Zanotti, M, Dunner, S, Georges, M 1998. Molecular definition of an allelic series of mutations disrupting the myostatin function and causing double muscling in cattle. Mammalian Genome 9, 210–213.Google Scholar
Healy, PJ, Dennis, JA, Moule, JF 1995. Use of hair root as a source of DNA for the detection of heterozygotes for recessive defects in cattle. Australian Veterinary Journal 72, 392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kambadur, R, Sharma, M, Smith, TP, Bass, JJ 1997. Mutations in myostatin (GDF8) in double-muscled Belgian Blue and Piedmontese cattle. Genome Research 7, 910–916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kristensen, LS, Dobrovic, A 2008. Direct genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphisms in methyl metabolism genes using probe-free high-resolution melting analysis. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 17, 1240–1247.Google Scholar
Liew, M, Pryor, R, Palais, R, Meadows, C, Erali, M, Lyon, E, Wittwer, C 2004. Genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms by high-resolution melting of small amplicons. Clinical Chemistry 50, 1156–1164.Google Scholar
McPherron, AC, Lee, SJ 1997. Double muscling in cattle due to mutations in the myostatin gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 94, 12457–12461.Google Scholar
McPherron, AC, Lawler, AM, Lee, SJ 1997. Regulation of skeletal muscle mass in mice by a new TGF-beta superfamily member. Nature 387, 83–90.Google Scholar
Sambrook, J, Fritsch, FE, Maniatis, T 1989. Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 2nd edition. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbour, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Sellick, GS, Pitchford, WS, Morris, CA, Cullen, NG, Crawford, AM, Raadsma, HW, Bottema, CD 2007. Effect of myostatin F94L on carcass yield in cattle. Animal Genetics 38, 440–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swatland, HJ, Kieffer, NM 1974. Fetal development of the double muscled condition in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 38, 752–757.Google Scholar